Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Random EV thoughts.....

1251252254256257421

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,222 ✭✭✭creedp


    I get it people don't want to pay tax, why would they? However sometimes it seems every (other) EV owner on Boards is particularly sensitive about paying tax on their EV. 2 things are certain in this country, death and taxes on private cars



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,820 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    i don't think its that, taxation on vehicles, once they are predominantly EVs, will have to work in a different way. Road usage is the most sensible, making arbitrary bands basis efficiency or bhp is nonsense really, tax people per KM driven, its how it should be done regardless of ICE or EV.

    the non urban dwellers will complain but you cant keep everyone happy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,002 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I've no issues paying tax, but if there's a legitimate way to pay less tax then I'll consider it


    I think people are getting in a twist regarding motor tax. Whatever the system the next government comes up with it almost certainly won't be based on electricity consumption or mileage. Both of those are difficult to track and too open to fraud


    I mean, if somehow there was a tax introduced on using an EV charger, then people would just charge using the granny lead which is indistinguishable from an electric heater

    As for tracking mileage, how would it be reported? One suggestion was using the NCT but there's enough ways to turn back the odometer that there'll be fraud everywhere. You'll have folks driving 100,000km in a year and then paying tax for 10,000km

    Whatever it is, it'll be something which is easily linked to the model of car so it can't be faked easily.

    Going by current motor tax rules, my guess will be WLTP consumption, more efficient EVs pay less.

    Another option as I said is a tax in vehicle segment, effectively making bigger and heavier vehicles more expensive for taxation

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,733 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Maybe we could tax them based on colour?

    Red cars pay most, white cars pay least and the other colours something in between?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,262 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog



    I think you may have been confused by the short-term requirement to encourage zero emission vehicle uptake. We're still very early on the switchover <15% of new sales, and we still don't have cost parity across ICEVs vs BEVs. Taxation measures are one of the current best mechanisms to move that lever. As a nation we need to clean up our air. Removing any taxation advantage from BEVs at this time would not help us achieve the commitments we have made.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,002 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Tax based on how often you fail to use indicators at turns, with a higher rate for tailgaters


    Or as it would be better known, the BMW tax 🤣

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,636 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    No probs, as long as we get a BMW lane on all motorways 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,261 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    why pay 50k+

    many will go with finance.

    I went from a 2006 Vw Touran that was costing €300 a month in fuel before things starting Increasing to a 2021EV that costs less to finance and charge.

    i put 10k down, €250 a month to finance + 50 to charge.

    savings on toll, motor tax, maintenance etc.


    in three years I should have enough equity in the car tiki change it for a 2025. Maybe adding 3k or so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,747 ✭✭✭traco


    Motor tax - AKA car tax is for all intents and purposes a luxury tax.

    The fastest most powerfull EV's are the most expensive and will be bought by the wealthiest. The simplest way for them to do that is by power output. It was the same logic with the old cc based system and then the CO2 system and while there may be many more logical ways of doing it power output is very simple. I think the very original motor taxes in many countries were hp based to begin with.

    Everyone wants someone else to pay tax but not them and while EV's pollute less than ICE's they are still a car probably carrying one person on their commute to work. More efficent than an equivalent ICE but still way below public trasnport, motorcycle / moped or bicycle but still not the optimum result. The loss of income to the exchequer is significant with the CO2 system and will continue to fall as more people change to EV so I see actions being taken to recitfy that. I think more people are now changing to EV for green reasons rather than lower annual tax. A proper campaign could sell an increase in EV motor tax if it were all properly ring fenced to secure better national public transport and energy security.

    Its becoming quite clear they don't want cars in the city center so its not a question of if but when they will all be restricted. I got a taxi from the airport Saturday morning and he was saying he avoids the city like the plague now as its impossible to get around efficiently and make money. He can use the bus lanes and was driving an ID4 as I booked and EV taxi. I thought it was an interesting observation.

    What we really need is a decent public transport system and planning that allows and supports it but that's a whole other discussion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,002 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,262 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    You want to treat motor tax as a tax on a luxury but then propose a system that would result in higher tax on a family hatchback (ID.3) than an original Tesla Roadster.

    Motor power on its own isn't enough to stand in for performance, you have to include a vehicle weight to have an idea what it's capable of doing with the power.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,825 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    A car in not a luxury where I live, I need it to get to work and back (as does herself) as there are zero other options. It’s near impossible to achieve a fair tax on cars, no matter what a pretty significant proportion of the population will feel aggrieved whenever “motor” tax basis is revised



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,382 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Tax on km driven.

    Make it mandatory for Insurance Companies to take exact odometers when renewing insurance and then this feeds into a Revenue database.

    If you sell your car then when the next person transfers their insurance over to your old car (or the dealer updates the database) the current reading is given and applied to you retrospectively.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,002 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Tbh I don't think a tax based on motor power would work. The difference between power outputs on an EV is often just a parameter programmed into the car which can be changed afterwards

    Tesla have already demonstrated that they can monetise unlocking the full motor power and other manufacturers are looking to do the same.

    This would make a tax on motor power impossible to manage, people would just buy the lowest power version of the car to avail of lower motor tax (as well as lower VRT and potentially qualifying for grants) and then unlock the extra features later


    In many ways the same is true for ICE cars nowadays. The range of engine sizes has been reduced dramatically and power is just programmed in by the manufacturer

    Whatever the basis for taxation it needs to be something immutable which can't easily be changed

    That's why I think WLTP consumption or size/weight will be the basis for motor tax on EVs in the future

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,747 ✭✭✭traco


    I think the top ID3 is 204hp? Thats why I said €350 for the average family powered car. Motor tax never took power to weight into consideration in any previous guise that I can recall but I stand to be corrected. 350 is also less than one euro per day but it could be 300. Either way I can't see how anyone can argue with the logic of paying less than a euro per day to have the ability to use your own private family trasportation. Power to wieght ratios will always be a moving goal post but I suppose you could always just link it to 0-100kph speeds or perhaps another way would be to tie it to purchase price like BIK? No matter how its done it will have be very simple and hard for the manufacturers to bypass. I think they have learned as the CO2 think has bit them in the ...... Either way a Merc EQS, Porsche Taycan, Tesla Plaid + et al paying the same as Mr/Mrs Avg Family person will not be acceptable into the future especially if what the next potential government polls suggest.

    I agree its not a luxury but thats how it has been treated, higher tax on more expensive items. Again thats why I use the 350 per year figure for what a family need as good capable family vehicle. I have no choice but to use a car to get to work and for work. I 100% don't enjoy the commute to work but there is no alternative so needs must and all that.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,825 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    and that unfairly punishes those without any other option but to commute to work, even a modest half hour commute each way is guts of 15k Kim’s per annum



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,636 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    In Dublin a half hour commute each way is just 0.5k km per year 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,002 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I was about to say that as well


    15,000km in Dublin traffic is more like a 90 mins commute each way 😫

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,002 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I agree but it's also one of the realities of modern society that people have accepted

    The fact that you've no access to public transport in something that should be addressed, but even the most ambitious plans for public transportation won't cover the whole population

    I honestly think that vehicle segment is the fairest basis for taxation. A car may be a necessity, but it doesn't need to be a big SUV for most people

    You could skew the tax bands so that it encourages more efficient vehicles as the size increases, for example making estate cars cheaper to tax than SUVs, or make people carriers the same to tax as a hatchback so families with more kids aren't unfairly taxed extra

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,262 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Ahh, so now we're back to making tax bands based on whether a marketing department called a car a hatchback, people carrier or an SUV.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 103 ✭✭carbuncle


    Not sure the best way to replace the current motor tax system but some have suggested price per km. all post 2017 cars sold in the eu were/are required to have the sos system built in (ecall) my 2017 i3 had it. Check your car and let your family know know where the button is and when to press it

    for those that don’t know the car will send a burst of data inc speed gps etc if it detects a serious crash or the button is pressed.

    that data is relayed to the place designated for the area the incident was activated in. A human will call from a call centre to check the situation, if you don’t answer or request assistance then emergency services will be notified you need help, the data with position will have been sent already

    you don’t need a phone on you for this to work, it could of course be blocked with a phone blocker or mechanically disabled but the fact is that tracking is built into every car on the road in Ireland since at least January 2018 (well most, private non eu imports won’t have it).

    what else could it be used for? Road pricing, covert tracking, auto speed fines etc I don’t know what rules there are for eu members to request data (live or stored) from a particular car.

    who knows but it’s built into probably the majority of cars on the road in Ireland today

    it’s usually above the rear view mirror, on my Honda e it’s under a flip down cover

    Pressed to check a few years ago and had a nice chat with a lady and a friend had a minor crash and did not know what was happening when the voice came through the speakers

    maybe other people here have experienced it - I think airbags have to be activated for it to work automatically.


    good idea safety wise but it could be used for a lot of things people may not be too keen on - if moving drugs or bodies then as well as switching off your burner get a blocker or use a car without the sos button.

    maybe the eu have already decided that when something like 75% of cars on the road have it then live and stored data will be made available to member countries if they want it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,636 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    You can't have decent public transport outside of the greater Dublin area apart from some urban settings. The population density is simply far too low. Outside of the greater Dublin area the population density in Ireland is 25 times as low as in the whole of the Netherlands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,261 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    No it’s not, we’ve ad id4 that’s €120 a year and a 2005 Ford C-Max that’s €560 a year. The Ford is far from a luxury



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,261 ✭✭✭✭ted1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,002 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Nah, think of it from the government's perspective, do they want to get into that hassle of gathering and storing all that data and complying with data protection regulations, etc, etc.

    Maybe in China they'd want to in now where you are 100% of the time, but I honestly don't think our government gives a crap what people are doing as long as it isn't illegal and they're not all living off the dole

    It'll be some basic as biscuits annual fee based on some characteristic of the car, same as it's always been

    If they're doing pay per distance then it'll be a lot simpler to just introduce pay per exit tolls on the motorways

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,002 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    They can call it whatever they want but the dimensions of the car or the weight determine the segment and those are immutable

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,371 ✭✭✭MightyMunster


    They can't even match up PPS numbers, with addresses in this country no chance they'd be able to manage all that big brother data



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,222 ✭✭✭creedp


    You're right. Originally the discussion centred on the merits of different mechanisms to subsidise EVs. The current model is considered by some to be inefficient as it mainly results in a transfer of taxpayer funds to manufacturers without making EVs more affordable, unlike a proposed alternative model based on unlimited tax exemption.

    My view is that changing to a unlimited tax exemption would make very little difference in terms of reducing the price or increasing the supply of more affordable EVs. However, it certainly would be more beneficial to the purchasers of more expensive EVs currently above the €60k grant threshold. Don't think that's appropriate and just not sure it would be an easy sell in the current economic climate but I can see why it would be attractive to some.

    As you say all other EV related motor tax discussion is for the future when EVs motor taxation, irrespective of the model adopted, will no doubt increase significantly.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,262 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    The only formal designation we have is M class for personal vehicles. At an EU level we basically said we use segments as an indicator but without formal definition. That's fine in todays world where the numbers are only used for roughly comparing sales data.

    If we were to jump into using them for policy decisions you'd need a formal system of designation. The T-Roc and ID.3 have the same width (1819mm vs 1809mm), height (1573mm vs 1568mm), length (4234mm vs 4261mm) and ground clearance (160mm vs 150mm). One of them is reported as a C class (medium car) the other is reported as J class (sport utility car). Is the less than 1cm difference in any dimension enough to make taxation policy?


    image.png




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,002 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Fair enough, it would need a more formalised classification system. However there is an ISO standard for vehicle type already, so it isn't a huge stretch to put size and weight limits around it


    As for different classifications meaning different taxes, well that's the way it's always been. I've seen car engines written down as 1.95l capacity to avoid going into the next tax band

    I mean it doesn't need to be vehicle segment by itself. It's an indicator of vehicle size and weight but you're correct that it isn't formalised enough to be used outright

    The point I'm trying to make is that car taxes based on a high degree of government surveillance aren't realistically going to happen.

    There's some people saying that your smart meter will report to ESBN when you're charging your car and somehow tax that. Remember this is the same ESBN that weren't able to implement a night rate on smart meters until recently and have only just launched a portal where you can see your usage

    Similarly a tax on mileage isn't going to happen either. The amount of government oversight required to monitor that is beyond their capacity to manage IMO

    Car taxes have always been based on immutable characteristics of the car which the customer cannot hide or misrepresent.

    Given that the government has generally favoured smaller cars in the past then I imagine this trend will continue

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement