Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

DCG discussion thread

  • 10-06-2009 2:40pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭


    you know in those perspective questions, how do you get and when do you use does unusual vanishing points ,the ones that are not in line with the first 2 vanising pts,
    like on page 179 on the red dcg book


«1345

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 mikeyb09


    munchie14 wrote: »
    you know in those perspective questions, how do you get and when do you use does unusual vanishing points ,the ones that are not in line with the first 2 vanising pts,
    like on page 179 on the red dcg book

    its something to do with wen there are angles! U cant get the point from the normal 2 so u use auxiliary vanishing points! I dont really like those questions!

    Wat questions out of section B are people answering?
    Im doin roag geometry & surface geometry!


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭munchie14


    roads and mechanisms
    which i had to teach myself


  • Registered Users Posts: 174 ✭✭croker1


    auxillary vanishing points are used when ther is a sloped surface such as a roof of a building.. not a hundred percent sure how to gwt them i must look over it myself soon and il try get back to ya..

    im doing the dynamic mechanisms question and the assemles question for section C but i dont really like them tbh.. have to do em tho coz there the only ones we'v studied.

    what do ye think will come up for section B?? im kinda banking on the intersecting planes question and the interpenetration question...

    also does anyone know where i can get some sample questions on interpenetration? iv done all the ones in the book and in the sample papers...


  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    croker1 wrote: »
    also does anyone know where i can get some sample questions on interpenetration? iv done all the ones in the book and in the sample papers...

    There's two decades of past papers from the old course. Interpentration was question 4 I think. God, I miss the old course.


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭munchie14


    could someone give me a link to does folens sample papers that ever1 else seems to have except me,,,our school wasnt sent anything like it ,i need to see what standard of question is likly to come up, the past papers i think are harder and have stuf on them that we dont need
    can some one help me out


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 431 ✭✭aido179


    auxiliary vanishing points are used when the surface (or the edge of the surface) is not parallel to the horizontal plane. Think of it like all "flat" surfaces (flat being hozontal) extending as far as the horizon, so the edge meets on it. so in fact all parallel lines have the same vanishing point.

    when you want to find an auxiliary vanashing point, you need a few things:
    1. if the line is on the same verical plane as a horizontal line, its aux vanishing point will be some height directly above the regular van. point.
    2. you can get the height of it by two ways , one is kind of cheating, but makes it a lot less technical...so i'll explain that one first.
    2.1 you take a point on each end of the line and join them...(you might not be able to
    though, so this is not a certainty) then you continue the line until it is directly above
    a regular van. point from a line thats on the same vertical plane.
    other method
    2.2 you use a view of the object (elevation most of the time) and you find the line in that. then you extend the line until it touches the horizontal plane (ground). you bring that point onto the plan and then join it to the point you already have of the plane in the perspective view giving you a line which goes back onto the vanishing point form here you find a regular vanishing point as if the point you had on the plane was horizontal and draw straight up from that. where your vertical line you've just drawn intersects the line i wrote in bold gives you the vanishing point...


    thats long winded i'm sure and the second bit possibly might have some mistakes as i'm just writing it without drawing it...but it'll get the idea across


  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What question do auxiliary vanishing points come up in? Is it one of the options?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Delta Kilo


    Getting auxiliary vanishing points is very straight forward.

    At the spectator, you have a 90 degree angle. The horizontal line from S, where it cuts the picture plane, go straight up, vertical. With your 30 degree set square, go from S all the way back to the vertical line. Measure how high up the vertical line it cuts with your compass. This is the same height as the Auxiliary Vanishing point from the horizon line.

    Give me 5 mins and ill sketch it and put it up in a post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 431 ✭✭aido179


    it will be a long question so you will have a choice. comes up in perspective


  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    aido179 wrote: »
    it will be a long question so you will have a choice. comes up in perspective

    Ah right. I haven't done anything on perspective yet. I've kind of neglected DCG this year as I'm repeating, so I'm just hoping my knowledge of the old course will drag me through.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 431 ✭✭aido179


    im just doing the new course first time, but from what i know it should be alright...once you payed even a small bit of attention in class...


  • Registered Users Posts: 412 ✭✭Fince


    for the options i'm doing geometry and structural (with the hyperbolids of revolution, hyberbolic parabolas etc), think thats the nicest question on the paper, two of three things have to come up on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Delta Kilo


    OK here we go:
    Hope this helps!


    img117.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭munchie14


    Delta Kilo wrote: »
    OK here we go:
    Hope this helps!


    img117.jpg
    but what about the unusual ones where the "AVP" is not above the vanishing points


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Delta Kilo


    munchie14 wrote: »
    but what about the unusual ones where the "AVP" is not above the vanishing points

    Don't worry about them. They would never ask a question that difficult in the exam because you would need about an hour to do it. I haven't much of a clue either.


  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Is it bad that I've never seen anything about perspective before? I've never done anything about vanishing points, or anything on perspective for that matter...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Delta Kilo


    Is it bad that I've never seen anything about perspective before? I've never done anything about vanishing points, or anything on perspective for that matter...

    Perspective is fairly handy. Takes a few minutes to set up though. If you are good at orthographic, you would be fairly good at it. Can get a little confusing around the spectator/picture plane area because of the amount of lines. Can get a little tricky with angles and curves aswell. Similar degree of difficulty, maybe slightly easier, as interpenetration.


  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Delta Kilo wrote: »
    Perspective is fairly handy. Takes a few minutes to set up though. If you are good at orthographic, you would be fairly good at it. Can get a little confusing around the spectator/picture plane area because of the amount of lines. Can get a little tricky with angles and curves aswell. Similar degree of difficulty, maybe slightly easier, as interpenetration.

    I'm not sure if I'll bother covering it...

    I know everything else pretty perfectly (i.e. interpenetration, solids in contact etc. etc.) as I did the old course last year.

    I might have a look over it though. Tricky to teach to yourself?


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭munchie14


    i found one thatll test yas
    1997 perspective q
    the vanising points wont work!!
    try it
    http://www.examinations.ie/archive/exampapers/1997/LC028ALP210EV.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Delta Kilo


    You need 4 AVPs for this, one above and below each vanishing point. Same height for all of them. may be a little confusing for what to join to what. Very time consuming though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,626 ✭✭✭timmywex


    munchie14 wrote: »
    i found one thatll test yas
    1997 perspective q
    the vanising points wont work!!
    try it
    http://www.examinations.ie/archive/exampapers/1997/LC028ALP210EV.pdf

    Lovely question; points above and below the horizon line.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,514 ✭✭✭shanethemofo


    Can anyone tell me when doing the dihedral angle between 2 planes, which angle is it or does it matter?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Delta Kilo


    Can anyone tell me when doing the dihedral angle between 2 planes, which angle is it or does it matter?

    I don't think so. I usually mark the big angle but I wouldn't say it matters.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 145 ✭✭galway.gaa


    are most people using the old exam papers to practice questions? ive been doin them from the sample paper and the book cause i thaught that the old papers qs were way harder cause there were more marks goin for each question


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Delta Kilo


    galway.gaa wrote: »
    are most people using the old exam papers to practice questions? ive been doin them from the sample paper and the book cause i thaught that the old papers qs were way harder cause there were more marks goin for each question

    We mainly used the old questions in class and left out the bits that were too hard for the current course. Them questions are a lot longer! We used them because there was nothing else after the book at the time!


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭munchie14


    ive nearly finshed it and i havent used any vp below the horizon
    i hope theres more than one way to do it
    i used height lines aswel

    can some one give me a link for the sample papers ,we didnt get any


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,626 ✭✭✭timmywex


    munchie14 wrote: »
    ive nearly finshed it and i havent used any vp below the horizon
    i hope theres more than one way to do it
    i used height lines aswel

    can some one give me a link for the sample papers ,we didnt get any

    Ya dont have to, but the more vanishing points make it easier!


  • Registered Users Posts: 412 ✭✭Fince


    Can anyone tell me when doing the dihedral angle between 2 planes, which angle is it or does it matter?

    it doesn't matter which angle


  • Registered Users Posts: 412 ✭✭Fince


    munchie14 wrote: »
    can some one give me a link for the sample papers ,we didnt get any

    as far as i know the papers are not available on t'internet(i'm no George Lee but i'm fairly sure no one would pay for them if they were). the solutions are on folens website but thats not much good to you if you don't have the questions.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 521 ✭✭✭Prowetod


    In the official sample paper in the intersecting planes question it says: Determine the angle of inclination of the line of intersection to the vertical plane.
    Does this mean you look perpendicularly at the line of intersection in plan? or am I completely off!?

    Anyone else think that time could be a huge factor? How long are you giving to each question?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 145 ✭✭galway.gaa


    eoccork wrote: »
    In the official sample paper in the intersecting planes question it says: Determine the angle of inclination of the line of intersection to the vertical plane.
    Does this mean you look perpendicularly at the line of intersection in plan? or am I completely off!?

    Anyone else think that time could be a huge factor? How long are you giving to each question?
    i think time is the only real problem on this paper to be honest. i reckon ill get the short qs done in about 20mins. that should leave 40mins for the other qs but i think ill get them all done in 35mins and give the extra time to the interpenetration as i find this one the most time consuming


  • Registered Users Posts: 521 ✭✭✭Prowetod


    eoccork wrote: »
    In the official sample paper in the intersecting planes question it says: Determine the angle of inclination of the line of intersection to the vertical plane.
    Does this mean you look perpendicularly at the line of intersection in plan? or am I completely off!?

    Bump


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 287 ✭✭Des23


    Would you not just throw it onto a cone and rotate it? thats what we for it anyway. Just the oppisite of what you do for mining questions when they say that a borehole has an inclination of 30 or what ever..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,454 ✭✭✭mink_man


    the laminas question from the state sample paper, (c) determine the angle of inclination of the line of intersection to the vertical plane???
    how do you do this???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    Make one the line in either the plan or elevation horizontal relative to the X1, Y1 axis. The true lenght and angle will be in the other view.

    DCG questions are so hard to explain in words! :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,454 ✭✭✭mink_man


    ironclaw wrote: »
    Make one the line in either the plan or elevation horizontal relative to the X1, Y1 axis. The true lenght and angle will be in the other view.

    DCG questions are so hard to explain in words! :pac:

    i dont understand, do i get it as an edge view first? or what?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    mink_man wrote: »
    i dont understand, do i get it as an edge view first? or what?

    You could do an edge view, tell ya what, I'll do it and upload it later to Flickr, might be easier

    Basically, you have a line in the elevation

    Now that line is also in the plan

    Pivot the one in the plan to the horizontal

    Now, move the one in the elevation relative to it.

    You are now seeing the line at 90 degrees, thus a true lenght and true angle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 230 ✭✭Isaac702


    Thanks this is one of the things I did not fully understand. I should be able to answer the question if necessary now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,454 ✭✭✭mink_man


    ironclaw wrote: »
    Make one the line in either the plan or elevation horizontal relative to the X1, Y1 axis. The true lenght and angle will be in the other view.

    DCG questions are so hard to explain in words! :pac:
    ironclaw wrote: »
    You could do an edge view, tell ya what, I'll do it and upload it later to Flickr, might be easier

    Basically, you have a line in the elevation

    Now that line is also in the plan

    Pivot the one in the plan to the horizontal

    Now, move the one in the elevation relative to it.

    You are now seeing the line at 90 degrees, thus a true lenght and true angle.
    i think im kinda gettin it now, you swing the loi in elevation until its level but then in plan, when you bring that dow, what do ta join that to?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Delta Kilo


    If you have to get the dihedral angle, when you get your first auxiliary where you look across the line of intersection, the angle the line of intersection makes with the x1,y1 axis in your auxiliary is equal to the angle of inclination. Just mark it in their instead of doing the rotate method.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,616 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


    Ok ladies, lets talk long questions...

    What can come up?

    Solids in Contact
    Axonometric
    Intersecting solids
    Skew Lines
    Perspective
    Developments

    .............

    Ok so now. What actually WILL come up.

    Skew Lines is apparently a definite...

    So whats we have 5 other possibilities (or more I could be wrong) for 2 other questions, of which we have to do 1. To be covered I guess we need to do 4, are there any we can rule out?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 145 ✭✭galway.gaa


    skew lines is deffinate for a short question id say but for the long questions id say planes and traces, interpenetration and developments maybe. ive only looked over the first 2 topics but i think it will be very similar to the sample paper


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 33 Damien671


    I'd guess intersecting solids and possibly solids in contact but as their fairly similiar I don't think they would both come up


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 287 ✭✭Des23


    I would put money on two of the three long questions being out of:

    Planes, could be 6 points, with a little bit at the end on true inclinations

    Solids in contact, usual jazz, will have to use loci and find traces for a tangential plane.

    Interpenetration nothing unusual I would think because they take long enough.

    The two option questions I'm doing are fairly predictable:

    Structural forms: nothing unusual, have to get sections of a hyperbaloid of revolution to find a curve, or find circle using straight line elements, then for the hyperbaloid surfaces I'd say we will have to find either the line of curvature or plane director, most probably the latter.

    Geologic Gemoetry:
    Sloping road as usual, maybe a curve if they are feeling dangerous.
    Nothing unusual can come up in mining: Strike, length, dip and apparent dip are all that will be there I'd say.

    Short questions will just be a combo of what doesn't feature on the long questions, conics perspective/axonmetric other stuff...


  • Registered Users Posts: 521 ✭✭✭Prowetod


    Did anyone else get 58degrees for this?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,454 ✭✭✭mink_man


    anywhere that tells you how to do the interpenetration q's, i cant do them at all!


  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    eoccork wrote: »
    Did anyone else get 58degrees for this?

    You don't have to measure; you only have to indicate which angle it is.


  • Registered Users Posts: 521 ✭✭✭Prowetod


    You don't have to measure; you only have to indicate which angle it is.

    I know its just so I can check if I am right. Our teacher said to include the angle as well but its not necessary.


  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    eoccork wrote: »
    I know its just so I can check if I am right. Our teacher said to include the angle as well but its not necessary.

    Ah right right. Well, 58 rings a bell with me (from some drawing).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,616 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


    Well I didn't do it portrait, so I can't get the last part, but here we go, yes the ****ing thing is upside down. But I think that's right so far. (If you download it to flip it, use paint to invert the colours, its not any easier to see, but its cool.

    Oh one thing to note, I initially forgot the line of intersection was going to connect to point A, when it did I was like "**** I must have made a mistake" normally if I make a mistake its grand, but if you make one that "makes the question easier" you lose a **** load of marks. So I originally drew the line wrong, its still wrong in elevation1, but you can see its ok in plan, (although the wrong one is still in heavy, I am too lazy)

    Final Edit, if you are planning on scanning anything, don't use Green pencil, its ****ing ****...

    ?ui=2&ik=5967b2354d&view=att&th=121cee6d17996a41&attid=0.1&disp=inline&realattid=f_fvtc78290&zw


  • Advertisement
Advertisement