Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

RTÉ admits paying Tubridy €345,000 more than declared

1333334336338339848

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    He was a brand ambassador for BMW prior to this Renault deal so he knew exactly how this worked.

    So the "oh he didn't know" is rubbish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    Nothing wrong with having Renault involved if they are paying for advertisement etc....if RTE presenters are using that to fill their own pockets then it becomes an issue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,138 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    BMW to Renault? That's a punishment in itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭Will_I_Amnt


    Well more has already come out that no questions have been asked about in the committees. Example, Dermot Bannon, Lottie Ryan, Baz Ashmawy, Anna Geary, Carl Mullan, Doireann Garrihy and Hugh Wallace have all benefited from “ambassador” roles with car brands.


    Here's Kathryn Thomas starting a new one with Peugeot just 3 weeks ago, having previously been associated with Audi (who dumped her over a penalty points issue)....



    She's also a brand ambassador for Lupilu baby and toddler through Lidl


    All bar Hugh Wallace are with NK Management.


    There isn't necessarily anything wrong with all of this - But the questions should have been asked by now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭Will_I_Amnt


    IMO, The Ian Dempsey Breakfast Show is very very stale. But it's not a like-for-like comparison anyway. Tubs would fit better at Newstalk.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,621 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    Agreed. If he had nothing to hide, no problem. The rush to return it though shows something could be amiss.

    At the very least, the optics looks terrible and his statement about it being ad hoc was foolish.

    He should have come out with a full statement declaring everything in detail including what tax was owed and if it was paid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Dooley is backtracking because he doesn't think going after Marty is going to be popular.

    He's one of the few in RTE that could elicit sympathy in this situation. How unfortunate for Timmy



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 21,772 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Nice and subtle change in direction there, from "nothing to see here" to it's all NK's fault. 😂

    Really highlights the importance of letting your agent broker your deals, although we have seen that however the parent company “handles” the payments can wind you up in a mess entirely of their own making.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,621 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    To be fair its a grey area. Marty is a paid public servant with RTE. He has obligations like all public or civil servants. I can't imagine a civil servant in the revenue commissioners for example doing gigs on the side and getting a loan of a car in return. They'd have to declare it.

    Its only fair the same rules apply across the board. Public servants should not be getting substantial gifts or favours on the side, no matter what they do in return.

    This needs tightening up by the new DG. RTE staffers need to decide if they are public servants or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,074 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    Having RTE "stars" being associated with your brand must now be toxic.

    🙈🙉🙊



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,460 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,036 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin


    Jesus don’t put grey area and Marty in the same sentence. He goes through a lot of trouble to hide his grey.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,150 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I don’t think that’s the way it’s going- it’s simply RTÉ haven’t answered his original question- instead Marty was presented as the answer to a question that wasn’t asked.

    If Marty has a tax liability no one is going to feel sorry for him but he doesn’t deserve to be hung out to dry- I imagine there’s a lot of RTÉ folk right now totting up what they may have to owe to revenue - I won’t feel sympathy for Marty but I won’t “condemn” him either- his punishment will be a hefty fine from revenue if he’s under declared or not declared- just like it would be for any of us -I imagine there will be many others in the same boat.

    The list of “commercial arrangements” that RTÉ are now proposing is years overdue- anyone working in the corporate sector know full well the implications of not declaring interests and risk their careers for not disclosing- that for me is the bigger issue here - it’s the complete lack of governance in general in RTÉ



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,196 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Agreed. The situation seems to be that if he'd been getting paid for appearances, he'd have to pay taxes on that. Instead he was given the loan of a car in an on-going ad-hoc agreement. Whether that constitutes a benefit-in-kind considering he's not an employee of Renault and there was no formal agreement, I have no idea. But at the very least it should be looked into and any money that should have been paid to Revenue should be paid.



  • Posts: 8,532 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'd imagine there is a lot of "talent" consulting with their accountants at present!!

    I want his travel and sub claims to be made public. If he was claiming for depreciation on a vehicle that he didn't have to upkeep himself that could be an awkward conversation. Also what vehicle was registered for his claims.

    What was Martys salary? I can't believe that he wasn't charging for events in lieu of a poxy Renault.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,621 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    Just read that now. Marty was very naive if he didn't think he'd have to pay something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,621 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    He should receive a suspension of a couple months without pay, and get his tax affairs in order. As should anyone in RTE who has been found doing similar.

    Time to clean the place up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 644 ✭✭✭juno10353


    Is Marty a Rte employee or is he self employed doing contract work with RTE. Doesn't he also do work for GAA. Was the car 'loan' from work done with GAA and so nothing to do with RTE.

    I understand that this car arrangement is something which needs to be sorted tax wise, but that's separate issue. Or am I completely wrong



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,117 ✭✭✭creedp


    This is why you have to take what a politician says with a large pinch of salt. Blows with the wind..every day is a new day. Always said no need to spend big money producing dramas, just promote Oireachtas TV, best fictional drama in town and no additional production costs (far from free of course but it's a sunk cost so may as well get some actual benefit from the spend)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,064 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    He is described in media at the moment as 'RTE staff' or 'employee', so seems like a direct employee.

    Regardless though, RTE should have had a register of interests covering both.

    In addition, RTÉ’s Interim Deputy Director General, Adrian Lynch said he has agreed with incoming Director General Kevin Bakhurst that the station will develop a register of interests for both staff and their contractors - starting first with its on-air presenters.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,138 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    The fact, though, is that RTE is not part of the "Public Service", and it's not up to RTE staffers to decide if they're public servants or not.

    The Department of Public Expenditure & Reform lists all the organisations that are part of the Public Service here: https://databank.per.gov.ie/Public_Service_Numbers.aspx?rep=SectorTrend) . They fall into the following categories:

    • Civil Service
    • Defence Sector
    • Education Sector
    • Health Sector
    • Justice Sector
    • Local Authorities
    • NCSA (Non-Commercial State Agencies)


    The NSCAs relevant to the area of Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport & Media are:

    • Arts Council
    • Boord O Ulster-scotch (An Foras Teanga)
    • Broadcasting Authority of Ireland
    • Chester Beatty Library
    • Crawford Gallery
    • Fáilte Ireland
    • Foras Na Gaeilge (An Foras Teanga)
    • Irish Museum Of Modern Art
    • National Concert Hall
    • National Gallery
    • National Library Of Ireland
    • National Museum Of Ireland
    • Screen Ireland (Fís Éireann)
    • Sport Ireland
    • Tourism Ireland
    • Údarás Na Gaeltachta
    • Western Development Commission

    As you can see RTE is not a part of this. Legally, RTE is a "statutory corporation", the same as the ESB, Ervia (formerly known as Bord Gáis Éireann) and An Bord Pleanála. Legally, they are specifically not part of the public service, despite people colloquially regarding them as "a public service".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 294 ✭✭SnazzyPig


    So making a jokey observation about someone is 'attacking' them?

    Is that you, Ms. McEntee?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,916 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    Marty was/is also an MC at Bank of Ireland sponsored events which I believe he would be paid for. I think Marty would have an accountant and declaring this income as there’s a paper trail.

    I don’t think Marty is the person being discussed at the committee the other day.



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I know. I was responding to a post that said the state had lost tax revenue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,117 ✭✭✭creedp


    It's a valid point re charging VAT but some plumbers / electricians may not thank you for shining a light on their intermittent practice of not charging VAT for their services😂.



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It would be very helpful and save an awful lot of time and effort.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,621 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    As a permanent employee of RTE, Marty is possibly subject to the same rules as for civil servants. Here are the rules:

    Information notice - gifts to civil servants (sipo.ie)

    If he is subject to these rules, then I believe he may have broken 2 rules:

    1.  All offers of gifts or hospitality from commercial interests which have or might have contractual relations with the Department/Office of the civil servant to whom the offer is made must be reported by that civil servant to his or her manager for direction. 
    2. If sources can be believed, he didn't declare the car as a taxable benefit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,952 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    I said no such thing. The fault lies clearly, and only, with RTE. And in this case one of their own employees who “acted” on his own instead of using his agent, who should be consulted, and included, in any business agreements.

    People just seem to really want it to be the fault of Ryan Tubridy and Noel Kelly Management when, really, how RTÉ want to pay their payments is no concern of theirs.

    From the outset I said this was an RTÉ issue and it’s only become more of an RTÉ issue since.

    “It matters not what someone is born, but what they grow to be” - A. Dumbledore

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The end user is whoever buys a car from Renault, they will pay VAT as a consumer. But for this transaction the VAT wouldn't be passed on through the VAT chain. Its purely a bookkeeping exercise.

    That said, Marty should have submitted a VAT invoice to Renault for his services provided, not done it for "free" and received the loan of a car in lieu.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,868 ✭✭✭Nermal




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement