Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Random Fitness Questions

1222325272836

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 3,149 Mod ✭✭✭✭Black Sheep


    Jim Wendler has written here and there about running and 5/3/1.

    5/3/1 Forever has a lot on it, but there's a synopsis here too: https://www.jimwendler.com/blogs/jimwendler-com/running-lifting-and-becoming-a-marine-officer

    I feel like his recommendation to run 'sets' i.e 8x100m or whatever, is not dissimilar to what I'm suggesting above.

    It goes without saying that when you're 40+ sprints or hard runs are never all-out, they're 80% as he says, for practical reasons and to save your achilles.


  • Registered Users Posts: 530 ✭✭✭new2tri19


    Not sure if I'm doing incline bench correctly a couple of questions if someone has time to answer please.

    Do you arch your back like flat bench ? Would grip width be the same as flat bench ? And on bar path and starting position I lie down with eyes directly in line below bar , bring the bar down to touch chest just below nipple and return is that correct ? Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,654 ✭✭✭✭Alf Veedersane


    new2tri19 wrote: »
    Not sure if I'm doing incline bench correctly a couple of questions if someone has time to answer please.

    Do you arch your back like flat bench ? Would grip width be the same as flat bench ? And on bar path and starting position I lie down with eyes directly in line below bar , bring the bar down to touch chest just below nipple and return is that correct ? Thanks



    Think of it as a normal bench press that you happen to be doing at an incline. It may touch the chest a bit higher but focus on getting the set up right, as you always would, and it will touch the chest where it touches it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 49 Bey0nd


    Question on calorie surplus.

    What happens if someone moves from the following:

    (a) Little exercise and little strength, a very dirty calorie surplus (junk food and takeaways) and quite overweight as a result

    ...to...

    (b) Doing lots of strength based training, maintaining a calorie surplus - but a good, healthy one with the right macros to build muscle.

    Will they just burn fat and build muscle as expected, or is this inefficient? Are they better off losing the weight first on a deficit and then building it back up as muscle via surplus?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,673 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Bey0nd wrote: »
    Question on calorie surplus.

    What happens if someone moves from the following:

    (a) Little exercise and little strength, a very dirty calorie surplus (junk food and takeaways) and quite overweight as a result

    ...to...

    (b) Doing lots of strength based training, maintaining a calorie surplus - but a good, healthy one with the right macros to build muscle.

    Will they just burn fat and build muscle as expected, or is this inefficient? Are they better off losing the weight first on a deficit and then building it back up as muscle via surplus?

    they are parallel projects but on different time frames, but in the first year the priority is dropping the weight to normal and of course build up fitness and strength as one can. Someone could lose 10-20KG of fat in a year, but someone starting from 0 in the gym might gain 2-4kg of muscle mass in the first year so whatever way someone plays it its going to be a deficit

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,654 ✭✭✭✭Alf Veedersane


    Bey0nd wrote: »
    Question on calorie surplus.

    What happens if someone moves from the following:

    (a) Little exercise and little strength, a very dirty calorie surplus (junk food and takeaways) and quite overweight as a result

    ...to...

    (b) Doing lots of strength based training, maintaining a calorie surplus - but a good, healthy one with the right macros to build muscle.

    Will they just burn fat and build muscle as expected, or is this inefficient? Are they better off losing the weight first on a deficit and then building it back up as muscle via surplus?



    If you're quite overweight then the primary focus is losing fat. But that doesn't mean you don't do lots of strength training as well. You want to hold onto as much muscle as you can while on a deficit


    So (b) except with a calorie deficit as opposed to a surplus


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,414 ✭✭✭Cill94


    Bey0nd wrote: »
    Question on calorie surplus.

    What happens if someone moves from the following:

    (a) Little exercise and little strength, a very dirty calorie surplus (junk food and takeaways) and quite overweight as a result

    ...to...

    (b) Doing lots of strength based training, maintaining a calorie surplus - but a good, healthy one with the right macros to build muscle.

    Will they just burn fat and build muscle as expected, or is this inefficient? Are they better off losing the weight first on a deficit and then building it back up as muscle via surplus?

    This depends on how much body fat you’re carrying. I’m also assuming you’re fairly new to training?

    Essentially if you’re at an unhealthy body fat, you should train to get as strong as you can while in a small deficit, until you eventually get to a healthy body fat.

    If you’re only slightly overweight (say around 20% body fat) and new to training, then I would just try to maintain your calories and get stronger and fitter, which will lead to losing fat and gaining muscle (weight may stay constant but body composition should change).


  • Registered Users Posts: 530 ✭✭✭new2tri19


    silverharp wrote: »
    they are parallel projects but on different time frames, but in the first year the priority is dropping the weight to normal and of course build up fitness and strength as one can. Someone could lose 10-20KG of fat in a year, but someone starting from 0 in the gym might gain 2-4kg of muscle mass in the first year so whatever way someone plays it its going to be a deficit

    I remember looking at this before and I think I read a few different articles that said 1kg a month was possible to gain in muscle mass .
    I think the problem is it's very hard to tell if your gaining muscle or fat , when I was forcing feeding myself and doing weights I gained a lot of weight I initially thought it was muscle but it was obviously fat aswell . Now eating less but high protein I'm probably losing weight but look like I've more muscle cause I'm shredding a bit of fat .

    I think if your overweight, eat more protein 1g per pound of bodyweight a day . Weight train so youll be burn more calories and try do some cardio , run walk or cycle each day .


  • Registered Users Posts: 49 Bey0nd


    Thanks all.

    I'm certainly on the unhealthy side of things.

    An online calculator I used (which accounts for 4 workouts per week with a workout defined as 30 minutes elevated heart level) has my maintenance calories at ~ 2700, and recommends 2200 as my deficit for weight loss. Does that sound about right, or should I up that to maybe 2500 if I want more focus on muscle building but still achieving (slower I guess) fat loss?


  • Registered Users Posts: 530 ✭✭✭new2tri19


    Bey0nd wrote: »
    Thanks all.

    I'm certainly on the unhealthy side of things.

    An online calculator I used (which accounts for 4 workouts per week with a workout defined as 30 minutes elevated heart level) has my maintenance calories at ~ 2700, and recommends 2200 as my deficit for weight loss. Does that sound about right, or should I up that to maybe 2500 if I want more focus on muscle building but still achieving (slower I guess) fat loss?

    I don't know how accurate they are , it's probably more trial an error . It could be individual. Maybe try 2200 and see if you lose weight after a week if not reduce it ?
    I think you could train more to speed things up ? I eat 2500 and train 2 hours a day everyday minimum and weight is not really moving up or down that much.
    I think it's trial and error with these things some people need more calories to just function , find something you enjoy doing be my advice could be as simple as walking while listening to a podcast aim to walk 30 mins then build it up to 1 hour .
    Set yourself weight lifting targets or walking / running / swimming targets my wife starts and stops so many of these weight loss things on my fitness Pal every few months she loses weight but then puts it back on again .
    I've been training since 2007 various different things but have managed at least an hour a day on average since 2007 , the secret is I do something I enjoy till I don't enjoy it , got big into running did marathons then cycling , etc , you get the jist sorry for long waffle basically find something you enjoy and it won't feel like a chore and you'll want to do it each day . Good luck


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,414 ✭✭✭Cill94


    Bey0nd wrote: »
    Thanks all.

    I'm certainly on the unhealthy side of things.

    An online calculator I used (which accounts for 4 workouts per week with a workout defined as 30 minutes elevated heart level) has my maintenance calories at ~ 2700, and recommends 2200 as my deficit for weight loss. Does that sound about right, or should I up that to maybe 2500 if I want more focus on muscle building but still achieving (slower I guess) fat loss?

    Definitely aim to lose weight then. Good news is you'll probably be able to gain some muscle and strength while doing this, so long as you don't do a drastic deficit and eat enough protein.

    You're unlikely to get an accurate estimate from those calculators. That's fine though, because as long as you've entered accurate info about yourself, it won't be off by a lot.

    What you need to do is aim to take in the same amount every day, and make your weigh-ins as similar as possible (e.g. first thing in morning, after using loo, before eating or drinking, same amount of clothes). If your weight doesn't move in the right direction after a few weeks, just adjust the calories.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,231 ✭✭✭carrollsno1


    Howye? Not sure if its the right place to ask but i suppose its as good a place as any. Re Wim Hof which book is better? The Wim Hof Method or The Iceman Speaks? Will be buying on Audible and the former is not narrated by the man himself thats the only drawback i can find so far. Thanks in advance.

    Better living everyone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    What are people opinions on shrugs?

    Doing WSFSB3 at the moment and they are in for twice a week, but they feel like an exercise in which time would be better used doing something else


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 3,149 Mod ✭✭✭✭Black Sheep


    What are people opinions on shrugs?

    Doing WSFSB3 at the moment and they are in for twice a week, but they feel like an exercise in which time would be better used doing something else

    Shrugs are a great movement from a physique point of view. If you do heavy shrugs once a week, as they are programmed in WS4SB, and then add in some more direct neck work with a harness, then your neck will grow, assuming there's a good bit of indirect stimulation going on as well from benching, deadlifting, rows etc.

    In terms of the time involved and whether it's good bang for buck...

    The way WS4SB and other programmes where you might be doing shrugs work is that they are done way after your main lift of the day and the important assistance work. Typically I would do work at the end of my accessories. If you have the time you do them... If you don't, then you don't.

    On a lower body day maybe calves are analogous, or maybe direct arm training fits too. It's not that important for health or your overall performance, but if you want to bring along a specific body part then direct training works.

    Last workout I did with shrugs, for example:-

    Bench 6x6
    Press 4x8-12
    Pull ups 3 x max
    Push ups 3 x max
    Shrugs 3 x 15 (I actually did 5 sets in the end)

    If I didn't do shrugs then anything I subbed in would have to be in a similar category (Maybe neck curls or something else very specific), I'd blasted myself pretty comprehensively with the preceding stuff.

    In terms of performing them the most common errors I see are not using full ROM and simply using too light a weight. Using a pair of 30kg DBs is not going to do it for adult males, it needs to be up around 2/3 of your deadlift 1RM weight probably. Sometimes I will use a slightly lighter load and hold the top position for a pause.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,414 ✭✭✭Cill94


    What are people opinions on shrugs?

    Doing WSFSB3 at the moment and they are in for twice a week, but they feel like an exercise in which time would be better used doing something else

    Personally not a fan. Traps are a muscle group that get a lot of indirect work as it is. I'd only see a need to do them if you particularly want bigger traps.

    People like Ed Coan liked them a lot for building his deadlift, but that's probably not really applicable unless you're pulling biggg weights.


  • Registered Users Posts: 226 ✭✭Reps4jesus


    What are people opinions on shrugs?

    Doing WSFSB3 at the moment and they are in for twice a week, but they feel like an exercise in which time would be better used doing something else

    my traps were my only muscle that group that always looked big, never trained them directly when doing heavy deadlifts but after a bicep tear i kinda ditched deadlifts and just did heavy shrugs with a pause at the top and they stayed big. If you are deadlifting I wouldnt bother doing them, if you arent then i would throw them in, they are a relatively quick and easy exercise to do


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    i got the best results with shrugs from holding each rep for 3secs (long count) at the top. set to failure.
    you'll probably need to drop the weight , go slow and feel every bit of it.

    i do heavy shrugs too - believe all rep range important - but I find the hold each rep worked v well for me.

    will do again come 7th june


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭Patsy167


    Depending on your program or goals, Farmers walks might be a good alternative to shrugs. Much better bang for your buck with more big muscles worked.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 3,149 Mod ✭✭✭✭Black Sheep


    Yeah, but the point is that you don't always want compound lifts / exercises that work more big muscles.

    Accessories programmed at the end of a workout tend to be an isolation movement for good reason. Direct training of a relevant muscle group to target it, and isolation rather than just another compound because it's less likely to interfere with recovery and the main lifts of your next workout. As it is heavy shrugs flirt with being more than an isolation movement.


  • Registered Users Posts: 530 ✭✭✭new2tri19


    The YouTube algorithms have lots of lifting videos showing on my feed now . Nearly everyone I see doing squats has some kind of straps on their knees. Is this something everyone should be doing or only those that have issues ? I don't currently have any knee problems , is it harmful to lift long term without knee protection thanks ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,693 ✭✭✭Deano7788


    new2tri19 wrote: »
    The YouTube algorithms have lots of lifting videos showing on my feed now . Nearly everyone I see doing squats has some kind of straps on their knees. Is this something everyone should be doing or only those that have issues ? I don't currently have any knee problems , is it harmful to lift long term without knee protection thanks ?

    Probably either sleeves of wraps.

    Wraps are typically used in certain powerlifting federations, will increase the amount you could lift as they increase your bounce out of the hole. Not at all needed outside of that and are not comfortable to have on (they're taken off and put back on for every set). They're also very difficult to put on on your own, especially if not experienced with them. And they don't offer any protection, in fact a few high level lifters refuse to wear them as they claim they increase their chance of injury.

    Sleeves can vary from just keeping your knees warm and feeling nice to giving potentially a bit of an extra bounce at the bottom (I do get a performance boost from mine) . They're also used a lot in some powerlifting federations, including the one a few of us lift in where wraps aren't allowed. Not needed as such but a lot of people just find it nicer to wear them. I wouldn't really worry about them yet but at the same time they also won't do any harm really.


  • Registered Users Posts: 530 ✭✭✭new2tri19


    Thanks Deano , that covers it . I'm only competing with myself so not too bothered in performance benefits. If its safe to squat without them I'll continue as I am.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,693 ✭✭✭Deano7788


    new2tri19 wrote: »
    Thanks Deano , that covers it . I'm only competing with myself so not too bothered in performance benefits. If its safe to squat without them I'll continue as I am.

    Perfectly safe, I did it for years before I took up powerlifting properly.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 3,149 Mod ✭✭✭✭Black Sheep


    new2tri19 wrote: »
    The YouTube algorithms have lots of lifting videos showing on my feed now . Nearly everyone I see doing squats has some kind of straps on their knees. Is this something everyone should be doing or only those that have issues ? I don't currently have any knee problems , is it harmful to lift long term without knee protection thanks ?

    (Edit: sorry, threw this up before I saw Dean’s very good answer)

    Short answer - no, carry on as you are.

    Long answer: Someone with a previous knee injury might wear something for a little bit of compression, warmth etc I’ve dislocated my knee and torn ligaments from BJJ, and on some max effort days I’ll do this.

    Some competitive lifters will properly wrap for major support and compression, but that’s even more niche.

    The average gym goer with healthy knees will never need any of this and if their squat form is ok it will never arise. To be honest even if their form is not ideal chances are they are not squatting a weight where it matters that much anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,654 ✭✭✭✭Alf Veedersane


    new2tri19 wrote: »
    Thanks Deano , that covers it . I'm only competing with myself so not too bothered in performance benefits. If its safe to squat without them I'll continue as I am.



    I only got a pair before I did my first comp. Just on the off-chance it might add that 1%.


    You don't need them at all.


    Now, I mostly use them to muffle the sound of my knees crackling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,644 ✭✭✭✭Mr. CooL ICE


    Whatever you do, don't start wearing wraps for leg press


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,839 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    Whatever you do, don't start wearing wraps for leg press

    Why not? That way he can load 84 plates and 4 of his buddies onto it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,673 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Dtp1979 wrote: »
    Why not? That way he can load 84 plates and 4 of his buddies onto it.

    oil right you guys

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    new2tri19 wrote: »
    The YouTube algorithms have lots of lifting videos showing on my feed now . Nearly everyone I see doing squats has some kind of straps on their knees. Is this something everyone should be doing or only those that have issues ? I don't currently have any knee problems , is it harmful to lift long term without knee protection thanks ?

    I have had multiple knee surgeries and don't wear knee wraps squatting. I don't need them.

    Wraps give a slight advantage in competition. But people on YouTube wear them to look hardcore, mainly.

    If someone is wearing them to compensate for knee issues, they should spend time fixing the issues.

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,839 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    silverharp wrote: »
    oil right you guys

    I wonder how many folks get that one ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,673 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Dtp1979 wrote: »
    I wonder how many folks get that one ;)

    I was waiting :D

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 565 ✭✭✭frosty123


    What time of the day is your blood pressure at it's lowest?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    frosty123 wrote: »
    What time of the day is your blood pressure at it's lowest?

    When you’re asleep

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Registered Users Posts: 565 ✭✭✭frosty123


    ...and when you're awake?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,673 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    frosty123 wrote: »
    ...and when you're awake?

    its going to be individual, any GP worth their salt wont generally rely on a one off reading, they will get you to wear a 24 hr monitor if they wanted the data to help diagnose something. There are confounders like "white coat syndrome" where people's blood pressure rises by virtue of being in a GP surgery

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,798 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Guys, I’m looking spend a few quid on setting up a bit of a home gym...

    I currently have..

    Exercise bike..

    Weights..

    Bosu Ball..

    Resistance bands..

    Cross trainer..


    My next big purchase is a treadmill.. I was looking at MC sport and was keen to know if anybody has bought any equipment or stuff from them, any opinions... good bad or indifferent ? If negative a pm would be appreciated...probably over having to criticize on thread. Thanks for any help.


  • Registered Users Posts: 530 ✭✭✭new2tri19


    Met a polish guy today who was just back from underground gym :D secret knock job , anyways we got chatting about fitness and stuff he used to be a personal trainer in Poland .
    In summary
    He reckons you can't get big or muscular at home with a barbell and dumbells you need machines , loads of machine to isolate muscles lift really heavy and eat 6 chicken breasts a day .
    Don't do deadlifts at all - risk/reward with injury is just not worth it .
    Don't squat - use leg press machine .
    Basically without machines you'll never progress and only lift 3 days a week .
    Is that all bro science or has he a point . I don't necessarily want to get big but is it possible to make the same gains at home as someone in gym , if you have barbell and dumbells ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭the baby bull elephant


    new2tri19 wrote: »
    Met a polish guy today who was just back from underground gym :D secret knock job , anyways we got chatting about fitness and stuff he used to be a personal trainer in Poland .
    In summary
    He reckons you can't get big or muscular at home with a barbell and dumbells you need machines , loads of machine to isolate muscles lift really heavy and eat 6 chicken breasts a day .
    Don't do deadlifts at all - risk/reward with injury is just not worth it .
    Don't squat - use leg press machine .
    Basically without machines you'll never progress and only lift 3 days a week .
    Is that all bro science or has he a point . I don't necessarily want to get big but is it possible to make the same gains at home as someone in gym , if you have barbell and dumbells ?

    Pretty much just a men's health article from the early 2000s haha.

    It's all bro science.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,693 ✭✭✭Deano7788


    new2tri19 wrote: »
    Met a polish guy today who was just back from underground gym :D secret knock job , anyways we got chatting about fitness and stuff he used to be a personal trainer in Poland .
    In summary
    He reckons you can't get big or muscular at home with a barbell and dumbells you need machines , loads of machine to isolate muscles lift really heavy and eat 6 chicken breasts a day .
    Don't do deadlifts at all - risk/reward with injury is just not worth it .
    Don't squat - use leg press machine .
    Basically without machines you'll never progress and only lift 3 days a week .
    Is that all bro science or has he a point . I don't necessarily want to get big but is it possible to make the same gains at home as someone in gym , if you have barbell and dumbells ?

    Total Bro Science.


  • Registered Users Posts: 565 ✭✭✭frosty123


    silverharp wrote: »
    any GP worth their salt wont generally rely on a one off reading, they will get you to wear a 24 hr monitor if they wanted the data to help diagnose something. There are confounders like "white coat syndrome" where people's blood pressure rises by virtue of being in a GP surgery

    my GP wrote down "hypertension", I said that sounds bad could you write down above average blood pressure instead...he said NO! "I'm using the medical term" was he a bit mean? I mean the job application could hinge on this...


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 3,149 Mod ✭✭✭✭Black Sheep


    Met a polish guy today who was just back from underground gym secret knock job , anyways we got chatting about fitness and stuff he used to be a personal trainer in Poland .
    In summary
    He reckons you can't get big or muscular at home with a barbell and dumbells you need machines , loads of machine to isolate muscles lift really heavy and eat 6 chicken breasts a day .
    Don't do deadlifts at all - risk/reward with injury is just not worth it .
    Don't squat - use leg press machine .
    Basically without machines you'll never progress and only lift 3 days a week .
    Is that all bro science or has he a point . I don't necessarily want to get big but is it possible to make the same gains at home as someone in gym , if you have barbell and dumbells ?

    The way it's presented there it's not "true" in the strict sense.

    There's no reason you can't get big with no machines and a home set-up, particularly if you have access to a barbell, bench and rack as well as dumbbells.

    The claim about strength doesn't really make much sense, I'm not sure how someone who trains only on machines could definitively be determined to be "stronger". What, we have a leg press competition? Maybe, stranger things have happened.

    But if you take some of his claims then if they were coached in a different way they are not total nonsense.

    If your goal was purely hypertrophy, and in particular if you wanted to train using some bodybuilding approaches machines do make a lot of sense as a big chunk of your training.

    If doing rest/pause or anything involving real blood or guts failure then there are a lot of times a machine could work better than a barbell, and be safer. There's some lower body movements you would have to have them to do real rest/pause work.

    If you're doing drop sets they're much handier than free weights. Even without a partner, particularly on a selectorised machine.

    For forced reps you need machines and a partner to train the way some pro bodybuilders do. If you look at videos of Dorian Yates training people this gives you an absolute masterclass in what this looks like.

    It is hard to find free weight alternatives to particular machines like leg curls, leg extensions and hack squats that allow you to do a lot of volume for leg size without beating up your lower back. If you're training purely for size you will still do your free weight lifts but when you're doing squatting and so you would then go and still do a **** load of volume on the lower body machines. At home you can do single leg exercises and things but it's not the same.

    Probably the most controversial thing I'll say, but a lot of bodybuilders are probably right that if someone's sole goal is hypertrophy and overall size then depending on their body type and limb lengths they might be better served by not squatting, deadlifting etc and instead find movements that allow them to really train particular muscles in a meaningful, heavy way, with proper mind-muscle connection. Leg presses, hack squat, leg extension, leg curl and calf raises have developed a lot of big legs for people who may or may not also use a barbell.

    With regards to the comments about deadlifting and the risk-reward ratio... Yeah, I personally don't buy into this idea but to be honest if I could never deadlift off the floor again and I could only do RDL, stiff legged deadlift, leg curl etc. and various exercises for back thickness then I doubt I'd lose any size (if that was the only concern).

    As for leg press versus squat... Again, wouldn't be for me, I see no reason it is either / or.

    I guess finally what I will say is that if there is a focus on hypertrophy / size then maybe the new conventional wisdom that compound barbell movements are the be-all and end-all have become the "bro science" of today. And I say that as a mainly barbell guy. So many people with poor leverages will be doing high bar squats or front squats until the cows come home thinking they are building their quads when really the machines they like to laugh at, like the leg extension, might be just what they need a little of...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,654 ✭✭✭✭Alf Veedersane


    new2tri19 wrote: »
    Met a polish guy today who was just back from underground gym :D secret knock job , anyways we got chatting about fitness and stuff he used to be a personal trainer in Poland .
    In summary
    He reckons you can't get big or muscular at home with a barbell and dumbells you need machines , loads of machine to isolate muscles lift really heavy and eat 6 chicken breasts a day .
    Don't do deadlifts at all - risk/reward with injury is just not worth it .
    Don't squat - use leg press machine .
    Basically without machines you'll never progress and only lift 3 days a week .
    Is that all bro science or has he a point . I don't necessarily want to get big but is it possible to make the same gains at home as someone in gym , if you have barbell and dumbells ?

    Was his name Dom?

    Did he mention reps for Jesus?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    frosty123 wrote: »
    my GP wrote down "hypertension", I said that sounds bad could you write down above average blood pressure instead...he said NO! "I'm using the medical term" was he a bit mean? I mean the job application could hinge on this...


    late to the thread, why what's your blood pressure?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    frosty123 wrote: »
    What time of the day is your blood pressure at it's lowest?

    it's supposed to be lower early in the day but it can fluctuate anytime.
    Spinach and beetroot have nitrates in them, which relaxes blood vessels and smooth muscle tissue. This is why people use amyl nitrate for anal sex, the sphincter totally relaxes.

    this sounds mental on a gym training thread I know..anyway the affects of taking beetroot and spinach can last for 6 hours in terms of dropping your systolic blood pressure anyway and taken a few days a week, can help pull it back as long as you eat the stuff of nitrates...

    worth a shot. and yes no coffee, tons of water and relax, through the nose at all time as you breathe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 565 ✭✭✭frosty123


    rusty cole wrote: »
    late to the thread, why what's your blood pressure?

    155/80 ish


  • Registered Users Posts: 530 ✭✭✭new2tri19


    Was his name Dom?

    Did he mention reps for Jesus?

    No he was funny guy though , he says most Irish guys are just fat they don't know how to train they have 10kg dumbells and do 20 reps , you need a bit f@#king weight that you can only lift 3 times .
    I showed him my failed squat video :D he wasn't impressed " too slow " too lazy , no loud music, standing around too long , just f@&king do it .
    Then he says " you married yeah " what do you do if you walk down street with wife and a man takes her off you ? Not much if you can't squat 95kg :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,654 ✭✭✭✭Alf Veedersane


    new2tri19 wrote: »
    No he was funny guy though , he says most Irish guys are just fat they don't know how to train they have 10kg dumbells and do 20 reps , you need a bit f@#king weight that you can only lift 3 times .
    I showed him my failed squat video :D he wasn't impressed " too slow " too lazy , no loud music, standing around too long , just f@&king do it .
    Then he says " you married yeah " what do you do if you walk down street with wife and a man takes her off you ? Not much if you can't squat 95kg :D

    Sounds like a twat.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    frosty123 wrote: »
    155/80 ish

    I’m warning here: no medical advice. These are questions for a doctor

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Brian? wrote: »
    I’m warning here: no medical advice. These are questions for a doctor

    c'mon nobody is giving medical advice, or dispensing medicine, it's a question about blood pressure not a "what can I take for my blood pressure" going forward.

    but that was my one and only contribution on that level to be fair ok.

    separately to this and on track, is the "sleeper stretch" good or bad for the shoulder?? question to the floor


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    rusty cole wrote: »
    c'mon nobody is giving medical advice, or dispensing medicine, it's a question about blood pressure not a "what can I take for my blood pressure" going forward.

    but that was my one and only contribution on that level to be fair ok.

    separately to this and on track, is the "sleeper stretch" good or bad for the shoulder?? question to the floor

    please don't argue with moderation I'm the thread. Any further comments or questions, PM me.

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Advertisement
Advertisement