Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1488489491493494518

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 122 ✭✭AX636


    That would be warranty work from volvo DB do the same



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,739 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    That is impressive, it shows the advantage of a larger operator, though obviously a strange thing to have to bring them over from the UK, it can't be cheap. Aircoach/First Group have done similar in the past with buses/coaches and drivers from the UK. Though yes, they shouldn't have left it get that bad.

    From Bustimes it looks like the number of out of service buses has dropped substantially and continues to drop day by day. 28 today down from 70+ last week. I'd guess they aren't too far off normal levels now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 291 ✭✭Stephen Gawking


    The mechanic aspect of go aheads 'reasoning' is only part of the reason for so many cancellations. A large backlog of repair & maintenance work built up but buses with serious defects were being sent out in service over driver objections. This happened repeatedly.

    The NTA told them services had to operate. Concerns were raised to the RSA who arrived unannounced in Ballymount to check & they told them to repair said buses before they were allowed back into service. For obvious reasons there is no way go ahead management will highlight this, like lots of workplaces what can be git away with will be got away with I suppose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭jd


    So in Northwood "new departure" stop was removed, and departure moved back across the road. Buses pick up for town at the terminus/lay by, and do a u-turn at the roundabout to head out the Ballymun gate.

    I talked to an inspector, there is an inspector at the Northwood terminus from 8am to 10 am.

    Problems with the timetabling are causing some bunching, and some drivers are being told to go to the IKEA terminus for their break.

    Loss of footpaths due to the construction work by Cairn Homes is resulting in a lot of people walking on the roads, including at the roundabouts, this is giving raise to H&S concerns.

    There may be changes in the bust stop locations/lay out, it is a WIP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,618 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    So Go-Ahead were cutting corners and putting public safety at risk. No doubt they were probably putting drivers under pressure to drive these death traps and they'd point the finger at the driver if there was to be an accident.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭john boye


    If this is true then I'm not surprised. There's been a noticeable deterioration in the condition of their fleet in the last 12-18 months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 229 ✭✭BusGuy


    I highly doubt they'll get any PA's anytime soon…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    The condition of their buses since they begun on the L26 route a few weeks ago have always looked filthy dirty as well. Someone in the NTA/Go-Ahead need to up the cleaning & maintenance standards asap before things get worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 229 ✭✭BusGuy


    The 75 was terrible, you've had dirt and trash in between seats too…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,062 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    That sounds highly implausible, like canteen gossip, which is rife in every bus company (no driver will admit this, but it's because it's such an easy job, with so much downtime, that you've little else to do but moan about "management"). What I've heard is that their mechanical problems involve serious stuff like engine and gearbox failures, as opposed to safety issues. They've been doing the basics, services, regular safety checks, etc, but letting other stuff fall by the wayside. The kind of stuff that eventually catches up with you. If the RSA really called around, then surely they would also have paid Dublin Coach a visit at some point over the last few years. I've heard of drivers at Go Ahead and Dublin Bus being told to drive with orange warning lights, but never anything dangerous.

    Either their wash isn't working, or shunters are driving too quickly through it. It's positioned in a bad spot, too near the gate, so that buses end up queuing onto Ballymount Road at night. Drive past there between midnight and 1am any weekday night and you'll see the queue. Their overtime bill must be through the roof. And yes, I was driving behind one yesterday and noticed that only one half the bus appeared to have been washed. With the spotlight on them, you'd think they'd at least try to get that right.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,062 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    That's the clientele, unfortunately. Certain routes were worse than others, but I always remember the 75 having a much higher proportion of what can only be described as absolute scum. Especially on weekends and during school holidays. Some days, there literally wouldn't be a clean seat on the bus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 229 ✭✭BusGuy


    I mean if a bus was going through Tallaght, then good luck of having a clean seat…

    It's good to see PA's operating on the L25 today…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    About €5 million in fines have been issued from the NTA to Dublin Bus & Go-Ahead Ireland over fresh complaints about ghost buses since the E-Spine came out 2 weeks ago.

    Also in the news about BusConnects; a councillor in the Glencullen Sandyford area was saying to the Irish Independent that residents in Kilternan were not happy with them losing the 63 bus to Dún Laoghaire.

    Many of these passengers are students who went to school or college on the 63 bus. I am not sure if they were students attending Cabinteely Community School & IADT in Bakers Corner.

    The 63 bus used to go along Pottery Road between Bakers Corner and Cabinteely to maybe pick them up to bring them into school or college & then do the reverse journey home in the afternoon and evenings.

    I think the students in this case now may have to take an extra bus to get them to school or college or to walk from the bus stop to the school or college throughout the week.

    A lot of the other passengers who were impacted by the loss of the 63 were complaining about the loss of the direct link to Dún Laoghaire.

    If those passengers were relying on transfers on the Dart at Dun Laoghaire on their morning commute throughout the week. They have now said to the councillor that they have to use private transport to do their morning commute from now on.

    EDIT: The Irish Independent article is here.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,845 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Anyone writing to Anne Graham is wasting their time. She's retired from her role.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,270 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Probably hard to measure, but I wonder how many previous bus users (before BusConnects) have moved to cars/private transport since the roll out affected them.

    Another site talked about the E spine buses not being able to cope with demand; school kids waiting up to an hour to get on a bus because they are all passing full, because the frequency has reduced vs pre-BusConnects.

    Parents will then just drive them to school and you cant blame them. Same with this example in the article.

    The principle of connecting buses makes sense, only IF the connections are reliable.

    For those commuters that used to get a single bus to and from their destination that are now expected to change buses, knowing that there are likely to be delays or cancellations on both routes, you really cant blame them for driving the car instead.

    It does appear that BusConnects has lost the room, as far as a lot of commuters are concerned.

    Can we ever just get on with it and build a bloody Metro!

    A metro population of 2.3 million people and growing is just not going to function on 2 tramlines, a coastal train and buses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,044 ✭✭✭Polar101


    Are these new single deckers the same kind of buses that were briefly seen on the 39a route a few months ago?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,618 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    From my experience on the Northside, more people than ever are using the bus. We have a brand new N4 route which is 24 hours a day and is loading extremely well at all times of the day. Providing useful connections throughout the Northside.

    The N2 is bedding in and GAI problems aside is bringing new pax.

    I believe the 24 E spine on the Ballymun Road will give people more options for their journeys that previously had to be taken by car. And even the recently started 19 will give thousands of airport workers and residents travelling a new option to the airport which had to be taken by car.

    Some routes are heavily loaded for sure, especially the N11 but that has always been the way. Changing the number and letter isn’t going to solve those problems.

    To make matters worse for the south side, the upgrade of the green line luas to a proper metro has been put on ice and DART coastal south effectively binned. Unfortunately filling column inches isn’t going to resolve it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,270 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    What were the plans for DART coastal south?

    Are there any plans to connect the Luas at Brides Glen to the DART at Shankill?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,739 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Bus passengers numbers in Dublin increased by an absolutely incredible 24% from 2023 to 2024!

    That is an absolutely incredible increase and shows that BusConnects is a wild success.

    Change may mean you lose some bus users to car, but you may gain other passengers who now find the route faster or more convenient. You have to look at the net balance, not individual users.

    In 2024, buses in Dublin carried more passengers then it has ever, 5% more then the previous record in 2019.

    The NTA does yearly surveys of how people get into the city and the surveys show car modal share drops every year. With more and more people walking/cycling and taking public transport every year.

    I agree with bikeman1, the BusConnects changes have been a big success on the Northside, the n4 and n2 are fantastic (though I wish the n2 had better off peak frequency) and while pre BusConnects the 41 going 24/7 was great.

    I do worry though that much of the improvement has come from badly needed orbital and 24/7 routes, but I’m concerned with how much more can be squeezed out of the peak time radial route capacity. It feels like the radial routes are already at pretty much max capacity.

    Sure the interlined route timetables might balance capacity a bit better and give you a percentage boost and the infrastructure side might add some capacity too. But really enough to keep up with demand?

    We badly need Metrolink and DART+ and I believe we need to start planning to convert the busiest radial routes like the N11 and Swords Road to Luas lines.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,671 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Dart South: close all the level crossings and improve capacity between Greystones & Bray. It looks like just the Greystones bit is going ahead but they haven't even published the plan yet.

    Luas: Cherrywood to Bray Dart is in the long term plan, mid 2030s possibly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,008 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    I would say some of that 24% is more people back working in the office rather than at home too mind you



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,792 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It is far more to do with the rollout of the additional orbital services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,618 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    That's the thing about bus connects in general. The orbitals have been a big success the rest of the changes less so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,270 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I wonder when the modelling suggests that the buses will reach capacity, based on the projected population growth.

    If the capacity is due to be reached in the next 10 years, its hard to see any new rail/luas infrastructre being live by 2035, bar the tiny Green line extension to Finglas.

    Car ownership is also increasing. We have record numbers of cars on the roads.

    All forms of transport are increasing because of the population increase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,270 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Thanks. I really cant see a rail extension built in 10 years though. If we have broken ground ny 2035 we would be doing well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,671 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Fingluas was brought forward. The Bray extension is relatively simple, so might move up the list.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,792 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well the main point of BusConnects is the expansion of the orbitals - they represent the lion’s share of the increase in services and additional network coverage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,819 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    It would be interesting to know what the like-for-like increase in usage is for each spine, stripping out the totally new services such as new orbitals or 24h services where none previously existed before.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51 ✭✭jmcgold


    This may have been asked and answered already (though I can't see it anywhere), but what is preventing the routing of more buses through the phoenix park? I would have thought the 37 route in particular would be more efficient if it could cut through the park rather than meander around the navan road/blackhorse avenue - even if it were only a proportion of buses on that route that did it (e.g. 37a through park, 37b existing route) - is it primarily the absence of bus lanes?



Advertisement