Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1443444445446447449»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,517 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Funny, that, as it’s usually the same solvent as is in the spraypaint…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 Eduard_The_2nd


    Do you think with the new signaling system, the new trains, etc. that the trip times from Greystones/Bray to Malahide/Howth would be any shorter?

    I mean, are we saving any time with our trips to the City Centre? or is it all just about the new trains and that's it?



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,436 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Perhaps a minute or two could be saved with everything.

    Realistically, these projects can be considered as part of an overall aim to increase the number of trains able to run on the tracks. I think the eventual aim is for a train every five minutes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,517 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Punctuality should also improve, which is more important than absolute travel. times



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,926 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    In the current spencer dock Tender there is no allowence for any enabling works for a DU station in the future so will that mean if DU happens in the future it will be not possabile to have a station at spencer dock?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,517 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Correct, or not without removing and rebuilding that station…which is pretty much the same thing as "not possible", really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 339 ✭✭OisinCooke


    Is a mined station possible? Either deep enough under the station to avoid foundations or in the vicinity? Surely right…?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36 LastCall


    When Liverpool recently went electric with there new Class 666s, journey times reduced by 10% from better acceleration alone.

    Chester to Birkenhead: Reduced by 6 minutes (was 35 minutes, down to 29 minutes).

    Southport to Hunts Cross: Reduced by 9 minutes (from 64 minutes down to 55 minutes).



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,436 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    It's very possible, it's an engineering challenge, albeit one that has been repeated hundreds of times all over the world. Expensive, but possible.

    The problem with a mined out station there isn't the "constructability" of the station itself, but rather in fact that the tracks would then be so far underground that there would be no realistic way to get them back up to surface level in the space available north of the station.

    With the Rail Review making significant changes to the very idea behind DU, and this station going in as part of D+, I think that we need to go back to square one when we think about the new Cross Dublin City Tunnel. Would be great to see what they plan on it, because at the moment, none of us have any idea on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 117 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    The earlier units that the Class 777 replaced were already electric.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,926 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    The current Dart fleet isn't exactly sprinting in and out of stations either compared to many similar continental services that seem to jump to a quick sprint in and out of stations. I doubt these time savings will be achieved here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36 LastCall


    That's exactly my point. The new fleet should accelerate much faster than the old fleet, hopefully leading to 10% time savings by itself.

    And Dart+ West and South West could be in for substantialy better savings, current rolling stock has extremely slow acceleration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,926 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Don't they use the same rolling stock in Berlin? Or used to? I don't recall those units ever having a problem with acceleration. Is this a rolling stock problem or an Irish Rail problem?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 761 ✭✭✭PlatformNine


    The D+ FAQs, which IÉ warn were very early modelling and estimates, predict 5-10 mins savings for M3 services (I would expect similar for Maynooth) and 10-15 mins savings for Drogheda-CC. A good chunk of the time savings will be the switch from Diesel to electric, EMUs just perform so much better. However, we also don't know how those times were modelled or how conservative they were. If they were based on existing fleet specs and signalling it could actually save quite a more than that, especially for Drogheda services with the 145km/h top speed. If they took everything into account, 145km/h, ETCS, etc then they could actually be the absolute maximum time savings. We just don't know, but hopefully we will get at least a glimpse into the time savings once the BEMUs start entering service.

    It's a bit harder to say for CC-Bray and especially CC-Malahide. I would hope there will be some improvements as rolling stock has just gotten better over the years, and the 8100s are quite old. But even then I am not sure how much it can save. At the very least there will be some time savings for CC-Bray due to the switch to ETCS. My understanding of the current train signalling system is limited by signal line-of-sight which can cause speed restrictions that ETCS wont have with the in-cab signalling. Then also the current train protection system can only enforce certain specific speed limits with its yellow/caution signals on approach to red/danger signals and is also VERY conservative in its braking distances. Where as ETCS is can enforce pretty much any speed based on the distance on the distance to the next danger (and I don't even think ETCS has yellow/caution?) and also takes into account that vehicles specific braking characteristics making it much more efficient.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,707 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Two things spring to mind: signalling, which can be very restrictive, especially under the existing old ATP, and also dwell times at stations, which are far shorter in many other countries (including sleepy Southern Europe 😉). I don't see anything too bad with acceleration of exting DART stock.

    Howver, if DARTs habitially run late despite generous dwell times, then there is a wider problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 148 ✭✭A1ACo


    I can't locate it now, but I think I came across a Dutch reference a couple of years ago for the Netherlands rail system, stating that it was theorized to be able to make time savings of something like up to 7 seconds either side of stations, with the introduction of new rolling stock, but coupled with the replacement of their 1.5kV DC lines, with greater 3kV DC or 25kV AC current (I can't remember which!).



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,824 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Then he should have been given more as a punishment.



Advertisement
Advertisement