Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Minimum alcohol pricing is nigh

1274275277279280320

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 412 ✭✭bluedex


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.

    Not official reports as such but anecdotal evidence of a big increase in drug use, which is a reflection of what happened in Scotland, based on research there.

    Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,190 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Post a link to the research from Scotland please.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,190 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    I never saw that. Could you give some numbers, not stuff like explosion and gone through the roof.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭Pissy Missy


    So in the Newcastle airport to go back to Ireland and there's a mass sale on, drink is dirt cheap, 1 litre of vodka £11! If only I was a young one again



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,190 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Research from Newcastle University and published in the Lancet found alcohol sales fell by almost 8% after the policy was introduced in Scotland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,768 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Most the posts on that are about people going to north and giving out about prices now. There is little bargains to be had on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,190 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    And with the news from the North yesterday, that will make them give out a bit more.



  • Posts: 8,532 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And?

    Doesnt mean that consumption fell that much with problem drinkers. The problem drinkers are the ones still puchasing it and that hasnt been eliminated. Whereas us that like a beer in moderation get crucified. You can continue to throw out reports all you want but none of them clairfy whether they have dealt with problem drinkers. They also dont clarify if younger people have just been pushed toward illegal chaper alternatives. I think we all know the answer to that. Unfortuantely no spurious reports have been done up for it yet.

    Anyway in ireland health benefits werent the aim of mup. It was championed by publicans, fg and other lobby grouos so they could continue to screw people over in the pubs. Any reports on health benefits linked to off licence aales in ireland are irrelevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,455 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I suspect problem drinkers are not the sort to be accurately recording their alcohol consumption in a Kantar survey...

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,190 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Crucified. Appropriate for the day that's in it.

    And? I just thought it would be nice to give some more news from Newcastle.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 679 ✭✭✭GNWoodd


    To say that rural pubs are quieter now is an understatement . A significant number are already closed or else barely hanging in there . I often wonder what happened to those who used to socialise in them .

    Their closure is an permanent example of how various pressure groups have acquired inordinate influence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,190 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It is the smoking ban that did it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Yes. very sad.

    But were there too many to begin with?

    Are we seeing a right-sizing of the rural pub industry?

    If any busimess is not sustainable on its own merit, it is not truly economically viable.

    But that doesnt mean it wont be missed by the local community.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,101 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Various pressure groups?

    They are closing because of lack of business. Caused by multiple factors including significant increase in alternatives. TV, sport, travel.

    Smoking ban and drink driving have had an impact, but both are positive.

    The only pressure group closing rural pubs is the public.



  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.

    The ones that survive are the ones that adapted.

    Food, lifts home for regulars etc.

    Young people are drinking less too. Without a slew of new customers, you'll see many more closures.

    Coffee shops on the other hand. Roaring business.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,431 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    1.09 was the price before MUP.

    That was the market price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Yes, but was it the correct price?

    if its still selling at the new inflated price, in the same volume, perhaps it was under priced to begin with.

    Either way, there is a new market price.

    Prices from the past are generally lower than todays prices.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,455 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It's not a market price. It's not set by the market it is set by the government.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    As a mimimum, fixed price.

    Therefore, it is the minimum market price for the product.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,455 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The minimum price is not set by the market. It's set by the government. To talk of that as the market price is meaningless nonsense therefore.

    "The market price of an asset or service is determined by the forces of supply and demand."

    The minimum price was not set by forces of supply and demand.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    So we should remove all of the rent controls on property that the govt have installed?

    Sugar tax was introduced by the govt and increased the price of sugary drinks and other products. We should remove this also?

    There are occasions where the Govt intervenes in market forces, particularly where health is concerned.

    We have to rember that most people are not impacted by MUP.

    There wont be any meaningful opposition to it, because it just doesnt resonate with most people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,455 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06



    It may or not be correct for the government to intervene in each of those specific circumstances, but each of them need to be judged on their own merits. Because it would be an absolutely absurd argument to suggest, if rent controls succeed or fail that that has any bearing whatsoever on minimum pricing of alcohol. Just briefly, consider that rent controls are in effect setting a maximum brought in due to inadequate supply and MUP is about reducing demand through a minimum price.

    So that's some attempt in that post at whataboutery and deflection all because you were challenged on calling it the 'market price'.

    So you've gone from calling it the market price, to "where the Govt intervenes in market forces".

    Yeah and where the government intervenes to that extent, it's not the market price then - it's not primarily determined by supply and demand. If it was determined by supply and demand the price of alcohol would be at pre-MUP levels.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,190 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    You cant have your cake and eat it.

    If its ok for the govt to intervene with a Max price for rents, to help manage the supply and demand challenges around housing, then it has to be correct for them to intervene with a minimum price also.

    Especially if the intervention is to promote health benefits in our population.

    The market price is the market price.

    The government intervenes with all regulatory proecdures and legislation.

    They are allowed to do so and their actions can influence the market price.

    The market price is the cost of selling goods within the confines of the law.

    It is not the price you would like it to be, just because it used to be that price. :)

    Otherwise we should all be complaining at the price of a pint of milk, compared to what it was in 1960.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,455 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I think when you call something the market price when it's set predominantly by government with a minimum price far in excess of what the market was offering that is most certainly having your cake and eating it too. It's a meaningless definition then.

    The price of milk is not set by the government the way alcohol price is. So your point fails at the first step.

    Nobody is disputing the constitutionality of MUP, so the suggestion it's "ok" to roll out MUP and it "has to be correct" because of something something rent controls is so wrong on some many basic levels of economics it's a position utterly without merit or foundation. If you made that argument in an economics course you would be laughed at.

    I pointed out a rather obvious one that one is a measure to control supply and one is about demand but obviously your post demonstrates you can't refute economic points.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    All prices, for all products, are subject to intervenion from the government, in case you hadn't noticed.

    The govt influence the market price for EVERYTHING you buy and consume.

    Look at the tax on diesel and petrol, which will only increase as we accelerate the Green agenda.

    MUP is just another example of govt influence on a market price.

    I know you dont agree with it, but if it does help reduce alcohol consumption in Ireland, it can really only be deemed a success.

    Lets at least give it a chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,768 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Lad you are moving the goalposts off the pitch at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,259 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I'll give you this much you are persistent.

    However persistence is no substitute for facts.

    The market price for an item is what it is worth on an open market.

    That price is determined by what the seller is willing to sell at and what a buyer is willing to pay.

    By introducing MUP the Government purposely put an end to the open market for alcoholic drinks.

    It is now illegal for sellers to sell at the price they wish to sell.

    You can continue to claim that the MUP price is the market price but you will be wrong every time you make that claim.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Lad, you just dont understand basic ecomonics.

    The Govt influences the market price for all products, via legislation.

    Thats all I am saying.



Advertisement