Donald Trump discussion Thread IX (threadbanned users listed in OP)

He is admitting that everything Cohen said was correct. I'm not sure that is the win he thinks it is.

Especially the part of the suit where it claims that Cohen talked publicly about the hush-money payments. Whatever about testifying before a closed hearing Grand Jury where the testimony is closed until a judge unseals it at a later date in court, to try such a suit when Cohen may be called to give testimony in any trial in open court as a witness. let alone in the suit he's apparently bringing against Cohen. "Your Honour, we don't like the honest answers Mr Cohen is giving me and my client, Mr Trump. Please direct him to give the answers I want". How does a lawyer proceed with a suit on behalf of a client like Trump? I presume any lawyer worth salt would insist in payment up front.

The essential reason to go forward with a trial is to get a jury of his peers, R and D, to pass a just verdict that he is guilty as charged. Two follow-up reasons are to pass a sentence which will hurt him publicly by draining voter support from him AND lessening donor cash contributions to any fund he's connected to by name. If he's forced to resort to his own personal funds AND not donor cash to pay for his legal defence. the better it is.

Tag him with a criminal court conviction label for life by way of a jury trial of his peers and not in his own chosen "lock her/him up" style of convicting people without a trial. Ensure, as far as possible, that like-minded people on the R front [which there seem to be dozens of] are dissuaded from following his style of politics. To use one of his political slogans, "drain the swamp" which he has made of the Republican party.

Hard to know how much Rupert is involved these days as he is after all 90! However I can't believe that a man as ruthless as him must not be fuming with Trump at the moment and not want some vengeance. I assume they for the primary season at least ignore him and then see how it goes.

With one more court case due against Fox News Corp by another firm on the issue of Fox lying to the public with pro-Trump fake news and causing damage to the other firm as a result, the Fox News insurance coverage fund must be taking a deep hit now. I think a test on how much disfavour Trump is in with Fox News may be shown on how much pro-Trump material is shown on Fox in the next few months and which Fox News personality will be doing the presenting. If Trump items are going to appear/be shown on Fox News, there will probably be lead-out mention of the segments, even if they are publicized from Trump's own platform.

Its possible in the settled lawsuit with dominion a provision may have been Tucker had to go?

He was not as all in as others were in the conservative ecosphere but he was obviously the most prominent.

If it was his call to go I would assume he would at least got a farewell show.

I dunno his plans now, OANN and Newsmax have massive lawsuits to deal with over the "stolen election" drivel so unlikely their.

Dailywire would be a good shout, but he may just sit out for a while and see what happens.

Is Jordan Klepper still the guest on The Daily Show? I'd love him to break this news.

Ousted over a discrimination lawsuit

She is the producer who flipped sides so it is indirectly related to the whole dominion thing.

The fact that they have had to publicly let it be known they are holding an file of dirt on tucker in case he starts being loose with his tongue makes it pretty obvious they are hiding quite a lot of terrible things.

Is there a republican that is competent and telegenic? Genuine question.

The next in the polls is Ron , and he doesn't appear to be completely competent or telegenic. I can't imagine his anti-choice, cancel culture, anti-lgbt rhetoric hoovering up independent voters either.