Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cross-border review of rail network officially launched

14344454648

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,320 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Doesn't make a difference on fare evasion if you have competent revenue protection (Luas does this decent enough) but it is miles worse for Anti Social Behaviour.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Given that the gates are left open now all the time and most stations unmanned, how exactly is that better for anti-social behaviour?!

    Why is there so much anti-social behaviour on Irish Rail services, even though they have gates and often the issues are actually on intercity service that even has staff on board:

    https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/sharp-rise-in-anti-social-behaviour-on-irish-rail-services-1518375.html

    The reality of Ireland today, is that the majority of anti-social behaviour is actually coming from people who actually paid their fares (or have free travel pass).

    Specially on DART where teenagers are paying just 65c, gates aren't stopping any of them from using the service!



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The NTA Actually does a report into the number of anti-social reports:

    https://www.nationaltransport.ie/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Passenger-Personal-Security-Report-2024.pdf

    Incidents per 100,000 passengers:

    • Irish Rail: 7.3
    • Luas: 2.7

    Yes, the gates doing a great job there!

    I think it is more of a case of perception for you, rather then reality. DART has always had issues with anti-scoial behaviour and the gates never did anything about it.

    The gates are just "security theatre", the only thing that will really tackle anti-social behaviour is a Transport Police service and them actively riding the trains.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,117 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    A Transport Police won’t do much.


    We already have a police force and anti-social behaviour is rampant around the country.


    There is little or no penalty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,320 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I posted the stats here before. Luas has double the amount of ASB reports as Irish Rail services with similar passenger numbers. And as mentioned, Irish Rail only enforces fare gates in more urban locations. And they absolutely have less RPOs and security on the tracks. The facts are that by restricting urban locations that they reduce ASB at source.

    The discussion was had here about a year ago. Countries have put up gates again to stop it. It’s undeniable but some here still seem to deny reality. I’ve no issue with people arguing the trade offs of accessibility here and maybe even making a cost argument. Fine.

    This doesn’t really have much to do with lack of access to stations. That’s a choice by Irish Rail.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,320 ✭✭✭spillit67


    The stats here don’t comport with elsewhere but I’ll note perceptions of safety higher here in this survey for DART is higher than Luas. And again, Irish Rail don’t use fare gates / lack RPO enforcement in lots of instances.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    NA



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,824 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    IR can build as many new entrances as they want to improve accessibility, but can they be trusted to keep those entrances open? The new entrances at Tara and Pearse being closed throughout most of the day suggests tells me that any spend on new entrances will be a waste of money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,967 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    In China, there are bag scans and people scanners to access the metro. Cameras on every carriage, monitored, and cameras on every corridor and stairs. Added to that, there is a transport police as well.

    Anti-social behaviour is practically zero.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The facial recognition and bag scanning is on the high speed intercity rail services in China, not the Metro. The Metro has regular gates similar to DART.

    And there is definitely crime and anti-social behaviour on Chinese public transport! 26% of women there report having been sexually assaulted on public transport in Beijing! Take a look at this shocking case:

    https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1000539

    We often don't hear about these issues as to are only reported in the local media.

    I'm not sure if Chinese dictatorship is the model we want to follow! I'd look more towards Western European cities like Copenhagen and Berlin.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,967 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I stand corrected!

    Sounds dystopian to me.

    But it is also a great example of the "security theatre" I mentioned earlier, in fact the article you linked to actually talks about exactly this:

    Critics of subway security checks highlight overstaffing and the casual execution of procedures, rendering their presence largely ceremonial. They also complain about wasted time and public money, and the catalogue of prohibited items, which include not only guns, explosives, and petrol but also mundane items like over two lighters, nail polish over 20ml, kitchen knives, utility knives, and other sharp or blunt instruments that can cause injuries.

    ……

    Recent incidents, including the knife attack at a Shanghai metro station and additional stabbings in a Jilin park and Suzhou bus station, have intensified the debate about the effectiveness of subway security checks and the broader security surveillance system in China.

    So they have airport style security, but still end up with serious violent assaults. Perfect example of how "gates" don't work.

    Liang believes the question boils down to a trade-off between safety and efficiency. He estimates subway security checks cost 13.4 billion yuan annually for personnel nationally, and cause a 2.677 billion yuan loss in passenger time in Beijing each year. Despite these high costs, the benefits are minimal, and more cost-effective alternatives like enhanced video surveillance and police patrols could better deter crime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,967 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Oh, they have the video surveillance everywhere too, and the facial recognition software gets better by the day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,824 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    We should definitely have far greater aspirations for being more like a totalitarian state alright



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    I've been through the security at Chinese high speed rail, in my experience it really depends on where you are. Some stations you could have 5 people looking at one screen as your bags go through the scanner. Other stations you could have nobody on duty. I suspect it's more a case of a communist regime creating 100% employment than fulfilling any real security need.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 LastCall


    This conversation is getting well off topic, but:

    Ask anyone who's actually traveled on a metro or HSR rail system with security checks and fare gates. It feels much more safe and there are 0 antisocial issues. This doubly true at night.

    If you sneer at security because it's 'dystopian', don't be surprised when you mugged on the Dart.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,824 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Why are we even talking about this? It's never going to happen and it is the most absurd suggestion to say that it's needed on IR.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    And yet despite gates and x-rays and all that nonsense on Chinas high speed rail, a person was still stabbed to death on one:

    https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1012862

    As I said it is pure security theatre, it makes naive people think they are safer, like a kids with a security blanket.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Lol try the New York subway, every trip is risking your life despite fare barriers



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I was literally going to write that in my last post! But decided to cut it out!

    Personal experience, getting the NY Subway to JFK, not one, but two separate violent fights between two different groups of people broke out on the same carriage on the same trip that I was on. All within the space of 15 minutes!! Never seen anything like it.

    And all despite NY subway not only having gates, but many station have the turnstiles you see in Croke Park!

    In the Paris Metro I watched a pick pocket team (4 kids) working their way through the platform of waiting passengers, I watched them steal from a backpack and run. Paris Metro has gates too.

    I'm not sure why anyone thinks a gate is going to stop anyone willing to mug you!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,252 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I lived in some pretty rough parts of South London and never really saw anti social behaviour despite their being no barriers.

    Saw a lot more on the bus where you had to pay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,168 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    This may well have been answered before, but why can't we have Cork - Limerick direct trains like, tomorrow? Is it just that Irish Rail just aren't interested?

    Take the current Limerick Junction - Limerick trains and run them Cork - Limerick. The stop at Limerick Junction would act in their current role. Is it a case of their speed capability? If its how uncomfortable they are, thats a valid point, so start the route and order new trains immediately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,967 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Why would we need them? Is the demand there?

    It would seem to me that Limerick-Cork demand will always be less than Dublin-Cork demand, based on population, and that even Limerick-Dublin would have more demand than Limerick-Cork, so what need would direct Limerick-Cork meet?

    Surely, the best use of resources would be to increase Dublin-Limerick Jn-Cork frequency?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,270 ✭✭✭Economics101


    At present, Cork-Limerick takes about 1h 40m, with 10 to 20 minute changeover time between connecting trains at Limerick Junction. Direct Cork-Limerick trains would reduce journet times by 10 to 15 minutes. Is this worth the expense? Also remember that (a) there are line capacity issues on the Limerick to L Jn section and (b) the direct trains might compromise connectivity at Limerick Junction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭PlatformNine


    It could be a number of things honestly, demand is likely a significant part, IE may view that Dublin-Cork services have enough space for those travelling between Limerick and Cork. However even if the demand was there I imagine that the number of sets available is the biggest limiting factor. That said from my understanding Limerick Junction itself isn't a problem, although it definetly could be improved to allow a Cork-Limerick service to more effeciently use the station.

    You mention sending the Limerick-Limerick Jnc sets all the way to Cork, but to even send sets all the way to Cork would likely mean taking sets away from other services, especially WRC services. But also yes their limited speed would be a problem as they are significantly slower than other sets operating on the Cork-Dublin mainline and could risk delays to other services.

    I think above all there is a need for more trains sets for the IC network, both for existing services and for much needed expansions, especially non-Dublin IC services. D+ and the Enterprise fleet replacement will help. D+ will free all ICRs operating to Hazelhatch, and perhaps even sets operating as far as Newbridge and Kildare (although they may chose to keep ICRs for anything west of HH). It will also free most of the 29Ks from the GDA commuter services which could replace ICRs from some shorter services such as Dublin-Dundalk or Dublin-Longford. Additionally the Enterprise currently has a few ICRs for the hourly frequency which will be freed when the new sets arrive (order to be placed this year).

    However even then, I do believe we will need another order of IC sets within the next 5-10 years. My hope is that after the Enterprise sets have been commissioned(~2029) and have had some running time to prove they are reliable, IE will order additional sets to further expand IC services. Within the next decade I would like to see the introduction of Galway-Cork via Limerick services. I would also like to see Galway-Waterford Via Limerick and Cork-Waterford services However there is a lot more infrastructure needed there due to various issues with the Limerick Jnc - Waterford line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭PlatformNine


    It may help make the train service between the two far more appealing which could help increase modal share between the two cities. It's difficult to say, but I think it could be a case of even if the demand isn't there, the demand for rail between the two could increase if the service is improved.

    I think generally speaking we need to make improvements to the non-Dublin IC network, they are very important connections that even if the demand is lower than their Dublin based counterparts, need to be served well. I think that if those connections are created, people will use them and especially with Cork-Limerick the demand could increase quickly if people realise the service is quick and convenient because they have access to the direct service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 Covidhaveago


    Some form of Cross Country service Cork/Limerick/Galway seems an easy win. There are 20+ buses a day going Cork/Limerick/Galway, more if you add in indirect services like Charleville/Limerick.

    IMO it’s the kind of service that’ll be a success like the early morning Cork/Dublin express trains and we’ll all wonder why it wasn’t already in place.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,936 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Hundreds of millions of Euro (probably a few billion actually) would need to be spent on new alignments to make such a service viable to commuters. The Limerick to Athenry line is not up to the standard for proper intercity services and the train takes around 2 hours to get from Limerick to Galway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,967 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Yes, we do need to make improvements to the non-Dublin IC network, but not at the expense of the Dublin/Cork route.

    Rather than Cork to Galway, Waterford to Galway, interchange at Limerick Junction makes more sense.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭PlatformNine


    A new alignment shouldn't be necessary but a better fleet and improved infrastructure would be needed.

    Currently a Cork-Limerick-Galway service would take around 3.5 Hours, 60 minutes for Cork-Limerick Jnc, 30 minutes for Limerick-Limerick Jnc, 40 minutes Limerick-Ennis, 50 minutes for Ennis-Athenry, and 20 minutes for Athenry-Galway. Every single one of these sections has time to save and with the right improvements could see some massive time savings.

    Cork-Limerick Junction will see significant improvements as the Cork LC closures progress and when an MU fleet is introduced (as the current times are based on loco hauled). Limerick Jnc-Limerick is currently limited to 110km/h. And the future electrificaiton of both sections will of course also help reduce journey times.

    Limerick-Ennis I believe is where the most time can be saved, as currently the 40 km section is limited to 80km/h and has several LCs with very slow speed restricitons (40-65km/h). Though I am not sure if there is as much time to be saved between Galway and Ennis, though there is still time that can be saved through alignment improvements, LC closures, etc.



Advertisement