Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Why is sexism such a difficult topic?

1568101136

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭later12


    Millicent wrote: »
    What happens in those threads is never discussion but open hostility based on preconceptions which are consistently unproven. FWIW, I won't be contributing to another one in AH for a good long time.
    I think that's a pity because there were plenty of people like PhlegmMoses (sp?), Blatant Rereg, Seamus and K9 and others who put forward valid points that nobody was getting upset about on either side, but some of the posts in the threads were ridiculously personal.

    Pickarooney I would really take issue with your selective searching of the thread for terms like feminazi and implicitly using that as some sort of indicator of the aggressively anti-feminist tone of the thread; there are lots of ways of directing digs at someone without using such blatant language as feminazi, which is likely to be avoided as it's a pretty bare faced personal attack.

    I think it's probably true that nobody has drastically changed their opinion after their thread. If anything all that is apparent is that threads like that can't be handled in AH and I should have posted it in politics cafe or humanities.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 71 ✭✭hardbackwriter


    The media has a massive role In how Gender roles are represented and it's prety obvious that the feminist perspective has the ear of media , women are potrayed as the sane voice of reason in most tv shows while men are homer Simpson

    You can turn that on its head though.

    Many TV critics complain about writers using the convention of having the wife be a nagging shrew who stops the fun-loving, good-natured husband from having a good time.
    Marge and Homer are often held up as a good example of this trope.

    http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ParentingTheHusband
    http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HenpeckedHusband

    I don't think tv is particularly sexist compared to any other aspect of society.


    Marge is an angel , delightful , she's certainly not shrill and I think most feminists would agree , definatley not a feminist, Lisa is the liberal and feminist character and is quite overbearing and shrill


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    drkpower wrote: »
    That is pointless absolutism which doesn't help either 'side'. Equality has to reflect reality.

    What do you mean, "reality"?
    If I applied that to issues such as hiring discrimination based on motherhood, I would RIGHTLY be attacked by just about everyone.

    It's not equality if it's not equal, simple as. There's no grey area. If you fight for equality, you take the rough with the smooth. Otherwise you're a hypocrite.


  • Posts: 0 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Tucker Jolly Motorcyclist


    Really?
    Take a look at this article.
    http://www.metro.co.uk/news/875448-topman-pulls-t-shirts-with-sexist-and-offensive-slogans-from-uk-stores

    Now take a look at these, which are openly sold in tons of girls' clothes shops.
    http://www.crazydogtshirts.com/catalog/boysarestupid.bmp

    Once again, double standards.
    Why should men tolerate being told to watch what they say, if vice versa is not also applied?

    is "she's allowed to do it why cant i" really ok to argue?
    later12 wrote: »
    If anything all that is apparent is that threads like that can't be handled in AH and I should have posted it in politics cafe or humanities.
    no thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭drkpower


    It's not equality if it's not equal, simple as. There's no grey area. If you fight for equality, you take the rough with the smooth. Otherwise you're a hypocrite.
    This is why I don't bother with this type of debate; sometimes you don't really get anywhere.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    bluewolf wrote: »
    is "she's allowed to do it why cant i" really ok to argue?

    Why wouldn't it be?
    "Equality" means either both are allowed to do it or neither, anything else is a privilege for one gender over the other.
    Personally my opinion is that neither should be sold in terms of promoting violence, or that both should be allowed in terms of freedom of speech. But banning one without the other is a very clear example of discrimination, no?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    drkpower wrote: »
    This is why I don't bother with this type of debate; sometimes you don't really get anywhere.

    Look, I'm just a guy who resents the fact that it's ok apparently to sell t shirts advocating violence against my gender, but not the reverse. Does that really make me unreasonable? I don't like seeing my gender vilified all the time while crap like this is allowed to go on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,207 ✭✭✭The King of Moo


    Really?
    Take a look at this article.
    http://www.metro.co.uk/news/875448-topman-pulls-t-shirts-with-sexist-and-offensive-slogans-from-uk-stores

    Now take a look at these, which are openly sold in tons of girls' clothes shops.
    http://www.crazydogtshirts.com/catalog/boysarestupid.bmp

    Once again, double standards.
    Why should men tolerate being told to watch what they say, if vice versa is not also applied?

    I agree it's a double standard, and I think both the male and female t-shirts should have been withdrawn simply because they're really stupid and childish and people shouldn't be encouraged to be stupid and childish.

    But I think the reason there was more backlash against the men's t-shirts was because the slogans are coming from the mouths of men, who are still slightly more privileged than women in our society, and often physically stronger, so the slogans could be seen as intimidating and as discrimination by those with more power against those with less.

    I personally agree with you to an extent and think that because the gender divide has lessened somewhat, those arguments against the male slogans are less valid than before, and both types of t-shirts are sexist.
    If I saw someone of either gender wearing them I'd think them silly and question why they'd want something so stupid emblazoned across their chest.

    I will say though, that this is not really a big deal overall, and there are bigger examples of sexism to be tackled. Though I guess casual sexism could be a gateway to greater sexism.
    Marge is an angel , delightful , she's certainly not shrill and I think most feminists would agree , definatley not a feminist, Lisa is the liberal and feminist character and is quite overbearing and shrill

    I wish youtube had a clip of the montage of annoyed harrumphs played when Marge denies nagging Homer in the Brad Goodman episode. :D

    She's inconsistently characterised to be honest: sometimes she is the voice of reason, but sometimes she's a boring nagger.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Millicent


    Feisar wrote: »
    Can someone from the feminist camp outline how their or others lives have been negatively effected by sexism?
    Millicent wrote: »
    Feisar, if this thread is still open when I get home from work, I will give you a detailed response to how sexism has affected my life.

    Feisar, as promised, I'll give you that reply now. I am going to appeal to anyone reading this to be gentle with their responses. Much of this is extremely personal and still painful, so I would appreciate if people would treat it kindly. Thank you in advance.

    So *deep breath* on to mega post! :)

    I'm not exactly sure where to begin with it all so I guess I'll start from the beginning. I was a smart child. Inquisitive, curious and always reading. From the start of my life, I can remember getting hassle for it from family members, based solely on the fact that I was a girl. I lost count of the number of times I was told, "It's possible to be too smart", by both aunts and uncles. The same assertion was never levelled at my male cousins or siblings.

    It was made apparent to all the girls in our family that they would have to pull their weight. The girls ironed, cleaned, cooked, washed dishes from a very young age (maybe 7 or 8) while the boys were off playing. Cries of "Why isn't he helping?" were roundly ignored or sometimes shouted at. The girls were taught to shut up and get on with it or face anger or disdain.

    This translated into a brother who demanded that his sisters cook for him or clean up: the gender roles were set.

    As I grew, I was labelled a tomboy. I used to be quite proud of the term until I realised that this was just because I liked to play in the dirt or climb trees or playing with pets. I hadn't much interest in dolls and looking at the skinny, big-chested Barbies or over-sexualised Bratz dolls, I'm kind of glad of that now.

    I was very creative and liked to work with my hands. I even had this crappy little woodworking kit that wouldn't cut a thick slice of paper but I loved it. When I was deciding on a secondary school, I asked to go to the only mixed secondary school, which offered woodworking, metalwork and the most amazing science lab that I had ever seen. The boy's school also offered all these subjects. Pig foetuses in jars, big vials and bottles of chemicals and people performing simple experiments were shown to us on the open day. I was in nerd heaven. I begged to go, so excited to get my hands dirty and was told, no. I would only be chasing boys. It seemed exceptionally cruel that my parents would allow me on the open day only to say no for a reason that made no sense to me. I had no interest in boys at the time. (In fact, I didn't have my first boyfriend till I was 17 -- makes sense in light of the next part of my post.) Anyway, off I was sent to the girl's school to do "female" subjects like home economics and languages. That was less than 15 years ago.

    The biggest motivation for my feminism is what came at a young age.

    When I was about 7 or 8 was when the sexual abuse started. An older male figure saw me as property because of my gender and abused me for two, maybe three years. It shattered my innocence and sent me into a depression that took me 20 years to get over. It also set up another understanding very early on that my rights over my own sexuality were not my own decision and the pattern of a (much) older male taking advantage of my vulnerability and gender, which would repeat twice more before I was a teenager.

    One man was a family member; two, who sexually assaulted me when I was 14 and 15 (one of those after plying me with drink), were not related to me or each other in any way. As I entered late teens/early twenties, I had blossomed into a body that I had no idea what to do with and feared my own sexuality as it had never brought good things before. It again made me vulnerable for predatory men, who took any excuse to grope me, make lewd comments or treat me like an object. I began to drink to cope and self harm. As a result of being very drunk one night, I have a vague recollection of a close "friend" walking me home. On the steps on a hill in public, he proceeded to have sex with me while I fell asleep. I was so drunk I could barely speak, but that didn't seem to bother him. I don't know if he wore a condom. I no longer drink.

    I am very aware that men and boys are abused and am just as horrified by that as by assault and abuse of girls, but there is no denying that sexually motivated violence is a gendered crime. Far, far more women are abused or raped than men and I wish I could say I had it worse than other girls I knew, but the fact of the matter is, I could reel off a very long list of women I know who have suffered sexual abuse and violence.

    When my parents separated, despite saying I wished to stay with my dad who was the better caregiver at the time, custody was given to my mother as the court system assumed that because of her predefined gender role, she was the better custodian. I am aware that is also sexist against my dad, but shows how deeply engrained the "woman as nurturer" stereotype goes.

    Thus began my interest in feminism and the realisation that I had some power over my life. My role was not defined by what I had been taught a girl should be like, nor should I ignore the disturbing fact that I was not the only girl, not by a long shot, who had faced sexual violence or been taken advantage of.

    There are many other reasons -- the fact that the legislation of the X Case has still not been enacted and I could still have to travel to England if carrying a child would kill me; the increasing questioning of when I will be getting married and having kids and the horror when I say I want neither (incidentally, my brother is six years older, single and childless, and fields far, far less of these questions than I do); the fact that boyfriends and male friends have frequently tried to tell me that they are smarter than me, apropos of nothing; the fact that my heavy metal/alt/grunge tastes were treated with derision and suspicion by male fans and friends, who did their best to trip me up with the third degree on my tastes; the fact that it was assumed I was lesbian because I didn't dress a certain way or have too much interest in men (understandably, IMO, given my history); the list goes on.

    My interest in feminism does not negate my interest in the rights or issues of other groups--races, ethnic groups, fathers, people with disabilities or anyone else discriminated against. It simply forms the basis of my understanding of my own gender and the issues facing it.

    TLDR; I am not a single ideology. I am a person with facets and interests and am not defined but merely influenced by the feminist ideology.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,762 ✭✭✭✭stupidusername


    To me, equality means that women should not be discriminated against because of their gender.

    I say this because to me it seems the fight has always been about female discrimination, or this has at least been the more dominant fight. It was a movement that needed starting, but it seems to have taken on such momentum that it just kept going, and now we've gotten bollix such as gender quotas, which IMO are a step backwards.

    To me, the word feminist means probably what feminazi means to others. I would never label my views, and would especially never label them feminist, though I do believe women should have the same opportunities and rights as men. But at the same time, I recognise that women are different to men.

    I think it's an emotive issue because the issue of feminism is almost constantly in our faces throughout the media, and tbf it gets irritating. It irritates me watching a program like Midday, because it is always about things that discriminate against women. They play so hard done by all the time, and not in a way that says that women should stand up for themselves, but more in a "look how horrible all those men are to us!!" kinda way.

    There doesn't ever seem to be a national discussion about the issues of inequality facing men, but there does with any issue facing women. And I think this is why posters are angry when it comes to discussing inequality.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Why wouldn't it be?
    "Equality" means either both are allowed to do it or neither, anything else is a privilege for one gender over the other.
    Personally my opinion is that neither should be sold in terms of promoting violence, or that both should be allowed in terms of freedom of speech. But banning one without the other is a very clear example of discrimination, no?

    no , your entirely correct.

    there was a clothing line a few years back that had the slogan "the two types of men" and showed a picture of a cartoon pig and a cartoon dog below it, this ran for a few months and all was fine.

    yet any time a tshirt is run by any shop with any kind of sentiment thats even percieved by women as negative, theres a media shítstorm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Millicent wrote: »
    Feisar, as promised, I'll give you that reply now. I am going to appeal to anyone reading this to be gentle with their responses. Much of this is extremely personal and still painful, so I would appreciate if people would treat it kindly. Thank you in advance.

    So *deep breath* on to mega post! :)

    I'm not exactly sure where to begin with it all so I guess I'll start from the beginning. I was a smart child. Inquisitive, curious and always reading. From the start of my life, I can remember getting hassle for it from family members, based solely on the fact that I was a girl. I lost count of the number of times I was told, "It's possible to be too smart", by both aunts and uncles. The same assertion was never levelled at my male cousins or siblings.

    It was made apparent to all the girls in our family that they would have to pull their weight. The girls ironed, cleaned, cooked, washed dishes from a very young age (maybe 7 or 8) while the boys were off playing. Cries of "Why isn't he helping?" were roundly ignored or sometimes shouted at. The girls were taught to shut up and get on with it or face anger or disdain.

    This translated into a brother who demanded that his sisters cook for him or clean up: the gender roles were set.

    As I grew, I was labelled a tomboy. I used to be quite proud of the term until I realised that this was just because I liked to play in the dirt or climb trees or playing with pets. I hadn't much interest in dolls and looking at the skinny, big-chested Barbies or over-sexualised Bratz dolls, I'm kind of glad of that now.

    I was very creative and liked to work with my hands. I even had this crappy little woodworking kit that wouldn't cut a thick slice of paper but I loved it. When I was deciding on a secondary school, I asked to go to the only mixed secondary school, which offered woodworking, metalwork and the most amazing science lab that I had ever seen. The boy's school also offered all these subjects. Pig foetuses in jars, big vials and bottles of chemicals and people performing simple experiments were shown to us on the open day. I was in nerd heaven. I begged to go, so excited to get my hands dirty and was told, no. I would only be chasing boys. It seemed exceptionally cruel that my parents would allow me on the open day only to say no for a reason that made no sense to me. I had no interest in boys at the time. (In fact, I didn't have my first boyfriend till I was 17 -- makes sense in light of the next part of my post.) Anyway, off I was sent to the girl's school to do "female" subjects like home economics and languages. That was less than 15 years ago.

    The biggest motivation for my feminism is what came at a young age.

    When I was about 7 or 8 was when the sexual abuse started. An older male figure saw me as property because of my gender and abused me for two, maybe three years. It shattered my innocence and sent me into a depression that took me 20 years to get over. It also set up another understanding very early on that my rights over my own sexuality were not my own decision and the pattern of a (much) older male taking advantage of my vulnerability and gender, which would repeat twice more before I was a teenager.

    One man was a family member; two, who sexually assaulted me when I was 14 and 15 (one of those after plying me with drink), were not related to me or each other in any way. As I entered late teens/early twenties, I had blossomed into a body that I had no idea what to do with and feared my own sexuality as it had never brought good things before. It again made me vulnerable for predatory men, who took any excuse to grope me, make lewd comments or treat me like an object. I began to drink to cope and self harm. As a result of being very drunk one night, I have a vague recollection of a close "friend" walking me home. On the steps on a hill in public, he proceeded to have sex with me while I fell asleep. I was so drunk I could barely speak, but that didn't seem to bother him. I don't know if he wore a condom. I no longer drink.

    I am very aware that men and boys are abused and am just as horrified by that as by assault and abuse of girls, but there is no denying that sexually motivated violence is a gendered crime. Far, far more women are abused or raped than men and I wish I could say I had it worse than other girls I knew, but the fact of the matter is, I could reel off a very long list of women I know who have suffered sexual abuse and violence.

    When my parents separated, despite saying I wished to stay with my dad who was the better caregiver at the time, custody was given to my mother as the court system assumed that because of her predefined gender role, she was the better custodian. I am aware that is also sexist against my dad, but shows how deeply engrained the "woman as nurturer" stereotype goes.

    Thus began my interest in feminism and the realisation that I had some power over my life. My role was not defined by what I had been taught a girl should be like, nor should I ignore the disturbing fact that I was not the only girl, not by a long shot, who had faced sexual violence or been taken advantage of.

    There are many other reasons -- the fact that the legislation of the X Case has still not been enacted and I could still have to travel to England if carrying a child would kill me; the increasing questioning of when I will be getting married and having kids and the horror when I say I want neither (incidentally, my brother is six years older, single and childless, and fields far, far less of these questions than I do); the fact that boyfriends and male friends have frequently tried to tell me that they are smarter than me, apropos of nothing; the fact that my heavy metal/alt/grunge tastes were treated with derision and suspicion by male fans and friends, who did their best to trip me up with the fifth degree on my tastes; the fact that it was assumed I was lesbian because I didn't dress a certain way or have too much interest in men (understandably, IMO, given my history); the list goes on.

    My interest in feminism does not negate my interest in the rights or issues of other groups--races, ethnic groups, fathers, people with disabilities or anyone else discriminated against. It simply forms the basis of my understanding of my own gender and the issues facing it.

    TLDR; I am not a single ideology. I am a person with facets and interests and am not defined but merely influenced by the feminist ideology.

    Millicent. I am in awe of your courage, strength, openness and honesty.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭--Kaiser--


    jaja321 wrote: »
    Didn't you say though in the previous thread on Male Feminists that if a woman aged between 25-40 and an equally qualified man go for a job, then the man should be given the job, because the woman may go on maternity leave?! I am absolutely aware that in applying for jobs that I may be passed up for a position because of the fact that I'm of 'baby-making age' (whether or not I want children doesn't even come into it) I can be discriminated against because I'm a woman in the age group you mentioned. That's not equal opportunity. I really feel that we should have parental leave so that parents can decide between them who should take the leave, or even share the leave so that a) women aren't discriminated against in this way and b) so that men have the opportunity to spend more quality time with their children when they are really young, which I believe is really important. I think its unfair and discriminatory that they don't have the same opportunity to do so currently.

    You are not comparing like with like, that the's the problem with calling it an equal oppurtunity. There is no chance that a man will go on maternity leave, none because he can't. There is a certain precentage chances that a women between certain ages will get pregnant and will get maternity leave. This is potentially a huge risk for an important position, especially in a small to medium company

    (This is a purely hypothetical situation, given that the male and female candidates are equal in every other way apart from gender)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭later12


    bluewolf wrote: »

    no thanks

    Look at the gender quotas threads though. As bad as they are, at least you guys can cut the bullshit out because you have a strict charter.

    In AH, any sensitive topic is doomed from the start because the nature of the forum blurs the line between rough and tumble and aggression. The boundary is a bit clearer in politics/ humanities.

    Nobody wants to start up a new feminism debate I'm sure, but I would hope the issue could be raised elsewhere a bit more calmly. I think it's a bit grotesque that any topic should be deemed too sore to be discussed on a site as broad as this, where discussion is its stock and trade.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 71 ✭✭hardbackwriter


    Really?
    Take a look at this article.
    http://www.metro.co.uk/news/875448-topman-pulls-t-shirts-with-sexist-and-offensive-slogans-from-uk-stores

    Now take a look at these, which are openly sold in tons of girls' clothes shops.
    http://www.crazydogtshirts.com/catalog/boysarestupid.bmp

    Once again, double standards.
    Why should men tolerate being told to watch what they say, if vice versa is not also applied?

    I agree it's a double standard, and I think both the male and female t-shirts should have been withdrawn simply because they're really stupid and childish and people shouldn't be encouraged to be stupid and childish.

    But I think the reason there was more backlash against the men's t-shirts was because the slogans are coming from the mouths of men, who are still slightly more privileged than women in our society, and often physically stronger, so the slogans could be seen as intimidating and as discrimination by those with more power against those with less.

    I personally agree with you to an extent and think that because the gender divide has lessened somewhat, those arguments against the male slogans are less valid than before, and both types of t-shirts are sexist.
    If I saw someone of either gender wearing them I'd think them silly and question why they'd want something so stupid emblazoned across their chest.

    I will say though, that this is not really a big deal overall, and there are bigger examples of sexism to be tackled. Though I guess casual sexism could be a gateway to greater sexism.
    Marge is an angel , delightful , she's certainly not shrill and I think most feminists would agree , definatley not a feminist, Lisa is the liberal and feminist character and is quite overbearing and shrill

    I wish youtube had a clip of the montage of annoyed harrumphs played when Marge denies nagging Homer in the Brad Goodman episode. :D

    She's inconsistently characterised to be honest: sometimes she is the voice of reason, but sometimes she's a boring nagger.

    One thing that really worries me about all this obsessing over every single equality issue is that it makes life terribly sober and serious , if you can't laugh at peculiar female or male traits, comedy as we know it is dead


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    No adults, for example, would say "Girls are stupid!" or "Boys are smelly!

    Really?
    Take a look at this article.
    http://www.metro.co.uk/news/875448-topman-pulls-t-shirts-with-sexist-and-offensive-slogans-from-uk-stores

    Now take a look at these, which are openly sold in tons of girls' clothes shops.
    http://www.crazydogtshirts.com/catalog/boysarestupid.bmp

    Once again, double standards.
    Why should men tolerate being told to watch what they say, if vice versa is not also applied?
    Because not all women should have to "pay" for the idiocy of some?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    You are not comparing like with like, that the's the problem with calling it an equal oppurtunity. There is no chance that a man will go on maternity leave, none because he can't. There is a certain precentage chances that a women between certain ages will get pregnant and will get maternity leave. This is potentially a huge risk for an important position, especially in a small to medium company

    (This is a purely hypothetical situation, given that the male and female candidates are equal in every other way apart from gender)

    True a man can't get pregnant but a man could get seriously ill - should employers get to look at family health records as well as conducting a medical just in case there is history of heart problems, diabetes, cancer in the family?
    If he plays a sport he could be injured - beak a leg/hand for example - so no rugby players need apply?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭drkpower


    Look, I'm just a guy who resents the fact that it's ok apparently to sell t shirts advocating violence against my gender, but not the reverse. Does that really make me unreasonable? I don't like seeing my gender vilified all the time while crap like this is allowed to go on.

    Then argue against the crap.

    But dont take absolutist positions that fail to reflect reality because you are pissed off at what the 'other side' are doing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,207 ✭✭✭The King of Moo


    One thing that really worries me about all this obsessing over every single equality issue is that it makes life terribly sober and serious , if you can't laugh at peculiar female or male traits, comedy as we know it is dead

    Some of the best comedy is based on the battle of the sexes, absolutely.
    Much Ado about Nothing springs to mind.

    It only becomes an issue when programmes seem to reinforce unfair power relations again and again.

    I don't see that happening too much on modern tv, in fairness.
    With regards to the Simpsons, especially classic Simpsons, I think it was very fair and not particularly sexist against either gender. All the characters had their good and bad points.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 ✭✭✭✭hondasam


    Millicent wrote: »
    Feisar, as promised, I'll give you that reply now. I am going to appeal to anyone reading this to be gentle with their responses. Much of this is extremely personal and still painful, so I would appreciate if people would treat it kindly. Thank you in advance.

    So *deep breath* on to mega post! :)

    I'm not exactly sure where to begin with it all so I guess I'll start from the beginning. I was a smart child. Inquisitive, curious and always reading. From the start of my life, I can remember getting hassle for it from family members, based solely on the fact that I was a girl. I lost count of the number of times I was told, "It's possible to be too smart", by both aunts and uncles. The same assertion was never levelled at my male cousins or siblings.

    It was made apparent to all the girls in our family that they would have to pull their weight. The girls ironed, cleaned, cooked, washed dishes from a very young age (maybe 7 or 8) while the boys were off playing. Cries of "Why isn't he helping?" were roundly ignored or sometimes shouted at. The girls were taught to shut up and get on with it or face anger or disdain.

    This translated into a brother who demanded that his sisters cook for him or clean up: the gender roles were set.

    As I grew, I was labelled a tomboy. I used to be quite proud of the term until I realised that this was just because I liked to play in the dirt or climb trees or playing with pets. I hadn't much interest in dolls and looking at the skinny, big-chested Barbies or over-sexualised Bratz dolls, I'm kind of glad of that now.

    I was very creative and liked to work with my hands. I even had this crappy little woodworking kit that wouldn't cut a thick slice of paper but I loved it. When I was deciding on a secondary school, I asked to go to the only mixed secondary school, which offered woodworking, metalwork and the most amazing science lab that I had ever seen. The boy's school also offered all these subjects. Pig foetuses in jars, big vials and bottles of chemicals and people performing simple experiments were shown to us on the open day. I was in nerd heaven. I begged to go, so excited to get my hands dirty and was told, no. I would only be chasing boys. It seemed exceptionally cruel that my parents would allow me on the open day only to say no for a reason that made no sense to me. I had no interest in boys at the time. (In fact, I didn't have my first boyfriend till I was 17 -- makes sense in light of the next part of my post.) Anyway, off I was sent to the girl's school to do "female" subjects like home economics and languages. That was less than 15 years ago.

    The biggest motivation for my feminism is what came at a young age.

    When I was about 7 or 8 was when the sexual abuse started. An older male figure saw me as property because of my gender and abused me for two, maybe three years. It shattered my innocence and sent me into a depression that took me 20 years to get over. It also set up another understanding very early on that my rights over my own sexuality were not my own decision and the pattern of a (much) older male taking advantage of my vulnerability and gender, which would repeat twice more before I was a teenager.

    One man was a family member; two, who sexually assaulted me when I was 14 and 15 (one of those after plying me with drink), were not related to me or each other in any way. As I entered late teens/early twenties, I had blossomed into a body that I had no idea what to do with and feared my own sexuality as it had never brought good things before. It again made me vulnerable for predatory men, who took any excuse to grope me, make lewd comments or treat me like an object. I began to drink to cope and self harm. As a result of being very drunk one night, I have a vague recollection of a close "friend" walking me home. On the steps on a hill in public, he proceeded to have sex with me while I fell asleep. I was so drunk I could barely speak, but that didn't seem to bother him. I don't know if he wore a condom. I no longer drink.

    I am very aware that men and boys are abused and am just as horrified by that as by assault and abuse of girls, but there is no denying that sexually motivated violence is a gendered crime. Far, far more women are abused or raped than men and I wish I could say I had it worse than other girls I knew, but the fact of the matter is, I could reel off a very long list of women I know who have suffered sexual abuse and violence.

    When my parents separated, despite saying I wished to stay with my dad who was the better caregiver at the time, custody was given to my mother as the court system assumed that because of her predefined gender role, she was the better custodian. I am aware that is also sexist against my dad, but shows how deeply engrained the "woman as nurturer" stereotype goes.

    Thus began my interest in feminism and the realisation that I had some power over my life. My role was not defined by what I had been taught a girl should be like, nor should I ignore the disturbing fact that I was not the only girl, not by a long shot, who had faced sexual violence or been taken advantage of.

    There are many other reasons -- the fact that the legislation of the X Case has still not been enacted and I could still have to travel to England if carrying a child would kill me; the increasing questioning of when I will be getting married and having kids and the horror when I say I want neither (incidentally, my brother is six years older, single and childless, and fields far, far less of these questions than I do); the fact that boyfriends and male friends have frequently tried to tell me that they are smarter than me, apropos of nothing; the fact that my heavy metal/alt/grunge tastes were treated with derision and suspicion by male fans and friends, who did their best to trip me up with the third degree on my tastes; the fact that it was assumed I was lesbian because I didn't dress a certain way or have too much interest in men (understandably, IMO, given my history); the list goes on.

    My interest in feminism does not negate my interest in the rights or issues of other groups--races, ethnic groups, fathers, people with disabilities or anyone else discriminated against. It simply forms the basis of my understanding of my own gender and the issues facing it.

    TLDR; I am not a single ideology. I am a person with facets and interests and am not defined but merely influenced by the feminist ideology.

    You would have to have a heart of stone to read that and not feel your pain.
    Now I see you as vulnerable and I'm sure that's not what you want at all.
    I understand why you are so passionate about your beliefs, I might not agree with them all but life experience is what makes us what we are.:)


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 Roy Yummy Grenade


    Really?
    Take a look at this article.
    http://www.metro.co.uk/news/875448-topman-pulls-t-shirts-with-sexist-and-offensive-slogans-from-uk-stores

    Now take a look at these, which are openly sold in tons of girls' clothes shops.
    http://www.crazydogtshirts.com/catalog/boysarestupid.bmp

    Once again, double standards.
    Why should men tolerate being told to watch what they say, if vice versa is not also applied?

    are many t shirts as offensive if not worst against woman http://funnytshirts.savatoons.com/whores.html

    there also was outrage at that t shirt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boys_are_stupid,_throw_rocks_at_them!_controversy

    and yes i agree with you it is offensive violence and hate are never funny irrespective of gender .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 793 ✭✭✭jaja321


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    You are not comparing like with like, that the's the problem with calling it an equal oppurtunity. There is no chance that a man will go on maternity leave, none because he can't. There is a certain precentage chances that a women between certain ages will get pregnant and will get maternity leave. This is potentially a huge risk for an important position, especially in a small to medium company

    (This is a purely hypothetical situation, given that the male and female candidates are equal in every other way apart from gender)

    You're not getting what I'm saying at all. Of course men can't go on maternity leave, but they could go on parental leave if it was available!! Therefore the discrimination women of a certain age can face when going for a job could be reduced/eliminated, because they wouldn't be viewed as a huge potential risk, as you put it. Men could equally avail of the leave to look after their children, hence men and women would be equal in the job application process. You asked for a situation where women are discriminated against because of their gender and to give you possible solutions. I gave you an example and a possible solution.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Wow Millicent - so brave.

    Some of the knuckledragging sh1t posted here, on numerous types of thread, must be really hurtful for you to read...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Millicent


    hondasam wrote: »
    You would have to have a heart of stone to read that and not feel your pain.
    Now I see you as vulnerable and I'm sure that's not what you want at all.
    I understand why you are so passionate about your beliefs, I might not agree with them all but life experience is what makes us what we are.:)

    Thank you very much. :) That's a truly lovely post.

    I'm not vulnerable these days at all though, and I credit taking gender studies classes and learning more about feminism for much of that. It's a tool, same as any ideology -- liberalism, conservatism, egalitarianism -- with which to make sense of the world. It's only destructive if used in a negative way, but a few bad apples shouldn't rot the barrel. There are many moderate, empassioned but ultimately compassionate and reasonable people, just like me, who use feminist theory and studies to help them interact better with the world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Millicent


    Dudess wrote: »
    Wow Millicent - so brave.

    Some of the knuckledragging sh1t posted here, on numerous types of thread, must be really hurtful for you to read...

    It can be, especially when people are trying to paint me as some sort of man hater, because it's simply not true. Because for all those horrible assholes I have encountered who made me feel like nothing, there are wonderful amazing men like my boyfriend, my brothers, my dad, my friends, who enrich my life on a daily basis. I don't hate all men, or even the ones who treated me horribly. I want to foster better communication with them so they can understand the issues facing my gender as I try to do with theirs.


  • Posts: 0 Roy Yummy Grenade


    Millicent wrote: »
    Thank you very much. :) That's a truly lovely post.

    I'm not vulnerable these days at all though, and I credit taking gender studies classes and learning more about feminism for much of that. It's a tool, same as any ideology -- liberalism, conservatism, egalitarianism -- with which to make sense of the world. It's only destructive if used in a negative way, but a few bad apples shouldn't rot the barrel. There are many moderate, empassioned but ultimately compassionate and reasonable people, just like me, who use feminist theory and studies to help them interact better with the world.

    thanks for your post and yes very brave of you and i applaud you for it bravo sad to say though that their are very few woman who could not relate to most of what you posted


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    millicent - very brave for posting that , cheers , Im going to leave this thread now before i get banned. beliefs reinforced...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 793 ✭✭✭jaja321


    Thanks for your post Millicent, sharing that can't have been easy. Our experiences in life undoubtedly shape our outlook. As Roy Yummy Grenade said, I'm sure there are a lot of women who identify with a lot of what you have posted, sadly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Millicent


    millicent - very brave for posting that , cheers , Im going to leave this thread now before i get banned. beliefs reinforced...

    Because of my post or others'?

    And thank you. I think! :pac:

    ETA: Well definitely not thank you! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 ✭✭✭✭hondasam


    Millicent wrote: »
    It can be, especially when people are trying to paint me as some sort of man hater, because it's simply not true. Because for all those horrible assholes I have encountered who made me feel like nothing, there are wonderful amazing men like my boyfriend, my brothers, my dad, my friends, who enrich my life on a daily basis. I don't hate all men, or even the ones who treated me horribly. I want to foster better communication with them so they can understand the issues facing my gender as I try to do with theirs.

    This is not meant to offend you but you do come across as always defending the woman. It is understandable after reading your post why it seems that way.
    Can you see why it would come across as you are a man hater? I know I have changed my opinion after reading your post and I'm sure others will also.


Advertisement