Russia - threadbanned users in OP

The drones that hit Moscow- where are they being “launched” from?

He's a nutter but he does raise something obvious that no one faces up to. What would happen if Ukraine started winning the war on the ground?

Would Russia use a tactical nuclear weapon on the battlefield over advancing Ukranian troops? If they are losing the war, are sanctioned to the hilt and Crimea is at risk I think it would be indescribably dangerous.

Could we wake up one morning soon to news that a nuke has been used? The panic would be like nothing ever seen before.

The longer this insane war goes on the more dangerous it gets and the more likely an "accident" will occur that spreads the conflict. I don't think it's an exaggeration to say this is the most dangerous conflict for global security since WW2 and in terms of the nuclear threat since the Cuban missile crisis.

russia won't use nukes in ukraine, the most they'll do is manufacture an accident in Zaporizhzhia, they've clarified multiple times they are defensive weapons only and will only get used if the west used nukes on them which won't happen either.

Thanks. That’s pretty embarrassing for russia that they don’t intercept them long before Moscow.

Putin, Lavrov and Medvedev have been warned by China, no less, to cut down on the Nuclear rhetoric. They are not in favor of this Nuclear Sabre rattling. While Biden has warned that actually using a nuclear device would trigger such a response that Russian military capabilities would be destroyed, all of them, Land, Sea and Air. And this would be done using conventional weapons.

I see the dick waving we will nuke everyone if you don’t do what we want threats are back😂

Sure just take my house, family and car keys while you’re at it seems you have a BOMB!!

Cowards..

I guess the Russian offensive didn't work out, and Ukraine is advancing, since we are back to the nuclear threats until someone finds an old video of destroyed Ukrainian tanks.

Edit: similar from Darth, actually

putin must have the most up-to -date Oxford Dictionary because , no matter what happens, he can explain it away to his advantage.

One of the most recent examples of this is the Wagner position . He said that it’s leader is a traitor and we know what Putin does with traitors. So how do we explain that Putin has DONE NOTHING about it - and all the tea in China and that- and has said ABSOLUTLY NOTHING about it either since he called Prizoghin ‘a traitor’.

The answer , IMO , lies in what’s happening in Niger or the Nigers’ of this world. It starts off like this :-

Russia prefers a dictatorship - with a strongman , like himself, to a democracy and he is willing to ‘help out’ any army guy /revolutionary group that’s willing to overthrow a democracy. And where that is the case there is a payback required and this is where Wagner comes in . The payback is in the form of some asset/s , such as gold mining output making it’s way to Russian coffers - Which Wagner has ample experience in. So why would Putin get rid of Prizoghin when he can be so lucratively useful to Putin re the above ventures.

And apart from the above advantage there is another one. The above , when it happens, leads to refugees , asylum seekers and individuals emigrating to seek a better, safer and more secure life and we know to which countries they go to Thus PUTTING ALL TYPES OF PRESSURE on such countries which is to PUTIN’S advantage

Wasn't necessarily referring to you specifically, more a general group that was previously very vocal about such predictions, less so in recent weeks it has to be said

I think this fear was valid in the early days of the war. I suspect hearing from the Americans what the consequences would be has greatly reduced any likelihood that Russia would go that far. At the same time, having nuclear weapons is the only insurance policy Russia really has against the west. So it's a delicate balance