Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Against the head

Options
1356713

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,020 ✭✭✭Digifriendly


    jm08 wrote: »
    Irish teams that they hold the highlight rights to. They have only shown the Ireland games this series

    This is one of the weaknesses IMHO about the programme compared to both Scotland and Wales. STV's weekly highlights shows action from all Rabo Direct matches and while Scrum V concentrates on the Welsh teams does show Munster vs Leinster highlights as well. We need RTE to show a weekly programme with Rabo Direct and AIL coverage.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    .ak wrote: »
    Okay, you list the reasons then - and please no off-field reasons.

    Toured with the Lions previously (and there could be few enough tourists with previous experience.
    Done the Dirt Track bit - played all the Super Rugby teams (as they are now known). Captained a few of them.
    Could assist as kicking coach.

    Wilko would have similar attributes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    This is one of the weaknesses IMHO about the programme compared to both Scotand and Wales. STV's weekly highlights shows action from all Rabo Direct matches and while Scrum V concentrates on the Welsh teams does show Munster vs Leinster highlights as well. We need RTE to show a weekly programme with Rabo Direct and AIL coverage.

    RTE has only 2 channels unlike BBC who has tons of them. BBC don't have to cover GAA either. Champions League etc. is all on RTE2, premiership prog., Eircom League etc. are all on RTE2.

    FYI - you can get some AIL games here.

    http://www.aertv.ie/


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,745 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    jm08 wrote: »
    Toured with the Lions previously (and there could be few enough tourists with previous experience.
    Done the Dirt Track bit - played all the Super Rugby teams (as they are now known). Captained a few of them.
    Could assist as kicking coach.

    Wilko would have similar attributes.

    Sure we may as well bring Willie John McBride based on this kind of "logic"! :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,308 Mod ✭✭✭✭.ak


    jm08 wrote: »
    Toured with the Lions previously (and there could be few enough tourists with previous experience.
    Done the Dirt Track bit - played all the Super Rugby teams (as they are now known). Captained a few of them.
    Could assist as kicking coach.

    Wilko would have similar attributes.

    I said please no off-field reasons. What on-field reasons would there be to bring him? If they wanted a kicking coach they'd bring a kicking coach. Why waste money on bringing a player who can't play? :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭shuffol


    Would ROG really be that positive an influence in camp, I mean this is the same guy who threw a strop and announced his retirement after not being picked in the WC. I wouldnt have thought he's the type of guy who'd be very popular with other players(respected yes), not least if he wasnt selected on merit, should they designate a couple of spots every tour to a couple of oldies because they've tour experience or should they be allowing guys who deserve to be there enjoy that experience.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    molloyjh wrote: »
    Sure we may as well bring Willie John McBride based on this kind of "logic"! :rolleyes:

    Willie John was on the last one handing out jerseys and doing motivational stuff :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    .ak wrote: »
    I said please no off-field reasons. What on-field reasons would there be to bring him? If they wanted a kicking coach they'd bring a kicking coach. Why waste money on bringing a player who can't play? :confused:

    I suspect when he gets gametime with Munster he will get a bit of form as he has had a very disjoined season this year and has played very little rugby down to injury and player management (13 minutes since 13th October when he got injured against Racing Metro).

    Now, since you don't rate the challenge of the Lions to get the squad to gel, both on and off the pitch, I won't bore you any further.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    shuffol wrote: »
    Would ROG really be that positive an influence in camp, I mean this is the same guy who threw a strop and announced his retirement after not being picked in the WC. I wouldnt have thought he's the type of guy who'd be very popular with other players(respected yes), not least if he wasnt selected on merit, should they designate a couple of spots every tour to a couple of oldies because they've tour experience or should they be allowing guys who deserve to be there enjoy that experience.

    Well, if you look at his twitter account (he doesn't use it that much) he seems to be fairly friendly with players from all over the world. He seems to have great banter with Mike Phillips, I've seen photos of him dining out with Martyn Williams (POC & Casey). BOD, Shaggy, Rob Kearney, Wally, POC all seem to get on very well with him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    Isn't this a pointless discussion. O'Gara won't come close to making the Lions tour.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 1,519 ✭✭✭Higher


    Ok so the reasons for bringing O'Gara are:

    (1) Hes friendly with the players
    (2) He could be a kicking coach
    (3) Hes been on a Lions tour before
    (4) He could be a motivator for the players

    jm08 are you having a laugh?


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,308 Mod ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Ah, I'd say he's good to have on the lash. May as well bring him and pay him a wage like.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    .ak wrote: »
    Ah, I'd say he's good to have on the lash. May as well bring him and pay him a wage like.

    Considering Quinlan's point was that the options were poor elsewhere, you may as well bring O'Gara or Wilko. Not too sure if Wilko would be up for going on the lash, like.


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    jm08 wrote: »
    Willie John was on the last one handing out jerseys and doing motivational stuff :)

    Willie John wasn't in the playing squad!

    The thought of ROG touring is nonsense, of course ROG will aim to play himself into contention (why wouldn't he?) but he's far off being in the top three best British/Irish 10s. Sexton, Biggar, Hook, Flood and Laidlaw are all better options.

    If someone is taken for your reasons, Wilkinson is a far better choice than ROG.


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,308 Mod ✭✭✭✭.ak


    jm08 wrote: »
    Considering Quinlan's point was that the options were poor elsewhere, you may as well bring O'Gara or Wilko. Not too sure if Wilko would be up for going on the lash, like.

    Are they poor else where? Biggar, Cipriani, Priestland would all be ahead of ROG, even with the latter playing so badly at the moment.

    Atleast Wilko is playing decent rugby at the moment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Willie John wasn't in the playing squad!

    The thought of ROG touring is nonsense, of course ROG will aim to play himself into contention (why wouldn't he?) but he's far off being in the top three best British/Irish 10s.

    Quinlan doesn't rate any of them after Sexton (maybe Flood) - thats why he thinks Wilko or ROG are in with a shot.

    As a matter of interest, who would you rate after Sexton?

    edit: Willie John was on the tour though for some reason!


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    .ak wrote: »
    Are they poor else where? Biggar, Cipriani, Priestland would all be ahead of ROG, even with the latter playing so badly at the moment.

    Atleast Wilko is playing decent rugby at the moment.

    Gatland does not seem to rate Biggar, Priestland is playing poorly and Cipriani is likely to be a handfull to deal with off-field. Hook maybe in with a shout, but who knows?

    Wilko will be left out if Toulon make the final of the Top 14.

    Best option otherwise is Toby Flood.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    jm08 wrote: »
    Gatland does not seem to rate Biggar, Priestland is playing poorly and Cipriani is likely to be a handfull to deal with off-field. Hook maybe in with a shout, but who knows?

    Wilko will be left out if Toulon make the final of the Top 14.

    Best option otherwise is Toby Flood.

    Greg Laidlaw
    Toby Flood
    Charlie Hodgson
    Johnny Wilkinson
    Owen Farrell
    Rhys Priestland
    Paddy Jackson
    Ian Madigan

    I could go on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    ROG is barely clinging on to the title of 3rd best outhalf in Ireland at the moment, nevermind the 3rd best in all of Britain/Ireland.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Hagz wrote: »
    Greg Laidlaw
    Toby Flood
    Charlie Hodgson
    Johnny Wilkinson
    Owen Farrell
    Rhys Priestland
    Paddy Jackson
    Ian Madigan

    I could go on.

    Toby Flood & Wilkinson are runners at OH.
    Charlie Hodgson has never done it at OH. He loses his bottle too easily.
    Owen Farrell - should have pointed out to his captain that it was a waste of time losing by 1pt. to SA.
    Priestland - have you not noticed how poorly wales are playing at the moment?

    Paddy Jackson - could be in with a shot
    Ian Madigan - not a chance when he is not starting HC or Ireland games.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    The kick against SA is Robshaw's responsibility, not Farrell's. If Farrell had persisted in arguing, it could have been more embarrassing. Holding that against Farrell is pretty silly tbh and a stupid reason for not picking him. Did you expect Farrell to have a hissy fit before he got his way?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Tox56 wrote: »
    ROG is barely clinging on to the title of 3rd best outhalf in Ireland at the moment, nevermind the 3rd best in all of Britain/Ireland.

    Since he hasn't really played since he got injured on 13th October, thats a fair comment.

    Lets see what happens between now and next May.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,034 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    The kick against SA is Robshaw's responsibility, not Farrell's. If Farrell had persisted in arguing, it could have been more embarrassing. Holding that against Farrell is pretty silly tbh and a stupid reason for not picking him. Did you expect Farrell to have a hissy fit before he got his way?

    ROG style?? :pac: :pac: :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,969 ✭✭✭buck65


    Biggar would be my choice to go with Sexton, maybe Farrell then but certainly not ROG, Wilko, Madigan or Priestland.
    We could have a bolter yet at outhalf. Paddy J?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    jm08 wrote: »
    Toby Flood & Wilkinson are runners at OH.
    Charlie Hodgson has never done it at OH. He loses his bottle too easily.
    Owen Farrell - should have pointed out to his captain that it was a waste of time losing by 1pt. to SA.
    Priestland - have you not noticed how poorly wales are playing at the moment?

    Paddy Jackson - could be in with a shot
    Ian Madigan - not a chance when he is not starting HC or Ireland games.

    Ahem. Okay, this should put things to bed. In O'Gara's whole career, he has never ever ever been rated highly enough to start for the Lions in a test match. Okay. He has NEVER started for the Lions in a test match. He was on tour in 2001/2005/2009 in 2001 he made the bench for one of the tests, didn't come off it. In 2005 he made the bench for two of the tests and in 2009 he made the bench in two of the tests only coming off in one of the games playing 13 minutes (in which he had a horror show).

    So now, at a time where O'Gara is playing the worst rugby in his career, do you honestly think there is any possibility that Gatland would bring him? Why would he bring someone who's 36, never started in a test match for the Lions, playing the worst rugby of his career to date?

    It's obvious you have a strong affection towards O'Gara, but the reality is, if all those options I listed were eligible for Ireland, they would deserve to be a head of him at the moment.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Tox56 wrote: »
    ROG is barely clinging on to the title of is no longer even the 3rd best outhalf in Ireland at the moment, nevermind the 3rd best in all of Britain/Ireland.

    In terms of playing a cup final tomorrow

    Sexton >>>>> Jackson>>> Madigan>> Keatley >>> ROG

    imo


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    The kick against SA is Robshaw's responsibility, not Farrell's. If Farrell had persisted in arguing, it could have been more embarrassing. Holding that against Farrell is pretty silly tbh and a stupid reason for not picking him. Did you expect Farrell to have a hissy fit before he got his way?

    Why would he need to have a hissy fit? Most captains consult their OHs as a matter of course anyway.

    Not referring to him suggests that he isn't a decision maker. Besides, England were hardly riveting with him as OH. All they do is go for penalties.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Hagz wrote: »
    Ahem. Okay, this should put things to bed. In O'Gara's whole career, he has never ever ever been rated highly enough to start for the Lions in a test match. Okay. He has NEVER started for the Lions in a test match. He was on tour in 2001/2005/2009 in 2001 he made the bench for one of the tests, didn't come off it. In 2005 he made the bench for two of the tests and in 2009 he made the bench in two of the tests only coming off in one of the games playing 13 minutes (in which he had a horror show).

    So now, at a time where O'Gara is playing the worst rugby in his career, do you honestly think there is any possibility that Gatland would bring him? Why would he bring someone who's 36, never started in a test match for the Lions, playing the worst rugby of his career to date?

    It's obvious you have a strong affection towards O'Gara, but the reality is, if all those options I listed were eligible for Ireland, they would deserve to be a head of him at the moment.

    You keep going on about Test matches - there are only 3 of them (and presumably Sexton will be starting those).

    O'Gara could be an option in the role that Quinlan was picked for the last time - an older, experienced head.

    O'Gara has experience of playing with all of these teams, and if he is starting OH for Munster for the HCup, he will be well in with a chance to go to lead the dirt trackers.

    Lots of people seem to have a strong affection towards O'Gara judging from the cheer he got last week when he came on despite his disasterous showing against SA ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    jm08 wrote: »
    Why would he need to have a hissy fit? Most captains consult their OHs as a matter of course anyway.

    Not referring to him suggests that he isn't a decision maker. Besides, England were hardly riveting with him as OH. All they do is go for penalties.

    But when ROG plays Munster/Ireland are simply electric?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    jm08 wrote: »
    You keep going on about Test matches - there are only 3 of them (and presumably Sexton will be starting those).

    Because they are all that matters. If you think otherwise you're mistaken.
    jm08 wrote: »
    Lots of people seem to have a strong affection towards O'Gara judging from the cheer he got last week when he came on despite his disasterous showing against SA ;)


    Lots of people are casual rugby fans who don't watch club rugby. They see headlines like last minute drop goal saves Munster and then scratch their heads when O'Gara doesn't start for Ireland. Equally, lots of people don't like Sexton.


Advertisement