Rangers FC On Field Gossip & Rumour Thread 2017 Mod Note in OP(Updated 14/08)

bobbysands81 wrote: »

What about this Board?

Deloitte are refusing to work with THIS Board.

What about the Stock Exchange listing?

Come on, open your eyes... actually... Don't open your eyes...

Can you not read or are you being deliberately obtuse ?

Deloitte resigned under the previous board. Why would they come back crawling to the new board asking to be reappointed ?

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Under the previous board ? Absolutely.

What about this Board?

Deloitte are refusing to work with THIS Board.

What about the Stock Exchange listing?

Come on, open your eyes... actually... Don't open your eyes...

bobbysands81 wrote: »

A clarification that you're so financially toxic they want nothing to do with you.

Under the previous board ? Absolutely.

Jelle1880 wrote: »

I believe this is just a clarification from Deloitte towards the club and the fans.

They informed the previous board they would resign after the June 2014 audit, the previous board chose not to announce this until about half a year ago or so.

A clarification that you're so financially toxic they want nothing to do with you.

I believe this is just a clarification from Deloitte towards the club and the fans.

They informed the previous board they would resign after the June 2014 audit, the previous board chose not to announce this until about half a year ago or so.

That could be anything it's no secret they wanted nothing to do with the accounts it was well known by just about everyone. Also the fact that it's a bit of paper from that well known bastion of fairness with anything regarding Rangers is the Muddleboard.

A Dub in Glasgo

seems strange that it is signed 'Deloitte LLP', maybe it is because the person does not want to be intimidated?

From Chuck on Huddleboard.

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Raman Bhardwaj ‏@STVRaman 7m7 minutes ago
Rangers set to sign Wes Foderingham as Eustace arrives in Glasgow for further talks

:cool:

Eustace is training with ghclub for two weeks so his fitness can be assessed. Foderingham has signed a three year deal with an option for a further year

bobbysands81 wrote: »

What a nice way of saying he didn't want to sign for you.

Raman Bhardwaj ‏@STVRaman 7m7 minutes ago
Rangers set to sign Wes Foderingham as Eustace arrives in Glasgow for further talks

:cool:

Intifada

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Aye right you are. Once again I have no interest in what you think your opinion of my forum skills in a score out of ten is Ach I will be generous and give you a 1

Did you just rate my opinion of your forum skills, while telling me you don't care what I think? Bizarre stuff.

Intifada wrote: »

It is a response to what you have said. If that is not what you think then you need to learn how to express yourself properly, otherwise you will struggle badly with this message board craic.

I did not say you cannot accept a player not signing for you, I said you cannot accept the reason for it. Again, this is based on your posts where you reject the suggested reason and instead wish to entertain various other excuses.

Aye right you are. Once again I have no interest in what you think your opinion of my forum skills in a score out of ten is Ach I will be generous and give you a 1

bobbysands81 wrote: »

What a nice way of saying he didn't want to sign for you.

Nothing has been mentioned about him knocking back Rangers so you (as usual) know the square root of fuck all

It could be he's not coming, could also be he's thinking it over.

Intifada

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

I really wish you would stop assuming to have a clue of what I think.

It is a response to what you have said. If that is not what you think then you need to learn how to express yourself properly, otherwise you will struggle badly with this message board craic.

I did not say you cannot accept a player not signing for you, I said you cannot accept the reason for it. Again, this is based on your posts where you reject the suggested reason and instead wish to entertain various other excuses.

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Or maybe he thought he was going to get big money and got s shock when he discovered the club won't pay silly wages especially to a 35 year old with dodgy knees

Strange we don't see the headline - "35 year old with dodgy knees knocks back The Rangers to remain unemployed."

Intifada wrote: »

Don't know why you can't accept that he didn't want to sign for a lower league Scottish team. We are the only big club in Scotland and plenty of players don't want to sign for us either. You'll get used to it.

I really wish you would stop assuming to have a clue of what I think. I never said I cannot accept a played signing for us. I said there are many reasons why a player won't sign. The rest of your post is typical nonsense

Intifada

Don't know why you can't accept that he didn't want to sign for a lower league Scottish team. We are the only big club in Scotland and plenty of players don't want to sign for us either. You'll get used to it.

bobmalooka wrote: »

Same difference no?

Either he didn't want to sign or else 35 year old kneeless players need silly money consider to Ibrox

Really if you want to believe that fine the reality is you may be right but then again it could be one of a number of reasons none which may include not wanting to sign or new dining silly money. Their is a whole variety of reasons why he may not have signed I won't lose any sleep over it.

bobmalooka

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Or maybe he thought he was going to get big money and got s shock when he discovered the club won't pay silly wages especially to a 35 year old with dodgy knees

Same difference no?

Either he didn't want to sign or else 35 year old kneeless players need silly money consider to Ibrox

bobbysands81 wrote: »

What a nice way of saying he didn't want to sign for you.

Or maybe he thought he was going to get big money and got s shock when he discovered the club won't pay silly wages especially to a 35 year old with dodgy knees

Burnley at Ibrox on Tueday 21st July 7:45 kick off. Should be an interesting game

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Not so far, there's talks with several other players.

I heard Eustace had a productive talk with the club and then went back to England, probably to think it over and maybe because other clubs might be interested too.

What a nice way of saying he didn't want to sign for you.

zorro2566 wrote: »

Was he signed?

Not so far, there's talks with several other players.

I heard Eustace had a productive talk with the club and then went back to England, probably to think it over and maybe because other clubs might be interested too.

zorro2566 wrote: »

Was he signed?

Nope he hasn't yet anyway

[Deleted User]

Jelle1880 wrote: »

John Eustace is in Glasgow for talks too it seems.

Was he signed?

John Eustace is in Glasgow for talks too it seems.

bobbysands81 wrote: »

24 years of age, 87 pro games, you're his 12th club. That's a lot of clubs and very few games.

Time will tell he will be pulling in a Rangers jumper he gets my support until I see s reason to withdraw it 😉

PauloMN

bobbysands81 wrote: »

you're his 12th club.

Robbie Keane is in awe of that record.