Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Fighter jets for the Air Corps?

1148149151153154193

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 475 ✭✭delusiondestroyer


    Guaranteed fact you never even heard of a storm shadow missile till it was all over sky news too 🤣🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,459 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I would guess a little of both having read it. Interesting to see yet again DPER getting flagged as the major obstacle for progressing anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,361 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    This part seams interesting particuarly the costs

    Phipps said 2021 costings he has seen for such a fleet of aircraft, a squadron of between eight to ten fighter jets with the primary radar system, would be in the region of US$360 million, (€329.5m) with an annual running cost of US$20m (€18m).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 475 ✭✭delusiondestroyer


    Credit to the RAF they have done a fantastic job in keeping the air space safe, and without any thanks, if its security we are worried about in the air we d do far worse than working with our closest neighbors. Who have arguably the best airforce in the world.

    It's no surprise we are decades without a major incidents.

    The up roar over it is hilarious just shows security isn't the main concern.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,962 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Quite damming. It's not likely DPER acting independently either.

    ".....Regardless of those machinations and the gnashing of teeth over the supposed deal with the British, all that will become redundant fallacy if Ireland’s military security apparatus is found wanting when a critical incident arises..."

    The very minimum is the Radar and ancillaries.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,459 ✭✭✭sparky42


    If that is accurate and current within the AC it’s some interesting figures, seems to be much lower than what we’ve seen before, though off the top of my head that operational coatings seem to be closer to the M346 suggestion to the Commission than operating Gripens?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 475 ✭✭delusiondestroyer


    You must have a stack high of articles at this point.

    And yet..

    No fighter jets or progress towards them to be seen.

    Into the bargain Ireland remains as safe as ever without this equipment.

    The deal with the RAF is working flawlessly.

    0 major incidents.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 475 ✭✭delusiondestroyer


    I find it genuinely amazing though the level of mental gymnastics performed by you and your buddies to convince yerselves that everyone that disagrees with ye is a troll.

    Surely ye LL get an award to recognize your length of service 5 years on the same thread banging the same drum truly is a feat.

    Probably gotta be contender for the longest consecutive echo chamber in history too!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,459 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I’d be surprised if the AC was still using anything priced from then, in aviation 20 years is an entirety. I would have assumed if might have been internal work for the Commission?


    Speaking of 9/11, I wonder what options were considered then before we did nothing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,962 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    ...and 9/11 no doubt...

    Last I checked, and last time this thread discussed the running costs across the various options in any published articles were quite old even back then. Recent event have lots of nations rushing to a common more expensive platform. Defence budgets have been increased. Its a different landscape now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,459 ✭✭✭sparky42


    We have the costings put forward for the option of the M346 (well we have what the company says it would cost), and we have the ball park numbers/figures from a previous AC General for a mor capable option, so I doubt the AC is using 20 year old figures. While I don’t have it up right now the figure quoted in the Journal reminds me of the Italian option and costs more than Gripens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,459 ✭✭✭sparky42


    It’s not like we couldn’t have afforded it then (or any time since the 90s), but very Bertie to stick us with marginal at best AA guns and think that solved the issue. I’ve often wondered if we had kept the budget in or around the 1% circa end of the Troubles what we would be looking at now in terms of what the DF would be?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,361 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The M346 is 25/30 million per unit so it probably was them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I think we need to remember our own history and how our independence came about by force. Some of those who support neutrality, such as PBP, seem to do so from a pacifistic perspective, also opposing an increase in defence spending. Such an approach would leave Ireland defenceless in case of Russian or other aggression.

    There is a danger of Ireland being used as a launchpad to attack the UK and other European neighbours. There is also a danger that the transatlantic telecommunication-cables are being mapped and mined by the Russian navy. There have been reports I heard recently on RTE Radio 1 that analysts believe Russia has mined essential infrastructure throughout Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,247 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I suppose something will get done eventually....Just hope they don't go for the absolute minimum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,962 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭purplepanda


    I seem to remember when a levy on aviation carriers was previously mentioned to finance Ireland 's air policing duties, Ryanair MD Michael O'Leary & the aviation sector had a massive tantrum.

    I think some of the cost of air policing really should be implemented on the aviation industries, the multinational corporations paying low rates of taxes on profits should also be forced to contribute towards the cost of Ireland's defence forces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,459 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Nah, we aren’t even at a bare minimum at the moment, we have to work up to that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 475 ✭✭delusiondestroyer


    Ah yes Ireland is going to be used as a launch pad to attack the UK, meanwhile in reality the Russians cant project power past there own doorstep.

    This of course is completely ignoring the fact that no one is relying on Ireland to protect critical infrastructure, nor will they ever.

    Serious over estimation of Ireland position on the global stage in regards to military according to the notions on here we are absolutely vital which is genuinely laugh out loud stuff.

    The only reason we are taking about the russians doing anything to cables is because the UK military and the US military are all over it as its important to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 475 ✭✭delusiondestroyer


    If there was any realistic threat that definitely needed policing they would be campaigning for it but there isnt... as proven by decades of safe skys.

    O'Leary is no fool he wont pay for nonsense like that and rightly so, having gobshites flying around in jets unnecessarily just so the air corps can feel good about itself and combat imaginary threats they made up themselves.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,751 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Of course they are! We should be too. As for the Russians they don't seem to be able enough but who knows what can happen. At least we should have a certain capacity to defend ourselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,759 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 475 ✭✭delusiondestroyer


    None that you would be privy to only people in certain channels and people that are tuned in and up to date know about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,759 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    So to know about it, you must know about it, yeah?

    You're so satisfied that this deal adequately protects our territory and interests, I'm assuming you know all about the details?

    So instead of dismissing all the legitimate concerns of other posters here, tell us about what you know that we do not?

    Share the reasons for your boundless confidence and self-satisfaction so that we too might see the light!

    Because someone so smug could only be 'in the know'. Right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,459 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I do wonder with the increased attention, just how long the current policy of denying any details on "National Security" is going to hold up to be honest? I mean at least it's going to come up next time Martin is before the Committee, what's he going to do, say "National Security" to every question?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,459 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Indeed, and that should be the least he does given it’s importance and the ambiguity around the whole thing, but so far there’s been no suggestion of such, when’s the next scheduled hearing I wonder?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,247 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I somehow doubt that that fella has any inside knowledge at all. Probably a PBP activist who just happened upon the thread and wants to piss everyone off. Deeply unpatriotic into the bargain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 475 ✭✭delusiondestroyer


    Why am i so confident our airspace is so secure ? Let me see.... decades on decades without any major incident for one without any fighter jets.

    Im simply asking those who are campaigning so hard for jets to give me examples of these "severe" threats we are facing on a daily basis so much so they describe our need for fighter aircraft as "urgent"

    All i get back is vague nonsense about "hybrid threats" and other shite one lad referencing ww2 and scrawls of irish Times articles.. ffs.. of course i know asking these questions that there is no consistent threat of note to Ireland to warrant spending on fighter jets our decades apon decades of safe skies gives testament to my claims.

    Its not my fault asking people about imaginary threats triggers people.

    And apparently having common sense is unpatriotic these days to laughable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 871 ✭✭✭Mr Disco


    Why didn’t they purchase ex RAF Harrier jump jets with their multi role aspect they would have been perfect



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,247 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    True Mr disco



Advertisement