Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Gameweek 16 Matchday Thread

1272829303133»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,262 ✭✭✭iroced


    You moved up 40k its a big jump when you were already in the 200ks. A 40k jump for someone outside the top million isnt the same. You have gained points on the other 19 players in the FSA premier all players with a good history in the game. Most of us also captained kane so we are all in the same boat there. You also got souare in for Kolarov. A lot of us wouldnt have got a clean sheet coming off the bench for kolorav. Your 4th midfielder delefeou outperformed a lot of other teams 4th mid barkley/coutinho.
    But this is precisely my point!

    Top10k average is 62.9. I got 67 pts.

    So in a GW where I got 14 pts from my Palace duo at the back (won't happen often in the season) including a lucky escape 6 pts autosub for Kolarov, where most expected CS did not happen (United/Spurs/'Pool) and where my 4th mid outscored or matched most other big guns, I only gained 4.1 pts over competitive teams ?!!?!!

    It's better than nothing alright but in my bad GWs I lost a lot more than 4.1 average pts over top10k. Hence my "disappointment" ;).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,274 ✭✭✭✭FHFC


    iroced wrote: »
    But this is precisely my point!

    Top10k average is 62.9. I got 67 pts.

    So in a GW where I got 14 pts from my Palace duo at the back (won't happen often in the season) including a lucky escape 6 pts autosub for Kolarov, where most expected CS did not happen (United/Spurs/'Pool) and where my 4th mid outscored or matched most other big guns, I only gained 4.1 pts over competitive teams ?!!?!!

    It's better than nothing alright but in my bad GWs I lost a lot more than 4.1 average pts over top10k. Hence my "disappointment" ;).

    As you can see most of us are deeply affected by your 'disappointment' at a 40k rise in OR to the zone of despair that is just outside the top 200k. We are concerned you may never recover and be cast into deep depression by this cruel blow. We would like to offer our collective shoulder for you to cry on until you feel a bit better and able to face day to day life again.

    Even those of us who dropped 100k in OR this week and almost 400k in the last 2 weeks and find ourselves in the nether regions of high 600k.

    We feel your pain iroced. Be strong mon ami. This too will pass.

    :should be a sarcastic emoji:

    ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,502 ✭✭✭spock.


    62(-4) means a drop of 15k to 103k
    7 consecutive red arrows now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,262 ✭✭✭iroced


    FHFC wrote: »
    As you can see most of us are deeply affected by your 'disappointment' at a 40k rise in OR to the zone of despair that is just outside the top 200k. We are concerned you may never recover and be cast into deep depression by this cruel blow. We would like to offer our collective shoulder for you to cry on until you feel a bit better and able to face day to day life again.

    Even those of us who dropped 100k in OR this week and almost 400k in the last 2 weeks and find ourselves in the nether regions of high 600k.

    We feel your pain iroced. Be strong mon ami. This too will pass.

    :should be a sarcastic emoji:

    ;)
    Ahah touché :P. I guess the correct phrasing for me here is "explaining is digging" :pac:.

    Probably not the right GW to explain my controversial theory of mine but like Busts and his pts hits theory, I'm sticking to my guns here (whether you score a glorious 150 pts or a miserable 15 doesn't make any difference on you missing out on 5, 10, 15 or more pts from a 50/50 choice).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    iroced wrote: »
    Ahah touché :P. I guess the correct phrasing for me here is "explaining is digging" :pac:.

    Probably not the right GW to explain my controversial theory of mine but like Busts and his pts hits theory, I'm sticking to my guns here (whether you score a glorious 150 pts or a miserable 15 doesn't make any difference on you missing out on 5, 10, 15 or more pts from a 50/50 choice).
    That's what I found stick to your guns and eventually you will get someone to agree with you ☺


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,274 ✭✭✭✭FHFC


    iroced wrote: »
    Ahah touché :P. I guess the correct phrasing for me here is "explaining is digging" :pac:.

    Probably not the right GW to explain my controversial theory of mine but like Busts and his pts hits theory, I'm sticking to my guns here (whether you score a glorious 150 pts or a miserable 15 doesn't make any difference on you missing out on 5, 10, 15 or more pts from a 50/50 choice).

    Every gameweek. All season long my friend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,262 ✭✭✭iroced


    FHFC wrote: »
    Every gameweek. All season long my friend.
    Yeah that's why this game can be so dramatically cruel :p.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭stephenl15


    62 points small drop to 89k AFAIR. Benched Vardy this week but at least I started Mahrez unlike for his hattrick :P Mané is finally leaving my team and I will never ever bench Vardez again.


Advertisement