Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Saracens Salarygate: Automatic Relegation?

1246720

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    With the players now apparently being told that an additional reduction of 35 points is to happen that's it for Saracens.

    Apparently the full sentence was to be 70 points but it was halved on discretion. As Sarries did nothing about the cap after the judgement and Wray dismissed the charges somewhat they've gotten the full whack now.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,626 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think I remember hearing Saracens were 200/1 to be relegated at the start of the season...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    aloooof wrote: »
    I think I remember hearing Saracens were 200/1 to be relegated at the start of the season...

    I imagine the sneaky bookies wouldn't honour it somehow. They'd argue that 200/1 was based on an even competition from the start.

    Open to correction...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭jr86


    aloooof wrote: »
    I think I remember hearing Saracens were 200/1 to be relegated at the start of the season...

    Jeez they're short enough odds to be honest!

    Without all these shenanigans I'd have thought it about as likely as Spain winning the next rugby world cup


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,112 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    230k seems like a pittance for a player of Williams' calibre.

    Unless Wray was pumping money into Cheapshot Merchant Ltd...
    durkadurka wrote: »

    I wonder if the £230k is what they'd save by cutting him early rather than his annual salary? - The money they've already paid him this season is already banked against the £7M cap for the year I would assume.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,147 ✭✭✭OldRio


    With all these goings on I think it's only fair, that our thoughts and prayers go out to Stephen Jones at this most difficult and troublesome time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,899 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    Apparently the full sentence was to be 70 points but it was halved on discretion. As Sarries did nothing about the cap after the judgement and Wray dismissed the charges somewhat they've gotten the full whack now.

    while I have little sympathy, a number of the articles outline how it is effectively impossible to get under the cap mid season and it is unsurprising that they couldn't suddenly be compliant during this season.

    even cancelling contracts attract severance payments which would still be counted in this years expenditure


    the mess here comes from the apparent decision to wait until after the RWC to act. really should have all happened before season started


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,284 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Riskymove wrote: »
    the mess here comes from the apparent decision to wait until after the RWC to act. really should have all happened before season started

    Pretty sure there were people at the top and throughout the organisation that were convinced they had genuinely done nothing wrong and therefore had nothing to fix.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    Pretty sure there were people at the top and throughout the organisation that were convinced they had genuinely done nothing wrong and therefore had nothing to fix.

    Sure they had a FAQ section on their website in November after the news first broke where they plainly said that they were under the cap this season. You couldnt write this.

    It's all but official at thisnstage anyway. Another 35 point deduction.

    https://amp.theguardian.com/sport/2020/jan/17/saracens-salary-cap-premiership-relegation?CMP=share_btn_tw&__twitter_impression=true


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Amalia Dry Gauche


    durkadurka wrote: »
    that newspaper is an absolute rag but they've been good on this story, to be fair to them.

    The Mail actually do some half decent sports reporting at times. One of theirs was one of the main guys uncovering all the Team Sky shenanigans.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,112 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Riskymove wrote: »
    while I have little sympathy, a number of the articles outline how it is effectively impossible to get under the cap mid season and it is unsurprising that they couldn't suddenly be compliant during this season.

    even cancelling contracts attract severance payments which would still be counted in this years expenditure


    the mess here comes from the apparent decision to wait until after the RWC to act. really should have all happened before season started

    From what I'm reading the decision came after Saracens continued to argue the toss and feign innocence.

    If Saracens had come clean earlier and not fought and obfuscated at every opportunity they could have sorted it out and avoided all of this.

    They signed MORE players over the past summer FFS - Other than Shalk Brits there were no notable departures..

    Absolutely ZERO sympathy for the club as an Institution. I have sympathy for some players and staff that are going to take a hit here. But every dog in the street knew they were cheating so even that sympathy is fairly limited..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,899 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    Quin_Dub wrote: »
    From what I'm reading the decision came after Saracens continued to argue the toss and feign innocence.

    ..

    I dont see that in the articles linked to above

    Indeed the guardian sets out how it was effectively impossible at this stage to sort it out and the other clubs acceptance of that (effectively there was no way they could be under the cap this year and that is down in part to the late reporting in November)
    The club’s acting chief executive, Ed Griffiths, had initially indicated he would aim to cut wages and offload players but it has become increasingly apparent that doing so this season will not be practicable. Other English clubs cannot accommodate them without going over the cap themselves while any severance payments would also count towards the cap. It is understood Saracens would have needed to trim up to £2 million from their wage bill to be compliant.


    as I said I have no sympathy but think it should have been reported on earlier and Sarries either relegated or given the full points deduction at an earlier time


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,193 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    The Mail actually do some half decent sports reporting at times. One of theirs was one of the main guys uncovering all the Team Sky shenanigans.


    They've realised the disconnection between their front and back pages and now offer a sports only online package.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,284 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Riskymove wrote: »

    as I said I have no sympathy but think it should have been reported on earlier and Sarries either relegated or given the full points deduction at an earlier time

    Perhaps, though if Saracens had not been so belligerent in the face of all this they may have escaped further punishment. They are entirely to blame for this themselves.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,284 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    They've realised the disconnection between their front and back pages and now offer a sports only online package.

    So do the Telegraph actually which I find quite handy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    My take, piecing together various sources of information:
    Sarries knew they were nominally over the cap at the beginning of the year, but took a gamble on being able to convince PRL that extra-curricular investment in companies or properties in collaboration with players should not be counted towards their salary spend. This effort failed, (or it became apparent that it was definitely going to fail) and they had no plan B for cutting wages or jettisoning players.

    That's about the only thing that makes sense to me. Otherwise they were over the cap, were informed they were over the cap, knew further punishment awaited if they didn't act, didn't act, and just... I dunno... hoped the PRL would forget about it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,721 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    Neil3030 wrote: »
    My take, piecing together various sources of information:
    Sarries knew they were nominally over the cap at the beginning of the year, but took a gamble on being able to convince PRL that extra-curricular investment in companies or properties in collaboration with players should not be counted towards their salary spend. This effort failed, (or it became apparent that it was definitely going to fail) and they had no plan B for cutting wages or jettisoning players.

    That's about the only thing that makes sense to me. Otherwise they were over the cap, were informed they were over the cap, knew further punishment awaited if they didn't act, didn't act, and just... I dunno... hoped the PRL would forget about it?

    I think the first part is probably closer to the truth, and would line up with Wray stepping away after they had no grounds for appeal, and they realised how deep in the swamp they were after trying other avenues like shopping players around other clubs.

    It'll be interesting to see what comes out after the dust settles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,899 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    Perhaps, though if Saracens had not been so belligerent in the face of all this they may have escaped further punishment. They are entirely to blame for this themselves.

    sure

    but we now have the charade of sarries actually playing the rest of the premiership season

    perhaps at the same time as getting through to QF and further, even winning Europe


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,284 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Riskymove wrote: »
    sure

    but we now have the charade of sarries actually playing the rest of the premiership season

    perhaps at the same time as getting through to QF and further, even winning Europe

    There is no mechanism to simply relegate them though. Sarries would always have had to play out the season.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,112 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Riskymove wrote: »
    sure

    but we now have the charade of sarries actually playing the rest of the premiership season

    perhaps at the same time as getting through to QF and further, even winning Europe

    What would happen if all the other Premiership clubs simply refused to fulfill the fixtures against them?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,899 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    There is no mechanism to simply relegate them though. Sarries would always have had to play out the season.

    yes but perhaps they would be under the cap while doing so at least if it all came out during summer for example

    the fact that they can continue to have the full squad and play the rest of the season impacting on who wins etc is the charade


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,112 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Riskymove wrote: »
    yes but perhaps they would be under the cap while doing so at least if it all came out during summer for example

    the fact that they can continue to have the full squad and play the rest of the season impacting on who wins etc is the charade

    Don't disagree , but equally , if they were to force Saracens to dump half the squad right now then the clubs that they've already played and beaten might feel aggrieved that they had to play Money-bags Sarries and not Poor-House Sarries.

    As it wasn't done pre-season , there's not much they can do now really other than let the season finish out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,899 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    Quin_Dub wrote: »

    As it wasn't done pre-season , there's not much they can do now really other than let the season finish out.

    er....well yes...that's the point I have been making...that it should have been done earlier in summer rather than waiting until RWC so as not to upset England players


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,933 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    stephen_n wrote: »
    Only if they hold on to the players, which would be very unlikely given the cut in wages that would be required.


    Nosalary cap in the Championship..afaik.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,207 ✭✭✭durkadurka


    The near certain relegation this season ensures Saracens are out of the next two Heineken cup seasons.

    Will any of their stars stay on with that prospect?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    durkadurka wrote: »
    The near certain relegation this season ensures Saracens are out of the next two Heineken cup seasons.

    Will any of their stars stay on with that prospect?
    Would they stay on with the Championship in prospect next year? The heady heights of London Welsh, Cornish Pirates and Newcastle Falcons? Telling that they didn't seem willing to take a pay cut.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    jr86 wrote: »
    I'm sure it'd be facilitated though

    If you earn your place, you deserve your place in fairness

    I know its football, but when cardiff and Millwall made FA Cup finals they were playing for European football the year after despite being in championship at the time

    This is the nub of the argument; they didn't earn their place and it wasn't "in fairness".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,721 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    Remember the whole spiel Wray and co were spinning about players not joining Saracens just for the money, but the culture.... I have a feeling that's soon to bite them in the arse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Quin_Dub wrote: »
    What would happen if all the other Premiership clubs simply refused to fulfill the fixtures against them?

    Surely Sarries would get walkover wins in this case?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Remember the whole spiel Wray and co were spinning about players not joining Saracens just for the money, but the culture.... I have a feeling that's soon to bite them in the arse.
    It occurred to me when I heard no talk of them taking a pay cut alright. Culture doesn't butter parsnips I believe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Remember the whole spiel Wray and co were spinning about players not joining Saracens just for the money, but the culture.... I have a feeling that's soon to bite them in the arse.

    I have to say I've been sniggering at all the comments on here expressing "sympathy for their fans".

    I mean? Really?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    I have to say I've been sniggering at all the comments on here expressing "sympathy for their fans".

    I mean? Really?
    To be fair, the fans are guilty of nothing more than a bit of uppityness from winning stuff. Something I'd say we all could be accused of.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    To be fair, the fans are guilty of nothing more than a bit of uppityness from winning stuff. Something I'd say we all could be accused of.

    I dunno. I can't say that I'm not taking incredible pleasure at the demise of them tbh. The fans hurt being factored into it, in a Scott Tenorman style way.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    I dunno. I can't say that I'm not taking incredible pleasure at the demise of them tbh. The fans hurt being factored into it, in a Scott Tenorman style way.

    That's a horrible attitude. The fans didn't cause this. Jesus.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    To be fair, the fans are guilty of nothing more than a bit of uppityness from winning stuff. Something I'd say we all could be accused of.

    I read through some of their comments, well ok a lot, on their facebook page back in November. It was everyone elses fault, sure someone had to look after their England stars, the salary cap was silly.

    They have made it very difficult to have sympathy for them considering the way they have acted online.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    That's a horrible attitude. The fans didn't cause this. Jesus.

    Ah jesus calm down. Can we not all bask in this sh!show for the next few days? It's hilarious given the choir boy attitude when they were caught.

    I'm sure there will be mass protests in the streets of Saracens tonight as a result of all this.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ah jesus calm down. Can we not all bask in this sh!show for the next few days? It's hilarious given the choir boy attitude when they were caught.

    I'm sure there will be mass protests in the streets of Saracens tonight as a result of all this.

    How will we know ?, will it be the three people standing together in their Saracens jerseys ? whats the minimum number allowed to call it a "mass protest" or do they just have to go to mass afterwards ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,047 ✭✭✭Bazzo


    I was shocked when they told me, but they were insistant on it. There is a reason, they all leave Wales.

    They were taking the piss.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,300 ✭✭✭freyners


    Credit to the original poster legorockman on Reddit for this beauty


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    I read through some of their comments, well ok a lot, on their facebook page back in November. It was everyone elses fault, sure someone had to look after their England stars, the salary cap was silly.

    They have made it very difficult to have sympathy for them considering the way they have acted online.
    That's just the stages of grief. Denial being the first. It's the likes of Stephen Jones that should really get a slapping.


  • Registered Users Posts: 602 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    I read through some of their comments, well ok a lot, on their facebook page back in November. It was everyone elses fault, sure someone had to look after their England stars, the salary cap was silly.

    They have made it very difficult to have sympathy for them considering the way they have acted online.

    Go onto their forum and see the delusion first hand.

    https://www.rugbynetwork.net/boards/read/s104.htm?107,16709759


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    mike_cork wrote: »
    Go onto their forum and see the delusion first hand.

    https://www.rugbynetwork.net/boards/read/s104.htm?107,16709759
    Why not apply to join the Guinness Pro14?
    Why not apply to join the Guinness Pro14?
    Howiefez 17 January, 2020 08:46
    Having no intimate knowledge of the details of the salary cap, I unable to pass judgement on the rights and wrongs of Saracens position (without transparency no one else has either!), but it seems that the rest of the Premiership acting as judge and jury, has condemned Saracens to relegation already.
    Instead of being forced to play in the Championship next year and possibly beyond, perhaps one route out of the mess is to apply to permanently play in the Guinness Pro14, replacing one of the South African teams. At least then Saracens would be on a level salary playing field with the Irish and the also with the French.
    Accepting this would have many ramifications, for example, the English international players, Saracens Storm etc, is this a possibility? I'd rather see Munster, Leinster and Scarlets visiting Allianz Park than Ampthill and Ealing.
    Comments please.

    https://www.rugbynetwork.net/boards/read/s104.htm?107,16709242


    ---


    To be fair there are some decent posters on there who want the punishment to clear house and are sickened by the carry-on. But there are others wo are beyond help.


  • Registered Users Posts: 432 ✭✭sliabh 1956


    Just saw this on the BBC sports web page "Can Saracens play in the Champions Cup if relegated?
    No. While the winners of the Champions Cup qualify for next season's tournament - and Saracens are still in contention - European organisers have confirmed to the BBC that only teams from the Premiership, Top 14 and Pro 14 are eligible to play in European competitions. The only exceptions are the teams from emerging nations who play in the Challenge Cup."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    mike_cork wrote: »
    Go onto their forum and see the delusion first hand.

    https://www.rugbynetwork.net/boards/read/s104.htm?107,16709759
    Your link took me straight to a thread looking at the benefits of relegation. Most of the posts I read were entirely positive and looking forward to the prospect of going to grounds they hadn't visited in years. I kinda got a bit bored by all the positivity. :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 602 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    Your link took me straight to a thread looking at the benefits of relegation. Most of the posts I read were entirely positive and looking forward to the prospect of going to grounds they hadn't visited in years. I kinda got a bit bored by all the positivity. :D
    My apologies, meant this thread! As the news got worse during the last few hours,acceptance of their fate seems to have finally set in
    https://www.rugbynetwork.net/boards/read/s104.htm?107,16708853


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    mike_cork wrote: »
    My apologies, meant this thread! As the news got worse during the last few hours,acceptance of their fate seems to have finally set in
    https://www.rugbynetwork.net/boards/read/s104.htm?107,16708853
    Cheers. Still not seeing anything other than the odd few throwing questions around or being a bit disingenuous even. But a lot are like this one:


    Something I thought of whilst writing this was the fact that many if not most of us on here supported the club when we were rubbish. Winning trophies is not what it was about. It was about the rugby.

    None of us demanded trophies we were just happy that we stayed up or got a chance to play in the Heineken cup. It seems a long the way this has been lost by the club, it became about the winning and worse yet it became about winning at any cost!

    I won’t lie I have loved winning I have some great memories of all the finals that we won but when we look back what has it cost us?


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Yeah theres a real human element to this people are forgetting in their delight. People who had nothing to do with the cheating will lose their jobs. Some will forever be stained by what has happened. And the real culprits, the likes of Nigel Wray for example, get to walk away. This is exactly what the club deserves, but the people in it arent all guilty and dont all deserve this. Celebrating people losing their jobs is nasty. End of. I'm glad they were caught and I'm glad the punishment is as harsh as it should be. But I take no actual pleasure from the fact that it is happening. People need to remember the human cost of this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 602 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    Cheers. Still not seeing anything other than the odd few throwing questions around or being a bit disingenuous even. But a lot are like this one:



    Yeah saw that comment myself. I do feel sorry for the fans that have been with the club for years and saw them rise from basically nothing.
    However its been an open secret for years that Saracens have been systematically cheating. They've cheated their fellow clubs in england out of titles and the revenue and prestige that comes with that.
    Having been on many munster away trips in england and speaking to english club fans- They hate Saracens with a burning passion so I can understand the delight they are having watching "the wolfpack" empire collapse.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    durkadurka wrote: »
    The near certain relegation this season ensures Saracens are out of the next two Heineken cup seasons.

    Will any of their stars stay on with that prospect?

    Is there enough cap space on the other sides to take all the English internationals without dramatic pay cuts? They can't move abroad and play test rugby by the RFU rules so could a few of them sit on their contracts rather than take a big pay cut?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement