Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1388389390392394

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    This thread is specifically about DART+, plenty of other thread to discuss intercity services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Overhead lines provide the lowest operating cost of all the options (diesel, battery, EMU), and they also reduce the cost of rolling stock too, both in terms of purchase and maintenance.

    On a system with the kind of frequency that DART has, higher operating costs quickly exceed savings in upfront capital costs, so if you can do overhead lines, you should.

    IÉ chose BEMU sets as a risk mitigation. They are well aware of how toxic our planning process can be, so the BEMU stock allows them to deliver extension and service improvements on the coastal line (mainly from stopping a lot of slower diesels sharing track with the DART trains) even if the OHLE expansion gets JR'd to hell and back.

    (They have an option to convert these sets back to pure EMUs at mid life, rather than fitting new batteries)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Like others have mentioned, there is weight and cost aspects benifits to OHLE vs BEMU. But two other massive benifits to OHLE electrification over BEMUs are time and space. Charging the batteries takes time, time that they could otherwise be in service, and while it doesn't take an incredibly long time to charge these units, especially with improvements in charging tech, it still can take 30-60 minutes. This would mean that to maintain the same level of frequency, more sets are needed to account for the ones charging, which aside from costs means a larger depot and more room for stabling. And additionally it likely means a lot more sidings would be needed for all the sets to sit in while they charge. Siding capacity is already limited as is and as will be after D+, so to get the amount needed for a full BEMU fleet would just require a lot of space. Not to mention the amount of shunting between platforms and sidings as turning around the service that just terminated may no longer be an option.

    So while you would no longer needed as many substations (you still need some for charging at sidings) and you wouldn't need the OHLE lines. The added infrastrucutre to make stations large, build more sidings, make a larger depot all adds up. And particularly with some stations like Drogheda or Bray, there is only so much room to expand and create new sidings.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    On the charging time, according to the Irish Rail engineer doc, it should take less then 12 minutes for them to recharge, which would fall in the regular turn around time that happens regardless, so I don’t think they need extra trains like you suggest here.

    However the large amount of power being dumped into the batteries at such a quick speed does mean that they also have to build a battery system at Drogheda to act as a buffer as otherwise the local grid can’t handle the sudden surge. That of course adds to the cost.

    You are however very correct about the need for extra sidings that wouldn’t otherwise be needed. This is why the BEMU has less frequency then the OHLE plan. To match the OHLE frequency with BEMU’s they would have to build significant extra sidings at Drogheda which obviously would greatly increase the cost of the project.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Last I'll mention here, as it's discussed elsewhere, and this is a Dart+ thread. But new railcars are needed, with more modern engines. The tendering and procurement process is too long though.

    As Kris mentioned above, BEMU trains were chosen because of all the delays built into our system. From both a planning and a funding perspective.

    NTA are already raising issue with the cost of retrofitting ETCS 1 to the current fleet, meanwhile, in the UK, they are fitting ETCS 2 to steam engines.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought the 12 minute figure was specifically the charge time needed for a BEMU to continuously run Drogheda-Bray? When I thought about longer charge times (which I admit I don't have a source for and just was a guess based the charging figure which I missremembered as 20 minutes instead of 12) was that if the goal was to avoid building new overhead-lines, Maynooth, M3, and HH services would need longer charge times since they would be operating less under OHLE power compared to Drogheda-Bray services.

    I think saying 60 minutes was just excessive of me, but if the 12 minute figure does only refer to Drogheda-Bray, would a 20-30 minute charge time be realistic for the other services?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,129 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    Surely that's a relatively moot point, you can't run (most of) the services on those routes without a depot at a minimum and given the current state of progress on each plan, that's possibly going to be the last thing completed (other than Coastal South...)

    If the goal was 'just' electrification then I'm not sure IE would even have needed a railway order.

    About the only benefit of going direct to BEMU would be cascading older trains to other routes and doing 1 for 1 replacements, as I imagine most of the currently available paths are in use.

    And then you'd be looking at BESS/substation installs at Maynooth/Parkway/Hazelhatch that would probably still require permissions etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,750 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Catenary and substations for "just electrification" would need planning too; and would be easiest obtained via a RO.

    Irish Rail go for conventional planning when it makes sense.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Yes, you are correct, the engineering doc I read was only for Drogheda. BTW You can google for the doc, while parts are redacted, it is very interesting and informative.

    Just to be clear, I haven't heard or seen a hint of using BEMU's on the Western lines. The IR plan for those lines is clearly OHLE, that is what they are progressing through planning and that is what I hope they achieve.

    The idea was more based on my own musings (crayoning if you like) of what might be a plan B if they ran into problems with the OHLE plans in terms of planning and hopefully we won't.

    Though just for a moment, lets consider BEMU's on the Western lines, could it work?

    One key point to keep in mind, the batteries don't charge from the DART OHLE, they charge either at the station (in Drogheda) and they charge up from regenerative breaking. The OHLE only benefits them in terms of not using the battery while under OHLE.

    So Drogheda to Malahide is 44km or so.

    Hazelhatch to Heuston is just 19km, so 38km there and back, that sounds like it would fit nicely in a 12 minute turn around/charge at HH.

    M3 Parkway to Docklands, 20km, so 40km return. Again seems like it could fit in a 12 minute turn around charge at M3.

    Maynooth to Connolly, about 25km, 50km return. Perhaps a little bit of a stretch there. Close, but might need more batteries and charging time at Maynooth.

    It doesn't seem impossible. Though obviously this isn't giving any consideration to if the above stations have the space for such charging, block longer distance trains, etc. Just back of the beer mat maths.

    Did the works at Dorgheda for the BEMU's require planning? I don't remember an application.

    If it did, it seemingly slid under the radar and didn't face any delays or issues.

    That is the thing, no one is saying that nothing can get through planning. Just that it seems some planning seems to attract more delays, public consultation, public attention and even JR's.

    Works completely within an existing train station seem to not be a problem and slide by easily (see Cork too). Whilst closing level crossings, etc. have a much higher chance of ending up in JR's.

    Again, I'm hoping BEMU's on the Western lines isn't necessary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,750 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    A conventional planning application was made to Louth CC - file 22602. It was discussed, briefly, here at the time.

    It went to FI before approval so wasn't completely seamless

    These links often stop working really quick:

    ePlan - Online Planning Details



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    6 months! that is pretty much rocket speed for planning apps for major infrastructure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,366 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    At Drogheda the new substation needed permission

    Irish Rail however claimed exempted development on the OHLE installation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,750 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Was it given as such?

    The bridge and lift structure going in in Maynooth was deemed exempted also incredibly, different council interpretation of the rules of course. But taking up parking spaces/grassland for substations probably won't be considered exempt anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The Planning and Development Act, 2000, Section 4 says this about exemptions:

    (2) (a) The Minister may by regulations provide for any class of development to be exempted development for the purposes of this Act where he or she is of the opinion that—

    (i) by reason of the size, nature or limited effect on its surroundings, of development belonging to that class, the carrying out of such development would not offend against principles of proper planning and sustainable development, or

    That provision really should be exercised to exempt OHLE installation and trackwork by default, but I think the location and construction of substations shouldn’t be exempted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Ah fair enough. It isn't as unfeasible as I initially thought in that case. However like you say their plan is for OHLE and there definetly is a reason for that. My thoughts about BEMUs on the western lines we purely just from the suggestion of using BEMUs instead of OHLE. I hope long term BEMUs was never the plan, and that it wont be considered for any reasonably frequent commutter service.

    Truthfully I don't ever expect to see BEMUs on western or southwestern DART services. There are enough works, not to mention acquiring sets for the services, that by the time it will be ready for services I don't think there would be any point.

    All that said I will be curious to see what happens to the BEMUs when/if they are no longer needed for DART services. I assume there are no concrete plans yet because there are a number of possible options as well as some infrastructure up in the air, such as OHLE extensions to Wicklow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭scrabtom


    Isn't there's talks of using some of the BEMUs down in Cork before they can't out in overhead lines down there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Electrification in Cork may end up being incompatible with these trains (off topic, but 1500 V isn't a good choice for the national network, and unlike Dublin, Cork isn't big enough to be kept as an exception, so will most likely follow whatever is used nationally)

    I think it's more likely that the BEMUs will stay in Dublin, and be used for extension services one or two stops beyond the electrified area of W and SW. The length under battery power will be so short here in relation to the electrified route length that charging at the terminus might not even be needed: regeneration from braking would be sufficient for the battery to be charged by the time it leaves the electrified area.

    IÉ also have an option to convert the BEMU trains back to EMUs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭PlatformNine


    There is talk about using BEMUs in Cork for CACR where I think it was reccomended to use before OHLE were in place, but also about using BEMUs in Limerick where LSMATS reccomends it as an alternative to OHLEs. However depending on a number of things I could see them using BEMUs in limerick for a few years ahead of proper electrification, mainly because the 2800s only have so many years left, and unless they recieve the 29Ks they will need new sets before any OHLE could be in place.

    However I don't believe it is planned to use DART BEMUs in Cork. Like KrisW1001 said there is the potential for different specs being required, but also the Dublin might still need all of the DART sets they recieve. Also transporting the sets to Cork wouldn't be an easy task either, but if it was simply between buying new sets (that weren't otherwise needed) and transporting existing sets, Im sure they could find a decent way of doing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,458 ✭✭✭highdef


    Some abbreviations are fairly common knowledge here due to their frequent mentioning but others are a bit less obvious to me. What does CACR and LSMATS stand for and where I can see them previously mentioned in this chat as it would obviously not be expected of everyone reading here to understand what they mean. Cheers and thank you.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,712 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    CACR - Cork Area Commuter Rail

    LSMATS - Limerick Shannon Metropolitan Area Transport Strategy



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,771 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    CACR - Cork Area Commuter Rail

    LSMATS - Limerick Shannon Metropolitan Area Transport Strategy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    CACR = Cork Area Commuter Rail. That’s IÉ’s term, probably chosen to prevent it being called “CART”

    …MATS = Metropolitan Area Transport Strategy

    • CMATS: Cork
    • LSMATS: Limerick, Shannon
    • WMATS: Waterford

    Unsurprisingly, no such strategy exists for Galway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    A strategy for Galway is sadly caught up in the interminable fight over the bypass. The city will fall behind the others as a result and the West will be left behind once again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    I'm not sure 'Cacker' sounds much better than Cart. 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I am trying to pronounce that in a Cork accent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭DoctorPan


    Cork Area Commuter Rail

    Limerick Shannon Metropolitan Transport Study



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭PlatformNine


    CACR(Cork Area Commuter Rail) is a plan developed as a part of CMATS(Cork Metropolitan Area Transport Strategy) to develop a DART like service for Cork. The goal is to completely transform rail transport in the Cork Metropolitan Area, and is split into 2 phases. Phase 1 was more or less the "prep phase" and included twin tracking the rest of the network and signalling upgrades. Phase 2 is a proper overhall and includes expanding the network with new stations, electrification, a new depot, and of course a new much larger fleet.

    LSMATS(Limerick Shannon Metropolitan Area Transport Strategy) has a similar plan for Limerick City. However unlike in Cork there hasn't been a "LSCAR" programme developed yet. There are a few reasons for this, but I think it mainly breaks down to there not currently being enough demand and by extension IE having more important projects to focus on. Because if this the LSMATS suggestions might be delivered more independently than they are in Cork. Some of the improvements that will likely be delivered sooner include twin tracking Limerick-Limerick Jcn, Signalling improvements, and the Phase 1 network which includes new Moyross and Ballysimon stations, as well as frequency upgrades (likely through signalling and passing loop).

    It is a bit off topic for the thread, but it is closely related to D+ because the delivery of D+ is delivered and especially how well BEMU services perform will likely have a large impact on the future of the rail network and projects.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 80 ✭✭PH0NER


    This is obviously a stupid question, but is any progress being made on D+ West? The last updates I can find from news sources comes from last year. I'm curious if there's any movement on the depot issue which seems to be the primary problem for the upgrades.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,750 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Nothing public, but there are suggestions that the new design (on the same or a new site) for the depot will be out "soon".

    That'll have to go to ABP or possibly a council for conventional planning (where it will almost certainly end up appealed to ABP) - the 29000 maintenance depot in Drogheda was done as conventional planning.

    Plus there's also apparently a design for Kilcock due…



Advertisement