Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Rangers FC On Field Gossip & Rumour Thread 2017 Mod Note in OP(Updated 14/08)

1212213215217218307

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    Jelle1880 wrote: »
    Not so far, there's talks with several other players.

    I heard Eustace had a productive talk with the club and then went back to England, probably to think it over and maybe because other clubs might be interested too.

    What a nice way of saying he didn't want to sign for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Broxi_Bear_Eire


    Burnley at Ibrox on Tueday 21st July 7:45 kick off. Should be an interesting game


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Broxi_Bear_Eire


    What a nice way of saying he didn't want to sign for you.

    Or maybe he thought he was going to get big money and got s shock when he discovered the club won't pay silly wages especially to a 35 year old with dodgy knees ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭bobmalooka


    Or maybe he thought he was going to get big money and got s shock when he discovered the club won't pay silly wages especially to a 35 year old with dodgy knees ;)

    Same difference no?

    Either he didn't want to sign or else 35 year old kneeless players need silly money consider to Ibrox


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Broxi_Bear_Eire


    bobmalooka wrote: »
    Same difference no?

    Either he didn't want to sign or else 35 year old kneeless players need silly money consider to Ibrox

    Really if you want to believe that fine the reality is you may be right but then again it could be one of a number of reasons none which may include not wanting to sign or new dining silly money. Their is a whole variety of reasons why he may not have signed I won't lose any sleep over it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 974 ✭✭✭Intifada


    Don't know why you can't accept that he didn't want to sign for a lower league Scottish team. We are the only big club in Scotland and plenty of players don't want to sign for us either. You'll get used to it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Broxi_Bear_Eire


    Intifada wrote: »
    Don't know why you can't accept that he didn't want to sign for a lower league Scottish team. We are the only big club in Scotland and plenty of players don't want to sign for us either. You'll get used to it.

    I really wish you would stop assuming to have a clue of what I think. I never said I cannot accept a played signing for us. I said there are many reasons why a player won't sign. The rest of your post is typical nonsense :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    Or maybe he thought he was going to get big money and got s shock when he discovered the club won't pay silly wages especially to a 35 year old with dodgy knees ;)

    Strange we don't see the headline - "35 year old with dodgy knees knocks back The Rangers to remain unemployed."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 974 ✭✭✭Intifada


    I really wish you would stop assuming to have a clue of what I think.
    It is a response to what you have said. If that is not what you think then you need to learn how to express yourself properly, otherwise you will struggle badly with this message board craic.

    I did not say you cannot accept a player not signing for you, I said you cannot accept the reason for it. Again, this is based on your posts where you reject the suggested reason and instead wish to entertain various other excuses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,839 ✭✭✭Jelle1880


    What a nice way of saying he didn't want to sign for you.

    Nothing has been mentioned about him knocking back Rangers so you (as usual) know the square root of fuck all :)

    It could be he's not coming, could also be he's thinking it over.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Broxi_Bear_Eire


    Intifada wrote: »
    It is a response to what you have said. If that is not what you think then you need to learn how to express yourself properly, otherwise you will struggle badly with this message board craic.

    I did not say you cannot accept a player not signing for you, I said you cannot accept the reason for it. Again, this is based on your posts where you reject the suggested reason and instead wish to entertain various other excuses.

    Aye right you are. Once again I have no interest in what you think your opinion of my forum skills in a score out of ten is Ach I will be generous and give you a 1
    :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 974 ✭✭✭Intifada


    Aye right you are. Once again I have no interest in what you think your opinion of my forum skills in a score out of ten is Ach I will be generous and give you a 1
    :)
    Did you just rate my opinion of your forum skills, while telling me you don't care what I think? Bizarre stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,839 ✭✭✭Jelle1880


    What a nice way of saying he didn't want to sign for you.

    Raman Bhardwaj ‏@STVRaman 7m7 minutes ago
    Rangers set to sign Wes Foderingham as Eustace arrives in Glasgow for further talks

    :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Broxi_Bear_Eire


    Jelle1880 wrote: »
    Raman Bhardwaj ‏@STVRaman 7m7 minutes ago
    Rangers set to sign Wes Foderingham as Eustace arrives in Glasgow for further talks

    :cool:

    Eustace is training with ghclub for two weeks so his fitness can be assessed. Foderingham has signed a three year deal with an option for a further year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    From Chuck on Huddleboard.

    CJFlFLAWUAAc2Th.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,111 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    seems strange that it is signed 'Deloitte LLP', maybe it is because the person does not want to be intimidated?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Broxi_Bear_Eire


    That could be anything it's no secret they wanted nothing to do with the accounts it was well known by just about everyone. Also the fact that it's a bit of paper from that well known bastion of fairness with anything regarding Rangers is the Muddleboard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    CJFlFK9WoAAQH9g.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,839 ✭✭✭Jelle1880


    I believe this is just a clarification from Deloitte towards the club and the fans.

    They informed the previous board they would resign after the June 2014 audit, the previous board chose not to announce this until about half a year ago or so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    Jelle1880 wrote: »
    I believe this is just a clarification from Deloitte towards the club and the fans.

    They informed the previous board they would resign after the June 2014 audit, the previous board chose not to announce this until about half a year ago or so.

    A clarification that you're so financially toxic they want nothing to do with you.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,839 ✭✭✭Jelle1880


    A clarification that you're so financially toxic they want nothing to do with you.

    Under the previous board ? Absolutely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    Jelle1880 wrote: »
    Under the previous board ? Absolutely.

    What about this Board?

    Deloitte are refusing to work with THIS Board.

    What about the Stock Exchange listing?

    Come on, open your eyes... actually... Don't open your eyes... :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,839 ✭✭✭Jelle1880


    What about this Board?

    Deloitte are refusing to work with THIS Board.

    What about the Stock Exchange listing?

    Come on, open your eyes... actually... Don't open your eyes... :D

    Can you not read or are you being deliberately obtuse ?

    Deloitte resigned under the previous board. Why would they come back crawling to the new board asking to be reappointed ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    Jelle1880 wrote: »
    Can you not read or are you being deliberately obtuse ?

    Deloitte resigned under the previous board. Why would they come back crawling to the new board asking to be reappointed ?

    Yes, I can read the letter from Deloitte dated 19th June 2015 which was sent to your current Board which states that they are "resigning as Auditors".

    Was 19th June 2015 under the previous or current regime Jelle?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,839 ✭✭✭Jelle1880


    Yes, I can read the letter from Deloitte dated 19th June 2015 which was sent to your current Board which states that they are "resigning as Auditors".

    Was 19th June 2015 under the previous or current regime Jelle?

    Well I guess that answers my question about your reading abilities :)

    In the summer of 2014 Deloitte mentioned their intention to resign. Remember that time ? When the previous board were in control, in case you'd forgotten.

    http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/business/company-results-forecasts/rangers-international-football-club-reports-5433057
    RIFC interim chairman Paul Murray notes the company's auditor Deloitte, “informed the previous board of their intention to resign following the June 2014 audit”.

    Murray added: “The previous board chose not to announce this nor did they find a replacement for Deloitte.”

    No official announcement has been made to the stock exchange on Deloitte's intention to step down as auditors, though Murray said Deloitte are still “officially in place”.

    RIFC has now enlisted London-based accountants Jeffreys Henry to act as “Independent Reporting Accountants, not auditors”, and the board will “make a further announcement on this subject once we have found a replacement firm for Deloitte”.

    In case you have issues reading it, it says that they gave their intention to resign to the old board last summer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    Jelle1880 wrote: »
    Well I guess that answers my question about your reading abilities :)

    In the summer of 2014 Deloitte mentioned their intention to resign. Remember that time ? When the previous board were in control, in case you'd forgotten.

    http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/business/company-results-forecasts/rangers-international-football-club-reports-5433057



    In case you have issues reading it, it says that they gave their intention to resign to the old board last summer.

    Where did Deloitte say they were going to resign as Auditors? I must have missed that statement. Twice you've made reference to it but I can't find any statement from Deloitte about it.

    What I can see is a letter from Deloitte dated 19th June 2015 which was sent to your current Board which states that they are "resigning as Auditors".

    Was 19th June 2015 under the previous or current regime Jelle?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Broxi_Bear_Eire


    ]In a letter distributed to Rangers International Football Club plc shareholders, Deloitte say the messages came from "anonymous third party sources" during 2013 and 2014.

    In a separate letter to shareholders James Blair, the RIFC company secretary said: "The board is disappointed that Deloitte has chosen to resign due to acts which occurred in 2013 and 2014 whilst RIFC was under different stewardship."

    South African businessman Dave King and allies took control of the RIFC board from allies of Sports Direct tycoon Mike Ashley in a shareholders vote at an extraordinary general meeting on March 6.

    The Deloitte letter dated June 19 states: "We have decided that we no longer wish to carry on as auditor to the company.

    "During the period of our audit appointment in 2013 and 2014, members of our engagement team and other Deloitte partners unconnected with the audit received threatening or intimidating messages from anonymous third party sources.

    "The safety and wellbeing of our staff is of paramount importance, and they should not be subject to this treatment when undertaking their normal professional duties. Accordingly we are resigning as auditors to Rangers International Football Club plc."

    Blair told shareholders there had been "positive discussions" ongoing with "alternative auditors" and that an announcement on an appointment will be made "in the near future".

    The announcement to shareholders comes three months after the latest half-yearly RIFC accounts said that the Rangers holding company had appointed London-based accountants Jeffreys Henry to act as independent reporting accountants after discovering Deloitte had announced an "intention to resign" following the June 2014 audit.

    Acting chairman Paul Murray said at the time that the previous board "chose not to announce this nor did they find a replacement".

    At the time the board said it would make "a further announcement on this subject once we have found a replacement firm for Deloitte".

    The board said the financial statement made for the six month period to December 31 2014 was made on a "going concern basis", saying it was investigating a "number of options" for future finance and had identified a number of potential investors.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,165 ✭✭✭Savage Tyrant


    Am I missing something here?... Even if Deloitte had announced their intention to step down while the previous board were in control (and I accept that is likely accurate) they were and are still in effect into the tenure of the new board... If the situation was genuinely improving then it stands to reason that they could easily be convinced to continue in their role... I'm sure Deloitte aren't in the practice of turning down clients unless they are just more trouble than they are worth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Broxi_Bear_Eire


    Am I missing something here?... Even if Deloitte had announced their intention to step down while the previous board were in control (and I accept that is likely accurate) they were and are still in effect into the tenure of the new board... If the situation was genuinely improving then it stands to reason that they could easily be convinced to continue in their role... I'm sure Deloitte aren't in the practice of turning down clients unless they are just more trouble than they are worth.

    They say they stepped down due to threats made to their staff bu person or persons uknown. It also says makes it clear the said threats were in 2013 and 2014.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,165 ✭✭✭Savage Tyrant


    They say they stepped down due to threats made to their staff bu person or persons uknown. It also says makes it clear the said threats were in 2013 and 2014.

    Malicious threats on staff members would certainly fall under the category of "more trouble than they're worth" I suppose.
    Same old new old R*ngers fans.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement