Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The UK had to come to Ireland's aid as a Russian submarine was 'hovering' 12 miles from Cork harbour

Options
124678

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 535 ✭✭✭Scipri0


    There are lots of cables passing through Irish waters yes, but there's also redundant cables, so even if a few were cut on purpose or by accident it wouldn't make a difference. I've said it many times, what's stopping them from going further out into the Atlantic and cutting them there?

    We have a number of countries that go into our EEZ with their navies, France, UK, U.S. and of course Russia among others. While it's within Ireland's economic waters those are still international waters and don't we hear it all the time from the United States and other powers that freedom of navigation is essential when it comes to China and Taiwan? So why should it apply here? I wouldn't say the UK came to our defence, but more like looking out for their own interests. Russia couldn't give a **** about Ireland, We just happen to be in the way. They're probing around our waters, not because of Ireland but because of the UK and other states and i'm sure those cables play a part as well but while we rely on them as with others, they're not "Irish cables" they don't belong to us so i disagree somewhat when some people say we should be defending these. There's no way you could do that because as i said you could just go out further into the ocean.

    The Nord Stream was more than likely done by Ukraine with help from other NATO states. They want us to buy their weapons to defend ourselves and our waters, but somehow some country managed to go into the Baltic Sea surrounded by multiple NATO members and all their defence spending, and we can't forget about NATOs spy satellites in geostationary orbit, How come there are no pictures available there? You think Ireland will be able to do so in a larger ocean what these multiple members of NATO failed to do in a small area and right next to each other? What's being pushed is over the last few years they've seen the corporations tax surplus we're getting, and they want some of that for themselves, It's not about us being able to defend or protect ourselves, it's about buying their weapons!


    Yes, smaller neutral members also fund their armies, but they also have their own defence industries. We have a lot going on in this country and while i wouldn't say to defence forces members, an increase in pay. Buying trinkets which will sit in a warehouse not being a benefit to Irish citizens, it would be a constant drain of money, including basically a subscription for maintenance on any equipment we get. I've said this before, to say if we decided to get nuclear weapons(the ultimate defence) we'd have all these same countries telling "No, no! Don't be defending yourselves that much!) The reason? It's just to make money for their own defence firms, no one really benefits from that apart from these corporations and whoever has shares/stocks, their lobbyists and whoever in government who might get the promise of a kickback further down the line. I feel there are some in government who also want to be seen as the best pupil in class.

    No matter what we'd buy it wouldn't last in a war and if Ireland is being attacked then the whole world would've already gone to ****! As Ireland begins to move away from neutrality, The enemies of the bigger countries who throw their weight around on the global stage, well their enemies become our enemies and all the goodwill we've built up in UN peacekeeping would have been for nothing and remember one more thing, Ireland got its place on the UN security Council by beating Canada in a vote in the UN because other countries saw Canada as an extension of U.S. foreign policy.


    Sorry for the rant, guys! Have a good day, all! 😂



  • Registered Users Posts: 323 ✭✭duck.duck.go


    Had a good chuckle at this

    how would our defence forces even know of santas transit since we don’t have military radar and I doubt Rudolf has a transponder shoved up his rear



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,663 ✭✭✭An Claidheamh


    The same armchair military types will cry if anyone laid a finger on them and accuse the government of being too nationalist and in neighbourly.


    Britain barely has an aircraft carrier, it just stalks the Russians for photo opportunities eg “escorting their planes, observing their ships”

    - in reality they won’t ever fire on them - those “journals” are written by middle aged gammon Brexiters types who probably never fought in a war and cannot accept Irish sovereignty.

    In fact, Britain refused to join the EU battle groups as they believed it would dilute their pretend partnership with the US


    If Ireland built up its military under Sinn Féin, the Brits and their sympathisers here would cry blue murder.

    SF would argue they do have a policy of defending our sovereignty and are capable of defence with lesser resources


    Once again, people seem incapable of understanding the difference between having a reliable military/defence force and NATO/neutrality



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    So we should only trust the articles about Russia written by Russia?



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Ah those pesky Russians. Haha.

    And as for unprovoked. Try reading up on the subject. But there’s other threads on that topic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,578 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    ABSOLUTELY GAS ISN'T IT?

    The Times and CSO pulling "charged" stats out of their arse, with the clear purpose of trying to address numbers issue in the force.

    Doesn't say that the IT workers have a 39 hour week and have weekends off and that Rank and File Garda will need to work 6 days a week including weekends covering 16 hour shifts! It's absolute BS! (No mention of the Mode or the Median either for obvious reasons).

    Also doesn't mention the low life's you've to deal with and that you will mostly likely be seriously assaulted.

    Hardcore tip: a statistic can be made look any way the person presenting it wants you to think.

    Also how effective is a Garda on or after Day 5 of 16 hour shifts? Surely they're exhausted after that.


    The situation "on the ground" doesn't lie. And that is the public sector services that we rely on are not funded or administered very well. They're all funded to be "just enough to get over the line"



  • Registered Users Posts: 323 ✭✭duck.duck.go


    Ah the HSE totally deserved to be hacked and all Irish citizens medical information endup being sold by Russian gangs /s



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,351 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Quite an assumption you've made there that IT workers have a 5 day/39 hour week.

    In my experience a lot of tech companies expect a varying degree of unpaid overtime.

    Also, you mentioned earlier about IT workers being on 100-150k after ten years.

    I'd disagree with that too, certainly outside Dublin.

    And generally the only developers I see getting to the higher paid positions are those putting in the longer hours. That mightn't necessarily be in the office, but they'll be upskilling in their 'spare' time as tech changes rapidly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,752 ✭✭✭satguy


    At the moment the only nation attacking undersea infostructure are the USA.

    Russian submarines have always been hanging around our waters, and have never touched any of our stuff,, Ever .

    If the UK feel the need to keep an eye on our waters and air space,, well that's just fine, we need money for better things here in our cities.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Ah so a criminal gang, not actually Russia as you first claimed??

    Thread title should be changed. There was no “aid” as the Russian sub was in International waters and there was zero distress/threat to Ireland. Daily Mail-esque



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    The Russion sub was hovering just over 12 miles from Cork Harbour, so was well within  Ireland's marine territory of over 220 million acres (880,000Km2).



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,811 ✭✭✭billie1b


    Irelands Marine Territory is different to Irelands Territorial waters (owned by the state), our territorial waters (defence) is only just over 27,000km2 and is legally only allowed to extend out as far as 12 nautical miles (13.8 miles) from the coast maximum, anything after that is the EEZ and International waters.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,282 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    I can't tell which you lads are more afraid of, Russia or Sein Fein.



  • Registered Users Posts: 323 ✭✭duck.duck.go


    Both have the potential to harm the country greatly and have a history of doing so.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Ah yes, I knew it was the Russians even through the past hundred years of FFG and the Brits before them, it was always the Russians.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,454 ✭✭✭standardg60


    It wasn't hovering, it was swim bladdering

    Though in fairness that doesn't have quite the same ring to it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 422 ✭✭BagofWeed


    That's one of the most sensationalist posts I've ever seen on Boards. Do you actually have any knowledge about Russia and Ukraine or have you just gained your thoughts on them from CNN Sky RTÉ and Fox ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24 CatLick




  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    They can access our Ports anytime they don't need us to join NATO



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,743 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    No thanks.

    Prefer to be in a small independent country than a state if some loony corrupt nation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    We aren't independent, were ruled from Brussels not from the Dail



  • Posts: 0 Otto Many Umpire


    "how we should have fighter jets and submarines"

    Who is suggesting that? Wanting the defense forces of this state to be able to adequately monitor it's airspace and territorial waters is not asking that we go out and buy a couple of squadrons of F35s and a Nimitz class aircraft carrier to fly them off....



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Seems alot of recently registered accounts have found current affairs,

    It was nukes earlier and now fighter jets and submarines, give it a week or two and they will all vanish



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,200 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Russia is not a threat to Ireland,I am surprised that they still have an embassy here.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 37,971 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I am not the person who wrote above" We aren't independent, were ruled from Brussels not from the Dail", but he / she may have a point to an extent. Our interest rates are contriolled by the EU, our currency exchange rate is controlled by the EU, we got so much funding over the decades from the EEC / EU, we pay so much to EU coffers since the UK has left, our immigration policy is controlled to a large extent by the EU etc.

    As one fellow quipped once, it is as well we are ruled from Brussles as we are not capable of ruling ourselves. I for one am glad that Europe is keeping an eye on our accounts since we got bailed out by the EU / UK / IMF not much more than a decade ago.




  • Registered Users Posts: 323 ✭✭duck.duck.go


    Russia is not a threat to Ireland?

    What about the dozens of threads and hundreds of pages about refugees created by Russia in this forum

    If you read them people are obviously concerned about issues directly created by Russia and that’s before we look at that time Russia hacked our health records



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,175 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    We don't have any credibility.

    We are seen as a tax haven for the world's tax dodging multinationals.

    We have a prime minister that puts his big fooking foot in his mouth with regards simply things like the release of kidnapped children.

    We have a justice minister and parliament trying to shoe horn in probably the most draconian measure against free speech in the world right now and this is supposed to be a modern open democracy.

    We have chancers arriving at our main airport after dumping their identification documentation and they are given a hotel room.

    We have Ukrainian refugees earning more in social welfare benefits and state supporters than someone on average salary in Ukraine.

    We have fook all air defenses, a Navy that has fook all and no man power for the few boats we have.

    We make a song and dance about buying a few replacement transport aircraft for our air command and the only reason they can do fishery patrol is because of EU funding.

    We make a show of sending some special forces to a foreign country to help evacuate citizens, but they have to cadge a life off some other country.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,200 ✭✭✭Widdensushi




Advertisement