Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1371372374376377394

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    By the way, I don’t think it’s been mentioned here, but it appears the new DART trains will be the “90000 Class”. Here’s the first fully-assembled train at Inchicore, number 90501:

    image.png

    The previous single-car mockup shown earlier this year was given the number “90101”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,366 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    90101 is on the other end

    Two separate classes

    90x01 through 90x31 (Battery)

    80x01 through 80x06 will appear also in due course, 80x07-80x26 look likely to be ordered soon (No Battery)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭PlatformNine


    The point of the battery hybrids is that they will act as a stopgap while the lines are being electrified. Even in the best case scenario electrifying even just one line would take much longer than ordering and commissioning a BEMU. And in particular, electrifying all the way to Wicklow town is likely a ways away, if they even electrify it at all.

    Without them, there would likely be a few years where service just couldn't be increased on some lines because of a lack of available sets. The biggest short term benifit the BEMUs will allow is for better service to Drogheda, which will then allow all the 29K Drogheda services to instead to be used for Maynooth line services.

    After the main DART network is electrified, they can either continue to use the BEMUs, using them for the long distance commuter/regional services (Mullingar, Dundalk, and Arklow I think will all be within range). Or if compatible, they could reuse the batteries in 22Ks, I don't know if they would be, but if they are it would be a good way to repurpose them.

    Say what you want about it not being a good long term solution, but short term it will massively benifit Dublin, and by extension the BEMU tech will also be used for similar reasons to benifit Cork and potentially Limerick commutter rail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭PlatformNine


    It seems its going to be the same numbering scheme as the 29Ks with the 3rd number corresponding to the carriage number in the set? There is an interior picture on the previous page of the thread that shows an interior car with 90201, so I assume that is what they are planning.

    Also, I don't think it relates to the unit number, but I can't seem to find what it means. What is the number on the far left for? the 01? I never noticed until I saw the new units, but looking at pictures the 22Ks, 29Ks, 2600s, and 2800s all seem to have some 0X number.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,798 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    It's part of the EVN, the 071s and 201s have something similar (0117 and 0110/0210/0310 respectively).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭gjim


    My concern with the battery hybrid is that there are no (or was no - when the decision was made) examples elsewhere of such a configuration being used in an actual highish frequency/capacity metro heavy rail system in a city of Dublin's size ballpark. So IE are effectively the first movers with this technology.

    While I'm a big fan of battery tech generally and don't see obvious reliability or operational issues arising from it's use for metro-heavy rail - but as a matter of principle, I think that relatively small players like IE should hang back a bit when it comes to novel rail technologies - the concentration of risk is much higher for them.

    Having said that I think timing has forced IE's hand a bit here - older stock reaching end-of-life and the DART+ expansion has forced taking on the risk of a novel train power system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I will admit as excited as I am to see the BEMUs enter service, I can't say Im not at least a bit nervous. My biggest hope is that because Alstom don't seem to shy away from using the D+ units as a showcase for their BEMU tech, they will work closely with IE so all goes well.

    I will say I don't think there is a large risk from the BEMUs as in the worst case, they can just have the batteries removed and be used as regular EMUs on the existing DART network. Which if the BEMUs work well I believe IE is considering for Cork and Limerick before any OHLE electrification. Short term it would be bad for Drogheda commuters as they would be stuck with the current frequency, as well Maynooth commuters as they wouldn't recieve cascaded 29Ks. But its better than putting an untested battery set on a completely unelectrified line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    There's a good chance that at end of life of the battery packs, or even earlier, many of the BEMUs will simply be converted to EMU units instead of going forward for a battery replacement. These would stay in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,718 ✭✭✭Praetorian


    Thanks for the replies. I really hope the bemu's work out. I want Irish Rail to succeed as much as anyone. I have the same concerns as mentioned by others. We are the guinea pigs on this technology. I think 80 km range is awful, and I can imagine situations where the units get stranded and have to be pulled out of trouble by old reliable 071's.

    We had years to electrify. We could have had all the whole line(s) ready to go before the first train shipped from Poland.

    I can't get over how long we have been waiting for Dart on the Northern line. Arguably the service is worse now than it was years ago. I'm amazed by our motorway network and only imagine if we had put 1/4 of the money / effort into our railways where we would be by now.

    The sooner I don't have to catch a headache inducing 29k the better for my sanity…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,798 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    The big thing was that we, as a country, had no interest in investing in rail for such a long time. That looks to be changing with DART+ but my fear now is that the NIMBYs could derail the project (pun not intended).



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Keep in mind that 80km is double the distance they will be travelling. It is only 40km between Malahide and Drogheda and they will be leaving fully charged at both ends.

    In terms of worries of battery degradation and performance in cold weather, that is all modelled into the battery size chosen. If you read the docs on this they modelled in significant buffer and also modelled the expected battery degradation over time. The expected range is actually covered by the contract with Alstom, so lets say they degrade faster then expected then it is on Alstom to replace the batteries.

    I do agree with you that when we built DART, we should never have stopped, we should have continued the electrification gradually north and south and then start west. This should have been gradually done over the last 30 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    80 km range isn’t “awful”: it’s exactly what IÉ specified when ordering these BEMUs from Alstom. If greater range was required, they’d have ordered larger batteries (or the same batteries with a more aggressive replacement schedule).

    It's 37.5 km from Malahide to Drogheda. That is the longest possible distance the train has to travel to reach an electrified stretch or a charging station. Travelling that distance is never going to deplete the battery (if the battery doesn’t charge at Drogheda, the train will stay there and be replaced).

    Adding more battery makes the train heavier, which increases operating cost. This isn’t an electric car where buyers are fooled into buying 500 km+ of range despite never, ever haven driven more than 200 km a day; these trains operate in a controlled, managed system, where the operator knows exactly what distances they travel, and how often; and they are serviced and re-charged to a strict schedule. The battery has been sized at 2x the typical distance between charging opportunities. Braking regeneration allows the train to add about 40 km of range to its battery while operating in the electrified stretch: traction power is drawn from overhead, and the energy recovered from braking tops up the battery (on a pure EMU, this recovered energy is fed back into the overhead lines for other trains to use).

    “Range” isn’t a problem. The concerns are more long-term. One likely risk is that real-world use may result in faster degradation of battery capacity than was predicted, but this is completely fixable, most likely at Alstom’s cost, and all it means in practice is that the batteries have to be replaced after, say, 8 years instead of 12. It’s also as likely that battery degradation will be lower than predicted - our climate is actually quite gentle on Lithium batteries.

    The BEMUs are not a permanent solution - they are a medium term (~10 years) risk reduction measure, so that all commuter services from Drogheda can be switched to electric trains, even if the planned line electrification to Drogheda is delayed. Switching commuter services to electric trains is essential to make the best use of limited line capacity: electric trains can run with shorter headways than diesels, and that means more slots per hour.

    The alternative situation would be that no capacity improvements at all could be made until Malahide-Drogheda was electrified, despite continuing growth in demand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,366 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Alstom are on the hook for the batteries and 80km range at 10 years is the deal. Those batteries will be replaced and possibly used for line side battery farms to supply charging infrastructure. The battery units, 8 in total are thermally controlled to optimise performance

    80km range is really good and the units in factory fresh condition will probably manage over 100km. In theory if you ran all stops Drogheda Bray (which isn't the plan) the units could run all day up and down without need to charge at all, the energy recovered during braking would be enough on its own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,366 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    And we have done this before

    1936-1949 we had battery powered trains trundling up and down between Dublin and Bray, no recorded incidents of running out of juice, though did do Gorey Connolly return on a single charge once and limped home



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,584 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    I don't think that's really relevant for these new trains.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,098 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    No, not for these new trains. But from a historical point of view, it’s nice to know we had a battery train running, almost a hundred years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,718 ✭✭✭Praetorian


    I'm going to hold you all responsible in the coming years when we start having issues with these trains ;)

    Like BK said, we should have just electrified years ago. Even the extra cost of these bemu's now is sickening to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    We should have done lots of things, but can't go back and change things. So from where we actually are, rather than where we would be in some ideal world, the BEMUs are a very good move.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭Ireland trains




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 160 ✭✭OisinCooke


    Once the whole DART+ network is electrified, the batteries will likely, as @goingnowhere suggested, become stationary lineside battery farms for the charging infra and presumably some will be sent to Galway, Cork or Limerick for commuter services there, but you’d wonder if they’ll keep a few sets with batteries in the GDA to operate a skeleton service in the event of a temporary power shortage/cut or storm (or vandalism for that matter) damage to the OHLE…? Would it be worth their while to do this? How does the DART currently work during a power outage?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    If you wanted BEMUs as backup, surely you'd have to retain the batteries in all current and future units. There would be no point in having backup for only a small portion of DART capacity as that backup would be quickly overwhelmed and the system would stop functioning anyway. It's a mute point anyway as if power was lost, all pure EMUs already out would be unable to move and prevent the BEMUs from operating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,000 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    I'm hearing ABP has granted a railway order to the DART+ South West scheme. I'll post more as I find out



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭scrabtom


    Tremendous



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,584 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    quicker than Dart West. I think they also just approved another Busconnects corridor so maybe the logjam is clearing.

    It's notable that 2 of the Dart+ ROs have gone to ABP and been approved and they still haven't even started the consultation on Dart+ South…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,000 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    DART+ South is unofficially canned. It may be broke into two projects, one to improve Bray to Greystones and one to address the D4 level crossings, the later will of course never happen, you'd be facing the same residents that took a temporary covid cycle lane to the high court and got a judge to say that a local authority was lying, which afaik has never happened in Ireland, judges usually have to accept that local authorities or govt departments are truthful if there is no evidence to the contrary. Basically these people are untouchable in our common law system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭Economics101


    That's why I am not impressed at the 80 km range. Battery technology has improved by orders of magnitude since the 1930s, and the improvement in range of the BEMUs seems to be modest by comparison. What are the specific factors which account for this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    South is going to be contentious. It needs the removal of level crossings in the south city, but restricting car access in the wealthiest parts of Dublin isn’t going to go down well with the sort of people who like the cut of Michael McDowell’s jib.

    Best to get West, North and Southwest approved and building, and then people along the South corridor will start complaining that they’re being left out by all this improvement, and the positive voices might outweigh the NIMBYs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 230 ✭✭Bsharp


    Also just heard south West has a railway order as well which is great.

    South will be split between the Enhancements around Bray + Greystones and the Level Crossings. It makes sense from a delivery perspective. The LCs will be bogged down in challenges for years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    The article mentions adding tracks to the northern line but is that study into the feasibility of it ever going to actually be published?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,773 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    They said they are planning to publish it early next year.



Advertisement