Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What will the economy look like in 6 months time?

191012141520

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,753 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    havent a clue to be honest, but id imagine it is, as demand has collapsed, new levels of bank created credit must also have collapsed

    OK, I'll keep an eye out for the March data, it should be out soon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    Some serious recession on the way Boys.

    I reckon it'll be a hell of a lot worse than our last. This is a sudden sharp shock and collapse. Businesses have no time to plan or set aside cash to deal with it. It won't be as simple as wage cuts either.

    Some sectors wont recover from this for years while some businesses in those sector will never reopen.

    Can you actually fathom the potential damage and losses an ongoing and indefinite closure of our hospitality will have? The indirect impact on people like delivery drivers , cleaners , musicians etc will be devastating.

    And being honest immigration wont be an option for many this time.

    Scary times lie ahead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Geuze wrote: »
    Are you suggesting that the M1 and M3 growth rates will turn negative this quarter and during the summer?

    no im not suggesting anything, nobody can accurately predict future economic events, as all models are wrong, and my predictions would be beyond wrong, but you d have to ask, who the hell would take on debt in a major downturn?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭JohnnyFlash


    Jesus, they are some sobering figures. There's entire industries going to be wiped out with that sort of contraction in GDP. Can't see how a good old-fashioned euro print is going to help solve it either. Pan-European response required.

    Brexit seems so small and insignificant an issue now in comparison to this clusterfúck.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭Tacitus Kilgore


    Jesus, they are some sobering figures. There's entire industries going to be wiped out with that sort of contraction in GDP. Can't see how a good old-fashioned euro print is going to help solve it either. Pan-European response required.

    Brexit seems so small and insignificant an issue now in comparison to this clusterfúck.

    At least this isn't intentional.. :o


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    Jesus, they are some sobering figures. There's entire industries going to be wiped out with that sort of contraction in GDP. Can't see how a good old-fashioned euro print is going to help solve it either. Pan-European response required.

    Brexit seems so small and insignificant an issue now in comparison to this clusterfúck.

    Agreed.

    GDP will shrink so much and all printing money will do is increase inflation.

    Id say we they could tax the bollix outta us again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,362 ✭✭✭landofthetree


    Agreed.

    GDP will shrink so much and all printing money will do is increase inflation.

    Id say we they could tax the bollix outta us again.

    As bad as out figures are predicted to be what's its going to be like in southern Europe?

    The poor Greeks for starters. A decade of pain with little recovery and now this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,753 ✭✭✭✭Geuze



    GDP will shrink so much and all printing money will do is increase inflation.

    Estimated inflation rates in today's SPU:

    HICP = -0.6% in 2020, so mild deflation, 0.4% in 2021


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,854 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Ff fcuked up the economy last time, now fg are doing it....


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,362 ✭✭✭landofthetree


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    Ff fcuked up the economy last time, now fg are doing it....

    All parties agreed with the shutdown.

    It was the only option unfortunately.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Agreed.

    GDP will shrink so much and all printing money will do is increase inflation.

    Id say we they could tax the bollix outta us again.

    we re in a deflationary period, wont be much inflation from central bank printing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,854 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    All parties agreed with the shutdown.

    It was the only option unfortunately.

    Shutting down construction and landscaping for a start, was idiotic!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,078 ✭✭✭Thespoofer


    GazzaL wrote: »
    Here's a brief update on the economy:

    Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg

    Jaysus the 5G conspirators are taking things a bit too far now! :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭GazzaL


    It will be complete madness if people aren't allowed to return to work on the 5th. People are already returning to work on the quiet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,933 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    Shutting down construction and landscaping for a start, was idiotic!

    Why do I get the impression that if they were left open you would be saying "they should have closed them", "look at the deaths", "and the cases"...etc etc


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭Xertz


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    we re in a deflationary period, wont be much inflation from central bank printing

    We are also in a very big currency. It hasn’t seen inflation when it’s been used for QE before and it’s generally too big to speculated against. So it’s about as big as it gets other than the USD.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Some serious recession on the way Boys.

    I reckon it'll be a hell of a lot worse than our last. This is a sudden sharp shock and collapse. Businesses have no time to plan or set aside cash to deal with it. It won't be as simple as wage cuts either.

    Some sectors wont recover from this for years while some businesses in those sector will never reopen.

    Can you actually fathom the potential damage and losses an ongoing and indefinite closure of our hospitality will have? The indirect impact on people like delivery drivers , cleaners , musicians etc will be devastating.

    And being honest immigration wont be an option for many this time.

    Scary times lie ahead.

    Last crash was systemic in nature this one isn't, last crash saw hundreds of billions blown on propping up banks across the eurozone, some of which should have been allowed to fail (here - hello Anglo-Irish), this one is spending all the money on people - social security. So when the economy is opened up people will go back to work and the "dole" bill will start to fall. Inflation is dead, carbon prices are on the floor and will stay there as the world gradually moves to a post-oil energy market. The main threat to a rapid recovery is pushing down on the economy with a dogmatic austerity budget, now is when we need pump priming and pushing up with investment. God knows money and energy will never be cheaper - get building.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭Tacitus Kilgore


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    Shutting down construction and landscaping for a start, was idiotic!

    No it wasn't


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,362 ✭✭✭landofthetree


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    Shutting down construction and landscaping for a start, was idiotic!

    Have you ever been on a construction site? Even on the best of sites the drying rooms(where they change into to their work gear) can be very cramped for the tradesmen.

    I think the suspension was necessary to make sure construction companies would adjust to social distancing. Plus it will help get the unions on side. Rightly the unions will want the sits to be safe.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭Xertz


    There’s a high risk of dogmatic austerity financial accounting type approaches in Europe. I don’t know if we have really moved past that mode of thinking in the EU.

    Politicians aren’t economists and I think that’s something we forget. You end up having political debates about fiscal rectitude and moral hazard and all of that stuff which belongs in a philosophical discussion not an economic one. The markets generally don’t care. They are short to medium term focused and speculate.

    I found during the 2008 crash you had all sorts of political commentators both imagining the markets were some kind of political entity with a long memory that would punish transgressors and also people who imagine the markets are somehow an all knowing prophet and that slides in value actually mean something.

    If they see opportunity they invest. If they don’t they avoid investment. There’s nothing more to it than that. European bonds would be extremely safe investments and good places to stash cash. It’s very unlikely they’ll do anything other than be hugely beneficial to the Eurozone, including the NL and Germany and we sure as hell are not going to be paying signifiant interest on them. If the markets are still in turmoil they’ll be a safe haven and may even be offering negative yields.

    The reality is politicians need to both play the game and realise they also control many aspects of the game. It’s not a household budget or the accounts of a small business, nor is the Eurozone a small economy that has to be a rule taker and get bounced around. I don’t think we really have begun to even think about the Eurozone as a big, powerful, single integrated economy. We’re mostly still locked in the mentality of small and medium nation state economies that were used to very agressive speculation on their currencies.

    You can either use the very powerful tools of a gigantic Eurozone economy, or you can punish Italy and Spain because you perceive transgression of rules. The two aren’t the same thing and the NL and Germany are not going to be paying a cent. You’ll have huge investment in very safe haven bonds that will be costing us next to nothing and be incredibly low risk.

    The upside is a potentially thriving Eurozone and EU that could well end up serious global economic nexus in the years ahead.

    I also think throwing Eurozone problems into the IMF is an absolute disgrace. Europe is well able to solve these issues internally and easily and it’s just undermining itself by being petty and also undermining a global fund that is supposed to be for bailing out countries that have no other alternatives. It’s not meant for abuse by one or the world’s wealthiest places.


  • Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭vladmydad


    Xertz wrote: »
    There’s a high risk of dogmatic austerity financial accounting type approaches in Europe. I don’t know if we have really moved past that mode of thinking in the EU.

    Politicians aren’t economists and I think that’s something we forget. You end up having political debates about fiscal rectitude and moral hazard and all of that stuff which belongs in a philosophical discussion not an economic one. The markets generally don’t care. They are short to medium term focused and speculate.

    I found during the 2008 crash you had all sorts of political commentators both imagining the markets were some kind of political entity with a long memory that would punish transgressors and also people who imagine the markets are somehow an all knowing prophet and that slides in value actually mean something.

    If they see opportunity they invest. If they don’t they avoid investment. There’s nothing more to it than that. European bonds would be extremely safe investments and good places to stash cash. It’s very unlikely they’ll do anything other than be hugely beneficial to the Eurozone, including the NL and Germany and we sure as hell are not going to be paying signifiant interest on them. If the markets are still in turmoil they’ll be a safe haven and may even be offering negative yields.

    The reality is politicians need to both play the game and realise they also control many aspects of the game. It’s not a household budget or the accounts of a small business, nor is the Eurozone a small economy that has to be a rule taker and get bounced around. I don’t think we really have begun to even think about the Eurozone as a big, powerful, single integrated economy. We’re mostly still locked in the mentality of small and medium nation state economies that were used to very agressive speculation on their currencies.

    You can either use the very powerful tools of a gigantic Eurozone economy, or you can punish Italy and Spain because you perceive transgression of rules. The two aren’t the same thing and the NL and Germany are not going to be paying a cent. You’ll have huge investment in very safe haven bonds that will be costing us next to nothing and be incredibly low risk.

    The upside is a potentially thriving Eurozone and EU that could well end up serious global economic nexus in the years ahead.

    I also think throwing Eurozone problems into the IMF is an absolute disgrace. Europe is well able to solve these issues internally and easily and it’s just undermining itself by being petty and also undermining a global fund that is supposed to be for bailing out countries that have no other alternatives. It’s not meant for abuse by one or the world’s wealthiest places.

    You’re very very very optimistic on the future of the euro zone and the EU......Some might call it delusional.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    When restrictions are lifted there will be a surge ...some businesses won't recover. Its not a normal recession though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 671 ✭✭✭addaword


    When restrictions are lifted there will be a surge ...some businesses won't recover.

    Will there be a lifting of restrictions or further restrictions?

    The latest figures today, sobering reading:
    We now have 3248 covid-19 cases per million population.
    USA has 2458
    UK has 1901
    France has 2421
    Italy has 3043


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    Ff fcuked up the economy last time, now fg are doing it....

    Serious question, Do you ever get sick of listening to yourself?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Snow Garden


    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/covid-19-s-impact-on-the-economy-makes-for-grim-reading-1.4234433
    In these scenarios GDP could fall by an eye-watering 14 -16 per cent this year and instead of borrowings of €23 billion, we could see the total rise to €27-€29 billion.
    Against this backdrop, it is impossible to even guess what the 2021 budget might look like, though a national recovery programme to scope out the options is to be prepared.
    The longer this goes on, the deeper the lasting damage to the productive base of the economy – there will more companies which will never reopen or be hugely constrained if they do.

    The recession will “cast a long shadow”, the department warns, with not only damage to company balance sheets, but also a possible impact on foreign direct investment as companies re-examine global supply chains.

    Yes we will have to borrow massively (again) to balance the budgets. Every country will need to borrow massively. The borrowing rates will rise for certain.
    The debt-to-GDP ratio will shoot up again. Servicing that debt will obviously increase too. We will have austerity for years after 2020.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 167 ✭✭BillyBiggs


    Mocha Joe wrote: »
    So people that go to pubs and restaurants have a lot less money, the people who work in and own them have a lot less money, the government has a lot less money. Who has more money? There's still the same amount of money in the world.

    Well you tell me bud.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,362 ✭✭✭landofthetree


    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/covid-19-s-impact-on-the-economy-makes-for-grim-reading-1.4234433







    Yes we will have to borrow massively (again) to balance the budgets. Every country will need to borrow massively. The borrowing rates will rise for certain.
    The debt-to-GDP ratio will shoot up again. Servicing that debt will obviously increase too. We will have austerity for years after 2020.


    Massive emigration is on the way when the crisis passes.

    The likes of the UK,Canada,Auz,NZ will recover a lot quicker. They have their own currency and less debt per capita.


    Irish people will once again look to the commonwealth and not the high tax EU countries for a new life.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Yes we will have to borrow massively (again) to balance the budgets. Every country will need to borrow massively. The borrowing rates will rise for certain.
    The debt-to-GDP ratio will shoot up again. Servicing that debt will obviously increase too. We will have austerity for years after 2020.

    again, austerity is a failed economic idea, it has little or no evidence of success, its a dreadful part of neoclassical theory, having the opposite effect of its proposed purpose


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,753 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Massive emigration is on the way when the crisis passes.

    The likes of the UK,Canada,Auz,NZ will recover a lot quicker. They have their own currency and less debt per capita.

    Irish people will once again look to the commonwealth and not the high tax EU countries for a new life.

    An opposite opinion:

    https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2020/04/immigration-will-be-largely-shut-down-for-some-time-to-come.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    We need to stimulate the sectors badly impacted by Covid.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Snow Garden


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    again, austerity is a failed economic idea, it has little or no evidence of success, its a dreadful part of neoclassical theory, having the opposite effect of its proposed purpose

    Ok we got your point over and over and over.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Ok we got your point over and over and over.

    strangely enough, it doesnt seem like people are getting it at all, particularly our politicians, watch this space, it ll probably sneak its way back into our discourse soon enough


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭JohnnyFlash


    Massive emigration is on the way when the crisis passes.

    The likes of the UK,Canada,Auz,NZ will recover a lot quicker. They have their own currency and less debt per capita.


    Irish people will once again look to the commonwealth and not the high tax EU countries for a new life.

    None of those countries you mentioned are particularly low tax countries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,753 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    again, austerity is a failed economic idea, it has little or no evidence of success, its a dreadful part of neoclassical theory, having the opposite effect of its proposed purpose

    Can I ask what exactly is meant by austerity here?

    Let's take the following three scenarios, which of them are "austerity"?

    (1) no change to any tax rate/ tax credits / tax base, but tax revenues rise as the economy recovers, and Govt exp falls as more people return to work

    Clearly, (1) is not austerity.


    (2)
    no change to any tax rates/credits/base
    no changes to welfare rates, so real welfare rates fall very slightly
    and let's say the PS pay restoration of 1.75% due this Sep under the PSSA is scrapped
    and let's go further and say no PS increments

    Is that austerity?

    (3) does austerity mean specific increases to tax rates, specific cuts to PS nominal pay rates, specific cuts to nominal welfare rates?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Geuze wrote: »
    Can I ask what exactly is meant by austerity here?

    Let's take the following three scenarios, which of them are "austerity"?

    (1) no change to any tax rate/ tax credits / tax base, but tax revenues rise as the economy recovers, and Govt exp falls as more people return to work

    Clearly, (1) is not austerity.


    (2)
    no change to any tax rates/credits/base
    no changes to welfare rates, so real welfare rates fall very slightly
    and let's say the PS pay restoration of 1.75% due this Sep under the PSSA is scrapped
    and let's go further and say no PS increments

    Is that austerity?

    (3) does austerity mean specific increases to tax rates, specific cuts to PS nominal pay rates, specific cuts to nominal welfare rates?

    some good questions there, i ll try address them properly when i get the chance. but i ll give the official definition:

    the aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Snow Garden


    https://www.theguardian.com/business/live/2020/apr/23/uk-government-borrowing-covid-19-recession-pmi-us-jobless-claims-business-live
    Bank of England warns of worst contraction in centuries, as economic activity slumps

    UK to borrow £225bn to cover Covid-19 spending
    The UK has announced plans for a massive surge in borrowing over the next few months, to cover the cost of the Covid-19 pandemic.

    Britain’t Debt Management Office says it plans to issue £180bn of bonds between May and July.

    That’s up from £32.6bn in the same period a year ago, and more than the DMO had expected to raise over the entire year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,774 ✭✭✭donaghs


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    again, austerity is a failed economic idea, it has little or no evidence of success, its a dreadful part of neoclassical theory, having the opposite effect of its proposed purpose

    That sounds like a vague political slogan. Austerity doesn’t sound nice, but what’s the alternative? Presumably borrowing lots of money from somwhere, and then hoping the economy recovers?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Dorakman wrote: »
    It’s early days yet of covid-19, however the past couple of days the number of new cases have been in or around 200-250. If all goes well, and the curve is indeed starting to flatten, it begs the question of how our economy will cope? Will this be a short lived depression, which will bounce back relatively quickly, or will we be thrown into a 2008 type scenario?


    I am not an economist. Just a lay person. But i will give my rather limited opinion.


    Its not crisis due to dept or bad credit.

    Its due to us trying to protect ourselves.


    Its biggest impact is on our supply and demand.

    We can't supply certain things right now even though demand is high.

    The demand isn't there for certain things ....events pubs ...but this is a FORCED situation. We can't allow it. The demand is there ..but it must be suppressed.

    The biggest issue i think for long term trouble ..is unemployment. If people have money ...when movement is more free they will spend.

    Look after unemployment ...businesses the rest will look after itself.

    If you don't do that ....the rest will slowly come down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    The govt has to come up with ways to make sure people's jobs are still there. Or there are new jobs ...or they can work from home etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    donaghs wrote:
    That sounds like a vague political slogan. Austerity doesn’t sound nice, but what’s the alternative? Presumably borrowing lots of money from somwhere, and then hoping the economy recovers?


    Borrowing makes sense now, with rates at record lows, this can be rolled over for a very long time, and stimulate the economy back into recovery. Debt isn't necessarily a bad thing, its a critical component of our money supply, without if, there simply wouldn't be a supply. Austerity has the opposite effect than intended, it slows a recovery, having both the public and private sector contracting at the same time is potentially dangerous


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    Borrowing makes sense now,


    It really depends on what you intend to do with it and if you can repay it without austerity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    It really depends on what you intend to do with it and if you can repay it without austerity.


    Absolutely, what we do with this money now, is critical, it should be used to stimulate the economy, to building confidence, particularly in the private sector, to increase spending, as people have a tendency to save during a downturn


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,635 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Macron warns of EU unravelling unless it embraces financial solidarity
    Speaking to the FT from the Elysée Palace, the French president said there was “no choice” but to set up a fund that “could issue common debt with a common guarantee” to finance member states according to their needs rather than the size of their economies. This is an idea that Germany and the Netherlands have opposed.

    The EU faced a “moment of truth” in deciding whether it was more than just a single economic market, with the lack of solidarity during the pandemic likely to fuel populist anger in southern Europe, Mr Macron said.

    “If we can’t do this today, I tell you the populists will win — today, tomorrow, the day after, in Italy, in Spain, perhaps in France and elsewhere,” he said

    source

    A common debt is something the French government in particular and the Europhiles in have been seeking for some time. The particular unstated goal behind this is to save the Euro currency by having a federal debt priced in Euros similar to the United States and the dollar.
    “The Marshall Plan, people still talk about it today . . . we call it ‘helicopter money’ and we say, ‘we must forget the past, make a new start and look to the future’.”

    source


    Ultimately the euro currency project may come to an end depending on the outcome of these politics.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,753 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    our money supply is shrinking due to less demand for credit, credit being the largest part of the money supply. cb money is needed to stimulate our economies, the best way to invest this money would be via infrastructure spending, as demand in the private sector will more than likely remain low. austerity does not grow economies, its furthers the reduction of it, its implementation is ideologically based, not factually


    Here is data on the money supply:

    Feb 2020 data published 26 March

    M1 narrow MS + 8.1%
    M3 broad MS + 5.5%

    Mar 2020 data published today:

    https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/stats/md/html/ecb.md2003.en.html

    M1 narrow MS + 10.3%
    M3 broad MS + 7.5%

    The money supply is growing faster in March.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Geuze wrote:
    The money supply is growing faster in March.


    Would that be due to central bank bond creation, I'd imagine bank created credit is down?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,753 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    Would that be due to central bank bond creation, I'd imagine bank created credit is down?

    https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pdf/md/ecb.md2003_annex~3e411bdbb2.en.pdf?e6c968fde6853b699eb76f5ede4271c9

    M1 = the narrow MS = cash in circulation + overnight deposits

    Cash grew faster in March, up 7% y-on-y, which I find odd
    Overnight deposits grew faster, at 10.9%


    M1 = 9.335 trn

    M3 = 13.473 trn


    The data report discusses the "counterparts" of M3:

    credit to the private sector - rising faster in March

    Loads more details in report.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,621 ✭✭✭wassie


    None of those countries you mentioned are particularly low tax countries.

    Point being is that they all have lower rates of personal income tax and VAT than here. Plus we have a few special favorites ones like VRT & DIRT for good measure....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,753 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    Would that be due to central bank bond creation, I'd imagine bank created credit is down?

    When the central bank create extra money to buy financial assets, I don't think M1 will directly rise, will it?

    I think it's M0, the monetary base, that rises as more money is created?

    https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ebbox201706_07.en.pdf

    M0 = currency + required bank reserves at the ECB + excess bank reserves at the ECB

    M0 did rise fast as the ECB introduced QE in 2015.

    I note that base money M0 and broad money M3 seem to have decoupled.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 161 ✭✭LeYouth


    What will tye economy look like in six months time?

    Banjaxed!


Advertisement