DCG 2016

liverpool1997 · 09-09-2015 08:14PM #1

Started my project 2day and i feel it has to be the worst over the last few years. what do ye make of it.

Doctorhopeful · 09-09-2015 08:47PM

What's the project topic? I did DCG last year so I'm curious

spurious · 09-09-2015 09:00PM

Briefs here (.pdf file)

Salt and pepper shakers for Ordinary, Taps for Higher.

cathal2013 · 10-09-2015 08:02PM

"Include an analysis of contemporary taps in relation to their physical form, shape, ergonomics, materials, features, etc."
Physical Form - The shape and structure of an object
Shape - Spatial form, contour, or appearance
Were supposed to look into the two of these separately

Doctorhopeful · 13-09-2015 07:37PM

spurious wrote:

Taps for Higher.

jaysis that is c rap. Worst since lecterns.

Noccy_Mondy · 14-09-2015 11:41PM

A Tap isn't as bad as it seems. I've done up a few quick ones on solidworks, which would have the potential to be high markers, with the high attention to detail.

A simple twist on a regular garden tap for example could work, showing a section view with all the intricate parts.

spurious · 15-09-2015 07:30AM

There are the different types too - mix, lever operated, twist, push button etc..

legocrazy505 · 15-09-2015 06:52PM

Honestly does the person deciding it sit in a room of things in front of them and goes "Ah ha! I've got it! A tap!". I'm of the opinion they should at least give projects that people can get their hands on the required item easily. Last year was a torch, every house has one of those and buying one isn't too expensive. People in my class have had to go and buy a tap, that's 20 euro and over for a item you'll be using for a few months.

On the plus side at least there are many taps in the world or as my teacher said "as many taps as there are sinks".

michaelk744 · 16-09-2015 01:20PM

Can anyone give me a brief summary of the initial conception of the tap? Who invented, who used, when, why etc

Thanks.

spurious · 16-09-2015 01:32PM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_water_supply_and_sanitation

CathalRyano · 28-09-2015 08:57PM

What kind of things are people drawing for the "Freehand Graphical Representation" bit? I've got the big drawing of the tap itself, but what other things do we put in next to it?

legocrazy505 · 28-09-2015 09:04PM

CathalRyano wrote: »

What kind of things are people drawing for the "Freehand Graphical Representation" bit? I've got the big drawing of the tap itself, but what other things do we put in next to it?

That's pretty much what most people do, our teacher has showed us a project someone got an A1 for but he lost marks on that page. She said it would have been better to also include sketches of main parts on the page as well as a sketch of it all together.

CathalRyano · 28-09-2015 09:06PM

legocrazy505 wrote: »

That's pretty much what most people do, our teacher has showed us a project someone got an A1 for but he lost marks on that page. She said it would have been better to also include sketches of main parts on the page as well as a sketch of it all together.

So just the handle/spout/other bits on its own?

michaelk744 · 04-11-2015 05:40PM

Anyone have a link to something detailing how modern taps save water? e.g special type of spout or something

annmarie98 · 09-11-2015 08:05PM

Anybody know if it's okay to use a scanned version of the main freehand graphical sketch in the other sections (like compare and contrast)? Or will it need to be a new one? I have a perfect one sketched that I used in the compare section and was going to add a few sketches in around it but I'm afraid I'll lose marks. If not I'll use it as the main sketch and do a new one for compare and contrast. Thanks ðŸ‘ðŸ¼

seavill · 09-11-2015 08:29PM

For compare contrast you don't need to put in a full sketch of the item, here you are looking as specific parts of the object rather than the whole thing. You can use a photograph of the item on page one and a basic sketch of the overall general shape to get an idea for dimensioning, but on page two redraw individual parts of the two items

annmarie98 · 09-11-2015 08:37PM

seavill wrote: »

For compare contrast you don't need to put in a full sketch of the item, here you are looking as specific parts of the object rather than the whole thing. You can use a photograph of the item on page one and a basic sketch of the overall general shape to get an idea for dimensioning, but on page two redraw individual parts of the two items

The way I did it was put a small photo of each tap on page 1 and a small sketch of them beside it just for presentation and then on page 2 I redrew the smaller parts, just zoomed in. You hardly think they'll dock marks for using the same sketch though?

seavill · 09-11-2015 08:40PM

Do you mean use like screen grabs of parts of output 3 for output 2? If that is what you mean I wouldn't do that. For output two sketch the different parts again individually, away from anything else, so if you have 5 parts to your assembly, sketch those 5 parts singly onto page 2 of output 2, and compare them to the similar 5 parts in the other tap you are not doing.

I have never corrected the project but I can't see how you would get marks twice for the same sketch, it doesn't make sense

annmarie98 · 09-11-2015 08:50PM

seavill wrote: »

Do you mean use like screen grabs of parts of output 3 for output 2? If that is what you mean I wouldn't do that. For output two sketch the different parts again individually, away from anything else, so if you have 5 parts to your assembly, sketch those 5 parts singly onto page 2 of output 2, and compare them to the similar 5 parts in the other tap you are not doing.

I have never corrected the project but I can't see how you would get marks twice for the same sketch, it doesn't make sense

Okay basically, I sketched each tap for page one of output 2 for presentation more than anything and scanned them onto the page. Then on page 2 of output 2 I sketched the smaller parts onto the page where I'm comparing them with the other tap I chose.
I was just confused on whether output 3 would have to be a completely new sketch or if I could use the sketch I did for page 1 on output 2, because my teacher said I probably won't be marked for the sketch in output 2 anyways, only output 3 and output 2 will be awarded for presentation. Would you advise that I use 2 different sketches for each output even though the main marks go for output 3 (sketching-wise) or will it be okay if I use the original sheet and add on a few different views so I can use it in output3 too?

seavill · 09-11-2015 08:53PM

Oh rite ok, I would use the good one you have done for output 3 only, (make sure you use the original here not the scanned version). Having a really detailed sketch in output 2 page 1 is needless. I personally wouldn't use the same thing twice in the same project.

I would just do a basic sketch for general shapes for page 1 of output 2, so if it was the sports bottle from a previous year, I would have a picture of the sports bottle and below it a sketch of a basic cylinder, I would then fill in the general measurements on the basic sketch

annmarie98 · 09-11-2015 09:05PM

seavill wrote: »

Oh rite ok, I would use the good one you have done for output 3 only, (make sure you use the original here not the scanned version). Having a really detailed sketch in output 2 page 1 is needless. I personally wouldn't use the same thing twice in the same project.

I would just do a basic sketch for general shapes for page 1 of output 2, so if it was the sports bottle from a previous year, I would have a picture of the sports bottle and below it a sketch of a basic cylinder, I would then fill in the general measurements on the basic sketch

Okay, thanks or the advice !!

Noccy_Mondy · 09-11-2015 09:50PM

For those of you reading this, for the love of god, don't go tracing objects and passing them off as your own sketches. This is especially so with the compare and contrast. You can use the same image, just draw it at a different angle which clearly shows you haven't traced it. Tracing will result in 0 marks!

Raysamray · 10-11-2015 05:24PM

Does anyone know if all sketches need to be fully defined in solidworks? If so how many marks would you lose if you had one part of a sketch is under defined? I've been trying to finish my tap in solidworks but there just doesnt seem to be a way to fully define one of the sketches for one of my parts, however it still looks fine and the assembly looks good with everythig else fully defined. I really need to get going on the next part of the project asap but dont want to be losing too many marks on things like this, cheers

Urbex · 11-11-2015 08:44PM

I have no clue wether to modify my tap or to come up with a new concept design. Any ideas?

seavill · 11-11-2015 09:25PM

Sketches should be fully defined where at all possible. I'd imagine the marks can't be huge but why throw away any. Try to use the fix relation of nothing else works. Maybe horizontal relation etc might work.

I encourage my students to create their own design as you can go anywhere with it.
Remember it can be fully drawn as one part in a concept if you wish.

saif.khalid14 · 12-11-2015 08:53AM

how are people doing with the mechanism of the tap ? what kind are you using and how difficult are they to draw?

Snazzy15 · 15-12-2015 08:12PM

Have just finished outputs 3 and 8 and just remembered that i used a compass. i took me approx 1 month to do the 2 of them together. will i lose marks or is it ok. the compass on only about diameter 7 or so.

robin321 · 02-01-2016 08:34AM

Hi all.
Question.

In the first part of the project, you select one of your "compare and contrast" images to sketch for the "Freehand graphical representation"
Does this freehand graphical representation have to be the same would you do in solid works? Or can you do the other "compare and contrast" image in solid works? Because that is what I have done

robin321 · 02-01-2016 08:38AM

robin321 wrote: »

Hi all.
Question.

In the first part of the project, you select one of your "compare and contrast" images to sketch for the "Freehand graphical representation"
Does this freehand graphical representation have to be the same would you do in solid works? Or can you do the other "compare and contrast" image in solid works? Because that is what I have done

If I was to submit it like this how would I be marked can anyone tell me?

seavill · 02-01-2016 10:42AM

The solidworks is the same as the freehand sketching.
I have never corrected the projects but I would imagine you wouldn't get the marks for the freehand sketching. I can't see how you would as the project is supposed to flow from output to output. It's not a series of single pages put together

sxtn · 04-01-2016 04:01PM

does soap/deodorant dispensers count in this project?

DCG 2016

Comments