Are there any credible conspiracy theories?

RJ Lee did a mainstream dust study and found that 6% of the weight of the dust from the WTC towers was iron microspheres. They call it a signature event. Researchers drew attention to the strangeness of finding pure iron in dust collected in such quantities. Iron melts at 1500 celcius. 

Many debunkers dismiss the nano thermite theory, but Neil Harrit's study on the red/gray chip found in the dust explains why so many were found. When he burned some red/grey chips at low temperatures compared to typical thermite reactions, all the iron spheres appeared. It's also worth noting that NIST's highest temperature inside the the towers building never went over 1000 degrees. 

These mainstream studies and truther studies give a lot of clues about how the conspirators pulled this off. Instead of months to rig up the entire building they brought in a chemical grade explosive nanothermite and applied it to the steel structure to get it to fail. There were rivers of yellow/red liquid at ground zero because of the extreme heat. It looks like the steel also had sharp edges and bits ripped out, which FEMA says is an unusual occurrence. There were all these little signs that some chemical had been used to collapse the towers.  

If I ask you for the strongest alternative theory out there, you can't provide any. You'll utter something about magic explosives or secret Nazis at best. It's a complete nothing burger. Just a choose-your-own-adventure hobby.

But the RJ Lee study disproves your thermite theory. You ran away from this in the previous thread you brought it up in.

The RJ Lee study stated that the iron microspheres were caused by melting. They were not the result of reduction which would be the case if they were the byproduct of a thermite reaction.

It's also not possible for them to find pure iron microsphere as iron oxidises on contact with air. You are simply lying there.

Similarly the RJ Lee study did not detect any aluminum oxide, which is the other byproduct of a thermite.

So the study proves that there can't have been thermite at the WTC.

You threw a tantrum and abandoned the previous thread because you could not address any of these points.

You snookered yourself because you posted that study and declared it was infallible gospel. But you didn't realise how it was actually disproving your nonsense before it was too late.

This happens with every rabbit hole you throw out.

If any point is chased down it always ends in embarrassment for you. It always ends with points and questions you can't answer or counter. And it always ends with you ignoring, tantruming and running away instead of answering things.

And yet, you pretend none of this happens. You pretend you weren't shown to be wrong. You ignore how you were upset by all of this. And you just respew out the same shite expecting people to fall for it.

And this is supposed to be a thread where you show the PLAUSIBLE conspiracy theories.

Keeping going man. You're making an excellent point for us.

Crop Circles - who’s behind them?

Iron microspheres found here are elemental iron, so that alone means it never came off the steel. There are other elements in steel, it's a mixed alloy.

Another argument was put forward on here, that sparks came from the steel hitting steel, but that doesn't hold up. Sparks don't produce Iron microspheres. 

Mick West often confuses iron oxide spheres with iron microspheres. He does this with other topics in the conspiracy field too, and then ignores evidence refuting his claims. 

 430 Celsius is the reaction temperature for red/grey chips, but 900 Celsius for commercial thermite. Based on the size of particles in a nano-composite substance, reaction rate and energy, found nanothermite. In addition, there seems to be gas released after the reaction happens, which might explain why the towers burst open like a mushroom cloud? It was the gas building up with the fire caused it?. 

They're testing the material to use in new types of explosives, it's not theoretical or science fiction. These nanocomposites have gone off at this temperature before in tests.. 

Lighter has ferrocerium and yes may produce Iron oxide spheres. Very low factor of probability for this event anyhow resulting in Iron microspheres because 6 percent of weight of dust had Elemental Iron so something inside towers produced enough heat to produce millions of these iron microspheres. 

What trying to explain is the high amount in the dust Proton.  Very extreme heat that melted workers' boots that's weird! With only paper and wood and low fire burning materials present, it's hard to explain how this heat lasted so long under rubble? There's little chance of jet oil fires or any of these theories making sense since all official collapse studies say the towers never reached above 1000 Celcius.

These red/grey chips have thermite ingredients at nanoscale. This explains a lot of anomalies here found after the towers fell. Steel just lost strength and connections snapped would not cause extreme heat pockets for weeks, eating through thick grains of steel and have look like swiss cheese (hardly), the pockets of yellow/red liquid, that's all signs of some chemical attack happened.

Nanothermite explains how they did this without a lot of manpower and industrial work for weeks. We also have the Iron microspheres appear as byproduct on the chips after burning. Another byproduct, Aluminium Oxide, disperses and disappears almost like aerosol (like white smoke) which was seen in many photos.; A piece of steel was ejected sideways when the tower collapsed, and it had a white smoke trail coming off it. 

A week later after 9/11 the Anthrax attacks started.  In the end, this turned out to be some anthrax developed in a military lab, not in a basement somewhere. It's pretty likely conspirators took material from US labs and used it for this separate attack. Nanocomposites/explosive materials and anthrax are highly likely removed by same team before 9/11. 

Check your facts on that thermite early part of 20th century was used in cutting steel put into buildings. It became obsolete due to better explosives coming out that can be used. 

Truthers talked about theories but never found any evidence until they found these weird red/grey chips in WTC dust. You're manipulating the facts for your own post. Now we have evidence of something that shouldn't be there.

Why would they need to be wirelessly set off? Its a composite that reacts to heat. There would be a fire caused by planes hitting buildings, your source of heat!!

Is every covert US military operation carried out in foreign countries known to the public because of leaks? You think everything gets out, but it doesn't.  

You claimed they were wirelessly set off.

Why do you keep changing your own story? It's like a child caught in a lie.

Yup. Ranting and dodging and ignoring of points and back to your weird obsession with this Mick West guy.

Also again it's literally impossible for there have been purely elemental iron spheres with no iron oxide in them. Elemental iron oxidizes in contact with air.

The fact you don't know this and don't understand this is the perfect demonstration that you're talking out of your ass when you're ranting about chemistry.

His contention was that theplane flew over the Pentagon but never actually hit while a totally different plane (which he identified as a different model) did the damage. I think. He flipping back and forth a lot when his claims painted himself into a corner and he stop answering questions about his theory.

Weird how this seems to be a trend on this thread.

Not just any old Nazis - Jewish Nazis. Secret ones.

And yeah, apparently the plane missed the Pentagon and flew away. A 747 kinda dive bombed and flew away in the middle of Washington City and no one noticed. No word on what happened to the plane or the passengers as of yet but Cheerful is continuing his investigation.

There were three complete structural collapses in New York. Twin towers collapsed and a building seven collapsed hours later.  

Building seven has all the hallmarks of a controlled implosion. Explosives inside building seven could have been set of wirelessly the technology was available back then,

As to how the twin towers collapsed, it's complicated because of the dust. In this dust, there's evidence that some people put nano-thermite inside the structures before the collapse. It's a clever way to hide their dark deed, but they didn't expect so many people to investigate it later. Probably thought no one would ever suspect foul play.  

Here's the thing. This is the first time in human history a structure of this type has collapsed this way. There's your starting point. 

You can't just say it collapsed because of fires inside. If that was the case, same buildings would start falling down whenever a fire erupted!

In spite of plenty of details why the official narrative is wrong, prefer to ignore it. If the official study about the collapse got it so wrong, what does that tell you? Why you so confident was fire when NIST own structural models shows no freefall? Lack of understanding that freefall was is it? If structure is falling at freefall the only resistance is air thats it. How can NIST claim steel resistance and not specify how much? I never heard of a building falling through itself naturally. As the whole structure collapses, its top half crushes the lower half, but there's always concrete and steel to move out away. 

On 9/11, the building structural rules don't apply because their top half didn't crush the lower half, it just smashed through it over 100 feet with no slowdown. That makes no sense unless there's some other energy pulverizing the concrete and steel. 

Instead of claiming all conspirators believe the same stuff, stick to 9/11. Clearly pointed out numerous times the Boston marathon attack and 7/7 are genuine homegrown terrorist attacks. Now stop making the argument we all believe same things are true. 

My theory is they were conspirators. The evidence shows seven building was not natural collapse. I try to think who could be behind and why.

The official story doesn't mention that Atta had shady german friends and one of them was an international gangster with ties to criminal organizations and far right groups. All I know is that parts of it weren't discussed. An independent journalist conducted the investigation in Florida and spoke to people; and other training school heads and story is very odd. In a restaurant, Atta and some hijackers were arguing about money and owed it to family kept shouting about. This family's identity is a mystery. There's a narrative that these guys are devote Muslims. People in Flordia claimed would drink and smoke and and go to discos. Official story is a big lie. However, only real journalists on the ground found this out because big media is onboard with government lies. Then we have the cover ups of funding from Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, so these guys were well known to state actors before 9/11.

As my opinion goes, the collapse of buildings was an operation based on intelligence gathered about the hijackers. Due to the complexity and state of power at the time, it's most likely a rogue group of neocons hijacked the event. I cant be sure so keep an open mind on who did it include ( international fascists) and Israel and maybe there a group i am unware of?