Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

N11/N25 - Oilgate to Rosslare Harbour [route options published]

1192021222325»

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,737 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    IMO it’ll be motorway til at least the Duncannon Line/R733 or else the southern end of the Wexford bypass.

    There’s severe congestion at the Wexford bypass roundabouts at peak time and 2+2 which provides for at grade roundabouts or compact GSJs could be a recipe for chaos

    That’s only an extra 7km or so of better standard road which wouldn’t break the bank



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,367 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Thought it was agreed ages ago that it will be motorway all the way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,688 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    That's the one thing that it was agreed it would not be. From the beginning the plan was to have a mix of new 2+2 road and an extension of the Type 1 DC M11.

    South of Wexford, even 2+2 is excessive in terms of capacity.. it's only being done as a dual carriageway because of the amount of HGV traffic using this stretch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,194 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    My thinking is it'll be M11 to the current N11/N25 roundabout. Then N25 (2+2) from there onwards - possibly with some S2 at the end near to the port.

    We won't see any M25 as part of this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,459 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The issue with this is that there will almost certainly be a roundabout at the end of the motorway. If that is at the junction with the N25, it'll be a source of congestion. If it was 2+2 from the end of the current M11, you could have a GSJ at that junction and generally have a better flow of traffic. A roundabout further south on the Wexford bypass would not be such an issue as there would be less traffic using it.

    My assumption is that the reason for the ridiculous delays here is that they are designing motorway south of the N25 junction, thereby requiring a full motorway junction there, and it's creating lots of issues.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,688 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Why do you think N25 won't be 2+2? It's very obvious it will be a 2+2 from the project communications to date; the new guidelines that new national roads with speed limits over 80 km/h must have a divided cross section; and because the planned Rosslare Port access road that will connect to it is to be built as a 2+2. A single carriageway of any type is highly unlikely here. Worst case is 2+1 from Wexford to Rosslare, but for safety, given the high number of foreign drivers on this stretch, something simple to understand like a 2+2 is the safest option.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,459 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I didn't say I think the N25 won't be 2+2. I think 2+2 would be the best solution for the N11/N25 junction as it could then be freeflow from N11 and N25 to/from Rosslare. If motorway meets 2+2 then you'll have a roundabout.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 802 ✭✭✭Jayuu


    Looking at the preferred option route (assuming I have the correct map from the Oilgate-Rosslare website) the proposed junction of the new M11 with the N25 is at the same location as the current N11/N25 Roundabout.
    Given there's the Newtown Park Hotel and Wexford CoCo's weighbridge on two sides of the existing roundabout and farm buildings within around 25-50 metres of a third side of the roundabout it doesn't give a lot of scope for increasing the size of this roundabout to a full grade separated junction even if that was a desired option. I suppose they could CPO the farm buildings but that could be messy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,367 ✭✭✭✭kneemos




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 802 ✭✭✭Jayuu


    The N25 is the continuing road on to Rosslare from this junction so I'm not sure exactly what you are suggesting here. Are you saying an overpass from the new N11 on to the N25 to Rosslare? Is that not realistically the same as a grade separated junction?

    Actually I would have thought it would make more sense just from a logical point of view to redesignate the new Wexford to Rosslare section of this road the N11 and terminate the N25 at this junction.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,367 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    If it's going to be motorway all the way there will be no need for roundabouts. Be madness IMO not to, it's only twenty odd kilometres from Wexford.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,459 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    If the new N11 and the upgraded N25 Wexford bypass (i.e. the roads running north/south) are both Dual Carriageway, a the new road could be on a flyover above the east/west roads. When the road standard is consistent, the road can continue without obstruction. If changing from motorway to DC, previous experience shows that a roundabout will be put in.

    A DC junction would be much smaller than a motorway junction and would fit on a much smaller footprint even though both are "grade separated". For a DC junction, ramps are only needed in two of the four quadrants created by the cross roads, not all four. It would impinge on the weighbridge but that wouldn't be a big issue (just rebuild it out of the way and CPO as necessary). There aren't any obstructions in the other northern quadrant and the junction wouldn't affect the two south quadrants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,459 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Building a motorway would be a lot more expensive and bring multiple other issues. And no, there wouldn't be a small cost difference between DC and motorway in this case. Upgrading the Wexford bypass to DC would be straightforward; build two new lanes on one side while the existing two lanes continue to function as normal. Once the two new lanes are built and the adjustments at junctions are in place, an easy switch to DC can happen. If motorway, you still need a parallel non-motorway road so the existing bypass has to remain and an entirely new motorway needs to be built beside it.

    The cost difference is more like the cost of building a single carriageway v building a motorway (i.e. a significant difference). Then there are all the environmental issues, Climate Action Plan, etc. plus motorways being an objector magnet. There is no benefit to motorway as traffic volumes are nowhere near that level. It would be madness to propose motorway all the way, it almost certainly won't happen.

    Attempting to build a motorway is the only reason I can think of for it taking 5 years to complete the Phase 3 design here.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    ”If motorway, you still need a parallel non-motorway road so the existing bypass has to remain and an entirely new motorway needs to be built beside it.”

    No, this road is a bypass so a parallel non-motorway road does not have to be provided in this case. Non-motorway traffic can just go through Wexford town.
    Though I agree the bypass does not need to be upgraded to motorway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,367 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    The existing N 25 follows it pretty closely. There's not much between Wexford and Rosslare anyway bar a few villages.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,459 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    It might be the case that a parallel non-motorway road does not have to be provided. I'm not sure if that is formally stated anywhere and if not, ACP may not agree.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,688 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The will be no M25. Not here.

    A reminder once again that a "motorway" is a set of legal restrictions. It is not a kind of road, or a speed limit. The widest road in the state isn't a motorway, and Cork has a motorway with a 100 km/h limit (M8) connected to a national road (N25) with a 120 km/h limit.

    There's nothing to prevent a Type 1 DC being built, and having a 120 km speed limit, but also being called N11 and having green signs. And there would be no need for a parallel road.

    For N25, a Type 1 is out of the question. The traffic counts on this road really are tiny, and the only reason a Type 2 DC is even being proposed is that most of that traffic is in heavy peaks around ferry arrivals and departures, so the divided road type is to stop impatient car tourists from endangering everyone else by recklessly trying to overtake HGVs.

    There's a decent chance that the Slaney crossing will not be under motorway restrictions, and that the motorway restrictions will begin either at a a new junction north of the river and south of Oilgate, or where M11 starts already.

    That doesn't mean it won't be as wide as a motorway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,459 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    and that the motorway restrictions will begin either at a a new junction north of the river and south of Oilgate, or where M11 starts already.

    The Preferred Scheme Option report from 2021 (which I believe is still the most recent information published) shows proposed junctions at the current roundabout north of Oilgate and then at the N11/N25 junction, nothing in between. I hadn't really thought about it before, but having a junction between Oilgate and the Ferrycarrig bridge could make sense and continue the M11 to there. A junction north of Oilgate doesn't actually make much sense, only that it is where the motorway currently ends (which in itself doesn't make much sense either).

    I don't see why they'd build Type 1 if not intended to apply motorway restrictions. The junctions would still have to be "motorway" junctions with all the associated cost, landtake, objector and environmental issues. I can't see anything other than motorway issues causing the delays which this project is experiencing. A Type 2 DC probably would have planning permission now given the preferred option was published in 2021.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,688 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The reason to make the crossing an all-traffic road,is because there’s so few other crossings available. This was part of the rationale for not making the Suir crossing on N25 a motorway.

    As for why the M11 stopped before Oilgate, it’s the usual reason: the route of M11 onwards across the Slaney had not been decided, and bringing the road south of the village would limit the future options. That said, there should have been a single-carriageway relief road for Oilgate built in conjuction with the M11 project, so that the village didn’t get landed with all the motorway’s traffifc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,250 ✭✭✭geographica


    You forgot the last sentence of this


    “Expenditure to date on this project amounts to €6,770,342”



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,909 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    This won’t be happening any time soon (to repeat the blindingly obvious). When did the Wexford bypass open, 1988/89? If you jettison the roundabouts it would still be a perfectly good section of road. The rest of the N25 must have been all widened/upgraded around that time too



Advertisement