Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Assassins Creed Valhalla (Vikings)

17810121320

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Patch live now, 4.9GB on Series X

    EDIT: Tried it on visual mode as opposed to the default performance mode, doesn't look any better to my eyes. Okay maybe the grass and flowers look a little sharper but the frame rate fell through the floor. My character was on horseback in an open area with no enemies or animals save for birds when I loaded in. I'd question if it was even hitting 30fps as I panned the camera and the birds in the sky were janky as hell.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,157 ✭✭✭Markitron


    Did the patch notes mention anything about fixing the screen tearing? I don't notice it often on PS5 but when I do it sticks out like a sore thumb


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭ZiabR


    PS5 has very little tearing alright and when it does tear it is up towards the top of the screen compared to Series X tearing in the middle and much more often. This patch was supposed to address the tearing on Series X, anyone tested this yet?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Haven't seen any screen tearing what so ever on Xbox Series X. Though the fact I'm playing on a freesync enabled monitor might have something to do with that.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    ZiabR wrote: »
    PS5 has very little tearing alright and when it does tear it is up towards the top of the screen compared to Series X tearing in the middle and much more often. This patch was supposed to address the tearing on Series X, anyone tested this yet?

    Now, I'm not Digital Foundry, but it does seem better to my untrained eye. It's still there, but pulling out the torch doesn't result in massive tearing anymore, and it seems reduced out in the open world. The only time I really saw it in my quick test was when I went looking to induce it, i.e. spinning the camera around while standing in the middle of a busy part of a city.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭ZiabR


    CatInABox wrote: »
    Now, I'm not Digital Foundry, but it does seem better to my untrained eye. It's still there, but pulling out the torch doesn't result in massive tearing anymore, and it seems reduced out in the open world. The only time I really saw it in my quick test was when I went looking to induce it, i.e. spinning the camera around while standing in the middle of a busy part of a city.

    Thats good news, so hopefully progress in the right direction from Ubisoft.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 16,966 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gonzo


    tried the AC Vallhalla patch on the Xbox Series X, I have not seen any screen tearing so far so that seems vastly improved. The screen tearing was the main reason I stopped playing once I made it to England from Norway.

    The 30fps mode look maybe slightly higher quality visuals than we had before but the fps is of course halved, it seemed smooth enough then again I only tested in a quiet area with not much action.

    The 60fps mode is silky smooth and couldn't see any tearing but the resolution definitely looks lower than what we had previously and maybe textures paired back a notch as well.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,157 ✭✭✭Markitron


    Gonzo wrote: »
    tried the AC Vallhalla patch on the Xbox Series X, I have not seen any screen tearing so far so that seems vastly improved. The screen tearing was the main reason I stopped playing once I made it to England from Norway.

    The 30fps mode look maybe slightly higher quality visuals than we had before but the fps is of course halved, it seemed smooth enough then again I only tested in a quiet area with not much action.

    The 60fps mode is silky smooth and couldn't see any tearing but the resolution definitely looks lower than what we had previously and maybe textures paired back a notch as well.

    The image quality of the 60 FPS mode didn't bother me in the slightest on PS5, can't see myself changing. Option is nice though.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    When Ubisoft said they wanted both platforms to have the same framerate, I thought that they'd just spend some time tweaking the Xbox version. They did, but also managed to reduce the framerate on PS5 at the same time :pac:


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Platinum done.
    I think I got the good ending which laughably reminded me of The Witcher 3.
    This was a disappointment. I'm a fan of the series so I'm glad I completed it for my collection but it should have never been released in this state.

    How long for completion? I'm guessing 100+ hours all in. I'd say I'm about 60 hours in with 4 or 5 territories left to do, starting Lincolnshire I think was where I left off. Collectibles seem to be the biggest time sink.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,157 ✭✭✭Markitron


    CatInABox wrote: »
    When Ubisoft said they wanted both platforms to have the same framerate, I thought that they'd just spend some time tweaking the Xbox version. They did, but also managed to reduce the framerate on PS5 at the same time :pac:

    Is it noticeable on PS5? Haven't played since the patch but it was running fine for me beforehand


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Markitron wrote: »
    Is it noticeable on PS5? Haven't played since the patch but it was running fine for me beforehand

    No idea, just going from what people are saying online.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,157 ✭✭✭Markitron


    CatInABox wrote: »
    No idea, just going from what people are saying online.

    I had a look at the thread on Era, one of the Digital Foundry lads was in there saying the comparison that people are basing this off is shoddy. I'll wait to see what they say.


  • Registered Users Posts: 31 R3_Regera


    My favourite is the fishing animation, character stood there holding nothing after every catch.

    Well that's definitely changed since the patch!
    En20OywW8AAT-Eu?format=jpg


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    R3_Regera wrote: »
    Well that's definitely changed since the patch!
    En20OywW8AAT-Eu?format=jpg

    Was that on PS5 by any chance? On Xbox they just cut out the animation holding the fish altogether. Which is actually fine as it speeds things along, now you can recast again straight away.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Was that on PS5 by any chance? On Xbox they just cut out the animation holding the fish altogether. Which is actually fine as it speeds things along, now you can recast again straight away.

    Yeah, it seems like this patch on Xbox seems more like a quick fix thing, rather than actually fixing the problems. Useful, but I'll wait until they are actually able to do some proper work on it.

    Not a complaint on Ubisoft, by the way, they just launched a huge game on a bunch of platforms, during a pandemic. It's pretty solid for all that, but having played their work on Origins and Odyssey, I'll wait until it's at that level of quality before playing further.


  • Registered Users Posts: 31 R3_Regera


    Was that on PS5 by any chance? On Xbox they just cut out the animation holding the fish altogether. Which is actually fine as it speeds things along, now you can recast again straight away.

    Yup, PS5!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Jotunheim trying my patience with collectibles, some bull**** there. That and Asgard are easily the worst part of of the game. Maybe there is a payoff at the end but but the magic bs in Jotunheim made me turn the console off for the night.

    I said before Asgard felt like DLC from the last game, I'm just glad it's in the base game now and they are not charging me extra for it here :mad:


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




    Yeah, Jotunheim is by far and away the worst section of the game. A story line that refuses to end , a map that's horrible to traverse with collectibles annoying to grab. By the way 2 of the wealth collectibles in Jotenheim are missable so watch out.

    Yeah luckily I'd read about those 2 so was prepared for them and made sure to get them. Actually just did those last night.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,729 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Played this for an hour last night (first hour) and found the audio pretty iffy. Like everything was muffled or poorly mixed. This was on headphones on the PS5. Really took away from the atmosphere, honestly!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 80,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sephiroth_dude


    Jotunheim trying my patience with collectibles, some bull**** there. That and Asgard are easily the worst part of of the game. Maybe there is a payoff at the end but but the magic bs in Jotunheim made me turn the console off for the night.

    I said before Asgard felt like DLC from the last game, I'm just glad it's in the base game now and they are not charging me extra for it here :mad:

    In what way is it trying your patience ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 326 ✭✭dzsfah2xoynme9


    One thing that annoys me on PC, specifically Ubisoft Connect, is that there's no achievements. I've close to 70 hours in the game now. They say they're adding them at a later date so I'm guessing if I want them I'll have to replay the whole game again..


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In what way is it trying your patience ?

    The collectibles mainly as they are many and awkward with every one having a small puzzle, from a story point of view it's not great at all and as mentioned a chore to traverse.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Played this for an hour last night (first hour) and found the audio pretty iffy. Like everything was muffled or poorly mixed. This was on headphones on the PS5. Really took away from the atmosphere, honestly!

    Haven't tried on headphones but I find I have to crank up my speakers a little more than I'd normally have them set at for this game. Wouldn't say muffled exactly but certainly quieter than most games.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 80,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sephiroth_dude


    Played this for an hour last night (first hour)

    tenor.gif

    I literally just fell out of my chair, didn't think you liked these type of games seeing as you're nearly always giving out about them and their bloat.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,729 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    You actually bought this, Johny? I wouldn't have thought this wa syour type of game. Interested to hear your thoughts on it.

    Didn’t buy it, somebody else did and I’m just availing of it :) Used to be an Assassin’s Creed fan but gave up after Black Flag so interested in checking out where it’s at now. I’m particularly keen to check out the Ireland DLC, however - hopefully I don’t need to put in 100+ hours to play it, because I tend to lose patience fairly quickly with these kind of bloat-a-thons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,509 ✭✭✭marcbrophy


    There'll be a discovery tour added later on, if you're not able to get there on your own :D


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Met Chet in Essex
    the cake was a lie
    :D

    Also there was a Prodigy reference in another world event there
    Smack my Bishop


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,157 ✭✭✭Markitron


    Markitron wrote: »
    I had a look at the thread on Era, one of the Digital Foundry lads was in there saying the comparison that people are basing this off is shoddy. I'll wait to see what they say.

    I watched the DF video last night. The PS5 version is practically identical to how it was before, the patch mostly just focused on the XSX/XSS.

    I don't know why this game is causing so many people to freak out but its weird.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭ZiabR


    Markitron wrote: »
    I watched the DF video last night. The PS5 version is practically identical to how it was before, the patch mostly just focused on the XSX/XSS.

    I don't know why this game is causing so many people to freak out but its weird.

    Its simple, the optimization is terrible on the Series X vs the PS5. In order to fix the FPS drops Ubisoft took the easy and lazy way out of it. Instead of actually fixing and optimising the game properly on Series X they just dropped the lower resolution threshold which is an absolute joke. The Series X now drops to 1188p in some scenes in order to keep a rock solid 60fps. So you have a more powerful GPU in the Series X running at 1188p while the PS5 is happy to run at 60fps in a much higher resolution.

    Its a cop out from Ubisoft. Yes I know the game plays much better on Series X now but just dropping resolutions in order to fix screen tearing and fps drops is a cheap solution. The game is still not optimised for Series X or even PS5 properly and my bet is, it never will be as it was developed primarily with the last gen consoles in mind.

    Two things annoy me about Valhalla, 1) its a Ubisoft game, it still has a mass of bugs and it is not optimised in any shape or form properly for the new generation of consoles and 2) A buggy Ubisoft game is being used to benchmark and compare next gen consoles that are both clearly able to run and perform alot higher than they currently are. This game was developed on last gen hardware and then "optimised" for the next gen. I take the performance comparisons with a pinch of salt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,635 ✭✭✭JimBurnley


    Hoping to get some time to crack into this the next few days. In Odyssey general feeling was female character was best, what's thoughts on this one?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,157 ✭✭✭Markitron


    JimBurnley wrote: »
    Hoping to get some time to crack into this the next few days. In Odyssey general feeling was female character was best, what's thoughts on this one?

    I went with Kassandra in Odyssey and didn't regret it for a second, when I replayed it, I went with Kassandra again cos Alexios felt off to me.

    I'm the opposite this time, female Eivor seems off to me. Thing is, unlike Odyssey, you can switch between them whenever you want so you may as well see for yourself.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,987 ✭✭✭OptimusTractor


    I've just landed in Blighty. Do the boat songs improve at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,303 ✭✭✭Temptamperu


    I've just landed in Blighty. Do the boat songs improve at all.

    The Stories are better.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think the only time I've used a boat is for raids. Why bother when the horse can swim now.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,509 ✭✭✭marcbrophy


    I think the only time I've used a boat is for raids. Why bother when the horse can swim now.

    To bring along your Viking brethren? :)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ha just did the sync point in the north of Hamtunscire , nice nod to the towers in
    Far Cry games


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,558 ✭✭✭✭dreamers75


    Finding it hard to finish this, have alliances with everyone up to where I am in the story.
    Sigurd is a captive of some captain and Fulke is not nice

    Spent nearly 70 hours unlocking sync points in places I have no buisness in (pwr lvl 161)

    but its not grabbing me like Origins and Odyssey did, dont think its the characters as I am generally not arsed, its like it has gone backwards from being a stealthy ninja game to "raids" and open combat. I dont mind that if I had never played another Ass Creed game but not being able to clear an area without being spotted is one of the things I really like about these games.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I've 3 places on the west of the map left to do now, 100 hours in. So thats 18/21 areas cleared. By my reckoning the story missions take about 10 - 15 minutes each so that should take up 25-35 hours over all, that is a serious amount of busy work added to take me to 100 hours. There are just too many areas to take over and as yet I don't see the point to it even after this long, the main story beats you trigger when you return home take far to long to reveal.

    I'm not sure the game ever tells you what the feast buff is or how to actually use it but you ring the bell at the door of the longhouse which I still haven't actually bothered to do.

    I've actively been avoiding combat as there is no point to it given how little XP you get so I just run to the loot/objectives. That is not good game design. I also miss the stealth and being able to clear areas without being seen.

    I was thinking about it and it crossed my mind that maybe they need to change direction again and maybe go more like Dishonoured perhaps and more story/assassin focused?


  • Registered Users Posts: 215 ✭✭Davy05


    How long does the Asgard section go on for? I'm really not feeling it and just want it out of the way now.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,509 ✭✭✭marcbrophy


    Davy05 wrote: »
    How long does the Asgard section go on for? I'm really not feeling it and just want it out of the way now.

    You can go back to England at any time and revisit it later! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,808 ✭✭✭skerry


    Picked this up yesterday despite not being able to get into the previous 2 games. About 5hrs in and its slow enough going. Have encountered a decent few bugs so far so can only imagine how bad it was before the patch. Combat feels really off to me, hit registration is really bad and enemies behave weirdly. Had first real boss fight there and seemed like the background music was missing or something, was a bit strange.

    Finding the treasure a bit of a chore but maybe I'm not used to the mini puzzle mechanics. Interested to see if it improves any once I get to England.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 204 ✭✭Hey_Listen


    skerry wrote: »
    Picked this up yesterday despite not being able to get into the previous 2 games. About 5hrs in and its slow enough going. Have encountered a decent few bugs so far so can only imagine how bad it was before the patch. Combat feels really off to me, hit registration is really bad and enemies behave weirdly. Had first real boss fight there and seemed like the background music was missing or something, was a bit strange.

    Finding the treasure a bit of a chore but maybe I'm not used to the mini puzzle mechanics. Interested to see if it improves any once I get to England.

    Sounds like it isn't great so far...what are you playing on ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,808 ✭✭✭skerry


    Hey_Listen wrote: »
    Sounds like it isn't great so far...what are you playing on ?

    Playing on Series X. I havent really made much headway on it yet. Just think the combat isn't the best so far but a lot of skills to be unlocked so that may change.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 23,215 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kiith


    I got to England, and quickly lost interest. The bugs didn't help, but it just didn't hold my attention like i'd hoped it would. Cancelled my UPlay+, but may give it another go in a few months.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,509 ✭✭✭marcbrophy


    Bugs bugs bugs bugs bugs!

    Y'all crazy.

    This game is practically bug free!

    Glitches, on the other hand :D


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I guess I'm nearing the end now , I'm shaking my head at this point as the plot goes out the window. Why do we Major Spoiler alert
    fight Basim, couldn't make any sense of it
    ?

    The only thing that might make sense is that
    Eivor is Odin so he is Loki
    that would be some grade A nonsense but I guess we'll see when I get back to it later.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,157 ✭✭✭Markitron


    Just finished the first major questline with the Ragnarsonns and just did a couple of missions
    in Asgard, seems I'm underlevelled so I might come back later
    .

    Need to get a move on with the game, need to finish it before starting Cyberpunk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,509 ✭✭✭marcbrophy


    Can you call up the Vikings in your boat to help you on land with enemies?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,016 ✭✭✭PsychoPete


    I think that's where you go unviking like and go stealth, I prefer to run in swinging axes like a proper viking


  • Advertisement
Advertisement