Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Dash cam saves your ass (no Roundabout stuff please :)

12728303233255

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    qz wrote: »
    She left the main road though onto a secondary road, and was on it before you were, hence it became the new main road and you seem to have just barged your way onto it from a secondary road.


    I know your verdict is the same as mine but I wouldn't agree with the way you understand it.
    Neither OP nor the other driver were on the "new main road".
    Only reason why the other driver had right of way, is because none of the roads was the main road, and other driver was coming from the right side in relation to OP.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,565 ✭✭✭✭Tallon


    The ROTR are not legislation. Do you expect every driver to learn every Section of every Road Traffic Act?

    I explained why I thought what I thought. And I agreed with you that I may have made a mistake with my assumption.
    They should at least know the basic ones, like 'keep left' and 'yield'

    Neither of which the op did


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Tallon wrote: »
    They should at least know the basic ones, like 'keep left' and 'yield'

    Neither of which the op did
    I agree. I explained what I thought, and agreed it may be wrong. But if it was the conditions of which I thought, then I would be correct.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    Tallon wrote: »
    FFS! Typical Irish driver.. Haven't a clue what your arguing about, but by god, you'll argue it anyway

    Learn the ROTR and then come back and tell me the op was in the right :rolleyes:

    It would be interesting to see a google maps image of it before coming to any conclusions of near certainty.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,565 ✭✭✭✭Tallon


    robbie7730 wrote: »

    It would be interesting to see a google maps image of it before coming to any conclusions of near certainty.
    It would be brilliant, yeah. Even name the place and I can look myself, but it's fairly clear cut from the video


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    Tallon wrote: »
    It would be brilliant, yeah. Even name the place and I can look myself, but it's fairly clear cut from the video

    Well then, your a better boards driver than me:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭bar32


    If you pause the video at 6seconds both cars are on the same stretch of road. It doesn't matter at this stage what way you designate the road-main road, link, bypass etc. The roads do not meet at the one place so it is not a 3 way junction where you would give way to the person on the right. The other car cut the corner and pulled across in front of the OP. The other car is in the wrong for pulling in front of the OP.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,565 ✭✭✭✭Tallon


    bar32 wrote: »
    If you pause the video at 6seconds both cars are on the same stretch of road. It doesn't matter at this stage what way you designate the road-main road, link, bypass etc. The roads do not meet at the one place so it is not a 3 way junction where you would give way to the person on the right. The other car cut the corner and pulled across in front of the OP. The other car is in the wrong for pulling in front of the OP.
    Wow!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭bar32


    Tallon wrote: »
    Wow!
    Indeed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭housetypeb


    qz wrote: »
    The only reason you were "on" the exit road a fraction before she was is because you failed to give right of way to the traffic which actually had the right of way. Your argument seems to be that you should have been magically gifted the right of way just so you wouldn't have to wait for her to make her turn, which she is entitled to do.

    No,It's not a roundabout, she made a left turn,then should have waited until I passed before making her right turn.

    She failed to give right of way to me

    As you say I was "on" the exit road (past the walls in this case) before her,there would have been no problem if she had made a left turn and then indicated right waiting until I passed-but she cut diagonally across from the get go.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    housetypeb wrote: »
    No,It's not a roundabout, she made a left turn,then should have waited until I passed before making her right turn.

    She failed to give right of way to me

    As you say I was "on" the exit road (past the walls in this case) before her,there would have been no problem if she had made a left turn and then indicated right waiting until I passed-but she cut diagonally across from the get go.

    I demand a google map at this stage:D


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    robbie7730 wrote: »
    I demand a google map at this stage:D
    I'll even settle for a Yahoo map :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭housetypeb


    robbie7730 wrote: »
    I demand a google map at this stage:D

    Believe me I'm trying google maps but my browser is causing problems,
    skibbereen, market street, cost cutters petrol station, bypass road at the back.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Tallon wrote: »
    Finally
    Here we are.

    Google maps were crap.

    http://binged.it/SdvC25


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    After seeing this map, I sustain my opinion.
    It's a junction of 3 roads of equal importance, and therefore OP was supposed to give way to other car which was coming from his right side.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    CiniO wrote: »
    After seeing this map, I sustain my opinion.
    It's a junction of 3 roads of equal importance, and therefore OP was supposed to give way to other car which was coming from his right side.

    Yea it looks that way alright.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I would also tend to agree with Tallon and CiniO now.

    I accept I was wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭housetypeb


    That's it, took you a minute for what I'm trying for the last hour.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    housetypeb wrote: »
    That's it, took you a minute for what I'm trying for the last hour.

    Google maps has no coverage of the spot where it was, at decent resolution. Was just looking on the bing site when the spot was already linked by LJ91.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,565 ✭✭✭✭Tallon


    I can now conclude that the op was 1000% in the wrong!

    Next time, give way and stop thinking you have priority because someone was talking to someone else and also drove too diagonally for your liking


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 113 ✭✭Jack breen


    I want one of these with GPS and a good camera. Are deal extreme any good theh have a rake of them on show.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭bar32


    It looks like a staggered crossroads to me! I'm sticking to my guns and stand by my first decision! I'd draw it for ye if I could but basically think of the letter T, turned upside down, with another junction sticking out to the right...hope that makes sense. As someone said, no signs anywhere. We have debated for over an hour. You just have to make the best decision you can in real-time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    Tallon wrote: »
    I can now conclude that the op was 1000% in the wrong!

    Next time, give way and stop thinking you have priority because someone was talking to someone else and also drove too diagonally for your liking

    Yes a good conclusion alright, judging by the strong evidence presented.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,565 ✭✭✭✭Tallon


    bar32 wrote: »
    It looks like a staggered crossroads to me! I'm sticking to my guns and stand by my first decision! I'd draw it for ye if I could but basically think of the letter T, turned upside down, with another junction sticking out to the right...hope that makes sense. As someone said, no signs anywhere. We have debated for over an hour. You just have to make the best decision you can in real-time.
    If ever in doubt, slow down and anticipate the worst, don't continue on and get annoyed because someone didn't do what you thought they were going to do

    Also, op, I'd be interested in hearing the audio, I'd say its entertaining to say the least ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,429 ✭✭✭Cedrus


    It's not 3 roads of equal importance, the op came out of a shop car park, he should have yielded to that car and he should also yield to any car coming from the left as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    Tallon wrote: »
    If ever in doubt, slow down and anticipate the worst, don't continue on and get annoyed because someone didn't do what you thought they were going to do

    Also, op, I'd be interested in hearing the audio, I'd say its entertaining to say the least ;)

    Id say most of us have interesting audio outbursts at some time, even when we knew we were in the wrong. But it would be interesting to hear the op audio alright.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,892 ✭✭✭allthedoyles


    The OP driver crossed two roads / white lines ( maybe imaginary ones )

    Totally in the wrong .

    There is another dash cam in this thread somewhere which is similar ,- A car is on a roundabout and the dash cam driver just bullies his way in front of a car and thinks he was in the right too .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    bar32 wrote: »
    It looks like a staggered crossroads to me! I'm sticking to my guns and stand by my first decision! I'd draw it for ye if I could but basically think of the letter T, turned upside down, with another junction sticking out to the right...hope that makes sense. As someone said, no signs anywhere. We have debated for over an hour. You just have to make the best decision you can in real-time.
    Cedrus wrote: »
    It's not 3 roads of equal importance, the op came out of a shop car park, he should have yielded to that car and he should also yield to any car coming from the left as well.


    So in general bar32 reckons the main road goes to the petrol station, and there is a turn to the side to the estate.
    While Cedrus thinks the main road goes into the estate, and there is a side turn into the gate.

    Any reasons for such interpretation, provided there is no indication in form of any road signs or signage, and also all 3 roads seem to be nearly all at 120degrees angle between each other?>


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭bar32


    Cedrus wrote: »
    It's not 3 roads of equal importance, the op came out of a shop car park, he should have yielded to that car and he should also yield to any car coming from the left as well.

    But he has exited the car park and is out on the road when the incident occurs.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    The OP driver crossed two roads / white lines ( maybe imaginary ones )

    Totally in the wrong .

    There is another dash cam in this thread somewhere which is similar ,- A car is on a roundabout and the dash cam driver just bullies his way in front of a car and thinks he was in the right too .

    There's no such thing as imaginary white lines.
    They are either there or not.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement