M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning decision pending]

serfboard · 08-01-2009 6:51pm

Chris_533976 wrote: »

Heres an article in the Galway Independent. Some of it is completely true, but other parts are silly. There is no way the tenders for a Gort to Tuam PPP are going to be issued within a couple of weeks. Thats bull of the highest order.

I read that. Cloud-cuckoo-land in extremis. The only thing that could tag it back to reality is that, according to his reliable (;)) colleague Frank Fahy, the process starting the tender process should begin shortly and take 2 years to complete. I think that's what he's talking about. Of course, the fact that what he said obfuscates the facts (if they are facts), and makes it appear that it's going to happen sooner, is not surprising.

serfboard · 08-01-2009 6:56pm

Chris_533976 wrote: »

Another letter in the Advertiser ->
http://www.advertiser.ie/galway/article/6737

Wall of text but worth reading.

Any coincidence that the writer of this letter signs himself Chris, as do you?

Anyway, all very good points.

Chris_533976 · 08-01-2009 7:14pm

KevR · 09-01-2009 2:59am

Niall O'Brolchain in the Advertiser again saying the bypass isn't really necessary. He proposes that we instead implement less costly solutions such as an Urban Traffic Control (UTC) System, improve cycle facilities and improve junctions (he specifically mentions the Headford Rd roundabout).

For a start, bypass or no bypass, the Headford Rd RAB junction is being upgraded. It's not even a new suggestion or an idea from him.

Also, as far as I know (but correct me if I'm wrong), the Urban Traffic Control System has been planned/around for a while. It will more than likely happen even if the bypass is built so why is he suggesting it as an alternative.

It's all well and good improving cycle facilities but can he also improve the weather?? This is Galway and it rains 300 odd days in the year.

Junction improvements and a UTC system on their own won't do much to solve Galway's traffic problems. They are needed in conjunction with an outer bypass.

Also, how come he doesn't mention anything or even go so far as make suggestions about the proposed roundabout to terminate the M6 at Doughiska? This RAB is only supposed to be a temporary termination point until the bypass is built. Surely if he's campaigning against the bypass then top of his agenda should be a much improved junction for where the M6 will meet the existing N6 at Doughiska.
Another politician, Noel Grealish, was quoted in the same issue of the Galway Advertiser as saying 65,000 cars every day use the N6 from Oranmore, the Coast Road from Oranmore and the R339 from Carnmore. The bulk of this traffic will switch to the the M6 with some still using the old N6 - all using 1 RAB at Doughiska. A small amount of traffic will still use the R339 and avoid the Doughiska RAB but will still end up in the very near vicinity of it. It's going to be chaos around this area and no amount of cycle lanes will fix it because this will all be long distance (commute wise) traffic.

O'Brolchain is against the bypass but I don't hear him coming up with any good ideas for the Doughiska problem that will have to be solved if there is no bypass.

Chris_533976 · 09-01-2009 6:51pm

Chris_533976 wrote: »

Heres an article in the Galway Independent. Some of it is completely true, but other parts are silly. There is no way the tenders for a Gort to Tuam PPP are going to be issued within a couple of weeks. Thats bull of the highest order.

http://www.galwayindependent.com/local-news/local-news/bypass-construction-could-cause-mayhem-%11-o-cuiv/

Maybe we jumped the gun on this a little?? Weeks is crap, but they are thinking Galway to Tuam ppp.

Post from Sabre -

Kieran4003 wrote:

Sent an email to the Nra about a couple things.

Fistly I asked about PPP Schemes. What I find interesting the way one is refered to N17/18. I wonder are they going to toll the Gort - Oranmore road now as well. Just a thought...
"While the final Second Roads PPP Programme is not yet fully finalised, it is likely to comprise four PPP schemes, 2 on the N20, one on the N17/N18 and one on the N11/N25. The exact details will be finalised in 2009"

Also I asked about what they will do from 2010 onwards and intrestingly they say a prioritisation study will be undertaken this year. I wonder what would they consider the main priority...
You also seek information in regards to other road schemes to be constructed during the period 2010 to 2015. As you will be aware the primary focus up to 2010 is on the completion of the motorway network linking Dublin to Galway, Limerick, Cork, Waterford and Northern Ireland. The schemes to be progressed in the subsequent period will be determined through a prioritisation focus which will be substantially undertaken in 2009.

Finally no news about the N25 Midleton - Youghal scheme for those of you thats interested...
In respect to the N25 Middleton to Youghal scheme, this project is at the early stages of developments, effectively what is described as the "Constraints Study" stage. I do not anticipate the Route Selection being finalised for some time.

Edit:
N17/N18 = Gort - Athenry of M18 and Athenry to Tuam of M17
M20 schemes = Cork - Limerick
N25/N11 = I'm guessing New Ross bypass and Enniscorthy bypass lumped into one scheme? I've heard this mentioned on here.

spacetweek · 22-01-2009 6:47pm

Chris_533976 wrote: »

N17/N18 = Gort - Athenry of M18 and Athenry to Tuam of M17
M20 schemes = Cork - Limerick
N25/N11 = I'm guessing New Ross bypass and Enniscorthy bypass lumped into one scheme? I've heard this mentioned on here.

Yea, noticed that about N25/N11 being lumped together. But New Ross and Enniscorthy are some distance apart; are they talking about one long route starting west of New Ross and running all the way to Enniscorthy or is it just the two disconnected bypasses, but built by the same contractor?

Chris_533976 · 22-01-2009 7:29pm

Dunno. I think the plan is to link them.

Also a pile of idiots in Galway are already taking legal action against the thought of any of the Galway bypass being revisited.

KevR · 25-01-2009 2:07am

Chris_533976 wrote: »

Also a pile of idiots in Galway are already taking legal action against the thought of any of the Galway bypass being revisited.

I hope the judge throws the case straight out. It's a joke that the vast majority of people in Galway are in favour of the bypass but a small handfull of people who are against it are allowed to hold the whole thing up.

If these people are so against the idea then why don't they leave Galway in protest?!

Amtmann · 25-01-2009 2:11am

Chris_533976 wrote: »

Also a pile of idiots in Galway are already taking legal action against the thought of any of the Galway bypass being revisited.

I wonder will we be getting more of this anti-road activism in the years ahead. The M3 drew them all up to Meath like flies to shight. But now that they've lost that campaign they might set their sights on any number of other planned schemes.

Chris_533976 · 25-01-2009 11:55am

Thats what worries me. At least all the anti roads group have been fighting the M3 lately. What will they turn to next, the resurrection of the Outer Bypass, or will they go tooth and nail against the M20 as its the largest planned new route?

KevR · 06-02-2009 3:07pm

Article in today's Galway City Tribune:

Shock as Minister orders halt to work on city bypass
Gormley demands 'no more progress' in eleventh hour decision

You'd swear they were starting construction work tomorrow ffs!

Some of the article is available online, need to subscribe online or buy a copy of the Tribune for the full article.

?Cee?view · 06-02-2009 3:19pm

This is absolutely shocking. I can't believe what Gormley and O'Brolchain have done to damage Galway with their shortsighted blinkered attitude. They are environmental fundamentalists, who don't care what damage their actions cause. They tout environmental concerns when it is clear that they have neither the intellect nor the sensitivity to take other people's opinions on board to ensure a balanced and rational conclusion to matters.

I'm 35 years on this earth. I've never been involved in politics. That will now change. O'Brolchain, Gormley et al have to be removed before they kill off Galway. Their ilk nearly succeeded for years by scuppering the plans on Mutton Island (sewerage plant) - they have to be stopped before they do further damage.

Robbo · 06-02-2009 3:22pm

Well that's O'Brolchain done for in the locals...

?Cee?view · 06-02-2009 3:27pm

Robbo wrote: »

Well that's O'Brolchain done for in the locals...

And thank God/Allah/Buddha whoever. I will actively campaign against him. I would pay money (not to him obviously!) to have him call to my door on campaign.

My problem is, in going against him, who can be supported? Has any local or national politician (and don't say Fahy :-) ) done anything positive to support the bypass?

KevR · 06-02-2009 3:28pm

I agree completely churchview.

O'Brolchain especially gets on my nerves. He hasn't a clue what he's talking about and he won't ever listen to anyone else's comments.

:mad:

KevR · 13-02-2009 1:49am

On the way to work on Wednesday and Thursday (yesterday) there was a tail back from the Menlo Park RAB to the traffic lights at Dunnes/Aldi in Westside (2.6kms, bumper to bumper, 4 lanes) - I joined the queue at Dunnes/Aldi in Westside for the Menlo Park RAB, I'm sure it stretched a good bit further back through Westside and up in to Salthill.

Thankfully(!), it was clear after the Menlo Park RAB and it only took a couple of mins to get to Ballybrit from there. But, all in all, it took 45 mins to make a 6.5km journey.

I know the Novena is on this week but, to be perfectly honest, traffic normally is barely better at all.

serfboard · 13-02-2009 6:31pm

Article in this week's Galway Independent.

Galway County Manager, Martina Moloney has said that all issues with the Department of the Environment regarding the Outer City Bypass have been resolved and that work on the project will recommence immediately.

In a letter to the council last month, The Minister for the Environment, John Gormley ordered an immediate halt to work on the previously approved 15km stretch of the Galway City Outer Bypass across the Corrib to the N59 junction.

However, after extensive consultations between the Department for the Environment and Ms Moloney those impediments have been removed.

"The halting of the project was a non-issue," said Ms Moloney. "We received the minister's letter and replied immediately to it. The Department [for the Environment] do not intend in halting our progress any longer. There are no delays on foot of that letter.

"Our intent now is to proceed with the bypass as originally approved. We have received €2.9 million from the National Roads Authority for the construction and the project will restart immediately."

The Outer City Bypass has been subject to numerous delays already and two judicial reviews into the road are currently in progress.

An Bord Pleanala has already halted approval for the section of the road from the N59 to Furbo, but had approved the 15km section across the Corrib.

KevR · 16-02-2009 2:05am

Read in The City Tribune that they will start issueing Cumpulsory Purchase Orders soon (as in the next couple of weeks) for the approved 15km section. They're also going to look for an alternative route for the section that wasn't approved.

Can't find the article online and my copy of the Tribune was thrown out so I can't be any more detailed about what the article said.

Chris_533976 · 16-02-2009 6:55pm

They can issue CPOs all they want, this isnt a PPP and as such has little to no hope of being funded anytime soon.

serfboard · 16-02-2009 7:10pm

Chris_533976 wrote: »

They can issue CPOs all they want, this isnt a PPP and as such has little to no hope of being funded anytime soon.

Agreed ... but I'm in two minds about this.

My non-cynical mind says that, at least if they issue the CPOs and have all the other stuff done, then at least they'll be in a position to start it when things get better.

My cynical mind says that issuing CPOs gives the appearance of making progress, when in reality, there's feck-alll chance of this being started in the next few years anyway.

marmurr1916 · 16-02-2009 7:51pm

The Green party are likely to get hammered at the next general election unless they pull out of government very soon.

Hopefully the next government will revive this project and build the Outer Bypass from the eastern side of the city to the N59 at the very minimum.

galwayrush · 16-02-2009 10:56pm

I'm amazed that a section of the route was refused permission because of bog cotton, County galway has a lot of bogs, most of them have bog cotton, what the feck was so important about preserving it near the city then

It's certainly not rare around here.

Irish and Proud · 17-02-2009 12:11pm

Chris_533976 wrote: »

They can issue CPOs all they want, this isnt a PPP and as such has little to no hope of being funded anytime soon.

Maybe the Galway Outer Bypass could be incorporated as a hard toll element of the M17/M18 PPP scheme - especially if the unapproved section from the N59 to Barna is sorted out (re-routed etc).

What does anyone else think?

Chris_533976 · 01-05-2009 10:21pm

Bumping this.

No, there is no information on construction, and AFAIK this WONT be incorporated into the M17/18 PPP as thats 57km already and nearly as long as the M3.

What I have noticed is this. Sanity (of a sort) prevailing and the NRA thinking of a decent junction?

Old plan for the GCOB and Galway - Ballinasloe junction. Awful bloody mess of a thing. TWO ROUNDABOUTS to go from Galway to Dublin ->

Plan I've dug up from the M17/18 documents (Some GCOB ground work was done as part of technical surveys BUT THERE ARE NO PLANS THAT I KNOW OF TO BUILD THE THING AS PART OF THIS PPP)

Sorry for the huge pics but you lose too much detail if they're small.

If this is right it'll mean about 500m of the new Galway - Ballinasloe scheme will have to be carved up to make this. ****ty as that is, I'd rather have a decent junction than one that was destined to be overcapacity from day one.

Took a bloody hour to get from Salthill to UCHG the other day. Its ridiculous. I predict gridlock for the Volvo Ocean Race, I'm out of Galway for a week of that anyway.

Edit: Have another ->

KevR · 01-05-2009 11:09pm

Chris_533976 wrote: »

If this is right it'll mean about 500m of the new Galway - Ballinasloe scheme will have to be carved up to make this. ****ty as that is, I'd rather have a decent junction than one that was destined to be overcapacity from day one.

Took a bloody hour to get from Salthill to UCHG the other day. Its ridiculous. I predict gridlock for the Volvo Ocean Race, I'm out of Galway for a week of that anyway.

On the way home from work this evening (and every Friday) Westbound traffic on the N6 was backed from the roundabout at Oranmore to the turn off for Athenry at Derrydonnell [that's a 4.3km queue for just one single roundabout on my journey the whole way across Galway City; throw in queues for 8 other RABs and a few sets of traffic lights on my cross town journey and you can imagine what a nightmare it was/is].

I think when the Galway-Ballinasloe scheme is finished there will be a much improved situation in the evenings are Doughiska and Oranmore because the bulk of traffic will be able to use the slip onto the M6 from the existing N6 DC. It will be horrific in the mornings with most traffic having to use the RAB. I think there could be tailbacks of well over 6kms there some mornings and Friday evenings until such time as the bypass is built.

Next week will be a nightmare. I think the roundabout (which is being upgraded to traffic light controlled junction) will be closed to through traffic. This is going to send thousands of extra cars onto the already overly congested N6 and N17. I think I'm going to stay late in work everyday next week so by the time I get back to Galway in the evenings the worst of the rush hour traffic will have passed. I passed through the new junctions earlier today - it's coming along well and I think it will be a lot better than the RAB when complete. It's just a pity they decided to use those hideous steel traffic light poles, they should have used nicely painted black ones.
It would be nice to see even a few Gardai out at rush hour next week diverting traffic at the main junctions but I won't hold my breath.

Not sure what it will be like for the Ocean Race. In recent years I found traffic during race week to be better than the rest of the year. There are thousands of extra cars on the road during race week but the Gardai are at every major RAB/junction directing traffic and it makes a massive difference. It could be the same for the Ocean Race.
It does annoy me that the Gardai can't do this more frequently throughout the year or that Galway City Council can't/won't even hire a few traffic wardens. It seems that Mr T Ourist coming to the races or Ocean Race is viewed as far more important than motorists residing in Galway. God forbid any tourists should have to sit in a traffic jam but for the rest of the year Galway people can eff right off.

KevR · 07-05-2009 2:43pm

[Article]Majority of cars in city have driver only
50% of workers travel from outside City

MORE than 27,000 people drive to work in Galway City every day – and only a fraction of them share their car.
A new report, which also shows that just under 2,000 people go to their place of work by public transport, highlights the source of much of the city’s traffic congestion problems. The huge numbers of cars on the roads with just a single occupant is starkly illustrated by the fact that only 2,582 get a lift to work . . . less than a tenth of the number who drive.
And the case for improvements in commuter services into the city, including park and ride facilities, is strengthened by the numbers travelling to work here from outlying areas of the county and further afield.
Almost 19,000 workers – which is nearly half the total working population of the city – come in from outside the city, according to the report, A Profile of the Working Population of Large Towns, which is based on the returns from the 2006 Census.
In addition to the three out of...

http://www.galwaynews.ie/7386-majority-cars-city-have-driver-only

KevR · 07-05-2009 2:46pm

[Article]Fears that by-pass may be back to square one

Fri 1st May 2009
Warning that €340m scheme could bite the dust

Fears are mounting that the Galway City Outer By-Pass may be back to square one following a Judicial review into an Bord Pleanala’s decision to approve part of the €340million road project.
Minister for the Environment, John Gormley has appointed the Attorney General to represent him in the case scheduled for the High Court in Dublin for June 30.
There are growing concerns that the case taken by Hands Across the Corrib Ltd and environmentalist, Peter Sweetman against the State and An Bord Pleanala might mean another Oral Hearing would have to be take place.
The last Oral Hearing into Galway City Outer By-Pass lasted almost a month – the Judicial Review hearing is expected to last four days, though this could be a conservative estimate.
Work on the project, which plans to join the new Dublin-Galway motorway with Connemara with the inclusion of a fifth bridge over the Corrib, was due to start this year, but it now looks like the project may have to go right back to the drawing board, delaying it even further, if not forever.
Yesterday, Deputy Frank Fahey...

http://www.galwaynews.ie/7365-fears-bypass-may-be-back-square-one

Sponge Bob · 07-05-2009 3:32pm

By not taking into account a railway line for which there is no funding anyway it appears that every Bord Pleanála decision on Galway Roads is flawed and that all consents are legally invalid

Welcome to the land of Brian !

http://www.advertiser.ie/galway/article/11813

Brian Guckian, an independent researcher into sustainable transport and a campaigner, has analysed the report used by the planning board to give permission for the scheme on March 6 last and has said that it did not comply with the provisions of the EU directive on environmental impact assessment (EIA).

Mr Guckian found that the inspector had not carried out an objective assessment of the proposal, nor had he taken account of alternative, sustainable transport modes such as rail, coach, and bus. It was also found that the scheme would not reduce Co2 emissions, contrary to national policy on climate change.

“On the basis of the inadequate inspector's report, the Board's decision to grant permission for the proposed scheme was legally unsafe and had to be overturned. The CPOs for the proposed scheme were also invalid as the process leading to their approval had been found to be seriously deficient,” he said.

He did not ask for a Claregalway Bypass either

Mr Guckian stated that he was seeking a stay on all road scheme approvals pending a statutory inquiry into the operations of An Bord Pleanala. He has indicated that local people, including those affected by the invalid CPO process, could petition the European Parliament regarding the M17.

Amtmann · 07-05-2009 3:41pm

Oh, joy.

Galway's own Salafia. Any petition could surely be thwarted by a counter petition.

Robbo · 07-05-2009 3:44pm

Would these petitions be written in the crayons which he is so fond of?

Does he actually have any track record bar producing a nice looking diagram for various pressure groups and assorted nuts?

Stupido · 07-05-2009 4:05pm

I wouldn't worry.

They challange all oral hearings with this (EIA does not conform to EU law blah blah blah).

Galway isn't a special case.

?Cee?view · 07-05-2009 4:13pm

God protect us from these nutjobs!

Sponge Bob · 30-05-2009 7:20pm

churchview wrote: »

God protect us from these nutjobs!

Too late . They have gotten to the High Court now.

Peter Sweetman who is associated with The friends of The Irish environment has challenged the remaining portion of the bypass ( east of the Corrib ) .

An outline of Sweetmans particular case is here , it has now gone legal.

http://www.friendsoftheirishenvironment.net/cmsfiles/files/library/galwayby.pdf

Essentially it concerns the non application of EU Environment Directives or an incorrect application .

However the most important portion of the case is that the Chief State Solicitor has advised the department of the environment on aspects of the non application of directives and also wrote to An Bord Pleanala on the same subject ..

While advice to a minister is confidential the exact same advice given to an Bord Pleanala is open to FoI .

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2009/0529/1224247669111.html

THE STATE believes An Bord Pleanála has given invalid permission for a €317 million Galway ring road, possibly exposing the State to legal action by the European Commission, the Commercial Court heard yesterday.

and

The judge said the case brought by Mr Sweetman against the board and the State, with Galway City Council and Galway County Council as notice parties, had thrown up a “hornet’s nest” and exposed a split between the State and the board on interpretation of the habitats directive and Article 30 of the EC (Natural Habitats) Regulations and other issues.

and most tellingly

The chief State solicitor informed the board ( that is Bord Pleanala) that the existence of a consent which breached EU law exposed the State to an action for infringement by the European Commission and to risk of injunctive/interim measures and heavy fines.

Zoney · 30-05-2009 7:30pm

Magic land where the government aren't responsible for anything and it is always the fault of someone else who the government can pretend to not be responsible for.

Hello - if the EU is going to fine the *state* then it is up to the *state* to ensure the rules are applied! It's no good the government blaming An Bord Pleanala as if they're under the authority of some other state!

Chris_533976 · 30-05-2009 7:45pm

My heart always sinks when this thread gets bumped, because its ALWAYS something bad. This road needs to be built NOW. Galway is at an utter standstill on account of the Ocean Race. Its taking people a ridiculous length of time to cross the city and it needs to be bypassed NOW.

Sponge Bob · 30-05-2009 8:27pm

The appeal is highly technical and really says that ANBordP are not weighing EU Directives properly in their decisions , that is any decision but the Galway Bypass is the particular case to prove this .

Getting disclosure of advice only recently given AnBordP by the Chief State Solicitor is pretty damning .

I strongly suspect that there was a leak or a nod to Sweetman apropos some Chief State Solicitor advice given to the Minister of the Environment himself at some stage .

He certainly knew what he was looking for , it is a smoking gun and there is no doubt about it

I do have a resolution part of the issue but I would not tell a greaseball like Fahey about it .

Is there any class of a pro Bypass lobby groups of any sort or do I have to set one up FFS

??

KevR · 01-06-2009 10:24pm

Chris_533976 wrote: »

My heart always sinks when this thread gets bumped, because its ALWAYS something bad. This road needs to be built NOW. Galway is at an utter standstill on account of the Ocean Race. Its taking people a ridiculous length of time to cross the city and it needs to be bypassed NOW.

I have to laugh when I see Fianna Fail candidate election posters saying the bypass needs to be built now and that they will oversee that happening.

I really hope that candidate calls to my door so I can tell him that the bypass needed to be fully opened over 5 years ago, not maybe starting work on a part of it in the next few years, with the whole thing probably being at the very least 10 years away from full opening. His party had plenty of chances to deliver it and they didn't, they failed big time.
If Fianna Fail were serious about it they would have set aside funding for the entire project back when this country had more money than sense.

KevR · 07-06-2009 1:56am

Took a few photos while sitting in traffic (:rolleyes:) on the way home on Friday. It's quite difficult to get good photos in heavy traffic because the cars immediately around you obscure the rest of the road. Here's the best I could manage:

First two are looking back East along the Westbound queue for the Menlo Park RAB on the N6:

Next two are looking West at the Westbound queue for the Menlo Pk Roundabout:

Galway Shopping Centre Roundabout:

Seamus Quirke Road in Westside. This road was finally supposed to be upgraded to DC this year but funding has been cut and the badly needed upgrade has been postponed yet again. :mad:

L1011 · 07-06-2009 1:24pm

Proper DC or S4 like some bits of the Road of the Tribes (terrible name for a ring road...) are?

KevR · 07-06-2009 3:52pm

Proper DC. I think if/when it ever gets upgraded a concrete step barrier will be used in the median.

galwayrush · 07-06-2009 4:00pm

FFS Mr serial objector Sweetman at it again, he's not even from Galway.:(

Sponge Bob · 07-06-2009 4:42pm

galwayrush wrote: »

FFS Mr serial objector Sweetman at it again, he's not even from Galway.:(

I am led to believe that a Green political advisor tipped Sweetman off about the existance of highly specific written advice/legal opinion from the governments own legal people .

Then he simply had to FoI it or seek it in a disclosure request as part of a legal action .

Chris_533976 · 19-06-2009 7:22pm

CONFIRMED that this is going to be put forward as a PPP, on its own.

Now of course what will be built and when is a different matter, but its confirmed that this IS being pushed as a PPP, on its own.

KevR · 20-06-2009 2:49pm

Chris do you reckon it will be a shadow toll or a hard toll? I really hope it's not a hard toll because many people wouldn't use it to avoid paying the toll and the bypass wouldn't be half as effective as it could/should be.

Chris_533976 · 20-06-2009 4:20pm

Shadow toll AFAIK. All the new PPPs are shadow tolled. I presume this one will be the same.

Sponge Bob · 20-06-2009 8:48pm

Any truth in the rumour that its twin in the PPP is the Tuam - Claremorris scheme.

Chris_533976 · 20-06-2009 9:06pm

Havent heard anything, they only mention the GCOB on its own in the N11 Arklow & Newlands tender docs, nothing about Tuam - Claremorris. But the PPPs that havent had prequal tenders released seem to be chopping and changing all over the place. So I think things are still fairly fluid.

What they SHOULD do is do GCOB/Tuam-Claremorris/Claregalway relief road. But the timings of all those wouldnt line up as the latter isnt EISed yet. Tho if the GCOB gets dragged through the courts it might just work out that way.

KevR · 25-06-2009 11:43am

Galway News wrote:

Two challenges for hearing on Tuesday

TWO legal challenges against the 15km ‘eastern’ stretch of the Galway City Outer Bypass are set to be heard in the High Court next Tuesday.
The cases will be heard in the High Court’s Commercial Court arm, which is designed to fasttrack big business cases, on the grounds of the cost and urgency for the €317.5million roads project, and that fact that €12million has already been spent on it.
Meanwhile, Galway West TD Frank Fahey, who is also Chairman of the Oireachtas Transport Committee, has described the situation where four Government departments are on opposing sides in the case as “ludicrous”.
The first legal action is being taken by an environmental group called Hands Across the Corrib Ltd. which has claimed that An Bord Pleanala’s decision at the end of last year was based on a flawed Environmental Impact Assessment and argue that an efficient public transport system would suit commuters better.
The second case is being taken by environmental campaigner Peter Sweetman from Dublin – a self-appointed planning watchdog – who has claimed the Bypass would adversely impact on Lough Corrib as a candidate Special Area of Conservation.
He is also...

I wish Hands Across the Corrib and Peter Sweetman would just **** off.

In my opinion, if we can get the go-ahead for the 15km approved Eastern section and get it started then it will be huge efforts made in finding a solution for the Western section. The Eastern section needs to be started and then attention can be turned to the other section.

Mucco · 25-06-2009 12:31pm

I can't comment on the eastern section, but I'm not in favour of the new bridge over the river. That stretch of the corrib is very nice, peaceful, great place to hang out in Summer, and easily accessible from town. That sort of recreational amenity is extremely valuable to a city. Plonking a bridge through the middle will spoil all that.
There is plenty of evidence that building new roads just leads to increased traffic, and the congestion returns.
There are other solutions to the traffic problem. As mentioned above, most cars are 1-person occupied, so an obvious solution is car share. People could also use motorbikes, cycle (it's only 8km from Knocknacarra to Ballybrit), encourage employers to use flexi-time. Or, perhaps even live closer to work?
You could of course turn one lane of the current bridge into a bus lane, but that probably wouldn't be popular.

Sponge Bob · 25-06-2009 12:37pm

Too late now, had that bus lane been done 20 years ago then Knocknatallaght would be a lot smaller today and people would not live the wrong side of town for work .

We need that new bridge, today and forever more.

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning decision pending]

Comments