Dispute with mod

It certainly is - and very odd, given that I was told by a poster that I was "white knighting on the internet" and had no interest in the topic being discussed except in the service of my own agenda, and I got a 24 hour ban (again from Beasty) for mentioning the comment (to disagree with it) - a comment that was made about me!

So he's allowed to say that I don't care - unlike you! - and I'm not even allowed to say he's wrong.

(I'm currently banned from the forum so can't see if the original comment about me is still visible - but I bet it is.)

Jeez, here we go. Was impressed with how quiet it has been in here and in “Dispute Resolution”. Mostly just been, multiple, users looking for regional forum access. And people, continuously, say the site is dead?!

Wasn’t there a load of new rules set up for CA after a load of you complained about it? The vocal minority got their way and now that it’s not working out how they like it’s time to attack the mods…again.

Here we go, Mr SJW himself, like clockwork, you gunning for a moderator position or something?

How about leaving it to posters who have disputes with a mod on certain issues and keeping out of it.

_____________________________________

Warned: Backseat modding

And you think it’s the mod, or admins, who are the problem?

Thank you for your valuable input

Did you get many sanctions yourself emmet?

_______________________________________

Warned: Offtopic.

Same here, I've had similar issue with the mod in question, I was going to start a thread on here, but you beat me to it, so I figured why not use the same one to try and resolve the issue.

This is a public discussion on a message board site.

The OP said “Eager to get a resolution to this and to stop this carry on.” as such, I suggested a way to stop the carry on.

You should have been banned for your misleading username Fake Donald

Different rule for others I guess, whole problem with this forum imo.

It didn't concern you either?

I've also been previously banned for link dumps and/or breaking special stipulations in the election thread so no you're evidently not being specially targeted for bias or any other conspiracy theory. In fact you'll see a bit of a ban-wave around the timing of that post, all of people I'm reasonably certain you'd disagree with politically.

Not saying I was very happy with the ruling but lets dispel the myth its being applied with an abuse of bias.

And term limits? Boards is not a democracy.