Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Senior ministers concerned about effects of Occupied Territories Bill.

145791024

Comments

  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 7,022 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Aris


    Mod warning:

    Good evening

    I deleted a couple of one liner posts that didn't offer anything, they were just people sniping at each other.

    I would strongly advise everyone to calm down. Some of you get awfully close to warning territory. If you find yourselves too frustrated, call it a night. Tomorrow is another day.

    Thank you.

    2025 gigs: Selofan, Alison Moyet, Wardruna, Gavin Friday, Orla Gartland, The Courettes, Nine Inch Nails, Rhiannon Giddens, New Purple Celebration, Nova Twins



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,199 ✭✭✭Rubberchikken


    There are many countries with conflicts/starving kids/boys etc and yet it's taken gaza to drag people out whinging and our incompetent goverpassing useless sanctimonious look-at-us bills. Why I wonder.

    I don't agree with people being bombed but I don't agree with terrorists killing innocents either so I support Israel in defending themselves.

    BBut I take great umbrage with that iron taoiseach and his cabinet worrying their empty heads about other countries when they're driving ours down the drain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,514 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    israel is not defending themselves, never really has been in reality.
    i would save your support for somewhere like ukrain because israel definitely doesn't deserve your support, it disrespects and is ungreatful to everyone.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 324 ✭✭Kiteview


    It is. There’s a war on there and Israel is dealing with enemies that continually attack it, just as the Allies in 44 and 45 defended themselves from the Nazis and the Imperial Japanese by utterly destroying their ability to attack the Allied nations. Doing so didn’t make the Allies the “bad guys” and the Nazis and the Imperial Japanese the “good guys”…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,608 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    So you agree those guilty of war crimes in both Sudan and Israel should be held to account. Since you are not using the genocide in Sudan to excuse Israel , but to merely point out the hypocrisy of the left. No doubt for balance in your next post you will criticise those on the right defending Israeli war criminals. With this in mind you must have been appalled when Bibi was feted in Washington, considering your digust at the far left cosying up to unsavoury types and being indifferent to the Sudan genocide. Well done on your consistency regarding genocide and not using the Sudan issue to score political points, zerosquared.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,344 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Virtue signalling to who exactly? Every single party in the Dáil (to the best of my knowledge) supports the passing of the bill. The entire parliament consisting of 174 government and opposition TDs are 'virtue signallers'?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,491 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    But Saudi Arabia is presumably acting in its own interests and the interests of SA are, obviously, not the interests of Ireland. So, again, it doesn't seems that "What are the Saudis doing?" is a question that will cast much light on what we think Ireland ought to do.

    (For what it's worth, the argument that SA, US and others are "adhering to the doctrine of non-interference" is not a very compelling one. The context here is that Israel is illegal occupation of territory not its own and, as the occupying power, is in violation of its obligations under the Geneva Conventions. Thus the principle of non interference is being profoundly and systematically violated. A state which ignores this, or even supports it, far from adhering to the doctrine of non-interference, is undermining it.

    To be fair to the US and the Saudis, I don't think either of them have ever claimed that there position in relation to the occupied territories is driven by respect for the doctrine of non-interference. But they would expose themselves to a high degree of ridicule if they did make that claim.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭j62


    I have repeatedly stated Israel committed war crimes

    But you see the left doesn’t care about 4x black people being genocided by Arab Islamists in same timeframe in Sudan

    You wouldn’t even denounce them while demanding denouncing of Israel

    Yourself and Palestinian brigade better take a good look at yourselves as to why you are so upset about Palestine but deliberately avoiding mentions of much worse genocide by Islamists

    Is it anti semitism? Pro Islamism? Plain racism based on skin colour? Indifference?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Which begs the question as to why Ireland is not acting in its own interests.

    https://www.independent.ie/business/israel-and-us-will-retaliate-if-ireland-passes-occupied-territories-bill-says-fine-gael-mep-regina-doherty/a1294023543.html

    "MEP Regina Doherty said she would expect a reaction from Israel if the bill is passed, “to teach us a lesson, to say: ‘You can’t take these unilateral actions and not expect to have ramifications.’

    "We have in excess of €1bn worth of goods being imported into Israel, and I would expect some impact on that.”"

    "Ms Doherty said there is particular concern over security software which has been developed by an Israeli software firm and that is used by Irish banks."

    Why is it ok for Saudi and the US to act in their own interests and the interests of their people and not develop their own OTB, while it is a requirement for Ireland to act against their own interests and the interests of their people by putting in place a futile Bill that will threaten our interests? Bizarre that we are even contemplating this bill.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,688 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Cowardly? Maybe tell us what risk you personally are putting yourself at by posting anonymously on a discussion forum?

    This sort of pointless moral grandstanding makes it hard to take your opinions seriously. If you think it’s cowardly to express one opinion on this site, then expressing an opposing one is being brave. Which is laughable.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,523 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Funny, usually when ALL politicians are actually for something, you know somethin is "off."

    It's simple: none of them want to stick their necks out and say what they really think….It's too delicate a situation. Nobody wants to be labeled as someone who "supports" the killing of children, because this is absolutely what will be said to anyone not supporting the bill….said very much in the wrong!!!!

    it comes back to my belief that there is a whole lotta fake concern portrayed by people here….and plenty agree with this



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,344 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    It's too simplistic an explanation. If there was genuine disquiet and discomfort around the bill, there's no way you'd have the entire parliament on board. Israel as a foreign policy issue appears to have unified the left, the centre and the right in Irish politics. Trying to put the whole thing down to 'virtue signalling' and peer pressure is surely inaccurate - the prolonged violent attack on Gaza / Palestine (not to mention several other countries) by an out of control far right Israeli government was probably always going to produce this response, given the historical sympathy for Palestinians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,523 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    But the bill will have next to no impact on what Israel is doing, but could vey well have an impact here for us….this tells me that the bill is nothing more than a weak/lame virtue-sigalling (look at us, aren't we great).

    So bloody eager to show our "concern" that we aren't properly considering the potential damage to us….we're too concerned with showing everyone else how caring we are…..absolutely no need for the bill…pointless, but potentially damaging (to us).

    Post edited by walshb on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,688 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Israel as a foreign policy issue appears to have unified the left, the centre and the right in Irish politics.


    You mean like abortion did for decades? No peer pressure or virtue signalling there? 🤨

    Trying to put the whole thing down to 'virtue signalling' and peer pressure is …

    …the most logical explanation. It’s not as though it hasn’t happened repeatedly in Irish political life.

    And that perceived unity of opinion is exactly how peer pressure and virtue signalling work.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Au contraire, if there was genuine support and genuine comfort around the bill, it wouldn't still be languishing in the Dail since 2018 when a version was first tabled. Seven years of delays tells me quite clearly that there is genuine disquiet and discomfort around the bill, at least in some quarters.

    One of our most distinguished former diplomats was very critical of the Bill in recent days, are you dismissing his views?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,344 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    It's totally understandable that there would have been much less appetite across the spectrum for passing the bill between 2018 and October 2023. But the events of the last 16 months have been so horrific that the political mood has clearly changed dramatically.

    I'm bemused to hear people worried about what the US response might be. Trump has spent the last week threatening numerous friends and allies such as Canada, Mexico, Denmark, the EU and NATO members with trade wars and tariffs and even with invasion. The idea that something like the OTB will concern him hardly holds up (he probably couldn't give a flying fig whether we pass it or not).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,523 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    There are politicians skirting around the issue of support for the bill. Not outright saying that it's a crock a sh1t, but alluding to this when they mention possible ramifications to its passing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I think the political mood in the last few weeks has changed back. Israel withdrawing its Ambassador has had an effect. Nobody in politics believed they would resort to that. They did, and with Trump backing Israel, and a loose cannon, I suspect the OTB will be long-fingered again. There are so many potential legal issues that it can be repeatedly sent back for redrafting. I don't see the particular group of independents that will support the government making a big deal about it either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,186 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    There are plenty of cowardly politicians who reflect a lot of people. This does not make the decision wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Any politician who stands up to the wrong-headed public mob and says that this OTB is bad for Ireland is hardly cowardly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,186 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    I wonder will Trump take any action here? I'd say they are quaking in the Vatican.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/world/2025/0109/1489856-israel-gaza/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,688 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    It’s the very worst form of Student Union politics - a bunch of pretentious frauds who prefer to make grandiose statements on issues over which they have no power whatsoever rather than bother with the boring grind of actually working to resolve their constituents’ problems.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Remind me again how many American MNCs support the economy of the Vatican?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,186 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    That's your opinion and you are entitled to it. However I see it as a great and correct decision and the fact that it irks so many genocide supporters makes it even better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,186 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    I didn't count them but probably a good many -

    https://fortune.com/2020/12/08/council-for-inclusive-capitalism-with-the-vatican/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,186 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    I didn't notice your hero, Eamon Ryan, saying anything against it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,103 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    Mustn't upset our American masters, sur it's only a bit of Genocide.

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Last I checked, there were 0 employees of American MNCs in the Vatican. Perhaps you know as a few.

    As always, it is those who have no stake in something that make the loudest noise.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 7,022 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Aris


    Can I ask a question for those with better knowledge on the topic?

    If passed, what exactly would that mean in day-to-day terms?

    Reading from the 2018 bill text on the House of Oireachtas site (hopefully this is the correct source), it mentions occupied territories as confirmed by ICC, ICJ or international tribunals. In this case this would mean the West Bank, right?

    From that I would understand that if goods are generated in other areas of Israel (i.e. Tel Aviv, Haifa etc.), they are not covered by the bill. That would hardly consistute a boycott of Israel. Chances are a very small (if any) volume of goods coming from Israel would be from the West Bank, I'm open to correction though.

    It just feels like a token bill, that will have very limited applicability and might not be easily enforceable either.

    2025 gigs: Selofan, Alison Moyet, Wardruna, Gavin Friday, Orla Gartland, The Courettes, Nine Inch Nails, Rhiannon Giddens, New Purple Celebration, Nova Twins



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,186 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Ah so it's for personal reasons that you don't want a genocide and war crimes called out. I see. Lives mean nothing as long as you are collecting your shilling.



Advertisement