Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1445446447449451

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Funny, that, as it’s usually the same solvent as is in the spraypaint…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 Eduard_The_2nd


    Do you think with the new signaling system, the new trains, etc. that the trip times from Greystones/Bray to Malahide/Howth would be any shorter?

    I mean, are we saving any time with our trips to the City Centre? or is it all just about the new trains and that's it?



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,442 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Perhaps a minute or two could be saved with everything.

    Realistically, these projects can be considered as part of an overall aim to increase the number of trains able to run on the tracks. I think the eventual aim is for a train every five minutes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Punctuality should also improve, which is more important than absolute travel. times



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,937 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    In the current spencer dock Tender there is no allowence for any enabling works for a DU station in the future so will that mean if DU happens in the future it will be not possabile to have a station at spencer dock?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Correct, or not without removing and rebuilding that station…which is pretty much the same thing as "not possible", really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 340 ✭✭OisinCooke


    Is a mined station possible? Either deep enough under the station to avoid foundations or in the vicinity? Surely right…?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36 LastCall


    When Liverpool recently went electric with there new Class 666s, journey times reduced by 10% from better acceleration alone.

    Chester to Birkenhead: Reduced by 6 minutes (was 35 minutes, down to 29 minutes).

    Southport to Hunts Cross: Reduced by 9 minutes (from 64 minutes down to 55 minutes).



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,442 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    It's very possible, it's an engineering challenge, albeit one that has been repeated hundreds of times all over the world. Expensive, but possible.

    The problem with a mined out station there isn't the "constructability" of the station itself, but rather in fact that the tracks would then be so far underground that there would be no realistic way to get them back up to surface level in the space available north of the station.

    With the Rail Review making significant changes to the very idea behind DU, and this station going in as part of D+, I think that we need to go back to square one when we think about the new Cross Dublin City Tunnel. Would be great to see what they plan on it, because at the moment, none of us have any idea on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 119 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    The earlier units that the Class 777 replaced were already electric.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,927 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    The current Dart fleet isn't exactly sprinting in and out of stations either compared to many similar continental services that seem to jump to a quick sprint in and out of stations. I doubt these time savings will be achieved here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36 LastCall


    That's exactly my point. The new fleet should accelerate much faster than the old fleet, hopefully leading to 10% time savings by itself.

    And Dart+ West and South West could be in for substantialy better savings, current rolling stock has extremely slow acceleration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,927 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Don't they use the same rolling stock in Berlin? Or used to? I don't recall those units ever having a problem with acceleration. Is this a rolling stock problem or an Irish Rail problem?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 769 ✭✭✭PlatformNine


    The D+ FAQs, which IÉ warn were very early modelling and estimates, predict 5-10 mins savings for M3 services (I would expect similar for Maynooth) and 10-15 mins savings for Drogheda-CC. A good chunk of the time savings will be the switch from Diesel to electric, EMUs just perform so much better. However, we also don't know how those times were modelled or how conservative they were. If they were based on existing fleet specs and signalling it could actually save quite a more than that, especially for Drogheda services with the 145km/h top speed. If they took everything into account, 145km/h, ETCS, etc then they could actually be the absolute maximum time savings. We just don't know, but hopefully we will get at least a glimpse into the time savings once the BEMUs start entering service.

    It's a bit harder to say for CC-Bray and especially CC-Malahide. I would hope there will be some improvements as rolling stock has just gotten better over the years, and the 8100s are quite old. But even then I am not sure how much it can save. At the very least there will be some time savings for CC-Bray due to the switch to ETCS. My understanding of the current train signalling system is limited by signal line-of-sight which can cause speed restrictions that ETCS wont have with the in-cab signalling. Then also the current train protection system can only enforce certain specific speed limits with its yellow/caution signals on approach to red/danger signals and is also VERY conservative in its braking distances. Where as ETCS is can enforce pretty much any speed based on the distance on the distance to the next danger (and I don't even think ETCS has yellow/caution?) and also takes into account that vehicles specific braking characteristics making it much more efficient.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,724 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Two things spring to mind: signalling, which can be very restrictive, especially under the existing old ATP, and also dwell times at stations, which are far shorter in many other countries (including sleepy Southern Europe 😉). I don't see anything too bad with acceleration of exting DART stock.

    Howver, if DARTs habitially run late despite generous dwell times, then there is a wider problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 153 ✭✭A1ACo


    I can't locate it now, but I think I came across a Dutch reference a couple of years ago for the Netherlands rail system, stating that it was theorized to be able to make time savings of something like up to 7 seconds either side of stations, with the introduction of new rolling stock, but coupled with the replacement of their 1.5kV DC lines, with greater 3kV DC or 25kV AC current (I can't remember which!).



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,830 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Then he should have been given more as a punishment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 955 ✭✭✭EarWig


    The increasingly popular Enterprise Dublin-Belfast journey will be brought less than two hours by 2030 on foot of spending that will ensure the Enterprise can overtake Dart services.

    Works will see upgrades on the railway track north of Malahide and at Clongriffin, though the spending will benefit plans to electrify 37km of the rail network from Malahide to Drogheda too.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2026/06/22/funding-to-cut-train-dublin-belfast-journey-time-to-under-two-hours/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 330 ✭✭Ronald Binge Redux


    The same sort of bone stupid rumour mongering that had many of the hard of thinking swearing blind for years that the red and green lines were built to different track gauges rather than, in reality, loading gauges.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,599 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Theres no funding for DART+ Coastal North though so it wont happen. We've also been hearing the same tune for about a decade now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Current timetabled journey lasts 2 hours 8 minutes. It’s not much of an reach to bring that under 2 hours. As the article says, new bi-mode (diesel + electric) trainsets for Enterprise have been ordered* for delivery 2028, and these should be in service by 2030.

    Being able to operate on overhead electric on the DART stretch should improve journey times into and out of Dublin as the acceleration profile of both services will be much more similar (don't need to leave extra time for diesels to accelerate away from stopping). Those new trains, plus the signalling improvements in the Republic (ETCS is now installed all the way from the border to Connolly) will improve journey times without any new track being laid or electrified. However, the wording of this statement suggests a passing loop or two may be constructed too.

    __
    * Stadler won the contract, and will provide 8 FLIRT trainsets worth €698m (£548m), press release here: Premiere: Eight Stadler trains for Ireland. A previous IT article at that time said that just bringing the new trains into service would allow the sub-2hour journey time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,730 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    The funding isn't coming through the NTA or DoT which means to bypasses a lot of the messing

    Currently Malahide to Drogheda is a 90mph railway, I'd expect that to be increased to 100mph. The new DART+ fleet will accelerate to 90mph in the time it take the current 29k fleet to get to 50mph. The new Stadler trains on electric should be getting to 100mph in under 90 seconds. Enterprise set on a good day is 4 minutes to get to 90mph

    ETCS gets rid of the some of the problems with the current ATP. Policy currently is to brake to be at the future ATP limit before it is enforced, this is ridiculously inefficient on top of the system assumptions of braking performance. Back in the '80's drivers drove as fast as the system allowed and relied on it to intervene. Under ETCS everything is dynamic, once the driver is 1kph under the limit nothing flashes, no bells no alarms, system prompts you to brake and once you brake and keep below the hook its good. You drive to the warning braking curve, once you do you never get to the intervention curve or emergency curve

    Between Howth Junction and Drogheda (note its 90mph from Howth Junction to Malahide Quary) 10 minute saving is achievable on stopping services which in turn frees up space for Enterprise. Also plans to reinstate the Mosney loop



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 265 ✭✭BestWestern


    https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2026-06-18/192/

    As discussed on June 18th, reinstatement of the mosney rail loop and more use of the skerries one.

    In the short-term to 2030, the Prioritisation Strategy specifies a number of 'Early Interventions' to be delivered in the coming years, including new track passing loops and platforms to boost the rail network’s resilience and capacity. This includes reinstating a passing loop at Mosney and increasing the use of a passing loop at Skerries, which will support greater service resilience on the Northern rail line, by allowing the Enterprise, cross border rail service to pass slower DART and Commuter trains. These investments are funded to be fully delivered by 2030 under Enterprise Fleet Replacement Programme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76,178 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Is it intended to electrify the Mosney loop in D+N?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 662 ✭✭✭Thunder87


    This is the thing, as anyone who uses the Dart with any regularity knows it often crawls along for large sections, has random long dwell times at stations and then usually comes to a complete stop for a few minutes at a time on the city centre section. Optimising all these huge inefficiencies would be far more consequential than whatever a few seconds of extra acceleration will provide



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The extra acceleration is what allows these waits to be removed. Much of it is, I suspect, from having to share the track with diesel trains which can take a very long time to get up to speed. If a diesel up ahead has to slow or stop, then the recovery time is extremely long, and the electric trains behind it are also forced to run at that slower speed; also, they have to stay further behind diesels for safety due to the slower braking performance of diesel trains. Once you’ve got only EMUs on the line, you can design the timetable for, say, 80% of the trains’ acceleration/speed performance (still better than the limit in place with diesels sharing the line), and that way any minor delays can be eaten up by faster acceleration or faster running between stations. This is how the every extremely punctual railway operates: accept that delays will occur, but build in enough overhead to compensate for them as you go.

    Making Enterprise electric will be a huge benefit to the current DART system, as it shares its tracks with DART all the way in to Connolly. The next step would be to stop Rosslare services at Bray/Greystones, which frees up the run into Pearse.

    DART+ West is going to hit the same problems once it opens, as diesel Inter City services and DART EMUs will share track. At least the 22000s are faster than the Enterprise..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 119 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    Would there be any merit in closing Gormanston station? IIRC it had zero boardings in the last rail census, and getting rid of it should speed up times on the Northern line, as well as reduce the need for the loop at Mosney.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76,178 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    It had ~70 boardings and alightings in the 2023 one, so I suspect there was a sampling issue there. The 2024 report is a mess due to being taken on the day of a match at the Aviva.

    The 2025 report isn't out yet, surprisingly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 662 ✭✭✭Thunder87


    Maybe its just my lack of perception but I don't find the difference in acceleration all that noticeable between the current Dart trains & the diesels, probably because the Darts themselves travel so slow a lot of the time so never really get up to speed in the first place.

    The main issue by far is Clontarf - Connolly where it crawls along and usually comes to a long standstill once or twice, hopefully Spencer Dock will help a lot with the capacity issues here.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 955 ✭✭✭EarWig


    Fares to Dublin used to be much more expensive than next station in, now they're the same.



Advertisement
Advertisement