Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Potential for wind and snow (NW) 4th, 5th December - DISCUSSION ONLY

1235»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Tom Cruises Left Nut


    Sleety showers on the way for Dub ?

    183821.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,065 ✭✭✭JanuarySnowstor


    Told ye so!! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Tom Cruises Left Nut


    By the way, the 0 and -1 on that radar image are dewpoints


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,522 ✭✭✭✭dsmythy


    Told ye so!! :D

    Ya need snow not sleet :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭Su Campu


    Harps wrote: »
    Seems a bit odd all right looking at the temp and dp

    How 'snowy' would it have to be in order to be classed as snow as opposed to sleet?

    There's been a few borderline showers here of hail and very wet snow flakes but I'd still only class it as sleet. Is there an actual criteria or is it simply down to observation?

    I think it's down to observation. There must be clearly visible whole flakes for it to be reported as snow, partial flakes with high liquid water content would be deemed sleet.

    Regarding intensity, this is from WMO8:
    Guide for approximating the intensity of snow:

    Light: Snowflakes small and sparse; in the absence of other obscuring phenomena, snow at this intensity generally reduces visibility, but to no less than 1 000 m.
    Moderate: Larger, more numerous flakes generally reducing visibility to between 400 and 1 000 m.
    Heavy: Numerous flakes of all sizes generally reducing visibility to below 400 m.


  • Registered Users Posts: 661 ✭✭✭Mayo_Boy


    Would anyone be able to confirm if their will be snow for north mayo anytime during the night? All we had so far was hail/sleet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,363 ✭✭✭naughto


    Mayo_Boy wrote: »
    Would anyone be able to confirm if their will be snow for north mayo anytime during the night? All we had so far was hail/sleet
    thats like asking for the lotto numbers next week u will not know untill ists on the ground


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭Su Campu


    None of the 2300Z TAFs forecast snow tomorrow, even at Knock. Only sleet and hail showers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,138 ✭✭✭John mac


    Mayo_Boy wrote: »
    Would anyone be able to confirm if their will be snow for north mayo anytime during the night? All we had so far was hail/sleet
    your not living up neiphin so. :D;)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,667 ✭✭✭WolfeIRE


    For those of you seeing snow tonight, enjoy it. It very well may be the last snowfall you will see for at least 7-10 days. The worst of the wintry weather will occur overnight and during the first half of Monday. The Thursday-Friday cold snap is not looking promising in terms of widespread wintry showers, with the exception of coastal counties in the west and north. Nighttime frosts may be severe on Wed, Thur nights also. Beyond that it will turn much milder over the weekend. Of course, models will upgrade and then downgrade in between but there is no sign of any significant wintry weather in the next week or more.

    We look like remaining in this cold, mild, cold, mild... setup for the next 2 weeks at least with the nw and n being favoured to see any significant wintry weather.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,565 ✭✭✭Pangea


    Even if there is accumulations of 5cms as expected, I suspect all this will melt tomorrow as temps are expected to be 3-6 from met eireann?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭darkman2


    Pangea wrote: »
    Even if there is accumulations of 5cms as expected, I suspect all this will melt tomorrow as temps are expected to be 3-6 from met eireann?


    It will melt quickly alright. The snow level will rise too. I don't think there will be much in the way of snow falling pretty much anywhere below 150m tomorrow. It seems as though the snow level will rise quickly as temperatures rise.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭Su Campu


    Darkman was wondering what I thought of some snow reports near sea level. With the exception of Belmullet, I am not that surprised, as all along I have said that the snowline would be generally 100 m, but possibly to all levels in isolated parts of the north in the squalliest of showers. There were some brief reports of that, but they pretty much turned back to sleet and rain, so the 100 m theory still held.

    Regarding Belmullet, even if a shower is 95% rain, if there is any sign of snow in it, however brief, then that must be put in the report, as the most severe weather type is always given priority. I agree that it must have been in a brief downdraft, given its exposed location, as the other reports over the past 24 hrs have been rain or hail.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭Su Campu


    A couply wet snow showers earlier on which melted on impact. Slop!

    Belmullet is reporting 'Recent Snow' on the 10 pm reports, with a temp of 6c and a Td of 3.6c. Trace amounts.

    http://www.met.ie/latest/reports.asp


    In the 1 and 2 am synops this morning, the code used for present weather was 83, which by WMO definition (Page 417) is
    "Shower(s) of Rain and Snow mixed, Slight"

    which is really sleet, as there is no code for "Sleet" in the official list, and if they were purely of snow then Code 85 or 86 would have been used instead. I wonder if these are what are reported as the "Recent Snow", given that of the two types, snow must always be given preference, though I wonder why it's not just put down as "Recent Sleet" on met.ie then?? :confused:

    183881.PNG


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,205 ✭✭✭eskimocat


    Come on 86!!!!
    Thanks for that Su, very interesting...


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭darkman2


    Su Campu wrote: »
    Darkman was wondering what I thought of some snow reports near sea level. With the exception of Belmullet, I am not that surprised, as all along I have said that the snowline would be generally 100 m, but possibly to all levels in isolated parts of the north in the squalliest of showers. There were some brief reports of that, but they pretty much turned back to sleet and rain, so the 100 m theory still held.

    That is immediate west coasts which I always said were unlikely to see just snow.

    I live a few meters above sea level here in the East near Malahide. My area had a snow shower last night. I am as close to sea level as you can get on the coast.

    P.S that other thread I cannot understand why that has been closed. Now we are missing a forecast thread for this week. Which is Monday to Friday btw. Threads like that, IMO, should not be closed because a particular poster disagrees with the forecast. If said poster disagrees the least they can do is start a new thread with their own forecast for the week and put as much effort into it as the poster of the thread they wanted closed. Comes across as a bit ignorant really. If the forecast turns out to be wrong then it's best to discuss that after the time period of the forecast is over. That is the first time I have seen a forecast thread closed here before the time of the forecast expired.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,667 ✭✭✭WolfeIRE


    Su/Dark, come on now. No need to argue about who was right and who was wrong. We are all winners here:o....well, except for the bloke on the right. Doesn't know his behind from his tennis elbow
    183883.jpeg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭Su Campu


    darkman2 wrote: »
    That is immediate west coasts which I always said were unlikely to see just snow.

    Me too, which is why I was baffled at it. Maybe the explanation above might be valid.
    I live a few meters above sea level here in the East near Malahide. My area had a snow shower last night. I am as close to sea level as you can get on the coast.

    By your own admission it was "just a flake, but a flake nonetheless". But yes, we have seen some snow make it to near sea level, albeit very briefly. On the whole though I would not call rain with brief intermittent snow on the snowline. For me, snowline means where precipitation is only falling as snow, and that for me was around 100 m and above.

    P.S that other thread I cannot understand why that has been closed. Now we are missing a forecast thread for this week. Which is Monday to Friday btw. Threads like that, IMO, should not be closed because a particular poster disagrees with the forecast. If said poster disagrees the least they can do is start a new thread with their own forecast for the week and put as much effort into it as the poster of the thread they wanted closed. Comes across as a bit ignorant really. If the forecast turns out to be wrong then it's best to discuss that after the time period of the forecast is over. That is the first time I have seen a forecast thread closed here before the time of the forecast expired.

    To open yet another thread would be a nightmare. Your one already wasn't really needed as it could well have been part of the Winter 2011/2012 discussion as it was a week away when you opened it, but it was let run all the same. As Wolf said, people are now posting all over the place, and seeing as the threat of the widespread frost looks like not materialising, it is best to close it and let people go back to the Winter 2011/1012 one to avoid confusion and keep things tidy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,667 ✭✭✭WolfeIRE


    darkman2 wrote: »
    If said poster disagrees the least they can do is start a new thread with their own forecast for the week and put as much effort into it as the poster of the thread they wanted closed. Comes across as a bit ignorant really.

    The words 'Turning progressively colder' 'frost' 'snow' and 'next week' - none of the above really pertain to what is coming during the coming week. The thread is misleading and gives Boards.ie users false hope regarding potential for snow. Now, that might be "a bit ignorant really".


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭darkman2


    You are making a few assumptions there.

    Firstly I stand 100% by that forecast. Secondly the period for that forecast is Monday to Friday.

    The forecast period for that thread started literally 13 hours ago. If a mod has issues with the thread title - change the title.

    And if a mod wants to set examples like that then they might aswell set it across the board and apply it to everyone. For example starting with this thread which is far less relevant then the one just closed.:rolleyes:

    Also I look forward to yourself and Su dipping your toes in the water and actually giving your own forecasts. Inherently it is risky and it is very easy to be critical on the sidelines.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,667 ✭✭✭WolfeIRE


    Boards is the number one forum destination in Ireland for anyone interested in finding out about what's in store on the weather front. My opinion is that those with some knowledge of weather who start threads, moderate threads and who regularly contribute to threads should consider that the majority of users come here for information and contrasting, well-informed opinions. When a thread is misleading, it is important to correct this.

    And I don't agree with you on this thread being closed now. Snow is still falling at times in higher parts of Ulster and Connacht.
    darkman2 wrote: »
    You are making a few assumptions there.

    They are not assumptions. All model guidance points to last night and today being the coldest period of the week. Friday may come close.

    Met Eireann's forecast suggests this
    http://www.met.ie/forecasts/

    "Also I look forward to yourself and Su dipping your toes in the water and actually giving your own forecasts. Inherently it is risky and it is very easy to be critical on the sidelines."


    We do. We are just not that interested in the race to be the OP every time


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭darkman2


    The behaviour from yourself and Su this morning is no less then insulting to me. You have my thread closed because a thread title was not changed and you think the forecast is not correct (because what would I know?) and you then go on to justify leaving another thread open, the premise of which, is far more incorrect then anything in my forecast. MT will be the first to tell you that and spot the inconsistency.

    Not only that you then go on to attempt to validate my previous forecast assumptions by telling me now it might be cold on Thursday or Friday? After the thread has been closed!? Did I not say that last week? Was that not in the forecast thread that has just been closed? Coincidentally it will be more then "cold" by the end of the week as was in that thread.

    And by the way I don't like your inference that I went out to mislead anybody. Why would I do that? If any forecast I make is wrong then fine! Criticise away. I have no problem with that. But don't make me out to be an idiot criticising me in advance of the period forecast number 1 and number 2 go on to validate it with some forecast of your on!:rolleyes:

    That is a dismissive and ignorant way to act. It really is.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭darkman2


    WolfeIRE wrote: »

    We do. We are just not that interested in the race to be the OP every time

    No, you don't. You are either not capable or not interested.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,379 ✭✭✭snow ghost


    Personally, I saw nothing wrong with darkman's thread.

    I do however note a seeming bias creeping in towards what is deemed acceptable weather related posts / threads and if it does not suit that certain bias it is dismissed in terms of being closed, moved or deleted.

    This is becoming tedious and is likely to deter people from coming here and starting new threads.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,667 ✭✭✭WolfeIRE


    Enough of the Keyboard Commando antics. It's silly. We are all here for weather, not virtual squabbling.

    Back on topic.

    Here is a vid from Mark Vogan on last night's snow near Glasgow


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,068 ✭✭✭Iancar29


    Anyone know the best case scenerio for the shower from a NW flow to keep the strength passing through the country?, rather then them just being big hefty feckers... haha :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Tom Cruises Left Nut


    I would have to agree that there was no point in closing the other thread as it dealt with the whole week while this one ends today !

    Anyway, not trying to drag this on. Lets all be friends :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Tom Cruises Left Nut


    Iancar29 wrote: »
    Anyone know the best case scenerio for the shower from a NW flow to keep the strength passing through the country?, rather then them just being big hefty feckers... haha :)

    This isn't technical but wouldn't it have to be going very fast :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,003 ✭✭✭Lucreto


    WolfeIRE wrote: »
    Enough of the Keyboard Commando antics. It's silly. We are all here for weather, not virtual squabbling.

    Back on topic.

    Here is a vid from Mark Vogan on last night's snow near Glasgow


    Mark is rubbing it in. :(

    I want snow.

    I was watching the temperature go down to 0.8c at 11pm and I checked again around 1am it was 1.7c.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,667 ✭✭✭WolfeIRE


    Lucreto wrote: »
    I was watching the temperature go down to 0.8c at 11pm and I checked again around 1pm it was 1.7c.

    It was 3c at 3pm with moderate sleet/hail showers where I am yesterday. At midnight it was 4.5c and raining. Must watch 'The Man Who Went Up A Hill and Came Down A Mountain' to get some tips on how to improve my altitude.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,068 ✭✭✭Iancar29


    t|nt|n wrote: »
    This isn't technical but wouldn't it have to be going very fast :pac:


    But say is the Dew point is colder than the air temp , and say the shower is going at speed.... then would it not just loose its energy even quicker then?

    Is it no like rubbing your hand while drying them to dry them quicker? :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Tom Cruises Left Nut


    Iancar29 wrote: »
    But say is the Dew point is colder than the air temp , and say the shower is going at speed.... then would it not just loose its energy even quicker then?

    Is it no like rubbing your hand while drying them to dry them quicker? :rolleyes:

    Not if you use a Dyson Airblade :cool:


  • Registered Users Posts: 73 ✭✭zara100


    Have to agree i used to enjoy this forum


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭darkman2


    t|nt|n wrote: »
    I would have to agree that there was no point in closing the other thread as it dealt with the whole week while this one ends today !


    Indeed. Now I am going to open a whole new thread to deal with the end of the week something already catered for in the other one. Go figure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Tom Cruises Left Nut


    darkman2 wrote: »
    Indeed. Now I am going to open a whole new thread to deal with the end of the week something already catered for in the other one. Go figure.

    Its win win !! Everyone loves a good DM2 thread !!

    Go forth and open !!! :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,068 ✭✭✭Iancar29


    t|nt|n wrote: »
    Not if you use a Dyson Airblade :cool:

    Now im confused! haha


    But seriously ... is there any day time heating needed or anything, wider temp spread ... or indeed just high flow rate?


  • Registered Users Posts: 332 ✭✭howlinwolf


    i think darkman is spot on, his thread was as valid if not more so than this one...clearly we have not got a snow event for 4and 5 of december ...bar a few places in ulster and connacht up in the hills... and his thread was for the whole week ...admittly it doesnt look like being very cold this weekend but as a lot of people say on here the models upgrade downgrade all the time leading up to the time involved. at least let the thread run up until the time specifed in the thread and see what happens ...it gets everybody talking and thats surely what this site is all about,and if it turns out darkmans thread was way off im sure he is big enough to take the criticism and slagging that comes his way.

    anyway rant over sorry for goin on:rolleyes:

    p.s. im kinda glad we didnt see snow cause it was a nightmare drivin to work in it last year, i want the snow for the 2 weeks im off over christmas:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,667 ✭✭✭WolfeIRE


    Another vid from Mark Vogan today. Taken north of Glasgow



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭Su Campu


    Right darkman, I've opened back up your thread so now please stop the insults.

    Everyone, stay on topic.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭Deep Easterly


    Su Campu wrote: »
    In the 1 and 2 am synops this morning, the code used for present weather was 83, which by WMO definition (Page 417) is
    which is really sleet, as there is no code for "Sleet" in the official list, and if they were purely of snow then Code 85 or 86 would have been used instead. I wonder if these are what are reported as the "Recent Snow", given that of the two types, snow must always be given preference, though I wonder why it's not just put down as "Recent Sleet" on met.ie then?? :confused:

    I suppose with the term 'sleet' having different connotations in various parts of the world it was probably wise not to include it in the WMO definitions. But yep, it really is odd why met.ie used 'recent snow' in the report when it was obviously sleet by our standards. I am flummoxed anyways!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭Deep Easterly


    it really is odd why met.ie used 'recent snow' in the report when it was obviously sleet by our standards. I am flummoxed anyways!

    Just thinking about this further, I wonder does code 83 also represent snow and rain falling at separate intervals in the time leading observation report as well as snow and rain falling together at the same time? In one of the showers earlier this morning, we had rain starting off, then rain and snow falling at the same time, which then turned into snow fully before clearing away (which it did, quite quickly). Overall, I would have classed this particular shower as being 'sleety' despite the fact that snow proper fell for a very brief period, but I am not an official observer. So, if the same type of showers occurred at Belmullet (rain, then sleet turning to snow briefly) then does code 83 allow for this, and still be in line with the 'recent snow reports' as seen on met.ie??


    Who knows.. !!

    Edit: just looking at the 00z synop as well, Code 26 is down for present weather which is 'Showers of snow, or of rain and snow' (in the preceding hour) in the WMO guide, which doesn't really help either as not very specific. (72682)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭Su Campu


    Remember, code 83 refers to present weather, so it says nothing about the hour leading up to the observation. The fact that it is used instead of 85 or 86 means there was snow mixed in with rain, i.e. Sleet.

    Using 26 would mean the same thing happened, only it was stopped by observation time. Otherwise they would use 25 (recent rain showers).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭Deep Easterly


    So the 'mixed' used in codes 83 & 84 is a fixed rather than loose term. Code 26 for example does not use this definition but uses instead 'showers of rain & snow' whereas 83 and 84 state that the showers are 'rain & snow mixed'.


    I'll get it yet.

    Here is one coded weather report that we are unlikely ever to see being reported from Belmullet: 73590


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭Su Campu


    So the 'mixed' used in codes 83 & 84 is a fixed rather than loose term. Code 26 for example does not use this definition but uses instead 'showers of rain & snow' whereas 83 and 84 state that the showers are 'rain & snow mixed'.


    I'll get it yet.

    There are only 10 codes available for reporting "Past weather" (20-29), whereas there are 60 to chose from when reporting "Present weather" (40-99).

    40-49: Fog
    50-59: Drizzle
    60-69: Rain
    70-79: Snow
    80-90: Showers
    91-99: Thunderstorms.

    These are the "past weather" codes that refer to showers:
    25 Shower(s) of rain
    26 Shower(s) of snow, or of rain and snow
    27 Shower(s) of hail*, or of rain and hail*
    28 Fog or ice fog
    29 Thunderstorm (with or without precipitation)

    and these are the "Present weather" codes that refer to Showers. One of these weather events will have occured during the past hour for one of the codes above to be reported:
    ww = 80–99 Showery precipitation, or precipitation with current or recent thunderstorm
    80 Rain shower(s), slight
    81 Rain shower(s), moderate or heavy
    82 Rain shower(s), violent
    83 Shower(s) of rain and snow mixed, slight
    84 Shower(s) of rain and snow mixed, moderate or heavy
    85 Snow shower(s), slight
    86 Snow shower(s), moderate or heavy
    87,88 Shower(s) of snow pellets or small hail, with or without rain or rain and snow mixed (87=light, 88=heavy)
    89,90 Shower(s) of hail*, with or without rain or rain and snow mixed, not associated with thunder (89=light, 90=heavy)

    If there were only rain showers, then 25 would be used. But it wasn't.

    Using 26 means that one or more of 83-86 occured (87-90 contain hail, so code 27 would be used for those). The fact that 83 was used as "Present Weather" in some reports (as it was happening at the time of observation), plus the other temperature and dewpoint data, would strongly suggest that it was this that occured in the "Past weather" too, and not 85 or 86.

    Now when this gets reported on the met.ie site, it obviously need to be translated into a shortened form. I think the word "sleet" will only be used if it's occuring now, as it can be inferred from the 83 type in the synop that is being decoded for the site. I don't think I've ever seen "Recent Sleet" used. When referring to past weather, the options are greatly reduced, and therefore a 26 would have to be written as Recent Snow, for the reasons stated above.

    I need a beer! :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Tom Cruises Left Nut


    Su Campu wrote: »

    I need a beer! :rolleyes:

    This should quench your thirst :pac:

    World%25E2%2580%2599s+Largest+Beer+Can.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭Deep Easterly


    Su Campu wrote: »

    I need a beer! :rolleyes:

    and why in the Belmullet 00z report was past weather used in the current weather group?

    and and and....

    Only messin. Thanks ;)

    PS, good point about the 'recent sleet'. Don't recall ever seeing it being used on met.ie.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭Su Campu


    This thread has run its course now so I'm closing it. The Snow Reports thread will stay open for another 24 hours.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement