Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk/Gossip/Rumour Thread IV

1227228230232233319

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    For England I'd go with...

    RK
    Trimble
    Payne
    Henshaw
    Zebo
    Sexton
    Reddan
    Murphy
    SOB
    POM
    POC
    Ryan
    Ross
    Best
    McGrath

    Cronin
    Healy
    Furlong
    Toner
    Hendo
    Murray
    Madigan
    Fitzgerald/DK


  • Administrators Posts: 55,122 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    There is absolutely no point in Trimble playing against England. A complete waste of time.

    He should be released to play for Ulster on Friday night. That way he gets game time and Ireland aren't playing players outside the squad in a vital warm up game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,272 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    .ak wrote: »
    Just watched the press con with joe. Have to say he looked very tired and a bit drawn out. You can tell this was literally the hardest squad selection of his career. The weight of the World Cup is becoming clear now, and the stuff he says about selection and calls being emotional isn't just a sound bite.

    But of course that's just another reason why he's such a good coach. He may be a pedant and analytic in his approach but he's definitely a good man manager too and has a genuine connection with his players. That could mean the difference between staying in your feet that extra second and winning that extra inch.

    +1
    I thought during the summer tour to Arg when he was going on about Darren Cave as a genuine contender for the centre as just BS coach speak.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    awec wrote: »
    There is absolutely no point in Trimble playing against England. A complete waste of time.

    He should be released to play for Ulster on Friday night. That way he gets game time and Ireland aren't playing players outside the squad in a vital warm up game.

    Could you not counter that by saying that him getting more time in the Irish team prepares him more if he's called up to replace an injury?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 469 ✭✭smiley_face


    Stheno wrote: »
    Could you not counter that by saying that him getting more time in the Irish team prepares him more if he's called up to replace an injury?

    And counter that counter with D Kearney, Zebo and Bowe all need game time too and are more likely to feature in the RWC.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    I think it's worth involving guys where one injury in a position would mean someone is coming from outside the environment is probably coming into the match day squad. IE loosehead, scrum half. In the other positions we should probably be looking to give game time to first XV guys because they're going to be held back at least partially against Romania and Canada and it's still over a month until the Italy game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Did the not say Trimble had a reuccurence of the foot injury after playing for Ulster last week?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    stephen_n wrote: »
    Did the not say Trimble had a reuccurence of the foot injury after playing for Ulster last week?

    No, after watching the press conference I don't think that's the case. He said trimble was in and out of the squad numerous times but ultimately the injury that recurred against Wales meant he didn't have enough time to make the squad. When referring to the injury he specifically referred to it happening between the Wales game and the 80 minutes for Ulster.

    I wouldn't be surprised if we see Trimble at the world cup though. We have some pretty injury-prone guys in the squad...


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    stephen_n wrote: »
    Did the not say Trimble had a reuccurence of the foot injury after playing for Ulster last week?
    No, after watching the press conference I don't think that's the case. He said trimble was in and out of the squad numerous times but ultimately the injury that recurred against Wales meant he didn't have enough time to make the squad. When referring to the injury he specifically referred to it happening between the Wales game and the 80 minutes for Ulster.

    I wouldn't be surprised if we see Trimble at the world cup though. We have some pretty injury-prone guys in the squad...

    That's what I thought too, it was after the wales game that it recurred.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Ah right, heard a sound bite on the radio and thought it was referring to the Ulster game, but must be the Welsh game then.

    I'd expect a near full strength team against England. A proper run out is required for our starting 15, now all the positional variations have been tried.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    I think it's worth involving guys where one injury in a position would mean someone is coming from outside the environment is probably coming into the match day squad. IE loosehead, scrum half. In the other positions we should probably be looking to give game time to first XV guys because they're going to be held back at least partially against Romania and Canada and it's still over a month until the Italy game.

    So give Mad Dog a serious test at scrumhalf ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,019 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    awec wrote: »
    There is absolutely no point in Trimble playing against England. A complete waste of time.

    He should be released to play for Ulster on Friday night. That way he gets game time and Ireland aren't playing players outside the squad in a vital warm up game.

    Also he could go and put in a man of the match shift, and while it would be exactly the reaction Joe would want, it would put big pressure on the wingers picked. Far better he gets his fitness and form playing for Ulster.

    Besides Bowe needs to start this one, and he needs a big game too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 469 ✭✭smiley_face


    aimee1 wrote: »
    look at JS press conference in RTE player and he mentions the training several times. its pretty clear he used the matches for specific purposes but most of his decisions were based in the past record of the player and his training performance this summer.

    Listen to his media conference on the IRFU website explaining the selection process. He mentioned performance in training as well as performance in matches and positivity adding up to certain players getting selected.
    I think it's past performance plus training performance plus attitude plus match performance. He obviously knows if players execute his instructions or not and if they replicated their training in the matches. So clearly all those things mattered towards selection. Also combinations of players factored into the selection process.
    He also stated in an interview recently that the matches were a window to put your hand up for selection and those performances would be the litmus test if players were good enough to be selected.
    To my mind the matches must have had some impact on the selections, at least to a degree, for a lot of the players. The matches weren't just for fitness and trying out backups combinations with the squad already selected.
    He said they spent 6 hours deciding and went back and forth a bit on certain selections.
    It could just be more spin, but I would have to conclude that the match performances gave some impact into the selections.


  • Administrators Posts: 55,122 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    bilston wrote: »
    Also he could go and put in a man of the match shift, and while it would be exactly the reaction Joe would want, it would put big pressure on the wingers picked. Far better he gets his fitness and form playing for Ulster.

    Besides Bowe needs to start this one, and he needs a big game too.

    Yea it would be a very odd situation if that happened. Be a bit awkward to be honest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,290 ✭✭✭aimee1


    Listen to his media conference on the IRFU website explaining the selection process. He mentioned performance in training as well as performance in matches and positivity adding up to certain players getting selected.
    I think it's past performance plus training performance plus attitude plus match performance. He obviously knows if players execute his instructions or not and if they replicated their training in the matches. So clearly all those things mattered towards selection. Also combinations of players factored into the selection process.
    He also stated in an interview recently that the matches were a window to put your hand up for selection and those performances would be the litmus test if players were good enough to be selected.
    To my mind the matches must have had some impact on the selections, at least to a degree, for a lot of the players. The matches weren't just for fitness and trying out backups combinations with the squad already selected.
    He said they spent 6 hours deciding and went back and forth a bit on certain selections.
    It could just be more spin, but I would have to conclude that the match performances gave some impact into the selections.


    Thats what i mean when i said he used matches for specific purposes. What we looked at and what JS looked for would be worlds apart. Which explains some selections and some post match comments about a player going well when most people thought they had quiet games.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Was very interesting to hear Schmidt's comments. It sounded like a gruelling process. When he was discussing the Bent/Furlong selection, he admitted Bent's name was on the sheet, then off the sheet repeatedly. That must be heartening and crushing for Bent to hear in equal measure.

    Had to laugh when he said that he was probably more emotional than Trimble when he gave him the news. I always reckoned Trimble would be up against it after being absent since October but if he hadn't hurt his foot again, I've no doubt he'd have been on the plane. In terms of the out and out wingers, DK stepping up probably sealed his fate.

    Still completely baffled with the Madigan covering 9 selection. With Cave travelling, I think we've too many outside backs. Fitz, Earls, Bowe, DK, RK, Zebo. I honestly think we could have omitted one of them (probably Earls or Fitz, especially with them picking up some knocks) and gone with a second string backline of Boss/Marmion, Jackson, Madigan, Cave, DK, Fitz/Earls, Zebo.

    I'd see that as far less risky than what we've gone with.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 843 ✭✭✭QuinDixie


    If Ireland reach the semi finals it will be a great achievement by Schmidt and the whole squad.
    Reaching the final will be very hard, England are at home, Australia and South Africa have the history and Wales seem to have our card and most importantly if any of Best, OBrien, Heaslip, Murray, Sexton, OConnell get injured we will be in serious trouble.

    Taking 2 scrum halves is a real gamble.

    If Murray gets a slight knock before the French or italy game we will 2 options:
    - have Madigan as replacement 9 and redddan starting.
    - replace Murray in the squad meaning he cannot come back into squad
    Both options will see us exit the world Cup by or before QF stage.

    That squad named will see changes due to injuries anyway, its so common in rugby, before and during the world cup. What I describe above has a very good chance of happening, it seems a strange decision to me to bring only two 9's.
    Delighted for Cave, Earls and Fitzgerald. Earls, I feel, is going to make this world cup his own.


  • Posts: 20,606 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Buer wrote: »

    Had to laugh when he said that he was probably more emotional than Trimble

    I remember when the recession hit in the company I was in at the time the staff numbers dropped to around 3 people from nearly 20 (I was one of the 3).

    I noted a couple of times that the owners looked more emotional after rounds of redundancies than the staff did. Not an easy or enviable job, despite obviously being much worse for the person being let go / not making the cut.

    That said, I'm sure Trimble new he was up against it to make the team - it's just a bit cruel that he was almost back and available just to have one more small set back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,589 ✭✭✭Awesomeness


    I think one of the things Joe has done with the backs is to implement different tactics. Depending on whether we have Dave K and Bowe there or Zebo and Fitz we could implement different game plans and gives more options


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,981 ✭✭✭connachta


    connachta wrote: »
    Oh do you want some direct quotes? Will take a while, but i can easily find them
    connachta wrote: »
    Sorry, it was on the international topic. Never mind though. There are other ones
    Really though?
    The games are much less important in determining the make up of the squad than you seem to be suggesting.

    Dave Kearney has barely been on the field. By your logic he hasn't a chance, but he's being suggested by the media as have a very good change to make the squad. Why? Because the squad is going to be selected primarily based on what they've been doing at Carton House, not what they've been doing in mickey mouse warm up games.

    That's about international friendlies. Fact. Under-estimation of the games against Wales and Scotland was general here, nevertheless it costs Trimble place, partly at least


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,776 ✭✭✭Noopti


    I think some articles are spot on this morning highlighting that now the squad has been named it has lifted a massive weight of Joe's shoulders and he will relish being able to focus on this group of players and preparing them for what lies ahead.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,341 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    We do have alot of outside backs but still only 1 out and out centre and 1 out and out FB and I'm not sure how keen Schmidt is on Madigan covering centre either.

    I don't think we'll see much of Madigan at 9 either, I'd say he's only the break in extreme emergency option.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,078 ✭✭✭✭vienne86


    Noopti wrote: »
    I think some articles are spot on this morning highlighting that now the squad has been named it has lifted a massive weight of Joe's shoulders and he will relish being able to focus on this group of players and preparing them for what lies ahead.

    I'd say your're right - and it will calm us posters down as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,244 ✭✭✭rrpc


    connachta wrote: »
    That's about international friendlies. Fact. Under-estimation of the games against Wales and Scotland was general here, nevertheless it costs Trimble place, partly at least

    A few posts above this one is a reference to Trimble's injury against Wales being the deciding factor, not his performance which imo was very good until he limped off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,981 ✭✭✭connachta


    rrpc wrote: »
    A few posts above this one is a reference to Trimble's injury against Wales being the deciding factor, not his performance which imo was very good until he limped off.

    The issue is he couldn't proove his consistant performance, and Schmidt wanted it so "Mickey mouse" games mattered more than the quote above predicted


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 469 ✭✭smiley_face


    rrpc wrote: »
    A few posts above this one is a reference to Trimble's injury against Wales being the deciding factor, not his performance which imo was very good until he limped off.

    He had a great 34 minutes, but as he hadn't enough chance to back up that performance again in the subsequent training sessions and matches for Ireland, he missed out.
    The match he played for Ulster doesn't seem to have been enough to get him into the squad.
    No doubt in my mind though, he is the first choice replacement in the event that any of the selected wingers get injured.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 469 ✭✭smiley_face


    QuinDixie wrote: »
    If Ireland reach the semi finals it will be a great achievement by Schmidt and the whole squad.
    Reaching the final will be very hard, England are at home, Australia and South Africa have the history and Wales seem to have our card and most importantly if any of Best, OBrien, Heaslip, Murray, Sexton, OConnell get injured we will be in serious trouble.

    Taking 2 scrum halves is a real gamble.

    If Murray gets a slight knock before the French or italy game we will 2 options:
    - have Madigan as replacement 9 and redddan starting.
    - replace Murray in the squad meaning he cannot come back into squad
    Both options will see us exit the world Cup by or before QF stage.

    That squad named will see changes due to injuries anyway, its so common in rugby, before and during the world cup. What I describe above has a very good chance of happening, it seems a strange decision to me to bring only two 9's.
    Delighted for Cave, Earls and Fitzgerald. Earls, I feel, is going to make this world cup his own.

    If an injury occurs to any of the following players: Cave, Earls, Fitzgerald, Dave Kearney, it may be an idea then to bring in Boss or Marmion instead of Trimble. (Would replace Bowe with Trimble)
    I suppose it depends if Murray or Reddan have picked up any niggles, and how well the other wingers are performing, and how well Trimble, Boss and Marmion play in the Pro12 over the next few weeks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,290 ✭✭✭aimee1


    connachta wrote: »
    The issue is he couldn't proove his consistant performance, and Schmidt wanted it so "Mickey mouse" games mattered more than the quote above predicted

    I think its more a case of the recurring injury hampered his ability to train and play, not his performance as such. Trimble put in a very good 34 minutes against Wales a few weeks ago but he got injured.

    Its clear from the JS conference that credit in the bank, training and then the warm ups were all part of his thought process. Its no surprise really but the warm ups were only part of his selection process for 3-4 spots. Most/all of the rest were pretty much already decided upon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭total former


    connachta wrote: »
    The issue is he couldn't proove his consistant performance, and Schmidt wanted it so "Mickey mouse" games mattered more than the quote above predicted

    I'm so confused. The "mickey mouse" quote referred to the provinces' warm-up games.

    Trimble came through 80 minutes in the Ulster game (and scored a try) and it didn't change the coach's mind.

    On the other hand, Joe said that Cave's performance against Wales and his contribution in training is what won him the place in the squad. Just like Donnacha Ryan sealed his spot based entirely on the first Wales game. So performances for Ireland and in Ireland camp counted, performances for provinces seemed to count for very little.

    I don't understand what point you're trying to make.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    connachta wrote: »
    The issue is he couldn't proove his consistant performance, and Schmidt wanted it so "Mickey mouse" games mattered more than the quote above predicted

    Nope, they didn't.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement