Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Official Conor McGregor thread (part 6) *Read Mod Note in Post 1* Revised 13-01-19

Options
1…4243454748…90

Comments

  • Options
    #1322
    Ash.J.Williams
    Registered Users Posts: 20,929 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    clownfish91 wrote: »
    conor is really macking it up

    welcome aboard


  • Options
    #1323
    clownfish91
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3 ✭clownfish91


    a lot of people are calling him a goatist online


  • Options
    #1324
    Steve
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 22,584 CMod ✭✭✭✭Steve


    clownfish91 wrote: »
    a lot of people are calling him a goatist online
    No they're not (at least according to google). If you persist with this your time here will be short.


  • Options
    #1325
    hewhoscares
    Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭hewhoscares


    For the Kavanagh McGregor thing - it's very much conjecture on my part but I follow JK on twitter, not Conor and over the last month or so he's been liking and RT'ing lots of Conors posts which he wasn't doing in the Khabib fight aftermath.

    Its a hair brained leap but mighe be something in it.


  • Options
    #1326
    dashoonage
    Registered Users Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭dashoonage


    The only acceptable reference to anything containing the word goat in this forum must be in reference to the lord Artem.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1327
    Zero-Cool
    Registered Users Posts: 29,530 ✭✭✭✭Zero-Cool


    Spoilers from last night, although I feel like a lot of people on this thread wouldn't have and won't watch it but will spoiler anyway.
    Cowboy
    called out Conor after a lovely finish. Conor accepted on Twitter and Dana said he wouldn't be against it. I'd be all for a fight between those 2, especial in cowboy stadium, think it would be huge. Only problem is the UFC would want to add a title fight or 2 for such a big event and would still have to make Conor headline.


  • Options
    #1328
    helimachoptor
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 21,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭helimachoptor


    His mates were up in cabinteely with their kids yesterday. They were having hushed conversations on the phones. Definitely an element of getting out of the line of fire


  • Options
    #1329
    clownfish91
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3 ✭clownfish91


    Zero-Cool wrote: »
    Spoilers from last night, although I feel like a lot of people on this thread wouldn't have and won't watch it but will spoiler anyway.
    Cowboy
    called out Conor after a lovely finish. Conor accepted on Twitter and Dana said he wouldn't be against it. I'd be all for a fight between those 2, especial in cowboy stadium, think it would be huge. Only problem is the UFC would want to add a title fight or 2 for such a big event and would still have to make Conor headline.

    everybody in the audience now gets a belt too


  • Options
    #1330
    Beechwoodspark
    Registered Users Posts: 15,354 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    Very active reddit thread on recent happenings available for anyone who needs to be brought up to date.


  • Options
    #1331
    Never wrestle with pigs
    Registered Users Posts: 1,447 ✭✭✭Never wrestle with pigs


    Beechwoodspark wrote: »
    Very active reddit thread on recent happenings available for anyone who needs to be brought up to date.

    I've literally never went into Reddit before and after wasting 10 minutes of my life I'll definitely Never look at it again. Talk about a bunch of mong's he said she said crap. Some people really love to get carried away.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1332
    Tazzimus
    Registered Users Posts: 3,935 ✭✭✭Tazzimus


    Never wrestle with pigs wrote: »
    I've literally never went into Reddit before and after wasting 10 minutes of my life I'll definitely Never look at it again. Talk about a bunch of mong's he said she said crap. Some people really love to get carried away.

    You must be new to the internet. Welcome, friend.


  • Options
    #1333
    snotboogie
    Registered Users Posts: 3,568 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Zero-Cool wrote: »
    Spoilers from last night, although I feel like a lot of people on this thread wouldn't have and won't watch it but will spoiler anyway.
    Cowboy
    called out Conor after a lovely finish. Conor accepted on Twitter and Dana said he wouldn't be against it. I'd be all for a fight between those 2, especial in cowboy stadium, think it would be huge. Only problem is the UFC would want to add a title fight or 2 for such a big event and would still have to make Conor headline.

    That would be ideal, I think the Conor Khabib event sorely missed the strong undercard of his other fights


  • Options
    #1334
    Beechwoodspark
    Registered Users Posts: 15,354 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    Never wrestle with pigs wrote: »
    I've literally never went into Reddit before and after wasting 10 minutes of my life I'll definitely Never look at it again. Talk about a bunch of mong's he said she said crap. Some people really love to get carried away.

    Wouldn’t believe everything I read on it but found the thread very informative tbh.


  • Options
    #1335
    D.Q
    Registered Users Posts: 6,054 ✭✭✭D.Q


    UK daily mail tomorrow will be worth a read.


  • Options
    #1336
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    D.Q wrote: »
    UK daily mail tomorrow will be worth a read.

    Can you pm me what you are alluding to?


  • Options
    #1337
    dashoonage
    Registered Users Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭dashoonage


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Can you pm me what you are alluding to?

    I believe he is just stating the daily mail is a fine publication with quality well researched journalism and that tomorrow one should read it.


  • Options
    #1338
    Wheeliebin30
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    D.Q wrote: »
    UK daily mail tomorrow will be worth a read.

    Surprise surprise there is nothing there today.


  • Options
    #1339
    Ush1
    Registered Users Posts: 11,461 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    Wheeliebin30 wrote: »
    Surprise surprise there is nothing there today.

    Never ceases to amaze me the people that believe such clear nonsense.


  • Options
    #1340
    Sebastian Dangerfield
    Registered Users Posts: 1,794 ✭✭✭Sebastian Dangerfield


    Beechwoodspark wrote: »
    Very active reddit thread on recent happenings available for anyone who needs to be brought up to date.

    Pm pls


  • Options
    #1341
    BigMo1
    Registered Users Posts: 399 ✭✭BigMo1


    Sebastian Dangerfield wrote: »
    Pm pls

    Me too please. I'm fairly active on Reddit and I don't know what thread it is referencing.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1342
    super_furry
    Registered Users Posts: 27,322 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    It's pure spoofing nonsense.


  • Options
    #1343
    Effects
    Registered Users Posts: 9,761 ✭✭✭Effects


    Anything that's published can prejudice a trial, that's why there isn't much coming out about it. He can afford the best lawyers to exploit this as an angle to get away with his appalling behaviour.

    The guy can't really get any worse to be honest. I couldn't care less if he ever fought again. His best days are well behind him now.


  • Options
    #1344
    BigMo1
    Registered Users Posts: 399 ✭✭BigMo1


    Effects wrote: »
    Anything that's published can prejudice a trial, that's why there isn't much coming out about it. He can afford the best lawyers to exploit this as an angle to get away with his appalling behaviour.

    The guy can't really get any worse to be honest. I couldn't care less if he ever fought again. His best days are well behind him now.

    Well then why are you commenting in a thread about him?


  • Options
    #1345
    SteM
    Registered Users Posts: 6,570 ✭✭✭SteM


    Is it my imagination or was he cropped out of the buildup video prior to the espn broadcast at the weekend? They have Joe Rogan's reaction and cropped video of Aldo's face but not McGregor.


  • Options
    #1346
    Effects
    Registered Users Posts: 9,761 ✭✭✭Effects


    BigMo1 wrote: »
    Well then why are you commenting in a thread about him?

    I said I don't care if he ever fought again. It doesn't mean I can't appreciate his past performances or condemn his scum bag behaviour. Is the thread only reserved for blind McGregor fans?


  • Options
    #1347
    billybonkers
    Registered Users Posts: 2,293 ✭✭✭billybonkers


    SteM wrote: »
    Is it my imagination or was he cropped out of the buildup video prior to the espn broadcast at the weekend? They have Joe Rogan's reaction and cropped video of Aldo's face but not McGregor.

    He was the first fighter in the video shown when the prelims ended, has him with tricolor around his shoulders. I remember seeing it on the big screens


  • Options
    #1348
    BigMo1
    Registered Users Posts: 399 ✭✭BigMo1


    Effects wrote: »
    I said I don't care if he ever fought again. It doesn't mean I can't appreciate his past performances or condemn his scum bag behaviour. Is the thread only reserved for blind McGregor fans?

    Not that I can see but I certainly don't think it's reserved for adding fuel to unsubstantiated rumours.


  • Options
    #1349
    SteM
    Registered Users Posts: 6,570 ✭✭✭SteM


    billybonkers wrote: »
    He was the first fighter in the video shown when the prelims ended, has him with tricolor around his shoulders. I remember seeing it on the big screens

    Oh I didn't see the prelims, fair enough. I was taking about the one narrated by Ron Perlman just before the main card. Just looked like he was edited out of it to me.


  • Options
    #1350
    Wheeliebin30
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    Effects wrote: »
    Anything that's published can prejudice a trial, that's why there isn't much coming out about it. He can afford the best lawyers to exploit this as an angle to get away with his appalling behaviour.

    The guy can't really get any worse to be honest. I couldn't care less if he ever fought again. His best days are well behind him now.

    Guilty without trial?

    Few allegations are enough now to throw people in jail nowadays.

    Madness.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1351
    Effects
    Registered Users Posts: 9,761 ✭✭✭Effects


    BigMo1 wrote: »
    Not that I can see but I don't think it's reserved for adding fuel to unsubstantiated rumours.

    Who made out that it was? :confused:


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement