Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Last of Us - HBO *Spoilers* See warning in post #1

12223242628

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,314 ✭✭✭Cordell


    I think it's pretty clear Joel is neither good nor bad, he's just a survivor doing what he must.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    I think Druckmann has said in interviews that for the purposes of the story, it would have been successful and they could have made a vaccine.

    Then he should have put that on the screen, any story that needs supplementary reading is a failure.

    To be honest I don't know why he didn't, it would have taken 2 lines of dialogue and would easily have framed the scenario the way they clearly wanted. When Marlene is talking to Joel, instead of wishy washy mumbo jumbo she instead says something like:

    The doctor has been working on this for years, he needed to see an immune person to be sure but now that he has, this could work Joel, it could really work!

    I'm obviously no scriptwriter but it seems they could have focused the choices to be made a lot better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,152 ✭✭✭_CreeD_



    On the Doctor - Wait for Season 2 (presuming it follows the second game as closely). While not a fan of the sequel it does explain this reaction better, and likely why it was more extreme to set this up than what I remember from the first game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    It's not wishy washy mumbo jumbo (I mean, in real life it is, but in the context of the show it isn't), she outright explains why Ellie is immune and how the doctor is going to make a vaccine. She explains Ellie has been infected and immune since birth, the cordyceps in her releases a chemical messenger which makes it think she's cordyceps, and the doctor is going to remove and use that cordyceps to reproduce the chemical messenger which they can use to create a cure.

    Again, mumbo jumbo sci-fi explanation, but for the purposes of the show there's no way that Joel could know whether or not it would work. He's not a doctor or scientist. It doesn't matter to him whether or not it would work, because he'd make the same choice regardless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,682 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It seemed pretty clear to me that Marlene isn't herself sure it will work. The doctor has no way of knowing if he can extract, reproduce or inject the chemical.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    But the problem is that what Marlene says is clearly ridiculous in universe, and Joel was quite right to be sceptical of it.

    Why? Because if you had an immune person who is creating a chemical messenger, the last goddamn thing you want to do is kill that person, especially not mere hours after first getting a look at her.

    What if she dies in your ill equipped hospital before you extract the messenger? What if your theory doesn't work? What if it nearly works but you run out of samples before fine tuning the process?

    Somebody tells me that they are going to kill the only immune person in the world mere hours after finding her and I immediately think they are a **** idiot who shouldn't be allowed a rubber scalpel. This was a scenario that absolutely needed to avoid medical mumbo jumbo and just focus on the certainty or belief that the experts knew exactly what they were up to. Any jargon could only ever take away from that certainty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Honestly, I have no interest in a season 2. After a strong first half of the season there was a real dip in quality and really harmed my opinion of the show overall. I watched the last few episodes just to see it out but they annoyed me more than entertained me.

    I also read a plot summary of the 2nd game just yesterday and it killed any interest I might have had stone dead. Such a mess of a plot. Even then, if I was going to experience it I think I would just play the game, because it is clear now that that is what I should have done for the first season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Do you think if it was made absolutely crystal clear to Joel that the vaccine would definitely, 100% work, that it would have made any difference to Joel or changed his decision?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    The point is that it would have given him a decision to make.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,038 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Off the bat, I loved it. I loved the series as a whole. I really felt for Ellie's mum after seeing the bite. Imagine, getting that far, 9 months of pregnancy in THAT universe (best of luck with any cravings you get!) and then to fall just at the finish line. Heartbreaking stuff.

    I really liked the attention to detail that she hadn't fed Ellie yet as she was afraid she'd infect her. That was a nice touch.

    As a non game player, the bit with the giraffes threw me. Were they looking at a zoo? I actually thought they might have got attacked by a wild animal like a lion or a tiger 🙈

    Anyway, I thought they did a great job. I loved the pacing, but it goes to show you can't please all the people all the time because if that was TWD, there would have been enough there to drag it out for at least 4 seasons 😂

    One last thing, why the hell didn't Marlene let him say goodbye to Ellie? She could have handcuffed him/tied his hands together, brought him to the room to look at the operation threw the window. It was very stupid to have their story potentially finish like that. From reading above, it sounds like what happened in the game as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    And my point is it wouldn't have changed his decision. We are told in the show by Marlene that they know how to make a vaccine from Ellie but it would result in her death. If it resulted in Ellie's death, then it didn't matter if the vaccine would work or not, or even just if Joel didn't believe it would work. The result of everything would have been the same. We can disagree about the certainty of Marlene and the doctor that it would work, or how Marlene should have explained it to Joel, but it doesn't matter. Joel was not going to let Ellie die.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    Good show. But man, they really turned Joel into a computer game character in the final 2 episodes. Firstly giving him the heath boost to make a miraculous recovery and then the final fight scene where he just takes out a bunch of soldiers. Both really could have been avoided with an episode between 8 & 9.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    It may not have changed the decision, but they still can't skip over the part where he actually has a valid decision to make. It is step one and you can't have step two without it.

    If they want me to feel anything about Joels decision, if they want me to understand his depth of feeling for Ellie, so deep that he ignores all other choices, then they need to actually have valid choices to ignore. You can't have one without the other.

    Instead they neutered the entire theme because he never had a real choice to make.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,682 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It was a baseball pitch the giraffes were in you could see a scoreboard. Probably escaped from a zoo.

    We are not ever told by the show that "they know how to make a vaccine" we are told they have a theory on how to make a vaccine that involves killing the world's only immune patient. Never even using in world science does it say it's more than a theory.

    It wouldn't have changed Joel's decision and Marlene who was happy to kill an innocent child should have just put a bullet in Joel too. I mean who would have known.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,519 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    Never even heard of the game, never mind played it, but I thought it was very good without being one I'd really watch again (unlike some other HBO series' that I've watch several times). Regarding Joel - isn't one of the things that makes HBO stuff so good that characters aren't good or bad, rather they have you flip flopping on your opinions of them?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Marlene doesn't kill Joel because they owe him a debt for how he managed to get Ellie there. Marlene is ultimately honourable. She's willing to let Joel go, and even though she has that connection and history with Ellie through her mother she knows the sacrifice needs to be made. The cordyceps is around Ellie's brain and there's no way for them to remove it without killing her. I don't think Marlene would allow the doctor to go through with it unless they were as certain as they could be that it would work and there was no other way around it.

    An absolutely horrible decision, but I'd disagree that Marlene was happy to kill an innocent child. She also explains to Joel that Ellie hadn't woken up before being prepped for surgery, so they didn't cause her any pain or fear. It's why they didn't wake her up to have a goodbye with Joel or let her make the choice whether she wants to go through with it. That would be a huge thing for Ellie to bear in her final moments/hours. I think from Marlene's perspective, it was better that Ellie didn't have to be faced with that choice.

    Neither Marlene nor Joel made the "right" choices or are definitely good/bad. It's a far more complex situation. But Joel made his choices for more selfish reasons than Marlene.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,255 ✭✭✭Mav11


    It's weird how close that was to the game and yet still felt to be missing something.

    I really think that the only thing missing when compared to the game was the interactive element.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭MOR316


    I'm sure Jimmy will get his Bob Ross, Zebra moment in season 2.

    Went and bought the game last week. Finished it yesterday. **** Abby!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,255 ✭✭✭Mav11


    Never played the game and don't see why it was neccesary to do that.

    You don't have to have played the game, but it helps in terms of context and understanding.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    "Selfishness" has always been the most lazy and basic criticism of Joel and I'll explain to you why.

    Imagine a situation if you will where Joel and Ellie are greeted at the facility by Marlene and a bunch of doctors. They convene at the consultancy room and are given a detailed explanation of what has to happen to Ellie. They guarantee Joel and Ellie that her sacrifice will enable a vaccine to be produced. They show them around fully operational laboratories and explain they are working with other scientists and doctors around the country. Etc ect. They give them time to think it over and ultimately leave the choice to Ellie. If she choose yes , and Joel decided no , then that would make him selfish.

    Instead it went like this. Joel and Ellie reach the facility are immediately tear gassed. An armed goon then knocks Joel unconscious and imprisons him while Elie is taken away and sedated against her will. Joel wakes up not knowing what the hell is going on. Marlene tells him Ellie is about die because the doctor thinks he can make a vaccine- he thinks it can be a cure Joel. Then she has him frog marched out into the open with just a knife for protection. Remind me how she's honourable again 🤨

    So in this situation Joel has no time to process anything. All he knows is Ellie is on the slab ready to be euthanized by some guy he never met for a cure he only "thinks" will work. It isn't selfish to do what he did under those circumstances. Its never an act of selfishness to to want protect your daughter or son.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I said Marlene is honourable with regards to not just having Joel killed because "who would know". She owes Joel a debt for him getting Ellie to them. Kill Joel, and any potential problems or payback from Joel, even years down the line, are negated. She lets him go. She was also willing to sacrifice Ellie for the cure despite her promise to Ellie's mother that she'd protect Ellie, because the cure is more important than any of them.

    As people have said on the thread, Ellie is the only living person who is immune. They're not just going to kill Ellie based on the doctor just thinking it might work. By the time Joel wakes in the hospital, the doctor has clearly had enough time to examine and do tests on Ellie. "He thinks it can be a cure Joel" is said after she describes the exact reasoning and plan behind the procedure and how it would result in a cure. So yes, they're not fully sure, but it's clear they're certain enough that Marlene allows them to go ahead with it, even though it means Ellie's death (which isn't an easy thing for Marlene to allow given her history with Ellie's mother and her promise to keep Ellie safe).

    So again, it comes down to the point that Joel would have made the same decision he did regardless of whether Marlene tells him they think the cure will work, or it will definitely work. Joel's decision isn't based on the vaccine, it's based on Ellie.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭MOR316


    Deleted



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,314 ✭✭✭Cordell


    Marlene had every opportunity to reproduce the circumstances that lead to Ellie being immune, but it's always easier to sacrifice others. She was a woman of reasonably young age, she could have done the same thing and produce an immune child herself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    They're not just going to kill Ellie based on the doctor just thinking it might work.

    That is literally what they are going to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Are you suggesting she should have gotten pregnant women (or become pregnant herself), gotten them bitten by an infected while they were giving birth (not knowing what the time before the umbilical cord is cut helps lead to the immunity), and would have resulted in the death of the mother (or herself)? Not to mention that they didn't know Ellie was immune until she was bit, so there's only been a few months since the start of the show, not long enough for a pregnancy. Even then, it would have resulted in the death of the mother, and then the death of the baby as well.

    Sorry but that's just ridiculous. Ellie's immunity came from an incredible mix of circumstances, and was something nobody even knew about until Ellie was bitten and didn't turn. There's no way they could have recreated the same circumstances without any of them even having been there to witness the circumstances, and it would have resulted in more deaths than it would to kill Ellie to make the vaccine from her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    There's a difference between an educated doctor/surgeon "thinking" it might work based on the tests they did on Ellie and what he'd be able to do with the chemical markers they can make from the sample of cordyceps in Ellie's brain, and someone just saying "I think this might work"

    They would not risk killing the only living immune person based on "I think this might work". There is a level of uncertainty in everything, and Marlene is convinced enough to let them do this which will kill Ellie, even though she promised Ellie's mother, her friend, that she'd take care of her and keep her safe.

    Maybe they'd discover after doing it that the cure only works on specific people, or before a certain age etc. But they wouldn't know any of that without first being able to produce the vaccine, and to do that they would have to do the surgery which would kill Ellie.

    It still doesn't change the fact that Joel would make the same decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,682 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The difference between a doctor and a desperate doctor in a post apocalyptic world are very different too.

    Given all the nutbags, fascists and rapist cannibals do you trust a "doctor" who's first instinct is to cut out her brain ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,314 ✭✭✭Cordell


    The only thing that doctor could be sure of was that they will keep him alive by any means until he does it. So of course he did convince them it will work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    If you think they could have any worthwhile level of certainty after about 2 hours of basic tests then I don't know what to say to you.

    I'd love to know what tests they did in a few hours, all done without leaving a mark on Ellie by the way, that gave them enough surety to risk killing the one single immune person they had, the one person their entire hope was based upon.

    Its scientific and medical idiocy of the highest order, absolute lunacy that deserves to be rejected.

    You keep repeating that Joel would have made the same decision. It seems you cannot grasp that there was no reasonable decision to be made, because only a **** idiot would sit back and allow that to happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Even Joel knows enough from what Marlene said to recognise that the cordyceps is around the brain. It's how he figures that the surgery they're planning would kill her.

    Now you're just stretching and making stuff up. They would still need a doctor, and if anything his life would be in more danger from them if he killed the one person in the entire world who was immune (and someone Marlene has a personal connection to) without believing strongly enough that it would work. There's no indication that his life was in any danger from the Fireflies.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    To put it a different way. Of course Joel would always make the same decision. Because there was only one reasonable decision to make.

    And because there was only one reasonable decision, making it says nothing about his motivations or the implications towards anybody else.

    Its a failure of screenwriting that neutered their own goal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,314 ✭✭✭Cordell


    There's no indication that his life was in any danger from the Fireflies.

    I never said from Fireflies in particular, but his life, along with everyone's life, was in danger. How do you get the best protection you can get in that situation? You become indispensable. You're the only one who can 100% do it. You can't ignore his lack of ethics and his conflict of interest when he claimed he could do it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 345 ✭✭NattyO


    I've never played (or even heard of) the game, so came to this with no expectation or foreknowledge.

    In general, thought it was quite good, though with a few Walking Dead-sized plot holes - the most obvious being Marlene (I think that's her name) talking about how tough and resourceful Joel is, then sending him out, knowing how desperate he would be to save Ellie, with just two guys. Surely she would, at the very least, have handcuffed him, or sent more guys with him, or brought him off miles away while he was still unconscious.

    The scene with the giraffes had me puzzled, as it made little sense, but I see from here it was probably done to keep game fans happy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,813 ✭✭✭Evade


    The exhaustive tests they conducted in about 15 minutes? The doctor absolutely jumped the gun with vivisection there should have been months of testing done on Ellie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,383 ✭✭✭SortingYouOut


    More please

    Beverly Hills, California



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,682 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Did really look like she could be Bella's mother too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,190 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Agree. We did wonder for a while if we were looking at a flash forward or a flashback.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,888 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I don't understand why some people's brains are stuck on the giraffes. They probably escaped from a zoo 20 years ago and have been knocking around ever since, living off the land which has become overgrown, and breeding in the wild. It's entirely plausible.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I think people are more so questioning why the giraffe scene is important, especially as many who played the game consider it an important story moment.

    The scene is important because it helps Ellie start to snap out of how distant she became after what happened with David. It's a small moment of joy and excitement, and beauty, especially to Ellie as someone who was born into the post-outbreak world. It helps Ellie and Joel both reflect on the journey they've had and how it's coming to an end, and think about what happens next (thinking the Fireflies will just do some tests and take blood samples or whatever and then they'll go back to Jackson). It's also important for Joel as he's truly looking at Ellie as a daughter, and getting to help her experience something like that, like a parent taking the child to a zoo, is something he's longed for.

    It's just a small, personal moment between them, before they talk about what comes next, if Ellie wants to go through with it or just leave, Ellie reflecting on how important seeing the journey through is as it could lead to a cure and how everything they went through can't just be for nothing. That also shows us that if the Fireflies had woken Ellie up and gave her the choice to go ahead with the surgery or not, she would have.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,901 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I think if you want to understand the importance of the giraffe scene you sort of need to understand just how different it felt in the context of the game. Plenty of games before TLOU had little, thoughtful, quiet story moments... but the sheer cinematic flair of TLOU was quite a departure. So in the middle of this tense action game full of darkness you have this little setpiece of wonder and warmth. You also had the developers put in the significant work of rendering and animating these giraffes - no small amount of effort to create such bespoke graphics - for this one short sequence. The way the build-up also played with player spectacle was a witty little flourish - usually, you'd expect something much more horrifying or dramatic to occur when characters were briefly separated like that.

    It was a rare example of thoughtful spectacle in the video game space - a small but important story beat, creating quite complicated and advanced visuals solely for the purpose of a lovely little story and character beat. Again, this is deep into a game full of ultraviolent combat and bleak storytelling - while there are plenty of other quieter moments in the game (especially during its exploration sequences), that one moment stands out as the game's graphical fidelity - which was pretty much peerless at the time - being put towards a very different purpose. It's hard to emphasise its impact nine years later, and it undoubtedly feels less unique in a live-action TV setting. But it was almost without question the most memorable moment in a game that sort of redefined what was possible in a 'cinematic' video game.

    And I don't even like the game as much as many others do :P



  • Registered Users Posts: 345 ✭✭NattyO


    Not sure why you think "people's brains are stuck on the giraffes" - I've seen a lot of people remarking about how important it was the scene was put in the series, when it doesn't make an awful lot of plot sense (perhaps it does in the game). The scene feels shoehorned in to me - as if it was meant to lead somewhere or lead to some revelation, but then it doesn't (it also begs the question as to why the starving populace haven't eaten them!). If the writers felt there were scenes from the game that had to appear in the series, that's fine, but they could have written this one in a little better.



  • Registered Users Posts: 417 ✭✭ULMarc


    Eat the Giraffe? I think the idea is that the flora and fauna is continuing and flourishing unperturbed by humans, like the monkeys just having the craic earlier on. And I suppose the interaction is intended to be a very innocent experience for Ellie after what's just happened, the giraffe being a giraffe would mean no harm to her. The human world is dysfunctional. I don't think we're supposed to get hung up on how people are finding food and.... producing ammunition... Just that society is unable to get itself together, or at least has not yet gotten itself together, for various reasons. Dreaming up solutions to these discrete problems is equivalent to telling a person to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, when in reality we know life just doesn't come that easy for many.

    And at the end of the day. I don't know if the story necessarily wants you to think that there is no future. There's a balance of hope and despair. You know, FEDRA has their idea of a future, and Jackson has their way of how to move on, the Fireflies think they've figured it out, Bill was defending his ideals, the old couple in the cabin are happy out, even people like David seem to have found their own sinister comforts. And ultimately, it's all a backdrop to himself and herself.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That’s gas , I think she’s the greatest actress I’ve seen in a few years



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,391 ✭✭✭PhiloCypher


    Shes fantastic . Don't know what the people who think she's miscast are smoking . But they can keep it. They can't have played the game if they think she's played any more "annoying kid" then Game Ellie was .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,391 ✭✭✭PhiloCypher


    *Deleted. Double post

    Post edited by PhiloCypher on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,901 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I'd go as far as saying it was Pascal who struggled - not saying he was miscast or anything like that, simply that I feel he struggled to land some of what was required of him, especially in the last episode. Not a bad performance, just one that wasn't as sharply realised as Joel was in the game.

    Whereas I think Ramsey was totally in tune with the material - a slightly different take on Ellie than was in the game, but what's the point in casting an actor if they can't put their own spin on something? She achieved a fine balance between capturing the essence of the character while bringing something new at the same time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    I thought Pascals puppy dog manner at the start of the episode was really jarring to be honest. Like a teenager bouncing around after getting a kiss from his crush, all chatty, making plans for the future and bringing her gifts. I get what it was supposed to represent, but it was far too much a disconnect from everything we had seen to that point and needed to be a bit more subtle.

    The problem is that he has come to accept her as a surrogate daughter, but we saw how he acted around his daughter in episode one and it wasn't like that. Episode one felt real, the beginning of the last episode felt like exaggerated stage play directions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,190 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    What was the 'essence of the character'?

    It never really developed for me. I can't believe she didn't actually work out that she may have to die at the end of the journey, or at least undergo some serious traumatic and invasive surgery.

    We never got any of this, either questioning what was going to happen/fear etc and her character arc never really went anywhere for me resulting in not caring all that much at the end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Well it is very, very stupid to kill the only immune person, so it is somewhat understandable that Ellie and Joel didn't consider it a possibility. They probably joked about it around a campfire one night and then dismissed it as being too stupid for serious consideration.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement