Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1312631273129313131323690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,179 ✭✭✭eire4


    As someone who spends a portion of each year working in the US I agree some do despise their government but a lot I don't know I would say that. Of course neither you nor I can really put a number on it. Here's what I do say to people asking me about Americans. IMHO about a third of Americans are among the most vile disgusting violent hate filled people. Then conversely about a third are among the most friendly welcoming open people. Finally you have about another third who very much believe in a I society with not much We so are pretty selfish but they tend to be welcoming nice people in general with none of the hate of the bottom third. That of course is purely my own opinion but it is based on wide experience of the country directly on my part.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Untitled Image


    This.


    If Europe isn't willing to stand up and stop a severe global threat to itself from being implemented then it doesn't deserve security, stability or peace and it will ensure it has none of them.


    Remember the little flux in food prices that caused the Arab Spring.

    It's a moot point though, the problem is being implemented now, Europe stands idly by, not sure what to do or what is going on, a meeting in 6 months time to consider options will be planned..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,890 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Are we completely sure there are no back channel negotiations going on in order to bodge together a compromise?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,436 ✭✭✭SortingYouOut


    This grain isn't coming from an EU or NATO country. It's coming from a non-eu and non-nato country at war with the same. Europe stands "idly" by because for one they're not a force that can intervene more than they already have and secondly the Union is a Union, they can't just throw it all on the line for the sake of others.

    It makes for a lovely story, but in reality people don't want any intervention here because the cost isn't worth the gain for us.

    You're thinking emotionally instead of politically, which is usually the case in here.

    Beverly Hills, California



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    The implications for Western Europe are much more severe from this than they are for the Ukraine.


    This issue is bigger than Ukraine or the war there. It's a global security issue but especially an issue for Europe, one that is much bigger than the war in Ukraine which is just another **** war in the greater scheme of things.


    Putin hoped that the gas issue, Merkel's good work there, would leave Germany and Europe in deep crisis last winter. He will Keep trying.


    There is an existential element to this conflict for Western Europe, that outweighs Ukrainian needs. Protecting the stability of the entire arc around Europe is bigger than who wins in Ukraine frankly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭jmreire


    While its common practice for Chaplains to pray for Gods protection for their soldiers, Kirill is actively praying for the death and destruction of Ukraine, something that's completely forbidden under the 6th commandment, thou shall not kill. Which puts Kirill completely at odds with church teaching, a Church he claims to represent. Kirill is just another one of Putin's murderous horde.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,012 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    And people thought everyone was dependent on Russia.

    Turns out Russia is dependent on Ukrainian goodwill. Which as you imagine has been used up.

    Russia bombs Ukraine. Ukraine stops a pipeline. Russia bombs Odessa grain facilities and port and holds the world to ransom over Ukrainian grain ( or at least that's the story Russia wants out there). Then promises to extend the grain deal if a fertiliser pipeline is reopened. But the kicker is the grain facilities and port have been damaged even if the offer to open the pipeline is taken up. And Russia most likely will be demanding Russian ships berth in Odessa at the end of the pipeline.

    I'd love to blow that pipeline myself. 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    If you want to go the believer route then the following should apply


    6. Thou shalt not kill.


    8. Thou shalt not steal.


    9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,303 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    If true, extraordinary figures. And ratios look at the killed v wounded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,890 ✭✭✭✭briany


    A little levity...

    I've done some calculations.

    Ukraine could produce around 51 million metric tonnes of grain.

    The average car boot holds between 280-300 litres.

    Taking an average density of the grain, I estimate that we only need around 220 million round trips to get the grain thing sorted by land.

    Maybe adding a few lorries into the mix would speed things up...



  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 899 ✭✭✭I.am.Putins.raging.bile.duct




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,012 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Reading more into this.

    You can't help but get the feeling the unconfirmed reports of 100k soldiers ready to take Karkiv. Was. All over a stupid ammonium pipeline that was damaged in Karkiv.

    All I can say is.. Ha. Ha. Ha. Russian government. Russian people. Russian fools who'd be led to fight for a mafia boss over fertiliser sales.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,890 ✭✭✭✭briany


    So, Wagner lost 1/3rd of its fighting force in Bakhmut?

    Good enough for them. Pity it wasn't more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    The issue there is the grain needs to head to Africa and the middle east not Europe other wise we affect Europen production and economies , which in turn causes governments to rethink their involvement in the process



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    10,000 are already in Belarus, so much for only 2 convoys only recently arrived

    Hmmmm coming soon the fall of Lukashenko or another front, another source has claimed that they are planning to move to Africa again



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,890 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Joking aside, I would have thought that in the event of trying to move grain by land, it would be a case of ferrying it southward to a port in Romania where it would be shipped toward the Bosphorus within NATO territorial waters. I'm sure there are aspects to this which hinder the idea from somewhere between highly impractical to almost impossible, but is there any alternative to even discuss, never mind implement?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,012 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    I read somewhere the option is there of using canal barges by Danube -Rhine North Sea. Romania said they can use the canal I believe. May also be option of going by road from Danube to Adriatic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    I would have thought it would be simple enough to move from the Odessa to Romania and Moldova , Bulgaria and down to Turkish waters and out to the bosphorus straight,

    I get the feeling other countries are afraid their shipping being effected or Russia blockading or mining their ports ,

    There needs to be a firm response to Russian threats, let's see if they are willing to play the biggest game of Battleship not seen since WW2



    Screenshot_20230719_225651_Maps.jpg


    Post edited by Gatling on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    5 EU states looking to extend the ban on imports of Ukrainian grains and agriculture products ,the EU can't expect to allow the flooding of grains and agriculture products from outside the EU even if it is only Ukraine,it would open the doors to other non EU products haven't to be allowed despite agreements in place to prevent things like this happening





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,395 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    crossword-security-ccs.png

    It looked like the village of Klischiivka was going to fall to Ukraine about two weeks ago. The Russians reinforced the area since then.

    To provide perspective, Ukraine have been trying to liberate this one single village for 2.5 months now.

    America seems to have more of an interest in preventing Ukraine from being defeated, to actually enabling Ukraine to win.

    When Ukraine was close to collapse in March 2022, America rushed military aid in.

    Here we are in July 2023 with a situation that is much more delicately poised and America are pumping the brakes on aid.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,090 ✭✭✭Homelander


    I would imagine that a large part of their reasoning is that they don't want to inflict a massive and obvious defeat on Putin that might prompt him to cross a line, and instead slowly wear down Russia until it's left with no choice but to withdraw, technically of its own will. That, or regime change due to growing internal unrest.

    Whatever you want to spin it, right now Ukraine may not on the verge of victory or even close, but Russia is in the exact same boat, although I would say sinking far more rapidly all factors considered.

    Russia being humiliated on the battlefield and actually ejected from Ukraine is something everyone would love to see but who knows what that egotistical madman would do, or at least, attempt to do if such a thing actually happened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,181 ✭✭✭Field east


    So, most Americans hate it’s government!!!!!!!? It must be an awful setup over there . O wait ……. Going by recent poles in Ireland circa 50% of the Irish people would not give their first preferences to the current government because they hate/are against it. Likewise in lots of other countries



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,181 ✭✭✭Field east


    Bombing The grain silos/grain loading/processing facilities and any collateral damage around same is another tool in Putins box to put pressure on the poorer nations of the world. This will the. ULTIMATELY LEAD to food shortages , famine , etc. Which I turn will lead to more migration/ refugees to Europe thereby putting pressure on Ruropean/Western nations security , political , economic and service provision perspective - THEREBY WEAKENING the West in every way compared to Russia



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,964 ✭✭✭rogber


    I imagine Trump could find a way to tear up any existing agreements. From his ridiculous "I'll end this war in one day" comments recently it's clear he has no interest in taking it seriously and an Economist podcast recently pointed out that the majority of America First think tanks and lobbyists think America should not be involved in the conflict and instead focus on China. The point was clear: if Trump wins, Ukraine should be very prepared for a dramatic shift in policy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,852 ✭✭✭zv2


    One third makes for a very unhappy society. Staggering.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,852 ✭✭✭zv2


    True but they're not storming government buildings like in America.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,395 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    That just proves my point.

    The size of that package is about typical for what we've seen in the last year.

    There is no evidence that Ukraine have been provided a step change in firepower above what they currently have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,936 ✭✭✭wandererz




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The capacity isn't there to do it overland. They have already massively increased their overland exports but it will be close to impossible to increase it anymore.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,703 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    You posts really are the most negative and inconsistent I've read on boards in a while. You're even openly contradicting yourself at this stage. Some awesome goalpost moving here.

    "America really pumping the brakes on aid"

    How about this absolutely enormous 1.3billion aid package the other day?

    Proves my point. That's just a typical aid package without extra capability


    Yeah sorry you can't have both of those. Either they're pumping the brakes on aid or they're still making their typical, absolutely whopping regular aid packages, which is it?


    Putting aside that their previous aid package not but a short while ago opened up the flow of a metric shitton of cluster munitions(an extra capability they haven't provided before and Ukraine have been begging for them and hailed them as potentially game changing).



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement