Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1314331443146314831493690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,553 ✭✭✭circadian


    Are you getting all your info from Russian mil bloggers on Telegram?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,658 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    Speaking of Russian telegram some are now reporting Staromaiorske as lost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,080 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Nice to see a little progress if that's true

    Hopefully Russian offence in North has been stopped as well



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭rogber


    That's all one possible scenario. Time will tell. It'll be a great day if he and his criminal band ever end up in the Hague, I'm just not very optimistic it'll happen



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,658 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    Luhansk looks to have stabilised for now at least, with Russia pushed back a bit in a few locations. It also looks like it wasn't an intentional play by the Ukrainians to try and suck Russia into a pocket. They were caught off guard and even have been using areas on that front for training of new recruits. Very surprising, as mentioned previously, Russia haven't been known to simply accumulate large force concentrations unless they're going on the offensive.



  • Posts: 1,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Can someone explain to me why it's considered a bad thing to see that the Russian forces are only in the game because of minefields, which they had months to lay down?


    If Ukrainian forces break through this layer of defense, anywhere, it really looks like Russia has little to keep them back



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,041 ✭✭✭jmreire


    While I've lived and worked for nearly 25 years in warzones all over the world, and can tell you pretty much what its like from a civilian point of view living in a city destroyed by war., I'm not military, so any discussion about tactics and weapons, I leave to the experts. Having watched the video, I'd say that he knows what he's talking about, but I think that what he's saying is just generalizing and not rocket science. Military wise. I'd imagine any other military analyst / commander would be thinking along the same lines. He mentions the first armored assault that got destroyed. That was always on the cards, which was why it was not a full scale attack. Ditto, he speaks about the imbalance, especially the air. He also mentions Russian soldiers having to buy their own protective gear to increase their survival chances, and the long duty cycle's Russians face V regular rotations of Ukrainian troops. He doesn't mention how many Family's can afford the better equipment, or what happens to this gear when they reach the front line, where Dedovschina is still alive and well, and they lose this expensive gear within a day or two after arrival. We will see 3 /4 mths down the road what he has to say, but maybe the most important thing he had to say was " You can train and equip men to the nth degree, but once the shooting starts, the outcome is never certain."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,625 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Yeah seems to have been a mistake made by new recruits during a rotation of troops and miscommunication. Caught with pants down. It happens. It's war.

    Situation stabilised and reversed in some cases.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Because, simply put, mines are gonna be a problem for the entire population living there after the war ends. Unless Russia has an exacting map of where the mines were placed, and hand it over to authorities when hostilities cease, you're talking about decades of potential death and maiming from mines yet to come. It's a sad, but repeated story across the world; even here in Europe unexploded WW2 bombs remain a thing.

    For sure from a strategic point of view the mines & trenches of the Russias are a static line of defence that, if broken, could spell the end of Russia control in that area .. but mines are repugnant precisely because of the long term effect they'll have on those living in the cities, working the fields in future.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,625 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Looks who has been spotted at the African summit in St. Petersburg

    F2COk98WYAEjiEM.png

    The cnut.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Posts: 1,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Oh, I know that the mines are a disgusting weapon and there will be deaths for decades, from them.


    I mean people are saying that the Ukrainian offensive is failing because they are having to clear out the fields.

    They are a thin line of static defense and Russia seems to have very little behind them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga


    was wondering where he was...id guess more pillaging in Africa is on the cards?


    "They gave me an impossible task,one which they said I wouldnt return from...."

    "You are him…the one they call the "Baba Yaga"…

    yo! donnie vonshitzinpants,vlad putin,benji netanyahu..you sirs are the skidmarks on the jocks of humanity!!!



  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,867 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Ah ok. Clearing mines is á slow and laborious process (pages back someone shared a video of how it's done); the forces & equipment used to clear mines would be vulnerable to attack themselves so offensives would presumably be stalled by the double problem of speed of clearance vs. the ability of Russia to hammer the mine-clearing forces - forcing their retreat. And even if the mines are cleared, you can only safely proceed along a narrower channel than you might prefer - further concentrating Russia firepower on your position. I'm sure were they unmolested the Ukraine army would have the mines cleared in day, but obviously Russia can sit behind their defences and fire at the slow-moving Ukrainians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,352 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Hope all that fancy stuff in the palace is bolted down! He looks the kinda lad that couldn't resist fleecing it!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,041 ✭✭✭jmreire


    I remember in one city, where we were expecting bombing and shooting, myself and a colleague were walking down the street carrying bomb blast plastic to stick to the windows in our residences, to stop the glass from flying if they got shattered. I remember it vividly to this day, not a soul on the streets leaves fluttering along the ground, and some birds in the air. And we walked along, making small talk, stopping off at each house and delivering until we got to the last one, job done. Time for the sit down and coffee, we each looked at each other saying nothing for awhile, and then my colleague said to me " Did you feel it? I answered yes, on the back of head as we walked along. Same as me he replied" I don't know if or when the sniper(s) went to work, but later on the bombing and shooting did start.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,138 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    Amazingly, that comment applies to both the palace and Africa itself.



  • Posts: 1,656 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They are a thin line of static defense and Russia seems to have very little behind them.

    Russia have constructed the most extensive fortifications in Europe since WW2. They have layers of trenches, concrete firing posts, anti-tank ditches, dragons teeth, wire, minefields. It's 5km deep or more.

    They are defending forward which means they have men in basic fox-holes hidden in tree-lines etc in front of the defensive line. They hold the position as long as they can, then when Ukraine is about to take their fox-holes they fall back and call artillery on this position. And move back into the same fox-hole afterwards.

    All of the fighting for the whole counter-offensive has been taking place in this forward position - Ukraine have not even reached the main defensive line in 2 months of trying. When you hear they punched through or captured a village, it's in this forward position. To breach the defensive line will be 10x more difficult than what they are currently trying (and failing) to do.

    It's a very tough task, particularly without air-support.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,041 ✭✭✭jmreire


    And after that speech in which he guaranteed to protect the Constitution an rights of Russian citizens, he proceeded to demolish them all, with the so called democratic election that he "won" being the first step.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,041 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Its the fields of fire the Russians have which is the main problem. if it was only the mines, they could be taken care of, but its the artillery and machine guns facing the de-miners that's the problems. We have seen what happened last Sept when the Ukrainians chased the Russians out of Kherson etc. No mine fields or entrenched position to protect them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Time for us to review our aid to some African states. When they start trying to play both sides, time to send a message and since we don't have a military, we cut funding and supports.



  • Posts: 1,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So they need more artillary munitions and long range weapons?

    Between that and lack of air support, again I think that they offensive is not "stalled" but going as well as realistically possible?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,064 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    A Ukrainian fencer who beat her Russian opponent and refused to shake hands has been disqualified by the FIE. Bizarre considering this has been happening across all sports for the last year and a half with no disqualifications for Ukrainian athletes

    Also the below is her Russian opponent




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 807 ✭✭✭technocrat




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    This just adds to the suspicion, Putin described Yevgeny Prigozhin as a traitor just a few weeks back now hes in Russia at an official government event. lots of games being played here. I still think Wagner will have a big role shortly. No doubt when Wagner go on the rampage Putin will say he has no control over them and blame Prigozhin for any atrocities that are committed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,596 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    The West benefits far more from the cheap resources it gets from Africa then the cost of aid. The West stands to lose if it cuts ties.


    Same for Russia. They spend a fortune on their African operations but are milking them dry.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,202 ✭✭✭vixdname


    Fingers crossed

    image.png


    Post edited by vixdname on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,277 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Wrong as far as the West is conceerned: they pay world market prices for commodities from Africa. No doubt African corruption means that the befenits are not widely felt. Maybe it was different in colonial times.

    Not the same for Russia: the deadly alliance between Russian and African kleptocrats and also Russian private armies like Wagner is incomparably worse than wnything being done by the Wicked West.



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement