Moon landing hoax

Because it wasn't a Hoax....

don't even want to argue this but Moon rock samples don't just come back to earth on their own steam

Astounding! I hold my hand up. I must yield to a clear master of the topic. Absolutely, you have ground this debate to a complete halt. Debate, as we all know, holds no place in science and I thank you for bringing us back to firm ground.

But before we do. If you are getting accuracy to within 1 meter, you clearly have an advanced piece of kit. Would have to be a differentially corrected GPS technology to get that level of accuracy - typically used by coast guards for navigating complex coastal areas and rivers and seems way out of the price range of an amateur sailor. Care to share the make and model? Wouldn't mind investing in this myself.

Also, my ADS-B/MLAT system can track aircraft over 150nm over land, and likely much further if I lived at the coast. Commercial radio trackers achieving much much further, over wide expanses of ocean. Care to share with us how many miles in all directions you've been away from land?

Not willing to provide the GPS model or distance you were from all coasts?

You claim all images or communications being sent from space originate from within the Earth's atmosphere. In the absence of satellites, how can you explain live sports feeds from other countries? How does it all work in a different way then?

Astro's explanation shows that the block fabric pattern seen on the ISS is not unusual at all. The Astro YouTube video matches the screenshot image you uploaded here a few days ago. This indicates the images from the ISS are not fake. Still claiming it's a greenscreen

Yes, I agree that it would not take hundreds of people to fake outer space footage. You have a problem with your theory, as massive amounts of data are generated by such activities every day. It would require an enormous team of people to keep track of all the fake communications, data, and footage that is generated across the world every day, and keep all the fake stuff secret. Do you not notice how absurd that sounds? This conspiracy must self-replicate every day to keep going.

You focused on the credibility of one guy who claimed to be his father-son and saw the usual thing in the hangar somewhere. Not even his story, by the way; he claims it came from his father. It's nothing story unless you have corroborating evidence from many others.

>>mod snip @Cheerful S as there is something salvageable from your post relative to this discussion, I've just snipped your post. Going forward if you want to discuss 9/11 there's a place for it and it's not this thread.

HS

Are you joking? A ~€350 GPS and 44nm from the coast and you expect that because you achieved this the debate should stop?

Incredible.

Or an explanation for why the people behind GPS claim that it works by satellites when there is no benefit for doing so and doing so only provides evidence to expose the conspiracy.

So you've entirely abandoned the green screen claim? Numerous links have been provided that gps exists over the ocean, so you should probably just pretend you didn't make that claim as well. There's no debate about gps working in aviation or sailing.

Another success from India.

I wonder why the decision was made to make it a success. I imagine if someone had actually figured out the conspiracy, they'd be able to make predictions of this before hand.

Also, I can only assume that the Indian government and space industry is also in on the conspiracy that only involves a few ex-CIA freemasons.

"Alternative facts" magazine, aka fanciful BS.

The usual claim from the majority of believers were that the Apollo craft actually went around the moon, but didn't land. (Or didn't land people.) All of the transmissions were sent from the capsule that was in orbit around the moon and all the radio traffic and telemetry was scripted to pretend that they were doing the landing.

The missions were tracked and listened to by sites around the world as well as amateurs and if course the Russians, so these scripts would have had to have been perfect so that no inconsistencies existed. Also they wouldn't have been able to communicate the real situations as they'd have been different from the scripted one. For example Michael Collins would have had to pretend that he wasn't cramped up in a tiny space with Neil and Buzz while they were supposedly on the lunar surface.

The major issue here though is that we are being told that all space flight is impossible and fake, so this can't be the method the transmissions were faked.

We can only assume that anyone with the capability of tracking the craft were also in on it. So we have to at least add the Australian government to the small team of ex-CIA masons.