Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1777778780782783943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    US, Canada, Australia, Switzerland all have indigenous industry, Ireland is almost exclusively reliant on FDI.

    That's the difference, and the risk in being a high wage economy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 350 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    This is a really important point. In the last 30 years the post-08 crash was nothing but a mere blip lasting between 2009-2013 but surrounded by growth in pretty much every other of the 26 years. It’s truly waiting for Godot to dwell on what was a sharp but very short-lived correction in the Irish property market which ended half a generation ago and trying to use that for context as to what could happen to the current market!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 350 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    A “recovery” in the property market; I didn’t realise it was in decline! These commentators are no better than us on Boards if they think the residential property market needed a recovery!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    All achieved by massive amounts of debt

    France debt downgraded yesterday, US looking like it could hit a Liz Truss moment at anytime. China is stockpilling gold, copper and oil. Russia nuclear saber rattling again. Never been so much visible risk out there yet.

    Jamie Dimon said last week that Goldma Sachs was not buying back anymore shares as they were too expensive. Later that week they hit a new high. Looks very blow off top mode

    The money printing and zero interest rate genie is getting found out

    If Dublin is classified as severely unaffordable and other cities are nearly twice as bad, that to me is a huge risk rather than a sign that this unaffordability can deteriorate for another decade

    Thanks @DataDude for doing the numbers



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Standard tax band 2018 €34,550

    Standard tax band 2024 €42,000

    21.5% increase



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I spent some time working as an investment adviser back around 2015/16 and at that point we were telling clients that every equity valuation metric was flashing red.

    Sure there will be another downturn, but timing it is almost impossible, and it will likely be relatively short lived. It’s factually just terrible advice to suggest hold off buying in the hopes of nominal price falls in property. It almost never happens, and what’s worse at the moment, the rental market is so expensive you need significant nominal falls to be better off.
    I’d confidently put the chances of this as less than 10% in a high wage inflation environment. I’m hopeful we will see 5-15% REAL reductions in prices over the medium term. But this still means prices go up in nominal terms.

    On your point of affordability in Dublin, it’s a great aspiration but it’s a bit farfetched. If you suggested that average income workers should be able to buy a new 3 bed semi in almost any other capital city, people in those countries would think you are mental.

    Dublin will continue as all other capitals do. Younger people on average wages rent in house shares or in state subsidised accom. A small percentage of people will earn/inhert enough to buy in the city. The majority will move a 45-120min commute outside the city when they want to start a family. Thats been the reality for decades around the world and looks strong favourite to remain so.

    Anticipating a fundamental change in the way the world works is fine to speculate on, but terrible to base your decisions on or worse - mislead desperate 20 something year olds into believing their pipe dream of average priced 300k gaffs in Dublin is going to come to fruition.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Apparently some progress is made on the long awaited crackdown on airbnbs, according to today's Irish Times:

    The plans to limit short-term letting would mean a person could not advertise a property on such platforms without a registration number. The aim of the legislation is to take as many as 12,000 properties out of the short-term letting sector and make them available to people seeking long-term rentals.

    Under the plans, property owners offering accommodation for periods of up to and including 21 nights will need to be registered with Fáilte Ireland. The tourism agency will monitor online platforms to ensure compliance with the obligation for advertised properties to have a valid registration number.

    Fáilte Ireland will have 10 staff monitoring websites for compliance with the registration rules. It will be able to levy a €300 fixed-penalty notice on property owners who advertise their property without a valid registration number.

    This is welcome news, though I'll believe it when I see it. I know there are many here who think airbnb is a nothingburger in grand scheme of housing issues, but since daft is currently listing only 1,756 properties for rent, it seems illogical that 12,000 additional properties would not have some impact on supply.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2024/06/03/short-term-letting-crackdown-bill-due-before-cabinet-after-concerns-boxed-off

    Post edited by hometruths on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    A bit baffling that you need 10 staff to monitor it. Simple IT solution.

    Does property have valid registration registration number

    Does registration number correspond with post code



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Vaguely remember some claim 5 or so years ago that the likes of AirBNB were being checked out. Think actual problem is council planning departments not enforcing the rules even after an offender has been identified.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    We had reports here of council staff and other public sector staff breaching these rules. Looking after there own, I suppose

    Separately the most recent public sector pay deal had assurances built in that AI would Not replace existing jobs. I wonder does extend to a few lines of programming code that eliminates the need to monitor



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    There was some talk that to solve this, Revenue would enforce it in future, which likely would have been very effective.

    Sadly I don't think Failte Ireland will have quite the same impact as Revenue!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Another one ex fianna fail now running as independent - Irish times

    Limerick election candidate sought €360,000 in ‘go-away money’, Galway developer claims

    Mr Pat O’Neill, who is from Clonmacken in Caherdavin, was a Fianna Fáil candidate in the 2019 local elections in North Limerick but left the party this year. He is now running as an Independent candidate in the June 7th elections.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It doesn’t say where the fines go, but if BF get to retain it, they may be far more motivated than any other department to gather fines.

    The problem wasn’t in the identification of the offender, it was catching them in the act. Under current legislation the LA have to catch the guest in situ and confirm the property owner is the Host. LAs do not have the personnel not funding to do this as outlined by DCC a few yours ago.

    What reports are you referring to?



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    It doesn’t say where the fines go, but if BF get to retain it, they may be far more motivated than any other department to gather fines.

    Good point. Hadn't considered that. Though I do wonder if airbnbs are considered a help or a hindrance from BF's point of view.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    @Dav010

    The problem wasn’t in the identification of the offender, it was
    catching them in the act. Under current legislation the LA have to catch
    the guest in situ and confirm the property owner is the Host. LAs do
    not have the personnel not funding to do this as outlined by DCC a few
    yours ago.

    Ah yes. Does beg the question of why legislation cannot be changed so that such legwork is not required. Worst-case use money laundering laws to find out who the host is.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Revenue already know who the host is with Airbnb as all income earned through the site is automatically forwarded to Revenue, but the Host may be someone renting the property rather than the owner. Leg work is required because advertising was not prohibited, whereas short letting is, ergo, they have to prove someone stayed in the property.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Unless airbnb hosts are earning income purely from people viewing ads, you'd have thought with details of income earned through the site, Revenue have some pretty strong proof that somebody stayed in the property.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Again, advertising on a site without planning was not prohibited, and a not an indicator of ownership. The current legislation punishes property owners, but the Host may be renting the property, so LAs not only have to catch the tenant there, they have to confirm that it was the owner who short let the property.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    So our government produced legislation, intended to improve rental supply for long term tenants, and that legislation decreed that it was illegal to buy a property and use it for short term lets, but not illegal to rent a property and use it for short term lets.

    No wonder we have a few issues with housing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,756 ✭✭✭tigger123


    Regardless of where your political leanings are, it was a very definitive position to take initially, and then its quite the u-turn.

    I heard the interview with Pat Leahy where she said it initially; she was very clear at that time what her position was. That in of itself was surpirsing and clearly signalled that she was chasing the votes of young (and not so young) renters. And also essentially ceding most home owning votes to the FFG.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Textbook case of trying to pretend government is a series ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ decisions that can keep everyone happy if you choose ‘correctly’ rather than the reality of it being a series of compromises. Prioritising one group over another etc.

    When pushed on the downsides of your policies you either have to directly contradict yourself (eg 300k houses) or live in fantasy land - we wouldn’t change immigration or ask communities permission…we’d just talk to them and ‘explain’ it to them and they’ll be fine with it (I’m not joking, this was her view).

    I wish Claire Byrne pushed her on the health system impacts of their tax policies reducing the net pay of every consultant doctor in the country by c.10% when we already can’t fill posts.

    I am kinda suprised how quickly they came off their cheap housing schtick though given how much support it brought them. If she was slightly better prepared she could have danced around it.

    Complaining is easy. Fixing is hard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Mary Lou had the easiest job in the world.

    Just keep quiet, maintain the status quo until the election and let FFG continue to shoot themselves in the foot.

    How it's all fallen apart in the past 4 months. Seems to be no consistency in their message, swinging one way and another over Palestine, immigration, economy, housing etc etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    This is a bit beside the matter at hand, and I'm not having a go at you, but can we please stop referring to politicians and senior civil servants by their given names? These people are not our friends, quite the opposite in fact.

    Post edited by RichardAnd on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,756 ✭✭✭tigger123


    No matter who's in Government, if the opposition was in power we'd live in a utopian society.

    The perspective from the opposition re migration really grinds my gears in particular. The basic position is that the Government nend to do whatever they're not doing, but they can't, becuase they're idiots.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,549 ✭✭✭arctictree


    The new Bord Failte registration will not make any difference. AirBnb owners will just register with BF, get a number and continue short term letting. You just have to tick a box to say that you have planning, you dont have to prove it.

    Also, Revenues only remit is to make sure that the tax is paid. Many AirBnb owners are tax compliant but not planning compliant.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,806 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Looks like an ECB rate cut is all but guaranteed to be announced tomorrow.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/05/european-central-bank-set-to-cut-rates-for-the-first-time-since-2019.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 350 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    They only need to cut rates and aim to keep inflation at 2%; there was no significant economic crash which warrants rates to now be cut dramatically so we won’t see many rate cuts. The funny money that has been hoovered up by the property market since the start of COVID through to early 2023 is probably still on fixed rates or only recently coming off fixed rates; the hundreds of euro extra payments each month are therefore only starting to materialise now. That will be a stress test for the property market over the rest of this year and into next year - to see if the higher rates actually managed to cool the huge price increases we keep seeing. €3/4/500 extra per month since 2020-2022 isn’t going to break the bank for most of those who were able to obtain significant mortgages where they will see these types of monthly repayment increases is my view; probably just wait an extra year to get the newer car as a sacrifice. Therefore, there is road to run in the property market in Ireland as rate cuts won’t do much to us compared to what they may do in other countries with traditionally much lower mortgage rates and where their economies have actually slowed much more than ours the last few years. Probably the election in Ireland coming later this year or early next year will be the next big market event to watch, especially if we see no majority government readily formed thereby creating a power vacuum with no government for a while will lead to less supply and more demand so higher prices. It is quite a bleak outlook for the market when we need to see it cool a bit so more supply comes on stream for people to move around more; upsizing, downsizing etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Presumably BF's ten strong enforcement staff might think to ask for evidence of planning permission before granting the number. It's not a exactly difficult thing to prove.

    Whether they do or not is another question. The point is ensuring compliance with the law that short term lets require planning permission to operate is not a particularly hard thing to enforce assuming there is a willingness to enforce it.



Advertisement
Advertisement