Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Creche charging for child's place during closure.

1235718

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    GreeBo wrote: »
    Any company that has employees working from home is paying the same amount of wages for what is, in most cases, significantly reduced output.

    What's that got to do with the price of tea in China?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Unless your creche specifically tells you that you can cancel your direct debit it would be downright foolish of anyone to think that you would keep your place if you stopped paying them.

    So extortion then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,253 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    lawred2 wrote: »
    What's that got to do with the price of tea in China?

    Employers are still paying staff whilst they are in receipt of significantly lower services.
    I thought the point was obvious...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,253 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    lawred2 wrote: »
    So extortion then?

    In much the same way as a landlord "extorts" rent from you...sure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    GreeBo wrote: »
    Employers are still paying staff whilst they are in receipt of significantly lower services.
    I thought the point was obvious...

    Well significantly lower services is a reach. Is not the case for our company anyway. However it still stands that that at least those employers are getting something in return for salaries paid.

    Childcare providers will neither pay staff nor provide a service.

    It's not remotely close to being the same thing.

    Employment contracts are not comparable to service contracts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    GreeBo wrote: »
    In much the same way as a landlord "extorts" rent from you...sure.

    Do landlords charge you for non occupancy?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,253 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    lawred2 wrote: »
    Do landlords charge you for non occupancy?

    What's that got to do with the price of tea in China?

    They would charge you if you said that you wouldn't be there for 2 months but expected that the property be kept for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    GreeBo wrote: »
    What's that got to do with the price of tea in China?

    Cool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    GreeBo wrote: »
    What's that got to do with the price of tea in China?

    They would charge you if you said that you wouldn't be there for 2 months but expected that the property be kept for you.

    Not remotely the same thing.

    This would be more like the landlord asking you out as they wanted use for six months. But they still wanted you to keep paying full rent so you could move back in in six months time.

    This is not the same as a taking your kids out on holidays and expecting the creche to reduce fees because of your own decisions.

    A balance needs to be found here. Our creche wants full fees in perpetuity to hold places. Yet we know all staff have been let go already.

    You're ok with that. We're not.

    Let's leave it there.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭dubrov


    GreeBo wrote: »

    You call it blackmail, but can you give me another example where an individual or business would guarantee a resumption of service without any payment during the times of no service?

    I wouldnt expect a hotel to keep my room free for me in between my bookings for example.

    A closer example would be if you were staying in a hotel that was closed due to CV19. They may not be bankrupt before they ca reopen but they sure as hell wouldn't try charging you until then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,253 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    lawred2 wrote: »
    Not remotely the same thing.

    This would be more like the landlord asking you out as they wanted use for six months. But they still wanted you to keep paying full rent so you could move back in in six months time.

    This is not the same as a taking your kids out on holidays and expecting the creche to reduce fees because of your own decisions.

    A balance needs to be found here. Our creche wants full fees in perpetuity to hold places. Yet we know all staff have been let go already.

    You're ok with that. We're not.

    Let's leave it there.


    The creche arent asking you out, the government has ordered creches to be closed.

    I'm not "ok with that" by the way, but I think expecting the creche to keep you a place when you arbitrarily decide to stop paying them is crazy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    GreeBo wrote: »
    The creche arent asking you out, the government has ordered creches to be closed.

    I'm not "ok with that" by the way, but I think expecting the creche to keep you a place when you arbitrarily decide to stop paying them is crazy.

    And that's why I said there needs to be a balance. Not 100% fees on threat of losing a place while they've no staff costs of their own.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,253 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    lawred2 wrote: »
    And that's why I said there needs to be a balance. Not 100% fees on threat of losing a place while they've no staff costs of their own.

    Not all creches have laid off their staff, mine hasnt for example.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 507 ✭✭✭argentum


    I think first of all that so many people have lost their jobs that all creche places wont be needed when this is over.
    The knock on effect of it all is that some creches wont reopen at all as either they'll be empty or the staff wont go back .
    I'd be pissed off if i paid full fees and the creche just closed and left you in the lurch anyway.
    You'll be way down the list of creditors


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    GreeBo wrote: »
    Not all creches have laid off their staff, mine hasnt for example.

    And that's great.

    Ours has not. Hence our reluctance to keep handing over fees for a full service we're not in receipt of.

    I don't know. Maybe I'm being unreasonable expecting some sort of recognition of that reality from the creche.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭tart29016


    Has anyone been told if full fee is not paid until a certain time then they will use the deposit to cover the fees.

    We got their email yesterday to that effect.

    I've checked the terms & conditions and do not see any clause allowing them to do that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,253 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    lawred2 wrote: »
    And that's great.

    Ours has not. Hence our reluctance to keep handing over fees for a full service we're not in receipt of.

    I don't know. Maybe I'm being unreasonable expecting some sort of recognition of that reality from the creche.

    I'd certainly have expected them to have contacted parents at this stage, even if you dont like what they tell you.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,124 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    Still waiting to hear from our Creche (large chain), I'd hazard a guess that they will want and try to charge us full fees. I know the staff are paid until the end of the month. It was announced today that rates can be put off for 3 months, so take that off and then if they tell staff to sign on they can feck off. I would pay a fee per month to hold places, but if they want full fee I'll roll the dice and take the chance. It could be months before they reopen. We could be down to 1 wage next month so I can't sustain that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,653 ✭✭✭AulWan


    Heres just a wild and crazy thought.

    What if creche owners arranged for their employees to mind 1/2 of their regular kids each in their own homes, creche keeps paying minder, parent keeps paying fees?

    For those who still need the service, obviously.

    I don't know if it would be workable, but it would help out frontline staff at least, like those working here?

    And push less of it under the table.

    (eta) Non high risk staff only (obviously) - and alternatively they could mind in the child's home, while still being paid by the creche.. surely some work around can be found for at least some cases?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,454 ✭✭✭mloc123


    pc7 wrote: »
    Still waiting to hear from our Creche (large chain), I'd hazard a guess that they will want and try to charge us full fees. I know the staff are paid until the end of the month. It was announced today that rates can be put off for 3 months, so take that off and then if they tell staff to sign on they can feck off. I would pay a fee per month to hold places, but if they want full fee I'll roll the dice and take the chance. It could be months before they reopen. We could be down to 1 wage next month so I can't sustain that.

    Giraffe by any chance?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭HelgaWard


    Ww got an e-mail from our creche yesterday to say they will not be charging fees.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,066 ✭✭✭✭neris


    Insurance would be an issue for a start
    AulWan wrote: »
    Heres just a wild and crazy thought.

    What if creche owners arranged for their employees to mind 1/2 of their regular kids each in their own homes, creche keeps paying minder, parent keeps paying fees?

    For those who still need the service, obviously.

    I don't know if it would be workable, but it would help out frontline staff at least, like those working here?

    And push less of it under the table.

    (eta) Non high risk staff only (obviously) - and alternatively they could mind in the child's home, while still being paid by the creche.. surely some work around can be found for at least some cases?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,653 ✭✭✭AulWan


    neris wrote: »
    Insurance would be an issue for a start

    You're right.

    ****ing insurance.

    Always a stumbling block.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,567 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    What are the main expenses for a creche ,
    staff .. obviously ,most got let go last week are on welfare ,they should be collecting last week's wages this week (week in hand )
    Food costs are nill,
    Insurance is still a cost
    Licences for soft ware ,and fees for ongoing professional services are gonna be mainly the same .. rates .. a lot of council's are waving them ...
    Rent and or loans ,it's up to the owner to negotiate with their bank and landlord ... But it'd be a pretty ****ty land lord who'd try dump a decent tenant with a recession on the way

    Ultimately, imo if they're not providing the service ,they shouldnt be charging .. hard on the owners and staff .. but this whole thing is hard on loads of people ...

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,409 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Markcheese wrote: »
    What are the main expenses for a creche ,
    staff .. obviously ,most got let go last week are on welfare ,they should be collecting last week's wages this week (week in hand )
    Food costs are nill,
    Insurance is still a cost
    Licences for soft ware ,and fees for ongoing professional services are gonna be mainly the same .. rates .. a lot of council's are waving them ...
    Rent and or loans ,it's up to the owner to negotiate with their bank and landlord ... But it'd be a pretty ****ty land lord who'd try dump a decent tenant with a recession on the way

    Ultimately, imo if they're not providing the service ,they shouldnt be charging .. hard on the owners and staff .. but this whole thing is hard on loads of people ...

    Were most let go last week? Most I know of but certainly not all have not let staff go yet, some are doing reduced wages.
    There is also ongoing bills for electricity and gas.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,553 ✭✭✭murphyebass


    lawred2 wrote: »
    So extortion then?

    How exactly is it extortion for a business to drop places of anyone who doesn’t pay them?

    Plenty of others will take your place if you choose not to pay.

    Their crèche, their rules. You don’t like it, find a crèche that you do like the rules of.

    I honestly can’t get over the entitlement that people feel they have in relation to this topic. Mental stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    How exactly is it extortion for a business to drop places of anyone who doesn’t pay them?

    Plenty of others will take your place if you choose not to pay.

    Their crèche, their rules. You don’t like it, find a crèche that you do like the rules of.

    I honestly can’t get over the entitlement that people feel they have in relation to this topic. Mental stuff.

    Pfffft

    It's an entitlement now to expect a service in return for a service charge?

    Do one pal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,553 ✭✭✭murphyebass


    lawred2 wrote: »
    Pfffft

    It's an entitlement now to expect a service in return for a service charge?

    Do one pal.

    You have an entitlement to go elsewhere if you’re not happy with having to pay for a service YOU agreed to pay for.

    Also attack the post not the poster. Post reported.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    You have an entitlement to go elsewhere if you’re not happy with having to pay for a service YOU agreed to pay for.

    Also attack the post not the poster. Post reported.

    Nobody agreed to pay for a service they weren't in receipt of. Where did you get that falsehood from?

    Report away. As if your own non generic post wasn't personal. Give me a break.


  • Registered Users Posts: 930 ✭✭✭Daz_


    Looks to me that anyone agreeing that Crèches should charge full fees have some connection with one .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,567 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    salmocab wrote: »
    Were most let go last week? Most I know of but certainly not all have not let staff go yet, some are doing reduced wages.
    There is also ongoing bills for electricity and gas.

    The electricity and gas bills will be fairly low ( but still there) if the building is empty,the lights will be off ,the computers off ,the heating off ...

    If they're paying all their staff full whack then maybe theres a case some charging ...

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,107 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    How exactly is it extortion for a business to drop places of anyone who doesn’t pay them?

    Plenty of others will take your place if you choose not to pay.

    Their crèche, their rules. You don’t like it, find a crèche that you do like the rules of.

    I honestly can’t get over the entitlement that people feel they have in relation to this topic. Mental stuff.

    It kind of is tbh, whether you like it or not. And its hardly entitlement. We are paying €1600 a month, if our creche tells us we are expected to pay full fees next month but they wont be open and if we dont, we lose the place, what would you call it?

    Creches have a captive market. We are saving for a house so cannot afford for one of us not to work, many other families are the same.

    As I said previously, I'd have no problem making partial payment to hold our spot but being forced ie having no other option, to pay full fee for a service we cannot avail of, well that's pretty shytty behaviour.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 416 ✭✭rosmoke


    That's like paying for a pizza but instead I'm not getting one as they don't serve pizza.
    Who comes up with the idea of paying for a service they can't provide?
    It just blows my mind.

    It's not my responsibility how they pay their staff, it's not my business to think about their profits or revenue.
    There are many people that are going to lose their jobs as companies are too greedy or just not profitable enough to put away rainy funds and they can avail of social services.

    I am sorry but this is my opinion and from reading through the posts here it appears that some creches charge parents the full whack and still don't pay employees.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,900 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    Plenty of others will take your place if you choose not to

    I honestly can’t get over the entitlement that people feel they have in relation to this topic. Mental stuff
    .

    Who’s going to take the places and start paying when someone else stops?

    I think you’ll find the entitlement is coming from crèches not parents, most of whom are or will be on the breadline in the coming weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,553 ✭✭✭murphyebass


    thomas 123 wrote: »
    Who’s going to take the places and start paying when someone else stops?
    .

    I take it you don’t live in Dublin. It’s as bad as school here for places in crèches.

    Ultimately it’s their business, they can run it how they like and if someone doesn’t like it they have the choice to leave and go elsewhere. Nobody is forcing a person not to cancel their standing order and go elsewhere.

    Crèches have insurance, staff costs etc whether you have a child / children are there or not.

    A lot of the people here and elsewhere who say “but they’re not paying their staff”, what actual evidence of this do you have? All antidotal hearsay or what someone wants to think as it suits their situation. ie. not wanting to pay.

    The insurance is probably the biggest cost though out of anything here so unless the government steps in and pays that for all the crèches (never going to happen) I don’t see why they wouldn’t expect payment.

    For the record I do not own or know anyone involve in the industry. This isn’t an alias account. It’s my only boards account. Check my posts.


  • Registered Users Posts: 930 ✭✭✭Daz_


    I take it you don’t live in Dublin. It’s as bad as school here for places in crèches.

    Ultimately it’s their business, they can run it how they like and if someone doesn’t like it they have the choice to leave and go elsewhere. Nobody is forcing a person not to cancel their standing order and go elsewhere.

    Crèches have insurance, staff costs etc whether you have a child / children are there or not.

    A lot of the people here and elsewhere who say “but they’re not paying their staff”, what actual evidence of this do you have? All antidotal hearsay or what someone wants to think as it suits their situation. ie. not wanting to pay.

    The insurance is probably the biggest cost though out of anything here so unless the government steps in and pays that for all the crèches (never going to happen) I don’t see why they wouldn’t expect payment.

    For the record I do not own or know anyone involve in the industry. This isn’t an alias account. It’s my only boards account. Check my posts.

    You come across very passionate in defensive of the Crèche to be honest .
    Unusual for someone to be like that about a topic unless they have some connection .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,900 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    I take it you don’t live in Dublin. It’s as bad as school here for places in crèches.

    Ultimately it’s their business, they can run it how they like and if someone doesn’t like it they have the choice to leave and go elsewhere. Nobody is forcing a person not to cancel their standing order and go elsewhere.

    Crèches have insurance, staff costs etc whether you have a child / children are there or not.

    A lot of the people here and elsewhere who say “but they’re not paying their staff”, what actual evidence of this do you have? All antidotal hearsay or what someone wants to think as it suits their situation. ie. not wanting to pay.

    The insurance is probably the biggest cost though out of anything here so unless the government steps in and pays that for all the crèches (never going to happen) I don’t see why they wouldn’t expect payment.

    For the record I do not own or know anyone involve in the industry. This isn’t an alias account. It’s my only boards account. Check my posts.


    I mean to say while crèches are closed who is going to take on a place?

    Also can’t you cancel insurance and then get it again?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,155 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    lawred2 wrote:
    Nobody agreed to pay for a service they weren't in receipt of. Where did you get that falsehood from?


    Whilst I don't agree with the charge nor the charge for the Christmas holiday these charges are in many of the contracts that parents signed. So in reality plenty of pare did agree to pay for a service that they won't get.

    Have you looked at your own contract? You might find that you have agreed to this too


  • Registered Users Posts: 930 ✭✭✭Daz_


    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    Whilst I don't agree with the charge nor the charge for the Christmas holiday these charges are in many of the contracts that parents signed. So in reality plenty of pare did agree to pay for a service that they won't get.

    Have you looked at your own contract? You might find that you have agreed to this too

    Don’t think anyone minds paying for Christmas - staff have to get paid hols too.

    Ridiculous comparison to be honest .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    Whilst I don't agree with the charge nor the charge for the Christmas holiday these charges are in many of the contracts that parents signed. So in reality plenty of pare did agree to pay for a service that they won't get.

    Have you looked at your own contract? You might find that you have agreed to this too

    Not the same thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,650 ✭✭✭cooperguy


    If people want a professional childcare service then they need to pay the staff. If you want constantly changing, low skilled, temp staff looking after your children then make the pay as precarious as possible


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    cooperguy wrote: »
    If people want a professional childcare service then they need to pay the staff. If you want constantly changing, low skilled, temp staff looking after your children then make the pay as precarious as possible

    Sigh

    The childcare workers in many cases have been laid off already.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,650 ✭✭✭cooperguy


    lawred2 wrote: »
    Sigh

    The childcare workers in many cases have been laid off already.

    In those cases, where they happen, then that is a different conversation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 664 ✭✭✭starbaby2003


    cooperguy wrote: »
    If people want a professional childcare service then they need to pay the staff. If you want constantly changing, low skilled, temp staff looking after your children then make the pay as precarious as possible

    If a company treat their staff well and run into this unexpected situation where they unfortunately need to lay their staff off they will return when this is over. Where exactly are all these jobs the staff are going to run off too? The exact type of Crèches who treat their staff like crap are the ones who refuse to budge on fees as they have built up zero goodwill with staff.
    Secondly the government will pay employers who continue to pay their staff.
    What you are suggesting is that we the parents take all the burden and the crèche takes none.
    Tell me why that is fair ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,155 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    Daz_ wrote:
    Don’t think anyone minds paying for Christmas - staff have to get paid hols too.

    Daz_ wrote:
    Ridiculous comparison to be honest .


    Eh hello??

    Every business in Ireland pays Christmas holidays. There is nothing unique in this.
    Most businesses include the Christmas holiday pay in your weekly fees. Crèches are the only business that I have ever come across that. It's a ridiculous setup. You work out how much you need to charge for the year and devide it by the amount of weeks that you plan to be open. Staff still get paid for holidays but parents don't feel ripped off or cheated.

    If you care to read my post again I didn't compare Christmas holidays to this situation. I pointed out that many parents signed a contract allowing crèches to charge at Christmas time and any time that the creche has to close.

    I'm totally against these charges but the vast majority of parents definitely did sign a contract allowing this practice. Another poster claims that parents didn't agree to it but in fact most did.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,155 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    lawred2 wrote:
    Not the same thing.


    You misread my post. I didn't say that Christmas was the same as this. I said that it's in the contracts for Christmas closing (that's one thing) & then totally separate in the contract it states that you agree to pay for any days that the creche doesn't open.

    Again I'm against the fees but most parents signed legally binding contracts allowing them to charge for days they close.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,729 ✭✭✭Millem


    There had a consumer expert on the radio this morning (newstalk). It was in relation to gyms. Basically if the gym is closed because of the coronavirus you do not have to pay your monthly fee. You should cancel the direct debit. When it reopens restart payment.

    Surely would the same apply to crèches? Most people sign a contract with a gym.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,155 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    Millem wrote:
    Surely would the same apply to crèches? Most people sign a contract with a gym.


    I agree but some parents are afraid that the creche will replace their child with another child if they don't keep paying.

    Personally I think the crèches are playing a dangerous game. They had great support from parents about the insurance issue. It was the parents who forced the government to cough up money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,729 ✭✭✭Millem


    I just saw Derry Clarke and his wife on the late late. They said something something along the lines of.....if the government had ordered the restaurant to shut they could claim on their “business interruption insurance”.
    Do crèches have such insurance?


  • Registered Users Posts: 435 ✭✭Toastytoes


    Derry Clarke on the Late Late now taking about closing his restaurant due to the virus and saying that if the government actually forced restaurants to close then they could claim for business interruption from their insurance.

    Is it off the wall to think crèches should have similar insurance cover? They have been told to close so you’d expect them to be able to claim but by the sounds of things they don’t have comparable cover.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement