Chemical weapon used on civilians in Syria + Airstrikes

mcmoustache · 13-04-2018 7:05pm

Gatling wrote: »

When is Boards getting the blame

Sush! Don't blow our cover.

cnocbui · 13-04-2018 7:05pm

Discodog wrote: »

Who the hell is advising Putin ? Does he really think that accusing the UK will be believed ? He accuses the UK & then asks the UK not to get involved in joint action.

He is becoming a laughing stock

I strenuously object to your use of the word 'becoming.'

mcmoustache · 13-04-2018 7:12pm

Discodog wrote: »

Who the hell is advising Putin ? Does he really think that accusing the UK will be believed ? He accuses the UK & then asks the UK not to get involved in joint action.

He is becoming a laughing stock

At the risk of repeating myself, feck it, I don't care. It's important in these threads where there's a Russian interest.

The Kremlin lies not to convince people of the truth. It spews a firehose of falsehood.

The goal is to confuse. That's why you get so many conspiracy theories and inconsistent, contradictory narratives.

They don't care that the rest of the world doesn't believe them. It's obvious to those of us outside their media bubble. These lies are to confuse a domestic and willing audience.

cnocbui · 13-04-2018 7:15pm

Cheerful Spring wrote: »

His the foreign secretary of the UK government not some guy from the street.

Don't name your kid Boris.

Vladimir Poontang · 13-04-2018 7:30pm

Former British Ambassador Craig Murray posted this in relation to the latest linguistic gymnastics of the type being spread in this thread:

"For the BBC and other mainstream media outlets to pretend that the OPCW has in any sense endorsed Boris Johnson’s claims about Russia is to spread deliberate lies as propaganda. In fact what they have confirmed is simply the finding of Porton Down – and that finding was that it is a chemical which cannot be confirmed as made in Russia."

Discodog · 13-04-2018 7:33pm

Vladimir Poontang wrote: »

Former British Ambassador Craig Murray posted this in relation to the latest linguistic gymnastics of the type being spread in this thread:

"For the BBC and other mainstream media outlets to pretend that the OPCW has in any sense endorsed Boris Johnson’s claims about Russia is to spread deliberate lies as propaganda. In fact what they have confirmed is simply the finding of Porton Down – and that finding was that it is a chemical which cannot be confirmed as made in Russia."

You have to do better than keep posting comments from Murray.

Gatling · 13-04-2018 7:38pm

Discodog wrote: »

You have to do better than keep posting comments from Murray.

He will be ranting about airsoft and boards next

mcmoustache · 13-04-2018 7:42pm

Vladimir Poontang wrote: »

Former British Ambassador Craig Murray posted this in relation to the latest linguistic gymnastics of the type being spread in this thread:

"For the BBC and other mainstream media outlets to pretend that the OPCW has in any sense endorsed Boris Johnson’s claims about Russia is to spread deliberate lies as propaganda. In fact what they have confirmed is simply the finding of Porton Down – and that finding was that it is a chemical which cannot be confirmed as made in Russia."

Which Craig Murray?

Disgraced former diplomat Craig Murray?
The one who left his wife for an uzbeki stripper?
The one who exchanged sex for visas?
The one who works for wikileaks?
The one who claims that Russians weren't interfering in the US elections?
The one who claims that the DNC emails were given to him in a wooded area after they had already been released?

Dohnjoe · 13-04-2018 7:45pm

Vladimir Poontang wrote: »

Former British Ambassador Craig Murray posted this in relation to the latest linguistic gymnastics of the type being spread in this thread:

As already pointed out, this is a guy thinks "the Jews" pulled off the Skripal attack and he runs a blog

Also the appeal to authority: "former British Ambassador" doesn't mean anything if someone supports unsubstantiated conspiracy theories. There are plenty of ex (and even current) administration loons. Some think that Charlie Hebdo, or 911 or the Boston bombings were inside jobs, other's believe in more bizarre religious or alien stuff

"For the BBC and other mainstream media outlets to pretend that the OPCW has in any sense endorsed Boris Johnson’s claims about Russia is to spread deliberate lies as propaganda. In fact what they have confirmed is simply the finding of Porton Down – and that finding was that it is a chemical which cannot be confirmed as made in Russia."

The OPCW confirmed the UK findings. It was predicted multiple times right here on boards that if OPCW confirmed it, certain individuals would immediately try and discredit it

Gringo180 · 13-04-2018 7:49pm

https://youtu.be/-8QsNWwtu2A

Anybody see this. Former head of the armed forces cut off by Sky News when he tells it how it is. Unbelievable

mcmoustache · 13-04-2018 7:49pm

Dohnjoe wrote: »

As already pointed out, this is a guy thinks "the Jews" pulled off the Skripal attack and he runs a blog

Russians pushing conspiracy theories?

Well, I never!

*drops monocle*

mcmoustache · 13-04-2018 7:54pm

Gringo180 wrote: »

https://youtu.be/-8QsNWwtu2A

Anybody see this. Former head of the armed forces cut off by Sky News when he tells it how it is. Unbelievable

He was giving an opinion and he should have been allowed to finish. Even if he is just repeating Russian talking points.

Sky are a terrible "news" organisation anyway. Far too jingoistic. They were pretty bad in the run up to the Gulf war - as bad as the yanks.

Gringo180 · 13-04-2018 7:55pm

mcmoustache wrote: »

He was giving an opinion and he should have been allowed to finish. Even if he is just repeating Russian talking points.

Sky are a terrible "news" organisation anyway. Far too jingoistic. They were pretty bad in the run up to the Gulf war - as bad as the yanks.

There like the BBC. Pro war mouthpieces for the establishment and this just proves it.

Gatling · 13-04-2018 7:56pm

Gringo180 wrote: »

Anybody see this. Former head of the armed forces cut off by Sky News

They ran out of time and went to a break after the interview was delayed due to ongoing news stories

Gringo180 · 13-04-2018 7:57pm

Gatling wrote: »

They ran out of time and went to a break after the interview was delayed due to ongoing news stories

Lol

Gatling · 13-04-2018 7:58pm

Gringo180 wrote: »

Lol

Laughing out loud doesn't change a thing it's happens regularly .

It's not russia

Cheerful Spring · 13-04-2018 7:58pm

Gringo180 wrote: »

https://youtu.be/-8QsNWwtu2A

Anybody see this. Former head of the armed forces cut off by Sky News when he tells it how it is. Unbelievable

Similar thing happening in this thread. Remember we working out of the Russian Dublin Embassy, we are Putinbots, anyone who appears on video disagreeing with the UK and US narrative is pushing Russian propaganda. People who think like that want a controlled society.

mcmoustache · 13-04-2018 7:59pm

Gatling wrote: »

They ran out of time and went to a break after the interview was delayed due to ongoing news stories

He did ramble but it did seem odd to cut him off. I know he was just spouting a russian talking point but it was shítty of sky. Then again, they aren't exactly renowned for being a good news station.

Gringo180 · 13-04-2018 7:59pm

Gatling wrote: »

Laughing out loud doesn't change a thing it's happens regularly .

It's not russia

They clearly cut him off when he was going against the narrative. Blatant. It was 2.24pm when the interview was conducted they always go to ad breaks every 15 mins.

Gringo180 · 13-04-2018 8:01pm

Cheerful Spring wrote: »

Similar thing happening in this thread. Remember we working out of the Russian Dublin Embassy, we are Putinbots, anyone who appears on video disagreeing with the UK and US narrative is pushing Russian propaganda. People who think like that want a controlled society.

Imagine RT pulling a stunt like that. Gatling be creaming himself.

mcmoustache · 13-04-2018 8:03pm

Cheerful Spring wrote: »

Similar thing happening in this thread. Remember we working out of the Russian Dublin Embassy, we are Putinbots, anyone who appears on video disagreeing with the UK and US narrative is pushing Russian propaganda. People who think like that want a controlled society.

I don't think anyone believes that. The Russians posting here are Baltic Russians and there's also a few Irish who think they're "woke" with secret information provided by the Russian media that they think other Irish aren't aware of.

The Putinbot accusation likely comes from the fact that posts by some people are identical to other bots from other social media which gets into discussions earlier than boards.ie.

mcmoustache · 13-04-2018 8:04pm

Gringo180 wrote: »

Imagine RT pulling a stunt like that. Gatling be creaming himself.

Doubtful. Sky news is a cráp news organisation like Russia Today. RT lying is like white bread.

Gringo180 · 13-04-2018 8:04pm

mcmoustache wrote: »

He did ramble but it did seem odd to cut him off. I know he was just spouting a russian talking point but it was shítty of sky. Then again, they aren't exactly renowned for being a good news station.

Its the second most watched news station in Britain. Surely they have a duty to let the man have his opinion. The mask is slipping, its all pro war propaganda from them and the BBC.

Gatling · 13-04-2018 8:05pm

Gringo180 wrote: »

It was 2.24pm when the interview was conducted they always go to ad breaks every 15 mins.

So they apologised for the delay and got through part of the interview and cut to a break ,this is a regular occurrence on sky news .

Again this isn't russia people are free to speak openly .

Gringo180 · 13-04-2018 8:08pm

Gatling wrote: »

So they apologised for the delay and got through part of the interview and cut to a break ,this is a regular occurrence on sky news .

Again this isn't russia people are free to speak openly .

Yes free to speak openly. Thats why Julian Assange is a prisoner in the Venezuelan embassy and Edward Snowden had to flee America for telling the public they were been illegally spied on by the Government.

ArchXStanton · 13-04-2018 8:14pm

Gringo180 wrote: »

https://youtu.be/-8QsNWwtu2A

Anybody see this. Former head of the armed forces cut off by Sky News when he tells it how it is. Unbelievable

His face says it all

Gatling · 13-04-2018 8:15pm

Gringo180 wrote: »

Yes free to speak openly. Thats why Julian Assange is a prisoner in the Venezuela.

Rape and sexual assault is not free speech

Snowden is a common garden thief who had delusions of being James bond 007 and all he ended up with was life stuck in Moscow

mcmoustache · 13-04-2018 8:18pm

Gatling wrote: »

So they apologised for the delay and got through part of the interview and cut to a break ,this is a regular occurrence on sky news .

Again this isn't russia people are free to speak openly .

I know what it was. It was a false flag. Let's run with this. Let's pretend to be Russian for a second. Drink some Baltika 9, have a pickle and put your pelmeni on the hob and get the smetana out of the fridge. Channel your inner Russian. Here we go...

Why would Sky cut him off when they didn't need to have him on in the first place? They knew what he was going to say. I'm suggesting, as a Russian, remember, that they planned this to make it look like Russian talking points were being censored.

Now, why would they do this. Well, ah fúck it, you can make anything up when you think like this.

Gringo180 · 13-04-2018 8:19pm

ArchXStanton wrote: »

His face says it all

Indeed. It just proves the media is censoring the other side of the story, the most plausible side infact. I remember a post a few weeks back I think on here where the Syrian government or else media found a chemical weapons makeshift factory in a house in rebel held territory. I must try find the pictures.

Dohnjoe · 13-04-2018 8:19pm

Gringo180 wrote: »

Its the second most watched news station in Britain. Surely they have a duty to let the man have his opinion. The mask is slipping, its all pro war propaganda from them and the BBC.

They cut a man off, they do it all the time, "sorry we have to cut you off there" is practically how every on-air interview ends on Sky. He's had other interviews and is a well known critic of the UK gov and Whitehall. They wouldn't have him on if they were pushing such a blatant agenda. Sky News is still trash, but they still have some standards.

Here he is on Sky in another interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orxCFIsAX_k

Of course if they had to cut this off, it would have been be appearing in the conspiracy feeds and no doubt make it's way here

Chemical weapon used on civilians in Syria + Airstrikes

Comments