Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1559560561562563565»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,822 ✭✭✭john boye


    I know that poor communication from the NTA is par for the course but they really should be making an effort to explain why routes are being moved away from College Green when these changes are being made.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,753 ✭✭✭rx8


    Exactly that.

    The RTPI can be adjusted to miss the first few stops, and the rest would show the bus on the screens to show it's on route.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Thanks.

    A situation where the bus can skip stops routinely, or even a series of stops, means the service is completely unreliable.

    If i waited for a train and it flew through my stop because it was late or for any other reason, i wouldnt be long driving instead next time.

    We cant fairly criticise people for driving when the bus service operates this way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,340 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    In many cases, though, the traffic is the problem because it is slowing the bus service up and we are at the point where additional buses are being used to deliver the same level of timetable because the buses need additional running time to get from one terminus to another.

    That’s not sustainable in the long run.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 505 ✭✭✭PlatformNine


    https://busconnects.ie/cities/dublin/new-dublin-area-bus-network/

    It seems there was another update to the frequency tables towards the end of October, although I've only just noticed them now and I haven't seen any posts about it. For the most part it seems like some general formatting changes, fixing the scale, changing the colour/frequency scaling, and overall making it look much better and easier to read. However there are a few frequency changes, some are corrections for existing routes but others may actually indicate changes for upcoming routes. That said there are some errors with the colour/frequency gradient.

    Though, there are three general problems I have noticed with the tables. First is that it seems they combined the docs from the old 2020 tables and the recent update, but forgot to update many times, I'll do my best to point these out. Second is they really messed up the peak services table, its almost unreadable but I'll explain any changes/problems below. Then lastly, they are inconsistent about whether short services are counted in main table or in the peak table (assuming if it wasn't messed up). The E-spine doesn't include them but the F-spine does, so I will point out where its relevant.

    Here are all the changes I have noticed:

    • Spines:
      • A1 has is increased to 6-min freq (from 12-min) during peak hour. However keep in mind what I said above, these may just be short services.
        • Though if they aren't shorts A-spine frequency during peak hour is now 25bph or every 2.5 minutes
      • C-spine freq both corrected and messed up. Peak hour frequency is correct but early morning frequency is wrong now
      • G-spine was given the old peak time freq (12-min) instead of the current 10-min freq
    • Orbitals:
      • mostly fine, but are missing the early morning departures for the S8, W2, and W4.
    • Radials:
      • 19, 52, 60, and 74 were missing early departures that are now added
      • 48 now only starts from 7:00, though I suspect given a few routes are missing early freqs it may be an error
      • 60 is missing its half-hour peak freq
      • 97 ends much earlier in the day, however this is more in line with the 53. This change makes sense given the 57/58 changes
    • Locals:
      • L1 and L3 were missing early departures that are now added
      • L55 was missing a late departure that is now added
      • L56 was readded, this is an error as it was replaced by the 57. Even if they were introducing a local route it would more than likely be renamed to the L57 for consistency
      • L80 has its old frequency back, 20-min peak and 40-min/60-min off-peak. I am not sure if this is an error or not, as it and the L56 would be the only error in the locals
    • X and P routes:
      • The P and X table is now organised just number, not by P then by X… not sure how I feel about this
      • The colours are all wrong which makes it hard to read
      • They have also readded the "similar route" column, and its a bit more accurate, showing a few more routes being replaced like the 47 and 70
      • P18 has its 2x departure times tweaked
      • X25 departure times corrected
      • P44 back to one departure
      • X56 is back, but like the L56 I suspect this is wrong as if it were coming back it would probably be as the X57
      • X58 is showing 2x departures again, not sure if this was accidently copied from the old tables or if this is now planned
      • P66 is not new this time, but I missed it last time so I wanted to point it out. It's a more direct replacement for the 38s going through Ballycoolin. Despite this it was missing from the new map.
      • X76 is back and X85 is gone, I suspect this is an error as it should more than likely will launch as the X85
      • X79 has one less departure
    • Spine/Radial shorts:
      • So they forgot to add the actual departures in, but there are some interesting changes with the routes
      • However given how badly this was done, I wouldn't treat any of this too seriously
      • Also for context, the first updated timetable had completely changed these from the original, with only four routes: A1 south, E1 south, F1 north, and 19 short.
      • The E1 short and 19 short are still there, but the A1 short and F1 short are gone. Though with the F1 its because its included in the main spine section (which it shouldn't be)
      • the A9 and D9 have returned and there is now a B9
      • There are new D2, D4, and 20 shorts (though the D4 and 20 may have their destinations swapped) edit: I both forgot the D4 goes to Swords Rd and mixed up the 20 and 22 so what I said makes no sense. I am not sure if the 20 Short is correct or is supposed to be another route

    edit: As pointed out below a number of routes still have their old termini which I missed.

    Post edited by PlatformNine at


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭Arhanedus


    They even messed up the spine destinations - it shows the E2 and F1 terminating in Charlestown, which hasn't been the plan since at least 2 years ago (although it was back in 2020).

    image.png

    As you said, it seems like they copied the old 2020 tables and tried to update the data with the current plans, but made an utter mess along the way… I hope in another month or two we get another "silent update" where they fix it up and actually provide accurate information.

    Rather surprised they managed to include the old A9 and D9 though, given that they are now in that new shorts section, separate from the P/X departures. Either they are planning to bring them back, or they copied them from the peak hours table with zero proofreading (well, they clearly didn't proofread considering the frequencies are completely empty).

    I suspect that the Walkinstown short is the 71, as that's what was listed in the old frequency tables, but how they managed to put it down route 20 for it is beyond me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 94 ✭✭thenuisance


    I guess it's because if you're a regular bus user you'll know why



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,240 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    The L14 has got the Palermo terminus listed back on the updated frequency table even though it goes to Cherrywood since June.

    There is also some interesting information being written about the B4 in the frequency table as well. It says it will go from Hansfield to Sallynoggin once the B-Spine routes are in place. Although with this information not being verified yet from the NTA or other sources at this time; I would assume that this change for the B4 could make it go from Hansfield train station to Sallynoggin/Killiney SC near Ballybrack once the B-Spine routes are live probably after the A-Spine routes are implemented.

    image.png

    The BusConnects Dublin route map has not been updated yet to show the extension for the B4 to Hansfield. The map is still showing the B4's terminus at Blanchardstown Centre for the time being. Although it could show the B9 terminating at Blanchardstown SC to do it's runs down to/from the City Centre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 307 ✭✭DaBluBoi


    It looks like that frequency map is no longer available on the site, even though it was there yesterday. I wonder if their staff browse here regularly :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,312 ✭✭✭Buffman


    F-Spine in the news again today, apparently over 700 complaints submitted so far and new action group created.

    The below is a general 'signature' and not part of any post:

    FYI, if you move to a 'smart' meter electricity plan, you CAN'T move back to a non-smart plan.

    You don't have to take a 'smart' meter if you don't want one, opt-out is available.

    Buy drinks in 3L or bigger plastic bottles or glass bottles or cartons to avoid the DRS fee.

    Public transport user? If you're sick of phantom ghost services on the 'official' RTI sources, check bustimes.org for actual 'real' RTI, if it's on their map it actually exists.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭Daith


    From my own experience, the F3 does feel like a downgrade to the 40. The frequency in general is a downgrade and you've more passengers waiting at peak times. A few times at peak commute time, the bus is so full it can't pickup passengers at the end of the Finglas route before it gets to Finglas Road. (This is largely because of school kids who get off in a few stops).

    Also, rather than "connect", it's caused some people in Finglas North to not be able to get to the Dunnes and Post Office in Finglas West. It's still a local service in addition to getting people to the city centre and elsewhere.

    There definitely feels like an imbalance with the stops the F3 has to manage and the stops the F2 does.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Agreed but the same problem of shared road space is posed here.

    The majority of road space is always going to be shared by an increasing number of cars and an increasing number of buses.

    Thats why buses alone cant be the PT solution and an underground network has to take over, before we reach critical mass on the roads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,340 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I think you need to adjust your expectations somewhat unfortunately.

    Aside from Metrolink there are no underground lines planned - that means nothing else of that nature is likely until well after 2040 if not 2050.

    That won’t change until the next review of the Greater Dublin Area Transport Transport Strategy by the NTA which isn’t due until 2028.

    That means that, for much of the city, buses will be the mainstay of the public transport network for the foreseeable future. Hence the major changes that will happen to restrict general traffic flows, in south central Dublin at least, when the core bus corridors there are eventually constructed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I dont disagree with the lack of ambition for an underground and we will in the end pay the price for that, in terms of new FDI and jobs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 838 ✭✭✭BP_RS3813


    "Before we reach critical mass on the roads"

    I'd say we are already far past critical mass at this point...

    40 minutes from lower camden St/the bleedin horse to eden quays ffs.



Advertisement