Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Weird, Wacky and Awesome World of the NFL - General Banter thread V2

12627293132327

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    I know people have been saying Peyton's age has really showed these last two years, but that screenshot of the youtube video is jarring!


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Luciano Embarrassed Drummer


    Hardys bad getting reduced to 4 games is rediculous. Also Cowboys and Broncos could be in trouble the players association are accusing them of agreeing to not sign dez and demarius to big contracts thereby setting a market for the other. Aparently this could result in massive penaltys for both clubs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,794 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Hardys bad getting reduced to 4 games is rediculous. Also Cowboys and Broncos could be in trouble the players association are accusing them of agreeing to not sign dez and demarius to big contracts thereby setting a market for the other. Aparently this could result in massive penaltys for both clubs

    this is where Dez needs to take the hit in the wallet and only play 6 games, he will make a ****ing fortune in free agency


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Luciano Embarrassed Drummer


    this is where Dez needs to take the hit in the wallet and only play 6 games, he will make a ****ing fortune in free agency

    Yup and also not have to play for the bloody Cowboys :D

    Realistically though your talking 2 years of franchise tags before he hits free agency


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,794 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Yup and also not have to play for the bloody Cowboys :D

    Realistically though your talking 2 years of franchise tags before he hits free agency

    over 2 million a game if he plays the minimum!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    this is where Dez needs to take the hit in the wallet and only play 6 games, he will make a ****ing fortune in free agency

    Great player, but overrated. The way people go on, you'd swear he was a Megatron, Randy Moss, or late 2000s Larry Fitzgerald. He's Pro Bowl-to-All Pro standard in my opinion, but I think Romo makes him look good more than he makes Romo look good (though it's obviously mutual between them both)... if that makes sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,794 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Great player, but overrated. The way people go on, you'd swear he was a Megatron, Randy Moss, or late 2000s Larry Fitzgerald. He's Pro Bowl-to-All Pro standard in my opinion, but I think Romo makes him look good more than he makes Romo look good (though it's obviously mutual between them both)... if that makes sense.

    The way I look at it does he improve my teams offence.


    Would he make packers offence more dangerous? **** yes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    The way I look at it does he improve my teams offence.


    Would he make packers offence more dangerous? **** yes.
    But does he improve a team offense enough to justify a massive salary that take away from other positions? I certainly wouldn't risk putting him in on a big contract if it meant losing other important players, when we've got Jordy and Cobb on good prices.

    I just think WR is an over valued position due to how much passing is in the game now. If anything, the pass interference rules have made it easier for average WRs to be productive with good QB play and a well fit system. For me, the QB and line are far more important... WR/TE/RB are on a tier below. Just my personal preference, mind.

    A team like the Rams (if they could afford him) though, would be doing very well. It's just that I don't know if there are enough decent teams to makke a real bidding war for him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,794 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Billy86 wrote: »
    But does he improve a team offense enough to justify a massive salary that take away from other positions? I certainly wouldn't risk putting him in on a big contract if it meant losing other important players, when we've got Jordy and Cobb on good prices.

    I just think WR is an over valued position due to how much passing is in the game now. If anything, the pass interference rules have made it easier for average WRs to be productive with good QB play and a well fit system. For me, the QB and line are far more important... WR/TE/RB are on a tier below. Just my personal preference, mind.

    A team like the Rams (if they could afford him) though, would be doing very well. It's just that I don't know if there are enough decent teams to makke a real bidding war for him.

    Well let me ask you this, how do the cowboys do without him ( I also agree he's not worth it for the packers but that wasn't my point)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Well let me ask you this, how do the cowboys do without him ( I also agree he's not worth it for the packers but that wasn't my point)

    Not as well. Just like without Murray, who they also let walk. He's a quality receiver, might be top 5, it I wouldn't want to be splashing out big money in him if it meant losing some key defensive players, or if I were a Cowboys fan, if it meant losing key linemen or Romp (though the latter would never happen to make room for Dez).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 950 ✭✭✭nasty_crash


    to be honest he is a franchise player - take him out of Dallas and they would be a different team! Terrance Williams and Cole Beasley - as much as i do like Beasley - he isnt an end zone threat.

    Would we say that Dez wouldnt walk into any team in the NFL that was looking for a WR - if teams had the cap space i think they would take him.... like imagine Seahawks if they had Dez and Graham! Or Falcons with Julio and Dez!

    Class player with only a couple of players better than him


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,475 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    Michael Irvin says that Cowboys are an 8-8 team without Dez Bryant, forgetting of course that prior to last season, Cowboys were the most notorious 8-8 team in the NFL.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,645 ✭✭✭phatkev


    Chiefs have signed Justin Houston to a $101 million with 52.5 guaranteed! Serious cash, but for a player of Houstons quality it'll be worth it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,780 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Apparently there are reports that the Cowboys are above the number of the tender which is $13 million so there seems to be some movement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,416 ✭✭✭Guffy


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    Apparently there are reports that the Cowboys are above the number of the tender which is $13 million so there seems to be some movement.

    How does the tender increase every year?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,475 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    gufc21 wrote: »
    How does the tender increase every year?

    If you franchise a player two years in a row, the second time they get a higher rate, I'm sure.

    1st year is the average of the top 5 in the position class, or 120% their current salary. Whichever is higher.

    2nd year is 120% the first, so if you're already receiving a top 3 yearly salary, and now you get 120% of that, you're most likely the highest paid player in your position.

    If Wilson gets tagged two years in a row for the Hawks, for example, he's gonna be earning a bomb.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,326 ✭✭✭✭paulie21


    Reports Dez Bryant agreed 70 million 5 year deal with 45 million guaranteed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,326 ✭✭✭✭paulie21


    Demaryius Thomas signed for same as Bryant with 35 million guaranteed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,317 ✭✭✭HigginsJ


    paulie21 wrote: »
    Reports Dez Bryant agreed 70 million 5 year deal with 45 million guaranteed
    paulie21 wrote: »
    Demaryius Thomas signed for same as Bryant with 35 million guaranteed

    They seem like really good deals for both clubs to tie down two of the top 5 WR's in the NFL.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,645 ✭✭✭phatkev


    Dan Connolly has announced his retirement. I know he's no spring chicken, but were pats fans expecting this or dose it come as a surprise??

    edit:Just read he's had 5 confirmed concussions, thats definitely reason enough to retire


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,627 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Very good article over on Grantland.com about Reggie Bush's last season with USC in 2005.

    Fair warning, it's not a short read.

    http://grantland.com/the-triangle/the-ghost-of-reggie-bush-looking-back-at-a-tarnished-trojan-hero-10-years-later/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,370 ✭✭✭✭Son Of A Vidic


    phatkev wrote: »
    Dan Connolly has announced his retirement. I know he's no spring chicken, but were pats fans expecting this or those it come as a surprise??

    Ya, we were kinda of expecting it. He's lost a sight of weight since the Superbowl and hasn't been on the field since then. Increased player knowledge of concussion risks obviously played a factor, then throw in the fact that he's 33 in September and you can see he made the right move.

    He was an unknown who turned into a fine player and became an indispensable starter on the OL. I'm glad to see him retiring in good health and with a well deserved Superbowl ring. Oh and for those who don't know, he also left us with this, the greatest kick return ever :D ....



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Why does every second special teams highlight ever seem to be against GB? :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,510 ✭✭✭baby and crumble


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Why does every second special teams highlight ever seem to be against GB? :(

    Cos for the last while our special teams have been pretty darn terrible? :/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Cos for the last while our special teams have been pretty darn terrible? :/
    But I thought special teams "are not football"... so how come it has had such an impact on some of our results (I'm looking at you, NFC Championship game)?




    Didn't mean that as a swipe at you, just a major personal gripe. Funny how the Patriots put a lot of effort into ST and are consistently among the top teams in the league... yet even a few days ago, some of the NFL media were baulking at the idea of tagging Gostkowski, simply because he is a kicker.

    The same goes for how some immediately see it as either a joke or even an insult when Steve Tasker, the greatest special teamer of all time, is brought up. Not like he was one of the most important players on a team that went to four straight Superbowls or anything... :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,370 ✭✭✭✭Son Of A Vidic


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Funny how the Patriots put a lot of effort into ST and are consistently among the top teams in the league... yet even a few days ago, some of the NFL media were baulking at the idea of tagging Gostkowski, simply because he is a kicker.

    The comments about Gost just shows you the stupidity of some media types. Being a very reliable strong & accurate kicker, against the strong winds in Gillette is nothing to be scoffed at or underestimated imo. Belichick has always put an equal emphasis on ST's than he does on the defensive & offensive components of the game. A lot of teams make the mistake of treating ST's as a chore, the Pats do the very opposite and I think it pays off.

    Not many teams would keep a guy like Matthew Slater on the roster, he's a WR with one career catch for 46 yards in seven seasons. But on ST's he is simply brilliant and he is probably the most influential ST player in the league. He has made so many huge ST plays down the years, I wouldn't know where to start. Now NFL Total Access will probably laugh at his lack of gaudy career stats as a WR when he retires. But his contribution on ST's has been immeasurable and will go largely unsung.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    The comments about Gost just shows you the stupidity of some media types. Being a very reliable strong & accurate kicker, against the strong winds in Gillette is nothing to be scoffed at or underestimated imo. Belichick has always put an equal emphasis on ST's than he does on the defensive & offensive components of the game. A lot of teams make the mistake of treating ST's as a chore, the Pats do the very opposite and I think it pays off.

    Not many teams would keep a guy like Matthew Slater on the roster, he's a WR with one career catch for 46 yards in seven seasons. But on ST's he is simply brilliant and he is probably the most influential ST player in the league. He has made so many huge ST plays down the years, I wouldn't know where to start. Now NFL Total Access will probably laugh at his lack of gaudy career stats as a WR when he retires. But his contribution on ST's has been immeasurable and will go largely unsung.
    The PAckers also had Jarrett Bush, who trailed off a bit the last year or two (he went 31 this spring) but was an exceptional special teamer for a decade - I would agree Slater has been the best, but Bush could have pushed for #2. Despite being one of the worst CBs in the league for years, he was held on to (later developing into a 'just barely ok' #5/6 CB) and it often paid back well, as at times we have had glaring holes in other areas. Likewise with our long snapper Brett Goode, who has possibly been the best in the league over the last 8-10 ears (don't think he has botched one single snap in his pro career). Yet every offseason, you would hear a murmur about getting rid of these guys for a 'completely raw, all upside' corner (read: excellent athlete, not a footballer player) or 'someone who can actually play on offense if required' in relation to Goode.

    But then we get idiots like this...


    At 1:40, you get a guy specifically saying he will never vote for a special teamer on the basis that he would only vote for "an every down player" and not "a guy who plays 5 or 6 downs a game". Two things
    1. I hope he has never voted for almost any player in NFL modern history then, because the number of 'every down players' over the last 15-20 years I can remember consists of: Deion Sanders, Deion Branch (was it Branch? I remember a Pats player playing 'both ways' quite a bit, a little over a decade back).

    2. Does this guy even watch the sport? No seriously, does he? How often do you see "5-6" special teams plays in a whole game (as Tasker played everything but FGs and XPs, as best I know). Given that the kickoffs would make two, you would need it to be a 3-2 or 7-0 final scoreline with zero punts, just endless turnovers for what would be a game that would surely last hours and hours and hours on end.

    I seem to rant about this a few times every off season :D but it really is baffling the level of sheer disrespect that special teamers get from their own sport. And the constant, stubborn, frankly childish refusal to except being wrong by teams that ignore ST over and over and over, and get stung over and over and over as a result of it.


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Luciano Embarrassed Drummer


    Eagles special teams won us a few games last year chip has actively signed a few player just for there special teams production and the difference has been massive Chris prosninsky and chris maragos in particular are special teams monsters (and last year he scoffed at the idea that he should be cautious of sproles as a returner "because it's just special teams")


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,370 ✭✭✭✭Son Of A Vidic


    Billy86 wrote: »
    I hope he has never voted for almost any player in NFL modern history then, because the number of 'every down players' over the last 15-20 years I can remember consists of: Deion Sanders, Deion Branch (was it Branch? I remember a Pats player playing 'both ways' quite a bit, a little over a decade back).

    That would have been our legendary 8th round draft pick, 3 times Superbowl winner and Pats Hall Of Famer - Troy Brown. What a player he was, a fine player on offense and on defense. He even played emergence QB in one game (Can't remember which one). But I do remeber Belichicks famous quote when he was asked why he played him at QB, Bill said - "To develop his legend.":D

    Your not alone in your ranting though Billy. It really irks me when guys who should understand the game, just seem to write off ST or the importance of player versatility. Look at Adam Vinatieri for example, the guy should be walking into Canton on the first ballot. But many football 'experts' don't even think a kicker belongs in the HOF. For me it's a team game and if you excel at your position, then you're entitled to be considered for the HOF.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,510 ✭✭✭baby and crumble


    It's comparable in some ways to doubles specialists in tennis getting looked down on by the majority of casual fans- but man the skill and instinct those specialists need to have is unreal.

    I quite like watching special teams, and if nothing else the importance of good solid special teams was spectacularly on display in the NFC game this year. When you have a QB and an O-line like the packers and a pretty decent defence and you only have 1 Super Bowl since Rodgers starting then there's clearly a big piece missing. Hopefully the Packers changes to ST's will make a difference this year.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement