Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

San Francisco 49ers Discussion

1212224262735

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,438 ✭✭✭j8wk2feszrnpao


    jonok28 wrote: »
    The Patriots have two second round picks so a second this year and a pick next season might land Rosen
    I'd be amazed if the Pats wasted picks on Rosen; one of the worst starting QBs this year.
    It might be something like a 2nd with the Pats getting a 6th back, or if the Pats don't want to sign Flowers, then they tag and trade him for Rosen. But I don't see multiple picks going from NE to get Rosen.


  • Registered Users Posts: 568 ✭✭✭jonok28


    I'd be amazed if the Pats wasted picks on Rosen; one of the worst starting QBs this year.
    It might be something like a 2nd with the Pats getting a 6th back, or if the Pats don't want to sign Flowers, then they tag and trade him for Rosen. But I don't see multiple picks going from NE to get Rosen.

    Jared Goff was one of the worst starting QB's in his first year, couldn't even get on the field for most of it. I'm not saying Rosen is Goff but Bill Belichick seems to get the best out of players and it wouldn't shock me if Bill turned him into a world beater.

    I was thinking a second and a player for Rosen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,438 ✭✭✭j8wk2feszrnpao


    jonok28 wrote: »
    Jared Goff was one of the worst starting QB's in his first year, couldn't even get on the field for most of it.
    More to do with Fisher than anything else.
    jonok28 wrote: »
    Bill Belichick seems to get the best out of players and it wouldn't shock me if Bill turned him into a world beater.
    He'll be sitting for a number of years, at least 2, maybe 3. Then his contract comes into consideration and you have maybe a year to decide if you are going to pay him.
    jonok28 wrote: »
    I was thinking a second and a player for Rosen.
    Maybe some needy team goes for it, but can't see the Pats making that deal. If the Cards want to trade their 1st round starting QB, cause they want to get a new QB, then they don't see the value or future in the guy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 568 ✭✭✭jonok28


    Joe Flacco to the Bronco's for a mid round pick, I knew the Ravens would move on from him. That's one less team to trade up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    jonok28 wrote: »
    Joe Flacco to the Bronco's for a mid round pick, I knew the Ravens would move on from him. That's one less team to trade up.

    Maybe takes away some incentive to move up to #2 but they’d be crazy not to try to get a QB this year. Presume their hope is a guy they like falls to them or they’ll move up slightly if their main target is still there. Alongside some improvement in coaching, Flacco is likely just good enough for them to have a worse draft pick next year and it will end up costing them more to move up to get a QB the following year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 568 ✭✭✭jonok28


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Maybe takes away some incentive to move up to #2 but they’d be crazy not to try to get a QB this year. Presume their hope is a guy they like falls to them or they’ll move up slightly if their main target is still there. Alongside some improvement in coaching, Flacco is likely just good enough for them to have a worse draft pick next year and it will end up costing them more to move up to get a QB the following year.

    If anything this screams of the Bronco's waiting til next year or the year after when Trevor Lawrence or Tua Tagovailoa are draft eligible. This class hasn't got elite QB talent but their are so many QB needy teams that they will reach for a QB and pray he is their franchise guy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    jonok28 wrote: »
    If anything this screams of the Bronco's waiting til next year or the year after when Trevor Lawrence or Tua Tagovailoa are draft eligible. This class hasn't got elite QB talent but their are so many QB needy teams that they will reach for a QB and pray he is their franchise guy.

    Big risk to wait though with the team they have right now. Could easily end up being 8-8 and the cost to move up from the high teens would be crazy. Even if the supply is slightly better next year, the QBs will nearly all come with some question mark and there will always be demand from teams for top end QBs. Even leaving out any potential big injuries or dramatic fall off in QB form, you can easily get to 10 teams that are likely looking at QBs by the draft Lawrence comes out.

    If they like someone they shouldn’t risk waiting but having said that I don’t think Elway will have the balls to make the pick even if they do. He's petrified to make a big move having made so many mistakes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 568 ✭✭✭jonok28


    Supposedly Elway loves Drew Lock from Missouri. I wouldn't be shocked if he took him but I think Flacco can do a job for maybe two or three more years at a decent enough level.


  • Registered Users Posts: 568 ✭✭✭jonok28


    Richard Sherman saying that Earl Thomas is choosing between the 49ers and Cowboys but if the money was equal he would choose the Cowboys. I think we would be better of going after Tyrann Mathieu. He is younger, a good leader and to me he still has some upside to him, Earl Thomas is coming off a leg break and I don't like how he had a me against the whole team vibe last season.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    jonok28 wrote: »
    Richard Sherman saying that Earl Thomas is choosing between the 49ers and Cowboys but if the money was equal he would choose the Cowboys. I think we would be better of going after Tyrann Mathieu. He is younger, a good leader and to me he still has some upside to him, Earl Thomas is coming off a leg break and I don't like how he had a me against the whole team vibe last season.

    Would like to be in for him to see what the market is and possibly drive it up a little. If he could end the run of injuries, he is the best out there in FA, who has the experience and leadership who can help all the young guys. Good thing about getting in a minor bidding war with the Cowboys is that any money they put into Thomas they can’t put into Lawrence so they may have to let him go.

    I’d be pro turning to Mathieu or Amos if it doesn’t work out. Could pick a safety in the 2nd, as one of the top tier guys are likely to fall there, but after all the communication issues last year I think a veteran presence would be extremely helpful.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Wouldn't be a fan of Mathieu, at least not in place of Earl Thomas. If Thomas is a non-runner they should look at Amos or Lamarcus Joyner from the Rams, I think he could be a good FS. I'd also steer clear of Dix. No matter who they bring in they should be looking to draft a t least a couple of players in the secondary.


  • Registered Users Posts: 568 ✭✭✭jonok28


    I think Earl Thomas body is going to start failing him soon, he was the height of consistency for his entire career up until 2016 and since then has broken both his legs and has picked up small injuries left and right. I think the honeybadger is not that far off Thomas level and is 3 years younger with room to improve.

    I found this really cool website that lets you do mock drafts. Its relatively accurate.

    http://www.thedraftnetwork.com/mock-draft-machine


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    The 49ers need a back-end Free Safety and Mathieu is not that IMO. He's be good against the run but covering the whole of the field deep, I'm not so sure.

    1. Thomas
    2. Amos
    3. Joyner

    Everyone else is a good bit off that level.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    adrian522 wrote: »

    When you look at what he and Kyle said in the past this isn't too surprising. They've always spoken about how important it is that who they pay has the right character, especially when it comes to FAs.

    Mr Big Chest has so many red flags at this point but still somewhat surprising that they haven't gone to see what the price is for him. Even if they did I think someone would outbid them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Starting to feel more comfortable with getting either Bosa or Allen at 2 (outside of trading down if it is enticing enough). It might be recency bias with Bosa being out most of this year but most OTs and QBs at the combine are calling out Allen as the most difficult edge guy they played against. Looking forward to seeing how they both test.


  • Registered Users Posts: 568 ✭✭✭jonok28


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Starting to feel more comfortable with getting either Bosa or Allen at 2 (outside of trading down if it is enticing enough). It might be recency bias with Bosa being out most of this year but most OTs and QBs at the combine are calling out Allen as the most difficult edge guy they played against. Looking forward to seeing how they both test.

    The combine has probably increased the value of the 49ers pick significantly, with Kyler Murray meeting with the Cardinals it seems as if there is a real chance he goes there number 1, so Nick Bosa could potentially fall to the 49ers. If the 49ers decide to trade the pick I think they could get a mountain of picks for Bosa.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    jonok28 wrote: »
    The combine has probably increased the value of the 49ers pick significantly, with Kyler Murray meeting with the Cardinals it seems as if there is a real chance he goes there number 1, so Nick Bosa could potentially fall to the 49ers. If the 49ers decide to trade the pick I think they could get a mountain of picks for Bosa.

    I hope Bosa falls to us because he is a perfect fit for what we need but I just don’t see teams giving up a mountain of picks for him, if we want to go another way. The only way I see a team giving a good enough offer to pass on Bosa is if they are moving up for a QB or the Raiders really want Bosa to cover for Mack. Outside of QB teams just don’t give away a lot to move up.

    Have to say that after being high on Allen earlier this weekend I was very disappointed in how he tested. He was supposed to be a much better athlete than Bosa but the testing nearly showed the opposite.

    It is a funny situation where the obvious fit and need matches perfectly for the 49ers with Bosa and it is nearly the opposite for the Cardinals. I know the saying that you can never have too many good edge rushers but they need much more help at DT, where Williams would fit in, and Bosa wouldn’t really suit them moving back to a base 3-4 (even if base isn’t used that often). As a divisional rival, if I was to look at it from a perspective of what the Cardinals could do at #1 to strengthen themselves, I’d nearly put staying with Rosen and picking Bosa as the least worrying. Obviously, FA could completely change this if they strengthen holes they have.


  • Registered Users Posts: 320 ✭✭myate


    Never know what to believe at the combine! Cardinals saying they're taking Murray for sure. Another report saying the team has told Rosen is staying & he's been told!! Don't mind who the Niners take as long as they're productive quickly & not a slow burner like Thomas has been.

    Not sure we'll be seeing AB on the team...his latest interview will do him no favours!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 568 ✭✭✭jonok28


    Antonio Brown to the Raiders for a 3rd and a 5th, good deal for the Raiders, thought he would have gone for a second but them being able to hold onto all of their first round picks and second round picks and land a top 5 receiver is a really good deal.

    Free Agency starting soon, going to be interesting to see if the Niners land Earl Thomas.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    I'd like to see the 49ers go after Justin Houston and Earl Thomas. Pick up either or both of those guys and its a good free agency period. There was talk to the trading for Dee Ford. He'd be a good pickup but I'd be happier keeping the draft pick and building through the draft.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Looks like for once supply matches the needs for the team. There’s a crazy amount of safeties on the market, a few good linebackers, and early day 2 there should be a number of good WRs available. For the biggest need at Edge, though the top guys were tagged, there is more depth in FA than normal and the draft is overflowing with round 1 level talent. CB isn’t great but I feel they should go for a solid reasonably priced veteran after investing so much draft capital there.

    From the first 2 FA markets, I expect Shanahan and Lynch to fall in love with a few guys and overpay if they must. We’re going to be linked to practically every player, but I’d be happy with a top tier FS and Edge in FA.


  • Registered Users Posts: 568 ✭✭✭jonok28


    Looks like the 49ers landed the ILB they wanted in Kwon Alexander, four-year, $54 million, that Reuben Foster draft pick just became even more costly.

    I think the 49ers are going to play the long game with Earl Thomas, the Cowboys really don't want to spend more than $10m a year on Thomas and the 49ers are just fine sitting back and waiting for the market to drop on him.

    I'd love to see the 49ers add Pierre Desir and Ziggy Ansah, both veterans, both good locker room guys and both flying under the radar at the moment in free agency.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    jonok28 wrote: »
    Looks like the 49ers landed the ILB they wanted in Kwon Alexander, four-year, $54 million, that Reuben Foster draft pick just became even more costly.

    I think the 49ers are going to play the long game with Earl Thomas, the Cowboys really don't want to spend more than $10m a year on Thomas and the 49ers are just fine sitting back and waiting for the market to drop on him.

    I'd love to see the 49ers add Pierre Desir and Ziggy Ansah, both veterans, both good locker room guys and both flying under the radar at the moment in free agency.

    Those 3 would make delighted with the FA, presuming the latter two are at a reasonable cost.

    Feel a lot better about the Alexander deal now seeing what Barr and Mosley got paid. Coming off an ACL he is a risk but he looks to have the skillset we need and seems to be the exact type of leader/character they’ve said they want to pay for.

    Speaking of Foster, despite having already been in the league 4 years Alexander is actually younger than Foster so has plenty of room to grow and develop further.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    I think they overpaid for Alexander. He may work out but even in a best case scenario he will only just about be worth it. I know they have a lot of cap space but they should still be making smart decisions. In my opinion they have overpaid for a few players in the last few years, including Alexander, McKinnon, Juzcek (or however that is spelled), Tagging gould, not to mention a few of the other veterans they've brought in that haven't been particularly good but have got very good contracts.

    In terms of Ansah and Desir, I know little enough about Desir, but I'd be against bringing in Ansah. I just don't think he's good and someone is going to give him more money than he is worth, I just hope its not us. With Houston being available and Ford apparently available via trade I think there are better options out there.

    I'd like to see them make a run at someone like Roby or Verett at CB. Though Houston and Thomas would still be my top 2 targets.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 320 ✭✭myate


    Niners are sorted now - Snapper news: the 49ers have signed LS Kyle Nelson to a four-year extension through 2022, per source. He still has six games left on a 10-game suspension handed out last December.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    adrian522 wrote: »
    I think they overpaid for Alexander. He may work out but even in a best case scenario he will only just about be worth it. I know they have a lot of cap space but they should still be making smart decisions. In my opinion they have overpaid for a few players in the last few years, including Alexander, McKinnon, Juzcek (or however that is spelled), Tagging gould, not to mention a few of the other veterans they've brought in that haven't been particularly good but have got very good contracts.

    In terms of Ansah and Desir, I know little enough about Desir, but I'd be against bringing in Ansah. I just don't think he's good and someone is going to give him more money than he is worth, I just hope its not us. With Houston being available and Ford apparently available via trade I think there are better options out there.

    I'd like to see them make a run at someone like Roby or Verett at CB. Though Houston and Thomas would still be my top 2 targets.

    Few aren’t overpaying during free agency though. For both Alexander and McKinnon there were other teams in the race for them and I’d rather they slightly overpaying for guys they really want and them then to be held to account for it than going with a 2nd or 3rd choice to possibly save a million here or there while having $60m in cap space.

    There were guys brought in on questionable contracts 2 years ago who haven’t panned out but at that point we were a complete basket case that no one wanted to join. The locker room seems to be fantastic so they might have paid some of their money back off the field.

    I’m out on Ansah if it isn’t a team friendly ‘prove it’ type deal. Having Mayhew and Kocurek on staff could be tempting for Ansah and they’ll both know what we’d be getting. With being able to get at worst our #2 Edge in the draft I wouldn’t be keen on giving away much draft capital for Ford but Houston would be good, at the right price.

    As for those CBs, I don’t think either really fit what the normal prototype for what the team is looking for but would be good gets, again at the right price. With the amount of injury prone players we have and are taking on, I would be a bit concerned adding Verrett to the bunch.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Unsurprisingly now that the details have come out the Alexander deal isn't anywhere near as bad as it first seemed

    https://twitter.com/spotrac/status/1105585046554054656

    Really hope that we have Thomas sorted out at this point and he just wants to check out the facility etc and sign in person. The once stocked safety market is starting to look pretty bare now. The one good thing is that most of the teams with an obvious need have taken a guy at this point but you always have to fear the other teams with big cap space, especially with the CA taxes always being an issue.


  • Registered Users Posts: 320 ✭✭myate


    Dee Ford! Looking more like Bosa in the draft now provided Arizona take Murray at 1 which it's all pointing too.
    The team seems to structure contracts pretty well. No reason why Alexander doesn't come back strong. Bowman came back ok from his knee annihilation a few years ago...wasn't the same but more because of age I think.
    On paper the D should be formidable...Defo, Thomas, Armstead, Bosa (maybe) all first rounders. If the others can step up like Defo, along with the new guys, D could be a force again. Get a strong safety & corner now.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Delighted with that trade. Hopefully that's the 64th pick of the 2020 draft :)

    Anyway, this really opens up the possibilities for the draft this year. They still should draft a pass rusher early but the pressure to do so diminishes a little. Ford is a good player but he needs someone rushing on the other side.

    The 49rs can stay put and draft Bosa or Allen. They could trade back and draft another pass rusher later in the first. They could trade back and take the best CB on the board at that point and get additional picks in the process.

    They could elect to wait until day 2 to get a pass rusher. I really like this move but they really need to address the secondary either through the draft or here in free agency.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 568 ✭✭✭jonok28


    adrian522 wrote: »
    Delighted with that trade. Hopefully that's the 64th pick of the 2020 draft :)

    Anyway, this really opens up the possibilities for the draft this year. They still should draft a pass rusher early but the pressure to do so diminishes a little. Ford is a good player but he needs someone rushing on the other side.

    The 49rs can stay put and draft Bosa or Allen. They could trade back and draft another pass rusher later in the first. They could trade back and take the best CB on the board at that point and get additional picks in the process.

    They could elect to wait until day 2 to get a pass rusher. I really like this move but they really need to address the secondary either through the draft or here in free agency.

    The 49ers have two really good options to play for Draft day. They can stay at 2 and hopefully Draft Bosa, or they could try and drum up a market and get the Giants to hand over their two first rounders and future picks for Haskins.

    6 and 17 and future picks for 2 would be a really good deal, the 49ers could still land a top Edge prospect or they could even land Quinnen Williams and get a decent edge prospect at 17. With Dee Ford it takes a little bit of pressure off of definitely signing Bosa. If I'm the 49ers I draft Quinnen Williams at 6, Greedy Williams CB at 17 and take Jachai Polite at the top of the second round, Polite had one of the worst combines in memory but was considered a consensus Top 15 pick before hand.

    The 49ers Defense would be nasty with Line Backers in Dee Ford, Fred Warner and Kwon Alexander.

    A Secondary of Jaquiski Tartt, Richard Sherman, Earl Thomas ( Potentially) and Greedy Williams.

    And a D line of DeForrest Buckner, Quinnen Williams, Arik Armstead and Solomon Thomas or Jachai Polite. Scary defense.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Surprised by the Coleman signing but the more I think about it the more I like it. Shanahan lamented at how he had to change his whole game plan for the season when Jet went down and this should hopefully stop that from being a risk of reoccurring. Will also allow Jet to be eased back into things and provide depth if Breida keeps picking up knocks. They could cut one but I think they find a way to keep them all (presuming none go down before the season).

    I'm not too bothered by Ward re-signing. He's an injury liability but every coach we've had has raved about him and he isn't costing too much.

    Good call Adrian on Varrett, he's currently visiting and hopefully we can get a prove it deal sorted with him. He apparently grew up in Northern California as a 9ers fan so hopefully that helps gets things across the line. If we sign enough guys coming off injuries, one of them has to stay healthy!!


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Verett signed anyway. 1 year, $3.6m.

    Hopefully it works out but no harm if not. I still say they need another CB and a FS.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    adrian522 wrote: »
    Verett signed anyway. 1 year, $3.6m.

    Hopefully it works out but no harm if not. I still say they need another CB and a FS.

    You got all your asks, now you're just getting greedy!

    Looks like we'll have Coleman, Jet, Breida, and Mostert for less than Bell this year. Think we keep all 4 and one less TE. Could also mean only 2 QBs if Jimmy is looking ok


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Surprisingly comfortable on the eve of the draft. When we missed out on #1 pick, I was sure I’d be stressing at this point about potentially missing out on Bosa, but I’m now happy with a number of routes - him, Williams, or trading back for a good deal. I feel we’ll likely have our choice of any of the above with Murray going to Arizona, as I think they would have ended their car wreck rumours/pathetic smokescreens if he wasn’t. He is however the player I least want to go to them, as without him I see Kingsbury being a complete failure and the thought of playing a Wilson like skill set at least 4 times a year is not good for the heart.

    I won’t enjoy cheering for Bosa but he is the top choice - the best Edge and given that this is still a need it will allow us to go with one of our other needs at the top of the 2nd, where there should be a lot of talent in those positions. The Ford signing opened the option to take Williams and having watched a lot more of him I don’t mind adding another 1st round DT, he’d be outstanding beside Buckner. I was previously high on Allen, but his comparative performance at the combine knocked him down a few notches for me. If we trade down I’d happily take him though.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    My preference would be

    1. Trade down (prefebarly staying in the top 10 but even moving down to middle of the first round would be ok if the price is right).
    2. Draft Bosa at 2.
    3. Draft Q Williams

    Though I'd much prefer option 1 or 2 over option 3.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    adrian522 wrote: »
    My preference would be

    1. Trade down (prefebarly staying in the top 10 but even moving down to middle of the first round would be ok if the price is right).
    2. Draft Bosa at 2.
    3. Draft Q Williams

    Though I'd much prefer option 1 or 2 over option 3.

    I feel most years teams would love to trade down for a heap of picks but it can be hard to get a trade partner. Could see potential in the Raiders to either go for Murray if he falls or Bosa (to stick it to everyone complaining about Mack). Other obvious option would be the Giants and I've no idea what Gettleman will do (serious amount of smoke coming out of NY in different directions). Funny that both are teams that somewhat screwed us over on trades recently.

    Struggling to see who else could move up. I'm struggling to see Elway having the balls to take another QB where they are, let alone trading extra picks to move up. Bengals could have potential, but given how little they spend on FA I'm not sure they'll be willing to give up a lot of picks and also passing on a top guy this year for future picks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Delighted to have Bosa now, especially as I don’t have to feel bad about that win against the Seahawks. I know guys can be scripted in these situations, but he came across pretty well in his interviews last night. Will give him the benefit of the doubt, ending up in San Francisco could do wonders for him as a player and a person.

    Interested to see how long it’ll take him to sign his contract. Given how long he has been away from playing, it would be great to get him in ASAP. Most likely though he'll take follow the usual Bosa hold-out routine.

    DL should terrorize QBs next year. There is so much talent left on the board at the top of the 2nd in areas of need (WR/CB/FS/OL). Given the quantity of quality left I could be tempted to trade down if we get a decent offer and potentially then try to trade back up into the 2nd.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Pick in round 1 & 2 were very much expected and I'm delighted with how it turned out. Given how the run on WRs didn't come to pass until much later in the 2nd it would have been nice to trade back before taking Deebo, but around 36 is where he was valued on most boards so can't argue with not gambling on moving back and hoping no one takes him.

    I'll admit to not knowing much about Hurd but it looks like he can play WR & RB to a high level and has the size to play at TE. He's raw and has shown great development in his 1 year as a WR. Was another guy that they got to work with at the Senior Bowl, so getting that role looks to have already paid off. Again, probably could have traded back and taken him, but I'm glad we've made the small step to avoid wasting picks to jump up to overpay.

    Really excited for how the offense is going to look next year. Shaping up to be a even bigger mind f*ck for defenses to play against, where a number of guys can shift to other positions depending on what the defense is showing and play these positions to a high level


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Also, big news from the division with their draft picks. Don't like seeing guys lose their careers to injury, but Baldwin and Gurley have huge question marks now


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Pretty poor draft from where I'm standing. Delighted with Bosa.

    I'd have preferred a pick in the secondary in the second round but if you need to go WR, surely AJ brown is a better bet?

    The 3rd round pick.would have been available 1 or 2 rounds later. And seriously a punter in the 4th?

    On top of franchise tagging a kicker and giving an injury prone LB a huge deal, I'm starting to think the 49ers FO dont really know what they are doing.

    They haven't addressed the secondary at all. I guess they are hoping that the pass rush will cover any flaws but look at KC last year, great pass rush but still one of the worst defenses in the league.

    I have all the faith in the world in Shanahan but I'm losing faith in Lynch at this point.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I'm still pretty happy with that draft. I'd have preferred an earlier pick on the secondary, but since the Lynch/Shanahan came in they've brought in a lot of DBs in both draft and FA and I'm ok seeing how they do for another year, especially with the likely improved pressure and less disruption with injuries. Slot corner is good and outside we have Sherman on one side and if Varrett can stay injury free then he'll be the best CB on the team. We spent 3rd round picks on Witherspoon and Moore and bringing in another guy would damage any progression from them. FS is more scary though, but we'll see if the faith in Ward and Colbert is justified.

    The continued issue I have with the team is they fall in love with guys and overpay, whether in draft capital or contracts, rather than looking for value. Their lack of picks this year thankfully tied their hands from moving up too much, but there was still clear signs that they reached to ensure they got 'their guy' rather than playing the board. I'm happy with the Deebo pick, as I feel he is perfect for the scheme and it was right around where he was expected to go, but picks in rounds 3 and 4 were clearly taken ahead of where they needed to be. At least with the punter we got a few extra picks by initially trading back. They could have however done that in round 3 and traded back again in round 4 and still gotten their guy and further capital.


  • Registered Users Posts: 29 Big mac and fries


    adrian522 wrote: »
    Pretty poor draft from where I'm standing. Delighted with Bosa.

    I'd have preferred a pick in the secondary in the second round but if you need to go WR, surely AJ brown is a better bet?

    The 3rd round pick.would have been available 1 or 2 rounds later. And seriously a punter in the 4th?

    On top of franchise tagging a kicker and giving an injury prone LB a huge deal, I'm starting to think the 49ers FO dont really know what they are doing.

    They haven't addressed the secondary at all. I guess they are hoping that the pass rush will cover any flaws but look at KC last year, great pass rush but still one of the worst defenses in the league.

    I have all the faith in the world in Shanahan but I'm losing faith in Lynch at this point.

    Apologies if this is a dumb question, but does the Coach not tell the GM who he wants them to draft?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,911 ✭✭✭✭Realt Dearg Sec


    adrian522 wrote: »
    Pretty poor draft from where I'm standing. Delighted with Bosa.

    I'd have preferred a pick in the secondary in the second round but if you need to go WR, surely AJ brown is a better bet?

    The 3rd round pick.would have been available 1 or 2 rounds later. And seriously a punter in the 4th?

    On top of franchise tagging a kicker and giving an injury prone LB a huge deal, I'm starting to think the 49ers FO dont really know what they are doing.

    They haven't addressed the secondary at all. I guess they are hoping that the pass rush will cover any flaws but look at KC last year, great pass rush but still one of the worst defenses in the league.

    I have all the faith in the world in Shanahan but I'm losing faith in Lynch at this point.

    Apologies if this is a dumb question, but does the Coach not tell the GM who he wants them to draft?
    The coach would probably have some input, and certainly you don't want players who wouldn't fit his system or philosophy, but drafting is ultimately the job of the GM in consultation with his scouts. The coach's job is to make it work with who he's given.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Apologies if this is a dumb question, but does the Coach not tell the GM who he wants them to draft?

    Depends on the team how much control the coach has. For the 49ers, Shanahan has huge control and actually decides on the final roster. It is a bit murky on who makes final decisions for the draft, but general thinking is that Shanahan makes the offensive picks, while Lynch does more of the defense (with Peters leading the scouting and helping both). Hard to know what happens with disagreements, but I’d believe Shanahan gets his way, which is why I feel he chose the 49ers over other teams.

    Despite Shanahan having so much power, Lynch needs to do better work guiding him. I think a more experienced GM could do that better, pushing back on Shanahan falling in love with players and reaching. Shanahan is such a good coach that his positives far outweigh this problem, whereas I’m not sure what value Lynch is actually adding, especially as the defensive picks have been more misses thus far.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Only Bad things happen in the preseason.....

    https://twitter.com/ChrisBiderman/status/1159206150610440192


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭Dymo


    adrian522 wrote: »
    Only Bad things happen in the preseason.....

    https://twitter.com/ChrisBiderman/status/1159206150610440192

    And here we are again.... Another season


  • Registered Users Posts: 29 Big mac and fries


    adrian522 wrote: »
    Only Bad things happen in the preseason.....

    https://twitter.com/ChrisBiderman/status/1159206150610440192

    Ian Rapoport

    Verified account

    @RapSheet
    6h6 hours ago
    More
    #49ers first-round pick DE Nick Bosa was diagnosed with just an ankle sprain, I’m told. He had an MRI after practice. Expect the team to be cautious with their top pick, meaning you may not see him in the preseason.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Big relief that both injuries are minor and that it looks like they'll be ok for Week 1.

    Bosa has killed it so far during camp against the starters, so no need for him to play any preseason at all. Put him in bubble wrap for the Bucs.

    Taking into account that reports from camp don't necessarily transfer to the regular season but it sounds like both sides of the ball are performing well so far.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Jinxed that a bit.

    - Bosa has high ankle sprain so out for preseseason and those can be a pain to clear,
    - Verrett's isn't minor and mightn't be ready for Week 1,
    - Williams got he knee scoped and may miss week 1,
    - McKinnon has knee pain after coming back, may need to go on IR

    That doesn't include the likes of Ford, Armstead, Blair who are day to day.

    Really starting back where we left off... :(


Advertisement