Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2700s return

1235

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭IE 222


    Nenagh line needs 2 sets of 2800 to operate

    Waterford needs either 2 sets of 2800 or 1 2800 and 1 ICR

    So peak AM you are looking at being 4 2800 sets better off, so you get swap out the current 7 car ICR used at peak in Dublin for a proper commuter train and use those 7 cars somewhere elsewhere so

    A train which is 3 car goes to 4 and one which is 4 can be moved to 6

    Net result is 1000+ more capacity at peak hour

    Neagh morning service splits. You would require 2 3car ICR then.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭IE 222


    Irish rail leave a lot of time for the turnaround of their trains so I'd say they could squeeze in some more services by reducing the turnaround time or add in an extra service of the turnaround time is that big. Let's say for example Heuston to Portlaiose takes 1h 7 min so you need 3 trains but you would be able to turn the train around quickly at Portlaiose and when it gets back to Heuston you have about 40 min which in that time you could run a service to Hazelhatch and back.
    Also irish rail have changed the 07:10 Newbridge to Grand canal dock to a 5 car ICR so does anyone know if some peak time service has been reduced to a 4 car ICR.

    Portlaiose is used to swap trains in and out of service as well. Turn around times facilitate other operations such as cleaning, driver breaks, train rosters, splitting, passenger tranfers ect. You also need to allow paths for other services to run as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,547 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    If you start caning stock on tight turns it needs heavier and more frequent maintenance


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,337 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    This post has been deleted.
    the R.E.M. project in Montreal proposes to remove the 25kV AC regional heavy rail service in favour of urban rail at... 1500V DC! So not a dead technology choice by any means. Chicago electric suburban rail is 1500V DC too (e.g. South Shore Line not the third rail urban lines)


  • Registered Users Posts: 399 ✭✭Ireland trains


    So how much icr's would the 2700 free up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭kc56


    So how much icr's would the 2700 free up

    If the 2700's take over, either directly or by cascading, the PPT services, that will release 4 ICR units which are a mix of 3 and 4 car sets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    kc56 wrote: »
    If the 2700's take over, either directly or by cascading, the PPT services, that will release 4 ICR units which are a mix of 3 and 4 car sets.

    Can't see PPT changing from an ICR, if anythig prehaps 6/7 ICR ex Newbridge in future. M3 Parkway/Maynooth will likely be the lines to benefit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭IE 222


    Can't see them going anywhere near Hueston services. I reckon they'll all go to M3 and make all Maynooth trains 8 car 2900s. Freed ICR's will go to Drogheada/Dundalk and maybe an extra PPT.

    Has the PPT seen numbers fall on Portlaise- Hueston service or is it still busy. Is future demand on the Kildare commuter routes just for PPT or demand for more Hueston services grown as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭man98


    IE 222 wrote: »
    Can't see them going anywhere near Hueston services. I reckon they'll all go to M3 and make all Maynooth trains 8 car 2900s. Freed ICR's will go to Drogheada/Dundalk and maybe an extra PPT.

    Has the PPT seen numbers fall on Portlaise- Hueston service or is it still busy. Is future demand on the Kildare commuter routes just for PPT or demand for more Hueston services grown as well.

    Surely any spare ICRs will go towards making Rosslare/ Wexford - Dublin fully ICR? Or at least reducing it to one 29k per day?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 399 ✭✭Ireland trains


    man98 wrote: »
    IE 222 wrote: »
    Surely any spare ICRs will go towards making Rosslare/ Wexford - Dublin fully ICR? Or at least reducing it to one 29k per day?
    Yes that is the sensible thing to do as intercity train on intercity route and commuter train on commuter route.
    They could do it tommorrow by just switching trains around


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭kc56


    IE 222 wrote: »
    Can't see them going anywhere near Hueston services. I reckon they'll all go to M3 and make all Maynooth trains 8 car 2900s. Freed ICR's will go to Drogheada/Dundalk and maybe an extra PPT.

    Has the PPT seen numbers fall on Portlaise- Hueston service or is it still busy. Is future demand on the Kildare commuter routes just for PPT or demand for more Hueston services grown as well.


    According to the 2017 rail census, there was a small growth in Heuston commuter numbers probably due to the extension of the SHZ to Sallins/Naas. Overall growth was 57% when PPT was included.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,547 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    NTA are now telling public representatives making queries that this isn't happening due to cost and that Irish Rail are now looking for regaugable second hand units


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    I could see how second hand units might help the DART, as there are going to be plenty of EMUs becoming available in the UK over the next year or two, including:

    - 100x 4 car class 321 units freed from Greater Anglia in the UK (many which are undergoing heavy refurbishment)
    - 10x 4 car Siemens Desiro Class 350 from London Midland
    - 21x 4 car Siemens Desiro Class 360 from Greater Anglia
    - 05x 5 car Siemens Desiro Class 360 from Heathrow Connect
    - 30x 4 car Bombardier Electrostar Class 379 from Stansted Express / West Anglia.

    Then there is the 30x 5 car Class 707 Siemens Desiro City that are only about a year old that are shortly going to be replaced by newer trains which are cheaper to lease, but they're third rail.

    However realistically Irish Rail need diesel units for commuter lines and converting a whole batch of units from EMU to Diesel is going to be costly and unproven. At the moment the project of converting the Class 319s to tri-mode class 769s is not going so well and the jury is very much still out on the D train project of converting ex underground cars to Diesel units.

    You might have the odd class 153, 156, pacers or perhaps the class 180, but given the reliability of the Class 180 and the struggles that the operators with them are having, it wouldn't be a good purchase truth be told. I struggle to see where they are going to get good quality, diesel units, second hand.

    I should imagine the class 170 and class 185 diesels will be snapped up fairly quickly when they go off lease in the UK, since modern diesel stock is very hard to come by and operators will lap them up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,547 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Re-equipping shoe contact or 25kv AC EMUs to 1500v DC wouldn't be cheap itself let alone regauging costs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    devnull wrote: »
    I could see how second hand units might help the DART, as there are going to be plenty of EMUs becoming available in the UK over the next year or two, including:

    - 100x 4 car class 321 units freed from Greater Anglia in the UK (many which are undergoing heavy refurbishment)
    - 10x 4 car Siemens Desiro Class 350 from London Midland
    - 21x 4 car Siemens Desiro Class 360 from Greater Anglia
    - 05x 5 car Siemens Desiro Class 360 from Heathrow Connect
    - 30x 4 car Bombardier Electrostar Class 379 from Stansted Express / West Anglia.

    Then there is the 30x 5 car Class 707 Siemens Desiro City that are only about a year old that are shortly going to be replaced by newer trains which are cheaper to lease, but they're third rail.

    However realistically Irish Rail need diesel units for commuter lines and converting a whole batch of units from EMU to Diesel is going to be costly and unproven. At the moment the project of converting the Class 319s to tri-mode class 769s is not going so well and the jury is very much still out on the D train project of converting ex underground cars to Diesel units.

    You might have the odd class 153, 156, pacers or perhaps the class 180, but given the reliability of the Class 180 and the struggles that the operators with them are having, it wouldn't be a good purchase truth be told. I struggle to see where they are going to get good quality, diesel units, second hand.

    I should imagine the class 170 and class 185 diesels will be snapped up fairly quickly when they go off lease in the UK, since modern diesel stock is very hard to come by and operators will lap them up.

    secondhand units don't have to be from the UK.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,141 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    the 2700s must be in horific condition now, or very badly built, if a refurbishment of them isn't going ahead due to cost, so much so that IE have to look at second hand units which themselves may need some work to work on the network here?

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Not a hope of second hand units IMO, NTA trying to buy more time before making a decision on purchase of bi-mode trains.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,547 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They could also look at loco hauled stock which is easier to re-bogie... Push pull 201s would be needed for that though and I don't think there's any spare or salvageable?

    As goes the 2700s - try badly built *and* in awful condition.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    L1011 wrote: »
    NTA are now telling public representatives making queries that this isn't happening due to cost and that Irish Rail are now looking for regaugable second hand units

    This was raised at a recent board meeting, currently the project is stalled, but, not dead just yet despite whatever the NTA may have said.

    Tenders were meant to have been issued before now and was all set to go until a few months ago, but, all the tenderers raised concerns about the cost of the project saying it could not be done for the estimated price.

    IE require more money from the NTA before it can continue, IE and the NTA are indeed exploring the idea of second hand stock and have approached a number of companies in the UK looking at the 156s or 158s, but with no success I believe.

    The reality is that once the NTA realise that second hand stock and re-gauging will also cost a significant price versus the relatively young age of the 2700s compared to second hand stock will most likely result in the 2700 project getting the green light once again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    the 2700s must be in horific condition now, or very badly built, if a refurbishment of them isn't going ahead due to cost, so much so that IE have to look at second hand units which themselves may need some work to work on the network here?

    They are in good condition structurally, some have also started up without problems in recent months, the problem is because they are so long out of service every single major component needs to be refurbished and other enhancements are required to bring them up to standards, the costs are more than the NTA are willing to sanction.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    Not a hope of second hand units IMO, NTA trying to buy more time before making a decision on purchase of bi-mode trains.

    The decision to purchase bi-mode units has already been made a long time ago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    GM228 wrote: »
    The decision to purchase bi-mode units has already been made a long time ago.

    Referring more to the process bringing it to tender etc Unrealistic to consider second hand trains because it will just just as much as the 2700s.


  • Registered Users Posts: 88 ✭✭Cravens


    Maybe a customer for the Class 230 DEMU?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Cravens wrote: »
    Maybe a customer for the Class 230 DEMU?

    Hopefully not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,547 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The NTA told the same public rep that they intend an RFI for bi-mode this calendar year (so within 10 weeks) and order in 2019.

    I believe the rep is passing on the info given, but I don't believe the NTA are telling him the entire truth!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    Isambard wrote: »
    secondhand units don't have to be from the UK.

    Anywhere else would have a larger loading gauge than Ireland & UK.

    The only exceptions are probably narrow gauge stock.

    The real scandal here is that the Mk II stock were prematurely scrapped and IR bought the 2700s & MkIV fleet. Both these were clearly unfit for purpose, Ir should have got their money back, or at least substantial compensation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    https://twitter.com/lawlessj/status/1052865151857176577?s=19

    Have a look at the letter from the NTA.

    "the full reasons for the increased cost level are not known"


  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭XPS_Zero


    tabbey wrote: »
    Anywhere else would have a larger loading gauge than Ireland & UK.

    The only exceptions are probably narrow gauge stock.

    The real scandal here is that the Mk II stock were prematurely scrapped and IR bought the 2700s & MkIV fleet. Both these were clearly unfit for purpose, Ir should have got their money back, or at least substantial compensation.


    Why do you consider the MKIV fleet unfit for purpose?


  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭XPS_Zero


    GM228 wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/lawlessj/status/1052865151857176577?s=19

    Have a look at the letter from the NTA.

    "the full reasons for the increased cost level are not known"


    ..and when canvassers knock on their door every one of those people will say "lower usc!" and "gimme a tax cut" and half will say "do something about dem scroungers on the dole" instead of "invest in public transport and public services in general!" and this will keep right on going.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,141 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    XPS_Zero wrote: »
    Why do you consider the MKIV fleet unfit for purpose?

    i think it's to do with the ride quality issues. mind you i didn't experience any on my 1 and only trip on them. all though i think the train didn't reach full speed for some reason or perhapse i didn't notice it if it did.
    they are quite nice trains but could be better internally i think. nothing a good refurbishment wouldn't sort.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭XPS_Zero


    I've been on them. They could use an Enterprise style refurb


    As to the 22k issue above, I was on a Cork train that was packed like that. A CORK TRAIN. A 3 hour trip.


    They didn't turn on the reservation panels, so everyone was playing musical chairs, then loads ended up sitting on the floor as IE has no system connected together to prevent overbookings. THen there was the empty first class they could have used their discretion to fill with an upgrade fee option over the speaker, but never bothered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,141 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    i've never done the enterprise. it's on the to do list before the de-deitrics retire.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,547 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    You probably have 15 years minimum then!


  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭XPS_Zero


    i've never done the enterprise. it's on the to do list before the de-deitrics retire.


    You're not a self respecting train geek until you've done the Enterprise.
    Even take a trip to Newry, it's even better since the refurb.


    Nicest train on the island, best staff, reservation panels that actually work, a train manager with a physical manifest if they don't..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    XPS_Zero wrote: »
    Why do you consider the MKIV fleet unfit for purpose?

    The ride was never right, even after being supposedly modified under warranty.

    Apart from that, the seating is rather basic by mainline standards, you get what you pay for, I suppose.
    Other rail operators (across the water) also fit inferior seats in their new trains, presumably to increase the seat capacity. This is a mistake, as the decades went by motorists have had improved seats, while rail passengers comfort has deteriorated.
    Rail operators probably feel that people only use trains because they have to, not for their comfort.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    the Mk4 compare very badly with the mk3.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,873 ✭✭✭SeanW


    man98 wrote: »
    Surely any spare ICRs will go towards making Rosslare/ Wexford - Dublin fully ICR? Or at least reducing it to one 29k per day?
    Are they still running 29000s Dublin-Rosslare? :eek: Seriously, WTF like?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,141 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    SeanW wrote: »
    Are they still running 29000s Dublin-Rosslare? Seriously, WTF like?

    unfortunately yes from time to time.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭trellheim


    so the 2700s are not coming back then ? What else is there in Inchicore that can seat passengers ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,141 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    trellheim wrote: »
    so the 2700s are not coming back then ? What else is there in Inchicore that can seat passengers ?

    only the 8200s i think.
    the 2700s will likely be brought back in the end i think. realistically them and new stock are the only options.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 617 ✭✭✭Drifter50


    Connolly to Sligo is a looooooonnngg way on a shake rattle and roll 2900 and the additional noise as well


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,141 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Drifter50 wrote: »
    Connolly to Sligo is a looooooonnngg way on a shake rattle and roll 2900 and the additional noise as well

    yup, for long distance they are horid junk. same with their cousins. brilliant at the suburban stuff though.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 617 ✭✭✭Drifter50


    Why why why don`t IR use the 2900`s on the Hazelhatch / Phoenix Park tunnel route while the intercity routes to Sligo and Wexford get them and they are clearly unsuitable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,141 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Drifter50 wrote: »
    Why why why don`t IR use the 2900`s on the Hazelhatch / Phoenix Park tunnel route while the intercity routes to Sligo and Wexford get them and they are clearly unsuitable

    there aren't enough 29s really and IE do not wish to run anything other then ICRS on the suburbans out of heuston. it all ultimately comes down to the decisian to site a depot at portlaoise, and to service most ICRS there. some are serviced at droghida as well.
    another reason often given is supposed higher speeds out of heuston, which in my limited experience of both types of service out of there, really only apply to limited/non-stop services and not to stopping suburbans.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    IE made it official, 2700 no longer required? Anyone confirm?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    CME has no plans to put the 2700 back in service.

    That said they have not been scrapped


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,141 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    tbh if there are no plans to put them back in service then i can't see anything else happening but them being scrapped in the near future. i can't see what else can be done with them. the longer they sit out of service the more costly it will probably be to bring them back.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    CME has no plans to put the 2700 back in service.

    That said they have not been scrapped

    Im told staff (assuming drivers) have been instructed to remove some operational material about 2700 class from there books.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭The_Wanderer


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    Im told staff (assuming drivers) have been instructed to remove some operational material about 2700 class from there books.

    Instructions concerning the specific operation of 2700's have been removed from the General Appendix. Nothing to stop them being put back in at a future date if the need ever arose.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement