Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump discussion Thread IX (threadbanned users listed in OP)

1108109111113114164

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭Guildenstern


    I think even CNN admitting it's a flimsy case, says it all. Last week was just theatre.

    The other cases coming up against Trump look to be more serious hurdles but his ability to play up the victim over the next year could be more than enough to secure the nomination.

    All in all, from where are looking, you'd think he wouldn't be able to bag the swing States. For the GOP, I'd say De Santos could do, but will he get the chance.

    Trump to get the nomination but not ultimately the White House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭Guildenstern


    Apologies. Was watching their coverage during the week. That was my take on their summary. Quite a fair analysis and went against the grain that their just a Trump hating entity.

    Much prefer plugging into CNN for US news than say, getting the RTE version.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    A couple of pages ago you said there were “No crimes” in the charges, now you think it’ll be dismissed at “the first attempt”.


    You haven’t a bulls notion about any of this. A grand journey was in panelled and decided that an indictment was warranted to m 34 charges. Now that doesn’t mean Trump is guilty, but it gives a probable conviction rate of over 90%.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    I find this “It’s a flimsy case” idea very interesting. Cohen went to jail for this “flimsy case” already. A grand jury found and indictment is warranted. Can’t be that flimsy.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Again you haven't shown any citation, just your opinion. So it's your opinion that cnn are saying it's a weak case, rather than cnn actually saying it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,810 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    It was big news the day of the arrest, and middle page news the day after the indictment was released, as no one, even Trump rivals could see anything in it, misdemeanours as a push, felony offences, no chance of conviction



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I asked already but who on The Left, are Trump's rivals who have dismissed this case? You keep saying these things and offering no proof.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Even though someone has already been imprisoned for the very same crime Trump is accused of?

    It died off because there's nothing more to report on. Do you think the news networks won't be covering the trial?



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    He was charged with 34 felonies. Don’t you understand that? I can’t figure out if you’re being disingenuous or blind.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,584 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Trump was indicted in a state court that is outside the jurisdiction of the SCOTUS, which means Trump cannot appeal to his mates in the SC.

    The Georgian case can go ahead because it will be a case that does not make history being the first to indict a former US President. The known evidence is on a recording of a telephone call made by Trump to a Georgian (Republican elected) official demanding that he find Trump 11,000 votes to fix the election in Trumps favour. I'd say banged to rights.

    Other cases will plod along.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,788 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Seeing as Trump will/may be facing trial in a non-federal court in New York on what are described as misdemeanor charges [34 in number] it's worth noting that while they aren't felony charges, misdemeanor charges - depending on their class - can individually earn a convicted person a locked-up time of between 2 weeks and nearly one year. Trump is facing 34 charges so if he's convicted of a large number and the judge sitting in the court decides the offences committed by Trump are serious enough and is convinced Trump knew in advance that the offences were criminal in nature, there is a fair to middling chance that Trump will spend time residing in a state prison, even if it's only while his legal team launch an appeal and [maybe] get him bailed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,634 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I was corrected on this a few days ago. It's 11,780 votes he was looking for😉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,331 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2



    I seen a poll where something like 60% feel its politically motivated and I agree. The problem however for Trump is while many may think this is flimsy in that poll the majority also agreed! Why?

    Because while they may feel its soft they want him got on something and you can't blame anyone, the man has spent decades saying FU to the law etc. Its basically Al Capone taxes again!

    However from what I have seen and not just in the echo chambers their is really serious stuff coming for him regarding Georgia and another rape case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,166 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    The 34 charges that trump faces are misdemeanours that become felonies if the illegal conduct was used to cover up another crime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,788 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Ta for that. It might be worth while knowing if any of his lawyers - given their stated profession - knew enough to see he was engaged in criminal behaviour but did nothing to stop him or advise the court that their client was engaging in criminal offences while they were representing him before the same court. Cohen did prison time for lying to congress about the Russian interference with the 2016 election and his former client.

    From 2021: “I will not cease my commitment to law enforcement. I will continue to provide information, testimony, documents and my full cooperation on all ongoing investigations to ensure that others are held responsible for their dirty deeds,” Cohen told reporters outside the New York City federal courthouse after his sentence was officially concluded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,166 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    I don't think any of his current lawyers represented him at the time of the offences. Though I'm not sure why you that lawyers are obliged to tell the police that their clients are committing crimes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,235 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Stewart gives a very good breakdown of why this isn't bigger news. The TV news need a moment, a picture to sell the story.

    Trump in an orange jumpsuit would be it. But that didn't happen. Instead all we got was basically a boring legal hearing followed by a wait until December. During which nobody should really comment.

    Even Trump knows that, hence the low key and frankly boring speech in Mar y lago afterward.

    The TV news need an episode of CSI, but this is real life justice which moves slowly, is boring and procedural.

    But while many on the GOP and Trump supporters attempt to claim this is nothing, yet another attack line is gone. He can't claim, well not credibly anyway to anyway but his core supporters, that he is out law and order. That he will 'lock her up'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,788 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Not the police. The lawyers are part of the US justice system the courts are part of. I was under the impression that lawyers there have an obligation not to get involved in criminal activities their clients are involved in as that would be an act outside any duty of care they have to any client and if they become aware that their client is trying to get them to assist in criminal activities, they would be legally obliged to take steps to avoid their client ensnaring them in such criminal acts.

    Stepping away from defence of a client by asking the court to release them from representation duties of a particular client doesn't quite shout out to the court that the client is doing something unlawful but informs people with a nous that the lawyer knows there is a lawful reason to step away from the client, and not something based on a whim.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    I could be wrong: but I think a lawyer has to report it if their client intends to commit a crime in future. E.g. if the client says “I’m going to lie on the stand”, they are supposed to report their client for perjury.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,584 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    They cannot report a client for the intention of committing a crime. Their obligation is to advise the client not to do such a thing. Any lawyer worth his salt would never get to the point of knowing their client was in a position to commit perjury to the knowledge of the lawyer. They mat very well suspect their client is guilty, but they would be foolish to get to the point of certainty.

    In other words, the lawyer never asks - 'Well, did you do it?' because the lawyer cannot continue with the client if the answer is 'Yes!'. He is obliged to reduce his defence of the client before the court to just ask for mitigation of the offence. The lawyer in that case would typically come off record and withdraw from the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,788 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    There's a media outlet titled Showbizz Daily running a story about another woman, Karen McDougal, a Playboy magazine model Trump was allegedly seeing around the same period [2006/2007] as Stormy Daniels. It's reported that DA Bragg investigated whether Karen McDougal also received hush money to keep quiet during the 2016 election period to avoid Trump losing votes, with two witnesses, who offered information about the McDougal case, giving testimony to the Grand Jury. The McDougal payment story is also in the Wall Street Journal.

    It's reported a larger sum of money was paid to Karen than to Stormy, with it being routed through a non-disclosure deal with The National Inquirer owned by a friend of Trump. The Inquirer never printed anything about the alleged affair between Trump and McDougal. The story also mentions the payoff was done around the time Trumps wife gave birth to their son Barron. It's also reported that an investigation was carried out by authorities into the McDougal story in 2018 around the time the Stormy Daniels revelations broke.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Well if Americans are disinterested in this case, as some here have recently spoofed ... it's not reflective in the polls: 53% of those asked believe Trump acted illegally, and knowingly so. Only 20% think he did nothing wrong.

    Crucially, 57% of independents thought he committed an illegal act, while only 45% of republicans think he's innocent of wrongdoing. The rest are split between trump's culpability, unknowingly criminality and ignorance(!) but IMO it's fascinating because to me this reminds that the 2024 candidacy is no slam dunk.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,634 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Yeah, McDougal got $150,000. NDA doesn't hold if it's got to do with a crime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,331 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    If I have read that correctly, only 25% of independents think favorably of Trump which is an absolute disaster. He's not winning the EC with those numbers.

    Its infuriating for the GOP, Biden's numbers are mediocre, but it doesn't matter because an election between the two of them turns into a referendum on Trump and that's a disaster for Trump. The GOP could be looking at losing the HOF and favorable senate seats which is astonishing as the senate map is relatively kind for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,788 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Hopefully it'll now be a matter for more and more Republican voters to realise that Trump committed criminal acts in his bids to retain the presidency and accept that [in truth] he did it not for the party but for himself, that his trial for his attempt to corruptly steal the Georgia election should prove to be the nail in the coffin for his 2024 bid. The attempts made to buy the silence of women he had affairs with is the proof that Trump is corrupt from the core out, that loyalty to him is the measure he judges peoples' worth by.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,166 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    For that to happen they would have to admit that he fooled them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,511 ✭✭✭amandstu


    They don't need to look at themselves ; just agree that another candidate has a better chance at winning the presidency.

    As for being fooled they are probably as culpable as he is ,just never got the opportunity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,788 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    He probably honed that skill on "The Apprentice".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,788 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    I dislike having to use the word "probably" but where Trump is concerned legally, I use it as he cant be counted as down and out yet. This is his latest legal move and probably is intended to ensure he remains visible to his supporters and stays in their electoral minds. Hope springs eternal etc.

    FORMER US PRESIDENT Donald Trump has sued the key witness in his criminal case, accusing one-time lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen of “vast reputational harm” for talking publicly about the hush-money payments at the heart of the case. The lawsuit, filed in Miami, offered a preview of arguments that are sure to be featured in Trump’s defence against charges that he falsified internal business records to disguise payments made during the 2016 presidential campaign to silence claims of extramarital sexual encounters. The suit accused Cohen of breaking a confidentiality agreement he signed as a condition of his employment, violating ethical standards for lawyers and “spreading falsehoods” about Trump “with malicious intent and to wholly self-serving ends.”

    It seeks more than half a billion dollars from Cohen. Trump is not specifically suing Cohen over his grand jury testimony in the criminal case, but he cites it in support of an argument that his ex-lawyer sought to profit from his role through the publication of two books, a podcast series and media appearances.

    Cohen’s spokesman, lawyer Lanny Davis, said the lawsuit will not deter Cohen’s cooperation with prosecutors. “Mr Trump appears once again to be using and abusing the judicial system as a form of harassment and intimidation against Michael Cohen,” Davis said. “It appears he is terrified by his looming legal perils and is attempting to send a message to other potential witnesses who are cooperating with prosecutors against him.” JOURNAL.IE.....

    The next two paragraphs are included in the Journal.ie report I took all this from and concern historical facts not necessarily directed to Trumps latest law suit against those he does not like or employ. The third sentence from Mr Davis seems to refer to Trumps latest law suit.

    The suit is the latest effort by Trump to use the legal system to go after his political enemies and is another example of the former president turning on a once-loyal aide after their relationship imploded.

    A judge in Florida sanctioned Trump and one of his lawyers in January, ordering them to pay nearly one million dollars for filing what he said was a bogus lawsuit against Trump’s 2016 rival Hillary Clinton and others.

    Davis predicted this lawsuit would also fail.



Advertisement