Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Dublin school cancels workshop on homophobic bullying, saying “both sides should be r

145791017

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Imagine an Educate Together was going to hold a workshop on racism and two parents (their colour is irrelevant) opposed it on the basis that their child shouldn't be subjected to anti-racism propaganda?

    Really bizarre decision by the school. They should have excluded the children whose parents opposed it and went ahead. I can only imagine some higher-up strings were pulled, even if it was on the basis of a parents' objections.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,533 ✭✭✭Donkey Oaty


    The head of the school should have a photo-op with the ShoutOut guy tomorrow as a matter of urgency.

    They can have a hug for the camera and issue a joint statement about how great everything is really.

    A manly hug, though - let's not go overboard here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,412 ✭✭✭oceanclub


    Fair play:

    http://www.thejournal.ie/colaiste-eoin-stillorgan-homophobia-workshop-1905500-Jan2015/
    TRANSITION YEAR STUDENTS at Coláiste Eoin in Stillorgan, Dublin, are planning a protest tomorrow over the school’s decision to cancel a workshop on homophobic bullying.

    P.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 454 ✭✭aunt aggie


    Well that's a matter of opinion really, and one that's entirely dependent on the parents. The school has no choice but to acknowledge parents concerns, and in some cases, parents concerns are actually beneficial in forming the school's anti-bullying policies.

    If parents have concerns they can keep their kids at home. Schools have to provide education on bullying and relationships. Parents cant argue with that.

    Your comments are just bizarre. First you think schools don't provide any education on the matter. Now, they do but only cover the topics all parents approve of.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,412 ✭✭✭oceanclub


    Sorry, just seeing this now.
    I don't see that happening. The whole thing would and did blow up in front of the school. Any principal or department head would not let themselves open to that.

    There's been quite a lot of similar controversies with schools and talks, but this is the first instance a school involved was named. I imagine they simply thought it would blow over as per usual.

    P.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Daith wrote: »
    Surely the children of those parents should just not go to the workshop?

    A little clique speaking for and protecting the masses ,

    That would be the logical thing to do let little Johnny or Mary sit out .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭Paz-CCFC


    lazygal wrote: »
    The gaelscoil closest to us couldn't be more traditional and more into equating being Irish with being catholic if it tried. Lots of parents send their children there to avoid having their children in school with non Irish children and the children who do go there spend hours in the church across the road. The music done is all for school masses and the artwork is all based on religious themes. As a parent raising children free from religion there is no way I could or would send them there and expect it to be a suitable, inclusive environment for my children.

    I found both Gaelscoileanna that I attended to be very progressive. They taught broadly on religions and cultures, they emphasised multi-linguism, not just Irish, and the sex-ed, whilst not perfect, was miles ahead of some of the English-speaking schools that friends of mine attended.

    What you describe was very likely a religious school, which of course would be religiously-themed. These aren't confined to Gaelscoileanna - the majority of national schools are Catholic.

    My primary school was run by the Catholic Church, so was of course more Catholic-themed. But I still found it to be relatively fair in its teaching of other religions, and certainly other cultures. They also gave us an early opportunity to learn a 3rd language, which I believe isn't common practice (or wasn't at the time) for primary level. My secondary school was secular, so more open. It was split into an English and Irish side. I felt the Irish side was more progressive and accepting. One was much more likely to be bullied (be it homophobic or otherwise) in the English side.

    My positives experiences of Gaelscoileanna is thankfully not confined to just my own, from what I can gather, it's very much the norm. What's alleged here is not the general standard. I think the criticisms against Gaelscoileanna and Irish speakers as a whole are ill-informed and prejudicial.


    On the students protesting, I think it's very sensible if the school have behaved in the manner of which they are accused. Pupils should know that they should have the confidence to stand up to their school in a calm and polite way for things they disagree with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,266 ✭✭✭Daith


    Paz-CCFC wrote: »
    On the students protesting, I think it's very sensible if the school have behaved in the manner of which they are accused. Pupils should know that they should have the confidence to stand up to their school and a calm and polite way for things they disagree with.

    Agreed and the students have said they aren't skipping classes so it's not just an excuse to not go to classes.

    They seem very mature!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,533 ✭✭✭Donkey Oaty


    Paz-CCFC wrote: »
    I think the criticisms against Gaelscoileanna and Irish speakers as a whole are ill-informed and prejudicial.

    Or maybe just poking fun at po-faced individuals like yourself, rather than a serious, sustained cultural assault on the institutions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    oceanclub wrote: »
    There's been quite a lot of similar controversies with schools and talks, but this is the first instance a school involved was named. I imagine they simply thought it would blow over as per usual.

    P.


    When are where? As far as ive known, it is the parents right as primary educators to remove students from certain topics or courses they do not feel appropriate, but never heard of a school just canceling an event on the morning, if they felt uncomfortable with the workshop, it would never have been booked in the first place.

    I remember when I was in 6th year, during RE we would get guest speakers every second week on social topics, (holocaust survivor Zoltan Zinn Collis, Peter McVerry, Richard Moore, etc) Very interesting people, but we always got notes home about upcoming speakers and events.

    Same with SexEd, couple of students went to study instead of attending the talk as parents didnt give permission, or when monks were in talking about their work, couple of students were in extra study class instead, no biggie, talk wasnt cancelled. Really must have been a mix up by admin or someone dropped a ball somewhere, considering they were in the school twice before, seems unlikely to be a reaction to an apolitical group promoting tolerance but rather a communication breakdown on the part of the school.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,366 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    I can't believe this is a thing, workshops on Homophobic bullying? Sounds a whole lot like white man's burden to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭Paz-CCFC


    Or maybe just poking fun at po-faced individuals like yourself, rather than a serious, sustained cultural assault on the institutions.

    Wow, what an amazingly articulated response. The likes of Plato or Aristotle could've only dreamt to have the talent of thought and debate that you possess.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,533 ✭✭✭Donkey Oaty


    I remember when I was in 6th year, during RE we would get guest speakers every second week on social topics, (holocaust survivor Zoltan Zinn Collis, Peter McVerry, Richard Moore, etc) Very interesting people, but we always got notes home about upcoming speakers and events.

    That's very impressive indeed.

    Would be nice to hear more about this kind of thing in schools, because everyone tends to focus on the crap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    I can't believe this is a thing, workshops on Homophobic bullying? Sounds a whole lot like white man's burden to me.

    Yeah, we shouldn't deal with homophobia in Irish schools until everything else on the planet is tickety-boo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,756 ✭✭✭Pretzill


    Isn't an anti bullying workshop enough. Or are there now Anti Nerd Bullying workshops, anti spectacle wearing bullying workshops, anti the chubby kid bullying workshops, etc, etc. Wouldn't a workshop on acceptance be more appropriate - I reckon most young people are a lot more clued in about these topics then they are given credit for.

    Bullying is not acceptable, bullies don't need an excuse to label, they do it anyway.

    Having said that this was a workshop not a televised debate - Why would they need to balance that with anything?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,366 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    lazygal wrote: »
    Yeah, we shouldn't deal with homophobia in Irish schools until everything else on the planet is tickety-boo.

    Huh? Did I cut a bit close there, or did you just choose to ignore my comment and misrepresent it for a quick witted comeback?

    You are familiar with the phrase "White man's burden" are you not?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,947 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    aunt aggie wrote: »
    If parents have concerns they can keep their kids at home. Schools have to provide education on bullying and relationships. Parents cant argue with that.

    Your comments are just bizarre. First you think schools don't provide any education on the matter. Now, they do but only cover the topics all parents approve of.


    No, I never said that schools don't provide any education on the matter. I simply refuted your assertion that they were legally obliged to do so. They are legally obliged to formulate a policy, and are provided with a template policy from the DES which includes guidelines for recommended teaching of the SPHE curriculum.

    Some schools will outsource some parts of the curriculum, some schools will choose to teach the curriculum themselves. The standard of the teaching of the curriculum is dependent on both the school and the level of parental involvement, and parents are usually encouraged to be involved.

    If they choose not to, and if they choose not to have their children participate in that part of the curriculum, then that's not the fault of the school.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    Huh? Did I cut a bit close there, or did you just choose to ignore my comment and misrepresent it for a quick witted comeback?

    You are familiar with the phrase "White man's burden" are you not?

    You, sir/madam, are no Rudyard Kipling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,963 ✭✭✭Meangadh


    That's very impressive indeed.

    Would be nice to hear more about this kind of thing in schools, because everyone tends to focus on the crap.

    That's the thing though- there is a huge amount of guest speakers and workshops that take place every day in schools across the country. To be honest, in my school where I teach there is probably somebody in to speak to one group or other every single day, mostly with Transition Years but it can be with any group really. I think a huge amount of the great work done in schools on what's called the "informal curriculum" goes unnoticed. It's a pity.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,380 ✭✭✭haveringchick


    Daith wrote: »
    Apparently it was "postponed"



    Having a child in 2nd level myself I am quite certain that this is the truth and im definitely not remotely surprised.
    Parents can and do object.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    I can't believe this is a thing, workshops on Homophobic bullying? Sounds a whole lot like white man's burden to me.

    It's a thing because bullying is a thing. Do you need to be reminded that a lot of gay teens struggle as it is being different with the added extra of being targeted for it. Until kids can be themselves without fear then there is a need for an anti bullying workshop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    Daith wrote: »
    Apparently it was "postponed"



    Having a child in 2nd level myself I am quite certain that this is the truth and im definitely not remotely surprised.
    Parents can and do object.

    If a pupil is 18 years of age, is parental consent required for sex education and other such 'tricky' things?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    lazygal wrote: »
    You, sir/madam, are no Rudyard Kipling.


    And you are no Lloyd Bensten!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    And you are no Lloyd Bensten!

    Who am I?:confused::confused::confused:


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,366 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    lazygal wrote: »
    You, sir/madam, are no Rudyard Kipling.

    Eh, nor did I set out to be. So you persist in misrepresenting what I said then?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 27,397 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    lazygal wrote: »

    If a pupil is 18 years of age, is parental consent required for sex education and other such 'tricky' things?

    No.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,380 ✭✭✭haveringchick


    Gatling wrote: »
    I'd make the parents publicly explain there concerns

    How on earth do you think you would do that? Parents of minor children have every right to decide whats best for their kids and don't have to explain their desicions to anyone!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,380 ✭✭✭haveringchick


    spurious wrote: »
    lazygal wrote: »

    No.

    Im being misquoted here can this be corrected please?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard




  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,533 ✭✭✭Donkey Oaty


    lazygal wrote: »
    Who am I?:confused::confused::confused:

    Admiral Stockdale, Sir.


Advertisement