Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Disgusted by Catholics

1356

Comments

  • Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I can understand the frustration with Catholicism here and I've no issue with people venting it and not explicitly condemning the other religions while doing so. It's not Islam that has us unable to buy alcohol today, it's not Islam that is preventing gay people from enjoying the same rights as heterosexuals here, it's not Islam that is indoctrinating the nation's children, on the bill of the taxpayer.

    What are we? Atheists or anti-Catholics? They are not the same thing.

    While I'm sure your point about Islam has some level of internal consistency, it is both parochial and illogical. Were Islam the dominant social ethos in Ireland, it would be doing what any dominant ethos does and imposing itself on us all. The fact that it does so elsewhere but fails to do so on this sodden little island is not sufficient reason to let it off the hook while adopting a sectarian stance towards Catholics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    qrrgprgua wrote: »

    There has not be one single new case of abuse reported in the last decade of abuse committed by an Irish priest in the last decade, that I've heard of.

    FYP.:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 76 ✭✭Declan Lander


    GarIT wrote: »
    Is anyone else just disgusted by people that say they are Catholic?

    Yes, it's nothing new.

    The Blank and Tans were.
    Oliver Cromwell was.
    The Shankill Butchers, LVF, UVF, UDA were.
    The Commuinist party of Russia also was.
    The Kmher Rouge are.
    The KKK is.
    The Westboro Baptist Church is.
    etc.
    etc.
    etc.

    Haters hate.

    That's what haters do, and yes, just like anyone else some self-proclaimed ''Catholics'' can be haters too. Anyone self-proclaimed in anything can be exactly the opposite to what they self-proclaim to be.

    Choose any race, creed, nationality or group of people different to you, and someone could easily tar them all with the one brush if it suited their agenda. Then make up and popularise an excuse why they should all be hated and then let it fester from there.
    GarIT wrote: »
    Why would anyone be a Catholic?

    Why would anyone be a Jew, Atheist, Hindu ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,512 ✭✭✭Ellis Dee


    I was born an atheist and was only briefly religious, due to the indoctrination to which nearly all small children are exposed, before I returned to my natural state of believing only in things that can be observed, detected or for the existence of which there is verifiable evidence.

    Yet, I do not think it is fair to place collective blame on all Catholics. Why not place collective blame on society as a whole, because it too must bear some responsibility for allowing undemocratic religious organisations to have so much influence and remain inadequately supervised?

    The late Conor Cruise O'Brien once said that religion in Ireland was not so much a way of life as a dirty habit. It will take time for everyone to shake it. In the meantime, I just get on with my life and avoid the church, but most of the Catholics I associate with are kind and decent people, and I wouldn't want to get in their faces over clerical child abuse every time I meet them. Whenever I've discussed it with them, they've been appalled and disappointed, felt betrayed and perhaps even partly in denial. It will take time for the wising up to sink in, because old habits die hard. Especially bad ones.
    catholic+church+pedophile+scandal+child+rape+sexual+abuse+pope+benedict+global+denial+hypocrisy+blind+leading+blins.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,540 ✭✭✭joseph brand


    ISAW wrote: »
    Where?
    just list the messages where evidence of coverup by the Vatican was given.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,731683,00.html
    New documents show how the former Archbishop Joseph Ratzinger -- now Pope Benedict XVI -- and his successor Reinhard Marx failed to properly deal with a suspected pedophile. Despite massive allegations of abuse, the archdiocese allowed the priest to continue working with children.

    Gangsters!


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    catholics are indoctrinated, which means they are incapable of rational questioning. you see it by the way ISAW posts.

    You bigoted attitude is evident enough without having to being me into it!
    ISAW aside from abusing children and covering it up

    and your evidence for widespread sexual abuse of pre pubescent children by priests currently or in the past is?
    And your evidence of this abuse being covered up by the vatican or prosecutions stifled by the Vatican or Pope is?
    what about 50,000 kidnap adoptions and selling babies around the world

    Well why not deal with that in a different thread after you produce the "pedophile ring" evidence?
    nazi assistance in WW2

    What? the fact that
    1. Roman Catholics didnt vote for Hitler.
    2. successive popes during Hitlers rise to power and in wartime opposed nazi policy. TThey opposed it widely e.g. in every single Catholic Church in Germany their opposition was read out.
    extermination of natives in the USA, crusades,

    Not by a Pope. alothough by Catholic Spain and Portugal at the beginning. and yes they did influence ONE pope the Rodrigo Borgia the only pope to support slavery. Later on America was atheist or Protestant.

    The crusades resulted in maybe a million dead and was called by a pope.
    But the killing was done by greedy rulers and vassals and very seldom by Churchmen.
    Atheistic regimes like Pol Pot's stalin's Mao's killed more people before breakfast and killed tens if not hundreds of millions of their own people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,036 ✭✭✭Sonics2k


    Yes, it's nothing new.

    The Blank and Tans were.
    Oliver Cromwell was.
    The Shankill Butchers, LVF, UVF, UDA were.
    The Commuinist party of Russia also was.
    The Kmher Rouge are.
    The KKK is.
    The Westboro Baptist Church is.
    etc.
    etc.
    etc.

    Haters hate.

    I'm no fan of the RCC, but the three I bolded are not Catholic groups.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW



    1. This isnt the Vatican it is Ratzingers old archdiocese.
    2. It is from 1980. In accordance with then-standard procedure within the Church, the allegations were not reported to police but instead Hullermann was removed from his parish assignment and sent to undergo psychiatric therapy.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,684970,00.html
    3. So far, there are no known cases in which bishops or vicar generals have been prosecuted for protecting pedophile subordinates or because they allowed them to continue to work with yo
    ung people -- as in the case with the priest Peter H.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hullermann
    Dr Werner Huth, set three conditions when he started treating Hullermann: the priest should not be allowed to work with children, he should give up alcohol, (because he allegedly committed the acts of abuse when he was drunk), and he must be supervised at all times by a mentor. The doctor said he made these requirements clear to church officials during a number of conversations, including an auxiliary bishop in the archdiocese of Munich and Freising.[3] However, he did not speak directly to Ratzinger

    In February 1982 Ratzinger left the archdiocese of Munich and Freising to take up his appointment in Rome as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

    Yes this is in my view an error by the Church in Munich. they should have made sure he didnt go anywhere near children. But it doesn't attach directly to Ratzinger or the Vatican.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,540 ✭✭✭joseph brand


    Just what % of Irish catholics actually read the bible? I'd wager that it's a small %.

    Saying you are catholic is almost like saying that you are Irish. Almost everyone here is born a catholic, whether they like it or not. It's so easy to convert a baby. It's a baby religion. Everyone who joined, did so, as a baby. You can't trust babies.

    My father chose what religion I would be, not when he was an adult, but when he was a baby, being baptised. His father chose his when he too was a baby, and so on.

    The disgusting thing about catholics here, is that there are those who ignore all the child raping and blowjobs, while others call it 'just fiddlin'.

    Of course there are catholics who are disgusted by what priests have done to children, but then they treat the gheys as perverts and believe in fairytales. :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Just what % of people actually read the bible? I'd wager that it's a small %.

    :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,540 ✭✭✭joseph brand


    ISAW wrote: »
    1. This isnt the Vatican it is Ratzingers old archdiocese.
    2. It is from 1980. In accordance with then-standard procedure within the Church, the allegations were not reported to police but instead Hullermann was removed from his parish assignment and sent to undergo psychiatric therapy.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,684970,00.html
    3. So far, there are no known cases in which bishops or vicar generals have been prosecuted for protecting pedophile subordinates or because they allowed them to continue to work with yo
    ung people -- as in the case with the priest Peter H.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hullermann
    Dr Werner Huth, set three conditions when he started treating Hullermann: the priest should not be allowed to work with children, he should give up alcohol, (because he allegedly committed the acts of abuse when he was drunk), and he must be supervised at all times by a mentor. The doctor said he made these requirements clear to church officials during a number of conversations, including an auxiliary bishop in the archdiocese of Munich and Freising.[3] However, he did not speak directly to Ratzinger

    In February 1982 Ratzinger left the archdiocese of Munich and Freising to take up his appointment in Rome as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

    Yes this is in my view an error by the Church in Munich. they should have made sure he didnt go anywhere near children. But it doesn't attach directly to Ratzinger or the Vatican.

    Was Hullermann not arrested?

    Also, Ratzinger was complicit in the above case. I think his defence was something like, "He doesn't read everything he signs" (regards moving a twisted, sick, child rapist somewhere he wouldn't be found, where he could rape more children)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 76 ✭✭Declan Lander


    Sonics2k wrote: »
    I'm no fan of the RCC, but the three I bolded are not Catholic groups.

    Sorry if my post was not clear.

    None of them are Catholic groups, what they have in common is they also found Catholics disgusting as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,540 ✭✭✭joseph brand


    Jernal wrote: »
    :D

    I heard from a good source, that Ratzy thinks it's [the bible] a load of sh1te and he's sick of having to read it. He loves sci-fi. Bishops love sci-fi!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    ISAW wrote: »
    What? the fact that
    1. Roman Catholics didnt vote for Hitler.

    :rolleyes:what not one?

    give me a break the nazi wouldn't have obtained power if they didn't have some support amongst the catholic population of germany

    and lets not forget both Austria and Italy (catholic countries) were nazi germanys closest allies during the war
    ISAW wrote: »
    What? the fact that
    2. successive popes during Hitlers rise to power and in wartime opposed nazi policy. TThey opposed it widely e.g. in every single Catholic Church in Germany their opposition was read out.

    really well why did the vatican send the papal nuncio to meet Hitler on several occasions ??

    read this


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    fryup wrote: »
    :rolleyes:what not one?

    give me a break the nazi wouldn't have obtained power if they didn't have some support amongst the catholic population of germany

    and lets not forget both Austria and Italy (catholic countries) were nazi germanys closest allies during the war
    Dont be silly.
    I dont know how every single individual votd.
    Catholics as a group didnt vote for Hitler.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_federal_election,_March_1933

    http://romanchristendom.blogspot.com/2008/10/face-it-protestant-areas-voted-for.html


    http://www.churchinhistory.org/pages/booklets/rise%28n%29-1.htm
    see chapter III
    really well why did the vatican send the papal nuncio to meet Hitler on several occasions ??

    Apparently Chamberlain the British Prime Minister also met him . I guess he must have been a Nazi too? Obviously States send ambassorord to meet people from other Stats. that is what the papal Nuncio is!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,641 ✭✭✭GarIT


    I'm not sticking around here, its pointless talking to people that will never learn and that all that's on here.

    The one thing I want to finish with is for ISAW you don't see it but everyone else does. The idea of priests fiddling with kids is like the idea of Bertie Ahern fiddling with his finances, everyone knew it was happening but there was a cover up and nothing could be proven. You have fun wasting your life trying to preach to educated people that wouldn't ever consider returning to the church and good luck to all.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    GarIT wrote: »
    I'm not sticking around here, its pointless talking to people that will never learn and that all that's on here.

    The one thing I want to finish with is for ISAW you don't see it but everyone else does. The idea of priests fiddling with kids is like the idea of Bertie Ahern fiddling with his finances, everyone knew it was happening but there was a cover up and nothing could be proven. You have fun wasting your life trying to preach to educated people that wouldn't ever consider returning to the church and good luck to all.

    run away if you wish it is quite obvious you cant support your claims.
    i never made any claim about belonging to any church!
    Im just fed up people having a go at the church, fianna fail, bankers, Saddam or any other scapêgoat. Yes some people did wrong but in perspective the faults are far greater outside the scapegoated groups others use to excuse their own buying into a myth. A myth promulgated by bigots who themselves preach and spread hate.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,621 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Ellis Dee wrote: »
    I was born an atheist and was only briefly religious, due to the indoctrination to which nearly all small children are exposed, before I returned to my natural state of believing only in things that can be observed, detected or for the existence of which there is verifiable evidence.

    Yet, I do not think it is fair to place collective blame on all Catholics. Why not place collective blame on society as a whole, because it too must bear some responsibility for allowing undemocratic religious organisations to have so much influence and remain inadequately supervised?

    The late Conor Cruise O'Brien once said that religion in Ireland was not so much a way of life as a dirty habit. It will take time for everyone to shake it. In the meantime, I just get on with my life and avoid the church, but most of the Catholics I associate with are kind and decent people, and I wouldn't want to get in their faces over clerical child abuse every time I meet them. Whenever I've discussed it with them, they've been appalled and disappointed, felt betrayed and perhaps even partly in denial. It will take time for the wising up to sink in, because old habits die hard. Especially bad ones.
    catholic+church+pedophile+scandal+child+rape+sexual+abuse+pope+benedict+global+denial+hypocrisy+blind+leading+blins.png
    Great post. :)
    I heard from a good source, that Ratzy thinks it's [the bible] a load of sh1te and he's sick of having to read it. He loves sci-fi. Bishops love sci-fi!
    Razi does not love sci-fi. If only..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,036 ✭✭✭Sonics2k


    Look, the fact of the matter is that children were abused by Priests across Ireland the rest of the world by numerous priests.

    Many of these have been confirmed, and yes, many of the Priests in question were simply moved to other Parishes.

    It doesn't matter if it was one Priest or one hundred of them. It doesn't matter if it happened in the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's or last week. It happened, high level members of the RCC covered it up and didn't report the people involved.

    The Magdalene Laundries are another example, or the forced adoptions that were carried out by Priests and other officials of the RCC.

    It's fine to have faith ISAW, if it helps you sleep at night and give you hope for what happens after death. But please open your eyes and see the corruption inside the Vatican.

    If you truly believe in God, do you think this is what he'd want?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32 el sorcerino


    Just a simple comparison...
    How many men are there in Ireland?
    Now how many of them have abused or have been accused of abuse?
    Next, express your result as a percentage.
    Finally, do the same calculation for priests in Ireland!
    I think that's the point being made here. I'm a RC but like most nowadays, a little embarrassed to admit it.
    Hence I also find it annoying when other RC try to defend their church after what's happened.
    Much better to just say "yes, my church is riddled with peado's and dirty, frustrated men but I still love God etc... would that not suit everyone?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭marienbad


    ISAW wrote: »
    Dont be silly.
    I dont know how every single individual votd.
    Catholics as a group didnt vote for Hitler.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_federal_election,_March_1933

    http://romanchristendom.blogspot.com/2008/10/face-it-protestant-areas-voted-for.html


    http://www.churchinhistory.org/pages/booklets/rise%28n%29-1.htm
    see chapter III



    Apparently Chamberlain the British Prime Minister also met him . I guess he must have been a Nazi too? Obviously States send ambassorord to meet people from other Stats. that is what the papal Nuncio is!

    You keep repeating this ISAW and ignoring the vote that allowed Hitler to create a dictatorship - the passing of the enabling act - which was only possible with the support of the catholic parties.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    ISAW wrote: »
    1. Roman Catholics didnt vote for Hitler.
    I'm not going to engage you in a discussion about this any more than I'm going to try and convince you that the 6.5% figure is accurate, or that the sky is blue or the moon isn't made of green cheese.

    That said, not only did Roman Catholics vote, directly and indirectly, for Hitler, but catholics provided the vital support that Hitler needed to pass the Enabling Act which provided Hitler with dictatorial powers he wanted. The support came from the catholic "Center Party" under the leadership of the catholic priest, Ludwig Kaas, a man who was well known in the Vatican's highest circles and who did much work to bring about the Reichskonkordat between the Vatican and the Nazi state.

    Check out any of the following to understand the role of the catholics in granting Hitler the power he craved:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Kaas
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre_Party_%28Germany%29
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_Act_of_1933
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichskonkordat


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    I am a former Catholic...was very active in the church growing up and it was a big part of my life but like a lot of people once the scandals started I found myself in a position where I just lost all trust in the church. I was about 16 or so then and decided to stop going to church and faced a lot of objection from my family who are still devout Catholics but my gut told me it was the right thing to do.

    As time has gone on I know now I was right to do that. I have seen nothing but scandal after scandal and no attempt to make amends beyond lip service. I have family in the clergy and they honestly don't seem to care about any of the victims, only their own position.

    I was one of the lucky ones who got "counted out", am now happily raising my family in a non religious environment and quite content with that.

    But yeah I do find it hard to understand anyone who still supports the church. I feel in my heart its a condoning of their actions before and since. I don't think anything will change while people continue to allow themselves to be taken in by these guys and their lies.

    I find it quite hard to understand practising Catholics now...I think they should be ashamed of themselves.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    Just a simple comparison...
    How many men are there in Ireland?
    Now how many of them have abused or have been accused of abuse?
    Next, express your result as a percentage.
    Finally, do the same calculation for priests in Ireland!

    Yes and you will find the percentage for priests is less than that for men.
    I think that's the point being made here. I'm a RC but like most nowadays, a little embarrassed to admit it.

    because you believe the media myth you above outline.
    Hence I also find it annoying when other RC try to defend their church after what's happened.

    first of all where did i calim to have any religious belief.
    second just WHAT do you think i am defending?
    Im just pointing out to you the actual facts.
    there is ample anti catholic bigotry on display here for you to see but you ignore that and believe misreported statistics. dont blame others for that.
    Much better to just say "yes, my church is riddled with peado's and dirty, frustrated men but I still love God etc... would that not suit everyone?

    If it happened to be true. the facts are the percentages of priests who are pedophiles are less than 0.01% and that at its highest somewhere say between 1950 and 1970 was about 1%. The other 99% plus of abusers were not RC priests. Thems the facts. you just dont believe them and believe media myths isntead. dis ytou also believe iraq had WMD and Saddam had bases training Al Qaeda? i didnt. but loads of people were telling me on the internet that it was true.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    robindch wrote: »
    I'm not going to engage you in a discussion about this any more than I'm going to try and convince you that the 6.5% figure is accurate,

    It isnt accurate and you cant support it despite saying you could.
    You then tried 4% as a climbdown but couldnt support that either.
    That said, not only did Roman Catholics vote, directly and indirectly, for Hitler,

    Wrong again! Wher are your stats?

    Here are mine
    Distrobutions of Nazi vote and demographics of Catholic population.
    One is the negative image of the other -co incidence?

    http://www.churchinhistory.org/images/hitler-rise/map3&4.jpg


    http://www.churchinhistory.org/images/hitler-rise/map5&6.jpg

    NAZI CARTOONS At first attacks were made against `political` sections of the Church, while friendship was professed to those Catholics `loyal to Germany`. After the 1937 Encyclical, the Church herself was accused of supporting Jewish Communist plots against Germany. Cardinal Pacelli became Pope Pius XII twenty months later. The first cartoon is from: `Das Schwarze Korps, July 22nd, 1937. Humanité was a Communist newspaper. The second from: `Der Heidelberger Student, May 4th, 1935. It shows a Nazi exposing Jews, Jesuits and Freemasons plotting together.

    http://www.churchinhistory.org/images/hitler-rise/cartoons.jpg

    but catholics provided the vital support that Hitler needed to pass the Enabling Act which provided Hitler with dictatorial powers he wanted. The support came from the catholic "Center Party" under the leadership of the catholic priest, Ludwig Kaas, a man who was well known in the Vatican's highest circles and who did much work to bring about the Reichskonkordat between the Vatican and the Nazi state.

    wrong. again!
    On 28th March 1930, the Centre's leader, Heinrich Bruning formed a government with less than 16% of Representatives supporting him. These were those of the two Catholic parties, the Centre and the Bavarian. The President had to use his emergency powers to put legislation into effect. Following the elections of 14th September 1930, Bruning's Catholic Parties continued to run the country. In these latest elections the Nazis had gained a surprising 18.3% of the vote.

    Immediately after these elections, in which the National Socialist Party had emerged as a major force, the bishop of Mainz excommunicated all Catholic members of the party in his diocese, and banned uniformed groups entering churches . He also gave instructions that party members would not be allowed to take an official part in funerals and other services . The other bishops decided to await the annual bishops' Conferences, so as to be able to formulate a united policy. In Rome the Osservatore Romano of October 11th 1930 commented: "Belonging to the National Socialist Party of Hitler is irreconcilable with the Catholic Conscience." In his New Year message, Cardinal Bertram of Breslau condemned extreme nationalism, without specifying the Nazi Party

    The decree 'was the fundamental emergency law upon which the National Socialist dictatorship . . . was primarily based'. It was more important than the later Enabling Act of March 24th

    the President issued a decree granting the government emergency powers. This decree remained in force until 1945. The decree stipulated:­

    1. Suspension of all the basic rights of the citizen. [This was an unlimited power of arrest, interrogation, imprisonment, searches, phone tapping, censorship, and authority to ban meetings, organisations and publications].

    2. Authorised the Reich government to assume full powers in any federal state whose government proved unable or unwilling to restore public order and security.

    3. Order death or imprisonment for treason, assault upon a member of the government, arson in public buildings, incitement to riot, and resistance to the provisions of the decree.

    Hitler permitted the 5th of March elections to proceed.

    A very high poll of 88.5 % gave its verdict:­

    The Hitler-led Coalition 52% (Nazi 44%, Nationalists 8%).
    Democratic Parties 36% (Socialist 18%, Centre 14%, others 4%).
    Communists 12%

    The 35 electoral districts may be classified into 21 Protestant, 7 Catholic and 7 mixed. The Nazis achieved over 50% of the vote in 7 constituencies, all strongly Protestant. When we include the Nationalist vote we find that the coalition gained over 50% in 20 constituencies (13 Protestant, 3 mixed and none Catholic). In only 6 constituencies was the combined anti-Democratic totalitarian vote (Communist and Nazi) less than 50%. Five of these were Catholic and one mixed.

    THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC VOTE IN MARCH 1933
    Nazi/Nazi and Nationalist/Nazi, Nationalist and Communist/Nazi and Communist/
    MAINLY PROTESTANT Areas
    1 East Prussia
    + 56.5
    67.8
    76.5
    65.2
    2 Berlin
    31.3
    40.4
    70.5
    61.4*
    3 Potsdam II
    38.2
    52.2
    70.0
    56.0*
    4 Potsdam I
    44.4
    56.1
    74.1
    62.4*
    5 Frankfurt on Oder
    55.2
    66.3
    73.7
    62.6
    6 Pomerania
    56.3
    +73.3
    +80.9
    63.9
    7 Breslau
    50.2
    57.3
    65.5
    58.4
    8 Liegnitz
    54.0
    63.1
    69.8
    60.7
    10 Magdeburg
    47.3
    58.0
    68.6
    57.9
    11 Merseburg
    46.4
    58.3
    79.8
    67.9*
    12 Thuringia
    47.2
    58.7
    73.9
    62.4
    13 Schleswig-Holstein
    53.2
    63.3
    74.0
    63.9
    15 East Hanover
    54.3
    65.6
    73.1
    61.8
    16 South Hanover-Brunswick
    48.7
    56.3
    63.8
    56.2
    19 Hesse-Nassau
    49.4
    54.3
    63.3
    53.4
    28 Dresden-Bautzen
    43.6
    51.3
    64.7
    57.0
    29 Leipzig
    40.0
    46.5
    63.9
    57.4*
    30 Chemnitz-Zwickau
    50.0
    55.4
    74.4
    + 69.0*
    33 Hesse-Darmstadt
    47.4
    50.3
    61.2
    58.3
    34 Hamburg
    38.9
    46.9
    64.5
    56.5*
    35 Mecklenburg
    48.0
    62.9
    70.3
    55.4

    MIXED
    9 Oppeln
    43.2
    50.7
    59.9
    52.4
    14 Weser-Ems
    41.4
    52.0
    59.9
    49.3
    22 East Dusseldorf
    37.4
    44.2
    66.7
    59.9*
    26 Franconia
    45.7
    51.1
    56.1
    50.7
    27 Palatinate
    46.5
    49.0
    58.0
    55.5
    31 Wurttemberg
    42.0
    47.1
    56.3
    51.2
    32 Baden
    45.4
    50.0
    59.8
    55.2

    MAINLY CATHOLIC
    17 North Westphalia
    34.9
    41.7
    52.4
    45.6
    18 South Westphalia
    33.8
    40.3
    57.1
    50.6
    20 Cologne-Aachen
    x 30.1
    x 35.8
    50.0
    x 44.3
    21 Koblenz-Trier
    38.4
    44.5
    50.5
    44.4
    23 West Dusseldorf
    35.2
    43.2
    58.7
    50.7
    24 Upper Bavaria-Swabia
    40.9
    45.3
    52.3
    47.9
    25 Lower Bavaria
    39.2
    41.2
    x 46.4
    44.4
    ALL GERMANY
    43.9
    51.9
    64.2
    56.2
    thems the actual stats
    they show catholic areas didnt vote for Hitler!

    The vote for the Catholic parties rose in 1933, although the high poll caused their percentage to fall. This indicates that the Nazi vote in Catholic areas was drawn mainly from those who normally supported non-­Catholic parties (i.e. the non-Catholic minority, lapsed Catholics and those who lacked wholehearted loyalty to their Faith and Bishops).


  • Posts: 81,309 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Andrea Defeated Lumberyard


    could you not go pray or something


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    OI! Dm07 go through those statistics with a fine tooth comb apply benfords law and tells us if in your expert opinion they're actually valid statistics. :D


  • Moderators Posts: 52,147 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    The nature of the Nazi Party's relations with the Catholic Church is also complicated. Before Hitler rose to power, many Catholic priests and leaders vociferously opposed Nazism on the grounds of its incompatibility with Christian morals. After Hitler took over and rose to power, party membership was not forbidden anymore and the Catholic Church actively looked for opportunities to work together with the Nazi government. At his trial Franz von Papen said that until 1936 the Catholic Church hoped for a Christian alignment to the beneficial aspects he said they saw in national socialism. (This statement came after Pope Pius XII ended Von Papen's appointment as Papal chamberlain and ambassador to the Holy See, but before his restoration under Pope John XXIII.)

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    koth wrote: »



    Yes sure.. The catholic church was best mates with the nazis,,sure its common knowledge. That is why the vatican allowed the nazis kill 18% of polish priests, 3000 of them....


    Did the vatican talk to nazi germany.. Yes...what choice did they have?.


    Get your facts straight and put them in context of the era!!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    ISAW wrote: »
    You then tried 4% as a climbdown but couldnt support that either.
    I've explained to you perhaps five, perhaps ten, maybe fifteen times, publicly and via PM about this figure. If you find yourself still unable to understand it, then the problem is entirely yours.

    With respect to this thread, you said that "Roman Catholics didnt vote for Hitler". I have pointed out that catholics were the crucial voting bloc which provided Hitler with dictatorial powers.

    You are free to stick your fingers in your ears, go "la, la, la", waffle interminably about a wide range of irrelevant topics, produce pages of random numbers, and deny the basic facts of history if you wish.

    BTW, on a mod note, would you mind using a spell checker on some or all of your posts?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement