Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Do you think nurses will get their payrise?

145791092

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭hawkelady


    Mad_maxx wrote: »
    Unions given foot massages in the media instead of tough questioning, intended propoganda gets out loud and uninterrupted


    This coming from you who believe nurses don’t clean anything at all ! I’ll take your comments with salt ! On the cleaning point , I also believe the cleaning companies that the hse employ to clean hospitals have it in their contract that they won’t clean blood or vomit or clean anything above waist high !! Who makes these decisions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 932 ✭✭✭Yillan


    I don't know how we can ignore the average pay.

    If those that deserve it most aren't getting it, then it means that many who don't deserve it are. This should be something the nurses themselves should be looking at and suggesting change or else they are asking us (the public) to pay for the inefficiencies.

    Where did this average pay figure come from? It sounds more than a little dubious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭hawkelady


    Yillan wrote: »
    Where did this average pay figure come from? It sounds more than a little dubious.
    It does indeed. The wages of a suit pushing a pen at the hse is probably included


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Why would I be joking?

    So someone who may have waited, let’say 18 months, for an appointment would be a scab in your eyes for going to that appointment if it fell on a strike day? In theory, it’s not an emergency because they’ve already been waiting so long but why should they be called that derogatory word for crossing a picket line?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Fuaranach wrote: »

    ...

    Anyway, I suspect in at least some cases money is not going to solve the problems of nurses. Working conditions in some places are just awful, and generally the female-dominated professions like childcare, nursing and teaching get a raw deal because, and not to offend anybody, women in caring professions accept more crap than men would.

    Or, because women in women dominated professions treat other women appallingly.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,940 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Yillan wrote: »
    Where did this average pay figure come from? It sounds more than a little dubious.
    hawkelady wrote: »
    It does indeed. The wages of a suit pushing a pen at the hse is probably included

    It does, but, Ivan Yates had the INMO secratary, Phil Ni Sheaghdha, on on Tuesday evening and she did not challenge him in the slightest on this figure.

    And he laid it out in detail, and he went back to it yesterday and pointed out that they are due agreed rises as part of current public sector pay deal which will mean that it rises to 60K by the end of 2020.

    If he was talking on his own, I'd take it with a pinch of salt, but Phil was very competent in putting forward her position so given that she didn't challenge it, I'm inclined to believe it.

    Shane Colman/ Ciara Kelly used the same figure also earlier in the week and Ciara was very strongly arguing for a nurses pay rise but did not dispute the figure either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,574 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    Yillan wrote: »
    Staff nurses start on 29k and over 13 years make their way up to 45.7k.

    That's the nurse that you meet when you go into A&E.

    Simply untrue.

    You're ignoring the minimum €1858 allowance they receive for working in A&E (most will presumably have an A&E nursing course, raising the allowance to €2791)*. This is before significant premium payments for shift, weekend work etc, or other allowances. You also presume that they stay at the basic staff nurse grade, and do not go for promotion to more senior grades.

    *these allowances are payable to a whole list of specialties and hospital locations, and are in effect additional basic pay for the large majority of nurses working in hospitals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,001 ✭✭✭Theboinkmaster


    hawkelady wrote: »
    As the title suggests ... do you think the government will give what the inmo is asking for ? The way pascal and Harris is talking it looks like it’s going to be a long drawn out process. Who will buckle first. Btw, I do hope the nurses get what they want and they do a great job.

    They should be paid more due to simple economical supply and demand.

    We can't keep our nurses or hire them so they should be paid more.

    Unlike gards/teachers etc. that do not have this problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,940 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    They should be paid more due to simple economical supply and demand.

    We can't keep our nurses or hire them so they should be paid more.

    Unlike gards/teachers etc. that do not have this problem.

    If we cannot keep nurses or hire them for reasons other than salary, raising the money will only create a bigger problem.

    A report last year found that salary was a factor, but by no means the only reason we struggle to fill all positions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 932 ✭✭✭Yillan


    Simply untrue.

    You're ignoring the minimum €1858 allowance they receive for working in A&E (most will presumably have an A&E nursing course, raising the allowance to €2791)*. This is before significant premium payments for shift, weekend work etc, or other allowances. You also presume that they stay at the basic staff nurse grade, and do not go for promotion to more senior grades.

    *these allowances are payable to a whole list of specialties and hospital locations, and are in effect additional basic pay for the large majority of nurses working in hospitals.

    Interesting.

    I've just been reading about the time and a sixth allowance they've been given for the transfer of tasks business. Is that for all hours worked do you know? Because that's a significant increase on their basic pay.

    I was inclined to put the 57k average figure down to maybe overtime, and conflating the staff nurse salary with the cnm and adon salary. I don't think it's fair to look at promotion to senior grades. Many nurses will do a masters in their application to CNM. It's not simply a gradual promotion from staff nurse to cnm.

    But all these allowances and premium payments do muddy the water a little bit. Are they more in line with physios and OTs than they let on? Clever girls (and boys)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,482 ✭✭✭Gimme A Pound


    Lack of understanding and lack of empathy shocker.

    Extremely tough job - great, under appreciated people. Very demanding hours. So what if they know this when they go into the line of work - someone has to. Doesn't make it unreasonable to seek fairer remuneration in line with what they do.

    Sad at times too - encountering patients dying, and the pain for their families. On top of this all the bullsh1t paperwork. And sometimes disruption from scummy demanding aggressive patients.

    My mother is a nurse - she is fecking awesome. Not a hope would I do it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭PhoenixParker


    hawkelady wrote: »
    It does indeed. The wages of a suit pushing a pen at the hse is probably included

    The statement it comes from specifically says it's related to staff nurse salaries. No pen pushers, no management grade nurses.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Peanuts? Really?

    That’s a starting rate.

    Excluding overtime, shift allowance, pension and a job for life.

    The public sector have never had it better.

    But sure keep giving them more and hello, another recession.

    Will we blame the nurses this time?

    Seems you're ahead of the game on that one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    The great thing about being self employed is that if you're good, none of those points matter :)

    He takes internet giving out breaks in any way :)

    Wheelie, have an aul' sambo next time, you can eat with one hand while shaking your other fist at the screen :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    Simply untrue.

    You're ignoring the minimum €1858 allowance they receive for working in A&E (most will presumably have an A&E nursing course, raising the allowance to €2791)*. This is before significant premium payments for shift, weekend work etc, or other allowances. You also presume that they stay at the basic staff nurse grade, and do not go for promotion to more senior grades.

    *these allowances are payable to a whole list of specialties and hospital locations, and are in effect additional basic pay for the large majority of nurses working in hospitals.

    These allowances aren’t worth **** when their monthly tax, fees and levies are more than their take home pay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,940 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    mad muffin wrote: »
    These allowances aren’t worth **** when they’re monthly tax, fees and levies are more than their take home pay.

    Everyone in the private sector pays monthly tax and so on.

    Not everyone in the private sector has the job security or pension benefits the public sector have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    mad muffin wrote: »
    These allowances aren’t worth **** when their monthly tax, fees and levies are more than their take home pay.

    Ah same for the rest of us- these pay increases aren’t worth half their actual worth- Maybe we should all be demanding fair play on tax, ending the crazy waste that goes on. Rather than putting more petrol on the fire


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    road_high wrote: »
    Ah same for the rest of us- these pay increases aren’t worth half their actual worth- Maybe we should all be demanding fair play on tax, ending the crazy waste that goes on. Rather than putting more petrol on the fire

    This government has one trick…


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,942 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    And, lets be clear, I am coming from a position where I want to be convinced because I see the impact nurses have on people in very trying circumstances. I want them to feel rewarded for their duties. But, if they are getting €57k for that, I can also feel that that is adequate payment.
    I'll give you a fact, any nurse with an unemployed husband and three kids would be at least as well off financially on the social welfare as they would be work a 57k per year job.
    Do you want people to work in this country or sit at home and scratch their arses?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    He takes internet giving out breaks in any way :)

    Wheelie, have an aul' sambo next time, you can eat with one hand while shaking your other fist at the screen :)

    Coming from the man who spends all day ranting and raving at Leo Varadkar and uses Leo Varadkars partners as his username on boards.

    Do you ever post anything positive on boards?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8 congareel


    they have permanent jobs,week on week off, most nurses spend most of their time at the nurses station watching pc screens, nursing attendants take care of the patients, and do any heavy work with the assistance of the fillipino nurses.the INO are never satisfied.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,594 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Yillan wrote: »
    Staff nurses start on 29k and over 13 years make their way up to 45.7k.

    That's the nurse that you meet when you go into A&E. The nurse who triages you and checks your vital signs regularly. Who draws up and gives you your medication. Who realises through experience that you are getting sicker, or that something has changed with your condition and tells the doctor. Who comforts you after you've been given bad news. Who will lift you up the bed when you've been doing your best to slide down the end of it. Who works 13 hour days. Whose roster bears no relation to the 9-5. Who can disagree with a doctor and isn't reluctant to question their decision for your benefit, even if it means they run the risk of being embarrassed. Who cannot afford to make a mistake on a medication dosage or calculation because it could mean they kill the patient.

    I don't have any interest in the 'average' pay of nurses. They don't want their salary doubled. They want it brought more in line with the OTs and the Physios (35-52k over 13 years) . Try to get some occupational therapy after 5pm on a Thursday in your local ED while a nurse is putting a cast on you and hassling a doctor to chart you some pain relief, while looking after another 5 patients, who are among the sickest in the country. Then try to resolve in your head this idea that one should be paid more than the other.

    It is a difficult, emotionally draining, cerebral job that should be paid better to reward those who are working in the HSE and attract talent back from overseas.

    What roster is that nurse on because I didn't meet him/her in A&E a few nights ago.

    Lift you up?! Yeah, I was left for 6hrs overnight and not even a glance from a nurse.

    Maybe online distorts impressions, but I get the feeling that support for the nurses is not as overwhelming as it usually is. Maybe the public is finally coming to the realisation that the problems with the HSE is not money, or staffing, but the carving up of the healthcare delivery solely for vested interests (among which nurses are a large group) to the detriment of delivering an adequate service.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭hawkelady


    What roster is that nurse on because I didn't meet him/her in A&E a few nights ago.

    Lift you up?! Yeah, I was left for 6hrs overnight and not even a glance from a nurse.

    Maybe online distorts impressions, but I get the feeling that support for the nurses is not as overwhelming as it usually is. Maybe the public is finally coming to the realisation that the problems with the HSE is not money, or staffing, but the carving up of the healthcare delivery solely for vested interests (among which nurses are a large group) to the detriment of delivering an adequate service.

    Are you still going on about your splinter in your toe episode at a&e ? Jesting of course ... but most normal thinking folks will assume there were patients more needing of attention than you ? I take It you weren’t having a cardiac arrest in a&e .. you say you had a wait of over 7 hours. Have you read the news in the last ten years ... it’s common place , even worse in winter of course. Listen, I see by your tone that you think you had a negative experience but please stop harping on as it’s the norm in hospitals ! I’m confident enough that the nurses on weren’t all in the canteen playing cards !
    I hear that the pna have announced their stoppages , it more or less ties in with the nurses strike. It’s going to be a tough feb. count your lucky stars you won’t have to go to a&e then, it’ll be a lot longer than 7.5 hours !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,940 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I'll give you a fact, any nurse with an unemployed husband and three kids would be at least as well off financially on the social welfare as they would be work a 57k per year job.
    Do you want people to work in this country or sit at home and scratch their arses?

    I'm scratching my head here, what point are you trying to make?

    No wage is enough if you have x number of dependants.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,942 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I'm scratching my head here, what point are you trying to make?
    That a nurse should be earning a lot more than somebody on similar circumstance who doesn't work.
    Nurses pay should be higher.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    eagle eye wrote: »
    That a nurse should be earning a lot more than somebody on similar circumstance who doesn't work.
    Nurses pay should be higher.

    I don’t get this. Are you suggesting nurses pay is now less than social welfare?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    What roster is that nurse on because I didn't meet him/her in A&E a few nights ago.

    Lift you up?! Yeah, I was left for 6hrs overnight and not even a glance from a nurse.

    Maybe online distorts impressions, but I get the feeling that support for the nurses is not as overwhelming as it usually is. Maybe the public is finally coming to the realisation that the problems with the HSE is not money, or staffing, but the carving up of the healthcare delivery solely for vested interests (among which nurses are a large group) to the detriment of delivering an adequate service.

    It isn’t there. These people want a blank chewue courtesy of the state. The state can’t afford it, simple as that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,594 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    hawkelady wrote: »
    Are you still going on about your splinter in your toe episode at a&e ? Jesting of course ... but most normal thinking folks will assume there were patients more needing of attention than you ? I take It you weren’t having a cardiac arrest in a&e .. you say you had a wait of over 7 hours. Have you read the news in the last ten years ... it’s common place , even worse in winter of course. Listen, I see by your tone that you think you had a negative experience but please stop harping on as it’s the norm in hospitals ! I’m confident enough that the nurses on weren’t all in the canteen playing cards !
    I hear that the pna have announced their stoppages , it more or less ties in with the nurses strike. It’s going to be a tough feb. count your lucky stars you won’t have to go to a&e then, it’ll be a lot longer than 7.5 hours !

    I needed medication to prevent an embolism, so yeah it was serious, so PFO with your "jesting". My GP told me to go there straight away as it was an emergency. I didn't care that I was on a trolley, but I did expect to be seen to relatively promptly as my condition could have seriously deteriorated suddenly. In fact they could have turned me around quite quickly, but chose not to.

    And it is the norm. The patients that were abandoned next to me had equally horrific experiences.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,940 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    eagle eye wrote: »
    That a nurse should be earning a lot more than somebody on similar circumstance who doesn't work.
    Nurses pay should be higher.

    How much do you think the average pay if nurses should be.

    The rest of your point relates to any profession.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,942 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    How much do you think the average pay if nurses should be.

    70k


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    eagle eye wrote: »
    70k

    Seriously???


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,365 ✭✭✭Alrigghtythen


    mad muffin wrote: »
    These allowances aren’t worth **** when their monthly tax, fees and levies are more than their take home pay.

    It's not. Where did you get that from? A payslip was posted earlier, are we just making stuff up?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Coming from the man who spends all day ranting and raving at Leo Varadkar and uses Leo Varadkars partners as his username on boards.

    Do you ever post anything positive on boards?

    The name is in regards of having the craic. Are you from the Carlow Wheeliebins? I use to go to school with a Deirdre Wheeliebin, any relation?
    I post about many things. When speaking on politics I mention the political leader of the country. Odd I know. When I see the nurses plan to strike and Leo talking sh*te I should be seeing what Mick Wallace has to say, I know :)
    As for your good self, you come on talk nonsense, get called out on it and either run away or change tack like the above. Each to their own wheels.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,381 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    eagle eye wrote: »
    70k

    So presumably there'd be a good few on over 100k.

    Better start planting the money trees now and pray for a bountiful harvest because the rest of the Guards and Teachers will be next out looking for the same.


    Kinda incredible to think that we had a major recession only a decade ago when our current spending spiralled out of control on the back of highly cyclical taxes - I guess this time it's different.:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭hawkelady


    I needed medication to prevent an embolism, so yeah it was serious, so PFO with your "jesting". My GP told me to go there straight away as it was an emergency. I didn't care that I was on a trolley, but I did expect to be seen to relatively promptly as my condition could have seriously deteriorated suddenly. In fact they could have turned me around quite quickly, but chose not to.

    And it is the norm. The patients that were abandoned next to me had equally horrific experiences.

    So you were waiting on a doctor to administer the drug. Clears it up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    So presumably there'd be a good few on over 100k.

    Better start planting the money trees now and pray for a bountiful harvest because the rest of the Guards and Teachers will be next out looking for the same.


    Kinda incredible to think that we had a major recession only a decade ago when our current spending spiralled out of control on the back of highly cyclical taxes - I guess this time it's different.:rolleyes:

    The direct budgetary cuts really only ended a few years ago- the recession is still felt in all our pay packets.
    We are sailing head long into deep trouble, these people have zero sense of public responsibility. It’s frightening


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭hawkelady


    So presumably there'd be a good few on over 100k.

    Better start planting the money trees now and pray for a bountiful harvest because the rest of the Guards and Teachers will be next out looking for the same.


    Kinda incredible to think that we had a major recession only a decade ago when our current spending spiralled out of control on the back of highly cyclical taxes - I guess this time it's different.:rolleyes:

    As mentioned before the guards won’t strike cause they recently threatened to go on strike and the government miraculously found 300 million to give them. What guards and 300 million can’t be found for nurses /pna


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    hawkelady wrote: »
    As mentioned before the guards won’t strike cause they recently threatened to go on strike and the government miraculously found 300 million to give them. What guards and 300 million can’t be found for nurses /pna

    Where are they “going to find it”?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    eagle eye wrote: »
    70k

    Pluck a figure from the sky- public service thinking alright. Incredible


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭hawkelady


    road_high wrote: »
    Where are they “going to find it”?

    Where did they find the 300 mill for the guards ?
    Listen, I’m a neutral here, I can see both sides but I would be 51% on the side of nurses cause it’s a tough job .. pisses me off a bit when I read posts saying they never glanced at me or they are lazy. That was never my experience


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,594 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    hawkelady wrote: »
    So you were waiting on a doctor to administer the drug. Clears it up.

    5 hrs to be seen by a doctor and another 2 to 2.5 hrs for the drugs to be administered. And only because I asked for them.

    The elderly man next to me was left without his medication all night despite being seen by three junior doctors.

    Despite it being a busy ward, the staff still found time to have a chat about the new year's party, even with misery going on around them. To be honest, direction for the nurses comes from the manager and the CNM that night could only be kindly described as ignorant.

    Yes, one night in one hospital shouldn't tar an entire health service, but the experience was far from unique.

    I'd always have been an advocate for nurses but that night in A&E opened my eyes up to them being ever bit as wasteful as other parts of the public sector. Certainly not deserving of the pedestal that the Irish public has traditionally placed them on.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    The name is in regards of having the craic. Are you from the Carlow Wheeliebins? I use to go to school with a Deirdre Wheeliebin, any relation?
    I post about many things. When speaking on politics I mention the political leader of the country. Odd I know. When I see the nurses plan to strike and Leo talking sh*te I should be seeing what Mick Wallace has to say, I know :)
    As for your good self, you come on talk nonsense, get called out on it and either run away or change tack like the above. Each to their own wheels.

    Hmmm, I only said yesterday you got absolutely rinsed in the government thread by about 8 people and you ran over to this thread.

    Now you use my expression against me today?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    hawkelady wrote: »
    Where did they find the 300 mill for the guards ?
    Listen, I’m a neutral here, I can see both sides but I would be 51% on the side of nurses cause it’s a tough job .. pisses me off a bit when I read posts saying they never glanced at me or they are lazy. That was never my experience

    They took it from elsewhere, probably disability or something “easy”. Or the USC was kept- these massive pay increases always have to come from somewhere else, not the magic money tree unfortunately


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,942 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    So presumably there'd be a good few on over 100k.

    No. All on 70k.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,365 ✭✭✭Alrigghtythen


    road_high wrote: »
    They took it from elsewhere, probably disability or something “easy”. Or the USC was kept- these massive pay increases always have to come from somewhere else, not the magic money tree unfortunately

    They closed wards in hospitals


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,940 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    eagle eye wrote: »
    No. All on 70k.

    So, the one with more experience and responsibility is on the same as the newly qualified?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    road_high wrote: »
    Pluck a figure from the sky- public service thinking alright. Incredible

    To be fair they find it when they want to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    It's not. Where did you get that from? A payslip was posted earlier, are we just making stuff up?

    What pay slip? I know first hand ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,942 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    So, the one with more experience and responsibility is on the same as the newly qualified?
    I'm not the policy maker.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Hmmm, I only said yesterday you got absolutely rinsed in the government thread by about 8 people and you ran over to this thread.

    Now you use my expression against me today?

    You imagined I got rinsed. I thought it was torn? I'm still over there. It's called diversifying your portfolio. By 8 people you mean the same three or four defenders of all things Fine Gael, (who had all their posts deleted?) as is their right. Mind neither them nor yourself are interested in discussion, just seem to lay in wait to pounce on anyone criticising the FG government, which albeit sad, is their right.
    Now as handsome and interesting as I am, this is a thread on the Nurses. I made a comment about the nurses and you tried to make it about me.
    Are you going to dock your wages for all the time you spend on me, on here?
    Now off with you to complain about nurses, which is seemingly okay over complaining about the Taoiseach or others whose actual job it is to look after the interests of the tax payer...unlike say..nurses.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement