Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cork - Light Rail [route options idenfication and initial design underway]

11820222324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,778 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    That might make the route from Carrigaline to the city too long.

    I'd follow Dylan's route from Carrigaline to Douglas Court but then have it run past Tesco via the Douglas link road and then have it follow the N40 to Black Ash where you could link with a high frequency bus route or possibly a spur to the Airport. Then you either close a lane on the N27 and squeeze it in there or culvert a 1km section from the Douglas road exit of the N27 to just beyond the Old Blackrock road overpass and build it underneath the road. You then run it past the Elyssian, follow Albert street all the way across Eamonn De Valera bridge down Anderson Quay to link with the East-West line at St Patrick's Street. In the current environment, closing a lane of the South Douglas Road, which would be the minimum required to run a luas there, seems completely unrealistic.

    I'd link Passage by extending the East-West line to Rochestown (as in Dylan's Route 1) and then follow his first 5 steps in Route 4. I don't think there is a need to continue this route to Douglas . I don't think there is an immediate need for a Passage link. In this dream scenario, the commuter towns in West Cork become the biggest concern, particularly Kinsale and Bandon.

    Post edited by snotboogie on


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-41586028.html

    ABP in the next 10 months. Remarkable uptick in pace if it happens.

    Darragh O’Brien turning out to be an absolute CMATS hero so far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,408 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Let’s hope that the preferred route is the one that passes through Kent station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 710 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    I'm hoping they realised a bridge over the Douglas River from Jacob's Island to Rochestown would make such a huge difference to the whole scheme. There are a few buses planned to pass close by to this as part of Bus Connects, and would allow an easier connection to Carrigaline/Passage West/Monkstown/Ringaskiddy

    1: Ovens (Dell EMC) - Mahon Point via City Centre

    4: Leghanmore - Jacob's Island via City Centre

    14: CUH - Little Island via Ballypheane, N40, Douglas and Mahon

    7: Mount Oval - Kent Station via Douglas and Maryborough/Garryduff

    12: Carrigaline Primary Care Centre - Kent Station via N28 and R610

    46: Douglas - Passage West via Monastery Road



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,408 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Attempts to go near Rochestown cannot be part of this project. People there have a long history of opposing public works, and if phase 1 of the light rail includes anything being built there, we may as well just cancel the project and start again. If there’s construction proposed through the expensive suburbs, I guarantee a “grass roots organisation” will fight tooth and nail to keep it out because, after all, public transport is only for people who have failed so badly at life they can’t even afford a car.

    The only way to achieve what you want is to get the thing up and running as far as Mahon, then wait a couple of years until envy nullifies the NIMBYs’ arguments.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 710 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    Just to add I don't propose going through Rochestown, but instead just over the water to the junction with Monastery Road. They could use the council lands already there that don't go too near to houses. You are right though, get it to Mahon and then in a later phase they can extend it. In this phase the least they can do is have a proper connection the Passage Railway Greenway at Jacob's Island, and safe and substantial bike parking facilities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 710 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    Consultation finally launches at 11am on April 14th! Open until June

    https://www.echolive.ie/corknews/arid-41605978.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,778 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    How many phases will there be to this consultation? As far as I know the Busconnects public consultation launched in June 2022 and is still ongoing 3 years later. Should we expect a similar timeline?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,000 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    I wouldn't take the luas or bus connects projects in Cork very seriously. There corridors in Dublin that have planning permission for a year and have been in planning for 7 years and there's still no construction tenders out



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭Captainsatnav


    I depressingly agree



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Finally, a route

    https://www.transportforireland.ie/news/luas-cork-launches-emerging-preferred-routes-as-public-consultation-is-launched/#:~:text=Luas%20Cork%20is%20a%20proposed,Cork%20Docklands%2C%20Blackrock%20and%20Mahon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,408 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Official site now up:

    Luas Cork

    Also looks like they’re going to use battery trams, as they’re showing no overhead wires in the city-centre mockup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 767 ✭✭✭ricimaki


    Could also be using something like this for catenary free usage in certain areas.

    I personally think catenary-free is a bad thing - it only increases the cost of the system, adds maintenance costs/complexity, and ensures any future rolling stock purchases are more expensive. Do people really notice or care about the overhead wires?

    I am very happy to see progress on this though - hopefully it progresses relatively quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,000 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    At a glance, I can only say the degree of proposed shared running with cars is…interesting, much less dedicated tram way than the luas in Dublin enjoys. I'd prefer the Dublin approach whereby shared running is strictly to provide access where no other options exist, but the NTA seem to want to maintain traffic through routes in Cork.

    The turn at finns corner was always going to be task and a half, demolishing finns corner might be impossible under our planning system.

    Also surprised that they didn't go for using the old rail alignment and extend to Roachestown.

    Anyway we're a long way off having to worry about it. There's at least 5 years until a railway order exists and at least 5 of construction.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,619 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The pictures show catenary in the areas outside the city center, battery operation appears to be in the city center only.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,619 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    At a glance, I can only say the degree of proposed shared running with cars is…interesting, much less dedicated tram way than the luas in Dublin enjoys. I'd prefer the Dublin approach whereby shared running is strictly to provide access where no other options exist, but the NTA seem to want to maintain traffic through routes in Cork.

    I expect the same will be the case for some of the future Luas Vision 2050 Luas lines in Dublin too.

    The Red and in particular Green line are relatively unique in being borderline Metro lines. Of course it is great to do that where possible, but it isn't always.

    I think this and lots of future Luas lines will be more similar to tram lines you see throughout Europe with far more street running. Think of them as more very high capacity buses, with better stops and much faster dwell/travel time due to the offboard ticketing, etc.

    A big improvement over buses, but not quite green line level. This would be quite normal for Cork sized cities in France.

    Post edited by spacetweek on


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,619 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I'd imagine knocking the Venue Bar is going to be controversial!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,408 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Most of the shared running sections are shared with bus-lanes, so it’s not as bad as it first seems.

    Also, this plan includes a significant re-organisation of traffic in the city centre: private cars will not be permitted to drive the length of St Patrick’s Street anymore; the narrow lane part of Woods Street (between Washington Street West and Mardyke) is finally being blocked to cars; Sheares Street and the Mardyke are being made two-way, and right-turns from Clarkes Bridge/Hanover Place onto Washington Street (East) are being routed around the back of the Courthouse.

    I can see the St Patrick’s St changes becoming an issue amongst the car-brained commentariat, as well as the NIMBYs.

    Also pleased to see that the Wilton Road issues have been resolved. The first plan involved taking all of the required land from one side of the road only (the right as you go uphill), which was so clearly unfair for no real reason (except to prevent a couple of businesses on the other side losing some car-park spaces) that it was just asking to for objections to be upheld by ABP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 431 ✭✭EnzoScifo


    Very hard to understand the routing in ballincollig, Missing out on large population in the west end of the town. Also to make any extension west complicated as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yep, there's fields out there (P&R, development), there's width available (Carriganarra Road, Coolroe Meadows), it's all City… I wonder what the thinking was.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,408 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I think they ended it in the right place. Anything to the west of Ballincollig town is very low density housing of the sort that’s designed for cars with no permeability for pedestrians. Wherever you put a line, it’ll be within walking distance of almost nobody.

    Until there’s a higher-density development outside here, there’s no good case for extending the rail line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 94 ✭✭gooseman12


    my own, meaningless, initial thoughts:

    • finally some form of a plan, some progress and something to discuss.
    • alot of sharing of lanes, with both cars and buses. Things like buses stopped at bus stops blocking trams seem like a really poor outcome here
    • Not using the line is quite a surprise. Given the routing through the docklands, i would have thought the line was the obvious solution. For me if you are using skehard road and going past temple hill, you should probably be continuing on boreenmanna road instead of trying to hatchet your way down the narrow section of churchyard lane.
    • The ballincollig loop is another interesting choice, limits any potential extensions and station road is another very narrow route. I would assume the main reasoning here is to cover the potential developments in the maglin area.
    • I'm going to get shot for this opinion but i see both the routing in bishopstown and the routing onto the northside as poor. Both look to me to be very circuitous and just add baked-in inefficiency to the route. I know everyone wants the kent station connection but i dont know, its just the feeling that i have. Give me a pedestrian bridge from Kennedy quay with some travelators or some innovative solution but bringing the whole route over to kent and all around bishopstown just doesn't sit right with me.

    All in all, its progress. I do worry about the uproar (demolishing buildings in particular) given busconnects and some of the bike lane proposals were a far less impactful change and got very watered down as a result but with a tram, there less wiggle room to make changes and maintain the route.

    Another impression is that there was potentially a good bit of politicking involved, there's probably no getting away from it but i wish major decisions were much more evidence based as opposed to political opinion based.

    Overall, i think the route is trying to too hard to cover too much at once, the list of requirements, Ballincollig, CIT, CUH, UCC, patrick st, kent, docklands, PUC, mahon is a very difficult design solution, it screams this is your one and only line and you're not getting anything else so make the most of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,408 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    @gooseman12 The sharing is a concern, but I don’t know what other options could be used: Cork never had that whole Georgian street-widening thing that gave Dublin handy, straight-line routes for Luas, and there’s no way to go underground in the centre, because there’s no ground under!

    I can’t agree with you about the routing along MacCurtain street: I believe that a direct link at Kent is essential for the viability of the tram line. It’s all very well bringing commuters in by rail from Mallow, Midleton or Cóbh, but if there’s no reliable, high-capacity option to get from Kent to major destinations like UCC (3 km), CUH (5 km), Mahon (6 km) or Bishopstown (7 km), people will just drive instead. I’d even suggest making sure that the new bridge from Kent to the south side is made wide enough to add another pair of tracks in future.

    The problem with using the old rail alignment is that it doesn’t go where the service is needed. Churchyard Lane, Well Road, Skehard Road is where people either live or need to get to. Plus, the old alignment is being used as a greenway, so there isn’t really the saving on land: widening would still have been needed.

    Demolishing buildings is unfortunate. Doubly so as one of those slated for demolition is Finn’s Corner, which has only recently completed a full re-build. The Venue Bar I could take or leave (Many years ago, I used to live behind it, so I’m not as in love with it as some might be).

    I don’t see this as the “one and only line”, but it is definitely the most obvious one. The geography of Cork will make any North-South rail alignment within the city an expensive pain in the arse, so it will need the first line to be a success before you could try to fund it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,503 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    I do like how they have a 3rd terminating platform at Pairc UI Caoimh to allow for extra match day services. The only other tunback facilities look to be at Kent and at the Mahon Point terminus. Hopefully there's some more added at later design stages as it will allow for better operational flexibility.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,947 ✭✭✭thomil


    The ballincollig loop is another interesting choice, limits any potential extensions and station road is another very narrow route. I would assume the main reasoning here is to cover the potential developments in the maglin area.

    It's a compromise born out of the fact that many here in Ballincollig find public transport of any kind only slightly less repulsive than a venereal disease. Pretty much every major bit of non-car related infrastructure has been attacked vociferously and either killed entirely or watered down to the point of uselessness, as with BusConnects. Much of the resistance seems to have been concentrated in the Coolroe area of Ballincollig, and the loop stays well enough away from that benighted part of town.

    Going with a one-way loop also sidesteps the area of having to tear up the full width of Main Street. When BusConnects was first announced, the plans called for a full pedestrianisation of Main Street between roughly the Bank of Ireland building and the intersection with Station Road. There were massive protests against these plans, with local business leaders claiming that they'd lose customer parking. You know, despite a multi-story car park in the shopping centre and large surface car parks next to the cinema. I personally think that this slight of hand with a single track won't help the situation and we're still going to see massive protests to kill the project, but it is an interesting approach.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 431 ✭✭EnzoScifo


    station road also being in the middle of two primary schools probably won't go down well either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 431 ✭✭EnzoScifo


    But there is plenty of room for higher density development and you have a big trip generator in EMC which would allow commuting within ballincollig itself. The idea that the loudest anti-active and public transport voices are in the west of the town is true as well (remember the "save our right turn" signs) and has probably informed this preferred route to the detriment of those areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,947 ✭✭✭thomil


    How well is the Dell plant in Ovens doing these days, anyway? There seem to be hardly any job openings over there and Dell seems to have lost interest in the area ever since they sold off VMware.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,408 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Yeah.

    “Having a tram there will be so dangerous to the poooor children”, said the distracted driver of a 2.1 tonne Volvo while trying to muscle in to the space between two other cars so that their child wouldn’t have to face the dangerous traffic, “I mean, it’s bad enough with all these big SUVs around”.

    I know someone with children in these schools. It's a complete shitshow every morning, with everyone trying to wedge their oversized SUVs down a narrow road. A one-way system will make it less attractive to drive down there, so I’m all for it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 501 ✭✭✭BagofWeed


    The busy bodies on the Skehard Rd are already in a frenzy over it, lol. Frantic door knocking going on there this afternoon.



Advertisement