Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1343534363438344034413690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,104 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Well, I was talking about the reticence to support Ukraine fully early on in the war for fear of escalating things into a wider conflict. I would say that fear has passed, so short of other countries sending their militaries into Ukraine or doing big attacks on Russia (bigger than the drone attacks and airstrikes which have already happened), Russia aren't going to do anything really beyond what we've already seen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Looks like a Ukrainian mig 29 was shot down yesterday or earlier today with the pilot been killed ..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 167 ✭✭Fastpud


    Not with standing the Ukrainian gains in the Black Sea my optimism of 2022 has evaporated over 2023 and now my long term view is quite depressing.

    Ukraine’s bravery thwarted Russia’s plan to decapitate Ukraine in the first few days but it feels like the west has missed a chance to end the war quickly by not fully backing Ukraine to win. The west’s slow drip drip has given Russia the time to get its war industry up and running despite sanctions.

    The west might have a much bigger economic capability but it hasn’t mobilised its industry to match, much less over match Russia’s. Given enough time Russia will find ways around the sanctions. Add in its high capacity to absorb losses and suffering this could run on for years and years.

    Ukraine has played a blinder so far but unless the west fully commits Putin will drag this out. A stalemate in Ukraine in the current positions is a win for Putin. Eu and NATO membership will be off the table, Ukraine’s economy severely damaged, all reconstruction on hold, millions of UKR citizens lost to other countries. This war will also allow him to continue lock down Russian society strengthening his grip on power.

    If it quietens into low intensity stalemate, he will move on Georgia, Moldovia or even Belarus. (Don’t see him ever going directly against a NATO country but there are other countries he could target)

    To Putin a stalemate is a win for him and a western loss. This will embolden him and other dictators around the world. (Iran NK, China are clear candidates but there are others)

    I think this is a pivotal point for the free world and depressingly at the moment we are sleep walking into a new world order that won’t be anything like as peaceful or comfortable as it is now.

    I hope I’m proved wrong and the west gets its finger out and turns military manufacturing up to 11 to over whelms Russia’s capabilities but I fear the longer this drags on the greater the risk of our resolve fading.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    How easily people forget events of just 2 years ago. Pre invasion, the US was convinced Ukraine wasnt going to last very long. The US was also clear that they wouldnt intervene. The best they would do is give a limited supply of weapons to Ukraine of a limited nature.

    After the battle of Kyiv, the tenancity of Ukraines resistance won over hearts and minds of the people of the US and EU and their governments were convinced to supply greater amounts of aid and more powerful equipment. Russia, meanwhile, showed itself to be utterly unable to fight a modern war and reverted all the way back to WW1 plus drones as a tactic.

    The war has dragged on longer than the US was expecting. They are now in the midst of a political spending crisis and the argument that Ukraine spending can be cut in favour of other projects is gaining traction. Hence their reluctance to supply more aid.

    It is also in Ukraines interest as much as it is the US to not escalate to a point of nuclear war or mass mobilisation with Russia. So her suggestion that there is a fear of collapse ignores this very real fear of escalation.

    How all that has happened is now being retconned into a false narrative to criticise the US and EU is straight out of the Russian propaganda booklet. It suits Ukriane for this narrative to go around, if it results in more aid, but thats by the by!

    The theory that Ukraine are being used as a tool to deplete the Russian army as you say, has no evidence to support it, vs the reality that other countries are providing aid and support, but that aid and support isnt unlimited and it is currently a political hot topic!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Lol .

    Which ones like the military expert you claim isn't a respected military expert because he calls it as it is ....

    Maybe a new hobby or account



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,368 ✭✭✭Ardent


    There is no win for Putin re Ukraine. It's a question of how big the loss is. The US recognises this and so the urgency to support Ukraine has diminished, which is really frustrating.

    We all want to Putin and Russia sent home with their tails between their legs. Just have to wait longer than we would like IMO, the resolve of the Ukrainians is incredible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,551 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Are people hopeful Avdiivka holds indefinitely after over 3 months of Bakhmut like attacks but very little gains? Will be a tough pill to swallow if Russia have to accept they won't take it and have to move their focus elsewhere.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Anyone old enough to enjoy them, they perhaps like me saw that "panorama" video and thought: is that a Command and Conquer mission briefing?

    "Comrade commander, the west are buckling. We must destroy 4 power centers before our attack can start"

    <Mission Loading>



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭scottser


    Poverty rates across all metrics are increasing in all countries in the EU. Gerashchenko should be a little less flippant about it; the shift to populist and far-right leaders isn't a coincidence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,551 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    This shift isn't uniquely tied to poverty either. Huge levels of immigration from outside the EU was always going to lead to a rise in the right. Especially when policy makers have been doubling down despite public opinion wanting otherwise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    The same Russians funding Far right and far left groups you mean? Like they done in 80s to spread hopelessness and drive a wedge in social and political fabric of their self declared “enemies”

    Our weekly welfare amount is already larger than Russian average monthly wage

    You want to see poverty I recommend a trip to Russia where their concept of welfare is to ship off men to die in a mud hole for the glorious benefit of oligarchs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭scottser


    Agreed, we're pretty well insulated here. I had the UK, France, Spain and Italy more in mind, particularly the UK given the Tories exceptional performance in driving inequality over the past 15 years. And it's not just Russia that funds far-right idealogues and authoritarian candidates - the USA and China are quite adept at it too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    And that’s what that video highlights 40 years later the exact same rhetoric and tactics are being used by Russia in their war against us

    Russia can’t win a conventional war against the “west” but it sure as hell is busy stirring **** up over here creating and exploiting various social and political issues in the hope the West collapses before Russia does, yet again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭scottser


    Causes of poverty are always complex and often contradictory. Immigration can be a red herring though, I think. Taking the UK as an example, most of their immigrants are either Irish, Polish, Indian or Pakistani - countries with strong historical ties to the UK:

    Migrants in the UK: An Overview - Migration Observatory - The Migration Observatory (ox.ac.uk)

    Illegal immigrants to the UK are still a tiny minority but are used by the Tories to push quite an insidious agenda.

    Most common migrants to Germany are Romanian and Turkish, both EU countries. France takes in the most from outside the EU; mainly from Africa and Russia. The vast majority of immigrants to France are working, whereas 75% of their prison population are French nationals.

    We all know that economic inflation is the main driver of poverty. I keep reading differing accounts of how the sanctions are affecting Russia, which was probably the point of the original tweet from Belarus above. It seems like they want to portray the west as broke to deflect from how dire things are over there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 219 ✭✭Carlito Brigantes Tale


    If the west wanted a quick win it would be long over by now. Our cowardly approach is fueled by the "but but but what about da bomb" shouts from Putin propagandists. How the west has handled this test will be a black mark on our history for years to come.

    If Trump gets in in November anything is possible



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,359 ✭✭✭zg3409


    I am not sure the real experts were of the opinion that Ukraine was not going to last long. They had specialist advisors on the ground giving advice, pre war training, intel, satellite imaging, telling them exactly the Russian battle plans and time and how best to draw them in and stop supply lines etc.

    In terms of latest weapon tech no country really wants to hand their latest weapons to the enemy, which is what happens in a war, they don't want the Russians knowing the range of missiles, how to counter them, how to copy them, how to identify them and knock them out.

    In terms of how long the war is going there is an opinion it's going perfectly for USA, little to no USA troops on the ground, economically crippling Russia for decades, Russia unable to withdraw, Ukraine nowhere near defeat. Similar proxy wars have been funded by USA for generations with low risk and high reward. Even leaked USA documents from a year ago expected no real change in front lines in 2023. Potentially 2024 was a probing year and Ukraine are waiting for enough equipment and a clear advantage before all out push. They may know they don't have that.

    That's not to say things don't go to plan and that there is not political messing going on and that it takes months or years to get planes and pilots and tactics ready.

    I suspect the real war strategists know exactly what's going on and the USA war machine is months ahead of action on the ground and can predict progress 3/6/9 months out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    I'd be thinking that your average citizen watching this was muttering bleakly while they put on an extra coat after looking in an empty fridge.

    Such hubris can be seen here too with government interviews on immigration concerns - blithely insisting the state is omnipotent, but ignoring the angry mutterings of the local populations affected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Well rehearsed POV, lots of similar back through the thread.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,039 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, and even a long time before Putin's invasion, outside of Moscow and St. Petersburg, in the republics, the poverty was unbelievable. Back in the 90's, they were just starting to use steel sheet cladding on house roofs, the same as we have been using for decades on farm sheds, while outdoor plumbing is still a very common feature. As they used to say in the past " If you are not happy in your own Country, spend a few months in Russia, you will be a very happy man when you return." That was true in the past, and even more so now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It could hold but like bakmuth there is no guarantee that they won't keep grinding away at it ,it will be a kick in the teeth if and when it falls in reality, it would mean after the big summer offensive they actually lost more territory than they liberated,

    But it seems they are more willing to fall back rather than risk thousand for a small town /city ,it's probably one the the main reasons they are now building multiple layers of defences more or less mirroring what the Russians are doing over the last year



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    I'm not sure where your getting that from,the majority of military experts gave Ukraine little or no hope of stopping the Russian military rolling across the border,the majority ordinary Joe's said the exact same thing, there was no advanced planning from the US or NATO there was no plan to lure the Russians in and trap them we sat here from the night of the invasion and watched Russian military convoys roll practically to Kiev and then sit there doing nothing and going nowhere and there wasn't any real effective attacks on the Russian military convoys,

    They were given the equipment and comprehensive plan for the summer offensive and push the Russians out of Kherson and elsewhere but they chose not to listen to the Americans and decided to go with their own plans which didn't involve smashing through the Russian lines , because they didn't want to risk and equipment,but they will risk thousands trying to hold a bakmuth,now were possibly looking at several years of trench warfare, which i highly doubt was part of anyone's plans ,

    With seeds of division been sown in between the politicians and military, I still believe they messed up last year when they had the Russians on the run after Kharkiv and parts of Kherson,but for some reason they chose to stop and re-evaluate which then gave the Russians 6/7 Months to build multiple layers of defences and fortifications, all the while slowly pushing back against the Ukrainians ...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,550 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Nice one mate. Any military credentials to show there?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    I post a reference with every post while you continuously regurgitate Russian propaganda and pass it as your own “military expert” opinion

    The post you made has outrageous and fantastical claims, which shouldn’t be hard to backup with reference if they were true



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    More on the Ukrainian Mig 29 pilot killed over the weekend "Blue Helmet" Vladyslav Zalistovsky(23)was known for his social media accounts from twitter, Instagram and tiktok , all the while flying regular combat sorties.



    Post edited by Gatling on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    What Russian propaganda....

    Ohhh dear ......

    Is that the best effort over two years



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,400 ✭✭✭Field east


    — how many more men can Putin ‘ encourage ‘ to occupy the front lines - the more you squeeze an orange the less juice you get each time— ?

    • will North Korea keep up its supplies to Ru?
    • Can Iran keep up its level of production/supply of drones to Russia. The area around Iran is getting increasingly more fraught and it may have to start stock piling - especially if the Israel/ Hamas conflict spreads
    • -


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 167 ✭✭Fastpud


    Our Western idea of a Putin win is very different to what Putin himself sees as a win. Chaos and destruction in Ukraine stopping EU& NATO membership =win, occupation of 20% of Ukraine =win, Ukraine economy in tatters =win, millions of refugees in the west to stir upright wing anti immigration trouble in the west=win.

    Everyone is hoping that a combination of 500k casualties, stalemate on battle ground, huge equipment losses, and pressure on Russian economy via sanctions is seen by Putin as a loss. I’m not so sure - I hope I am wrong.

    Ukraine has done amazingly well but could end up in a never ending war - it looks like neither side can land a knock out blow at this point.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement